Contrasting alterations to synaptic and intrinsic properties in upper-cervical superficial dorsal horn neurons following acute neck muscle inflammation
© Harris et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 21 December 2013
Accepted: 7 April 2014
Published: 12 April 2014
Acute and chronic pain in axial structures, like the back and neck, are difficult to treat, and have incidence as high as 15%. Surprisingly, most preclinical work on pain mechanisms focuses on cutaneous structures in the limbs and animal models of axial pain are not widely available. Accordingly, we developed a mouse model of acute cervical muscle inflammation and assessed the functional properties of superficial dorsal horn (SDH) neurons.
Male C57/Bl6 mice (P24-P40) were deeply anaesthetised (urethane 2.2 g/kg i.p) and the rectus capitis major muscle (RCM) injected with 40 μl of 2% carrageenan. Sham animals received vehicle injection and controls remained anaesthetised for 2 hrs. Mice in each group were sacrificed at 2 hrs for analysis. c-Fos staining was used to determine the location of activated neurons. c-Fos labelling in carrageenan-injected mice was concentrated within ipsilateral (87% and 63% of labelled neurons in C1 and C2 segments, respectively) and contralateral laminae I - II with some expression in lateral lamina V. c-Fos expression remained below detectable levels in control and sham animals. In additional experiments, whole cell recordings were obtained from visualised SDH neurons in transverse slices in the ipsilateral C1 and C2 spinal segments. Resting membrane potential and input resistance were not altered. Mean spontaneous EPSC amplitude was reduced by ~20% in neurons from carrageenan-injected mice versus control and sham animals (20.63 ± 1.05 vs. 24.64 ± 0.91 and 25.87 ± 1.32 pA, respectively). The amplitude (238 ± 33 vs. 494 ± 96 and 593 ± 167 pA) and inactivation time constant (12.9 ± 1.5 vs. 22.1 ± 3.6 and 15.3 ± 1.4 ms) of the rapid A type potassium current (IAr), the dominant subthreshold current in SDH neurons, were reduced in carrageenan-injected mice.
Excitatory synaptic drive onto, and important intrinsic properties (i.e., IAr) within SDH neurons are reduced two hours after acute muscle inflammation. We propose this time point represents an important transition period between peripheral and central sensitisation with reduced excitatory drive providing an initial neuroprotective mechanism during the early stages of the progression towards central sensitisation.
KeywordsMice A-current EPSC Carrageenan Action potential
Acute inflammation in peripheral structures, such as muscle, results in nociceptor activation and pain. Unfortunately, pain sometimes outlasts the initial inflammatory insult and persists in a more chronic form. Long-term changes in components of the pain neuroaxis such as altered synapses and neuronal properties are thought to underlie this process . Understanding the mechanisms involved in the progression from the acute to chronic pain state, however, remains a major challenge in pain neurobiology.
Regardless of the site involved in chronic pain states, the central processing of nociceptive signals begins in the superficial dorsal horn (SDH; laminae I-II) of the spinal cord . Here, the passage of information to be relayed from primary afferent fibres to higher brain regions can be gated by synaptic inputs from local segmental interneurons and descending brainstem centres. Such a process greatly influences whether nociceptor activation can ultimately be perceived as pain . Since the initial discovery that the electrophysiological properties of neurons in the lumbar spinal cord could be altered after repeated noxious peripheral input , plasticity in spinal cord pain circuits, termed central sensitisation, has been considered a key element in the development of chronic pain [5, 6].
Surprisingly, most of our understanding of the spinal mechanisms underlying plasticity in pain circuits comes from studies on the rodent hindlimb following nerve injury or inflammation, even though there is both clinical and pre-clinical evidence suggesting that such mechanisms may differ for axial and limb pain . Patients with neck pain often complain of a range of symptoms not obviously associated with damage to neck structures. These include dizziness, visual disturbances, general weakness, numbness or parathesis, cutaneous hyperalgesia, as well as psychological symptoms such as disturbances in concentration and memory . These signs and symptoms are not normally associated with limb pain where sensory disturbances tend to be more localised . At the cellular level we know that upper cervical SDH neurons receive input from a unique combination of tissues including cutaneous and deep structures in the neck, head and cranial vault [10, 11]. This afferent convergence presumably plays an important role in the complex presentation of pain originating in neck tissues . Together these data suggest the mechanisms underlying processing of nociceptive signals originating in neck structures differ from those in the limbs, and may be important for the development of neck pain and its symptoms.
In order to begin to understand the spinal mechanisms that underlie the development of chronic neck pain, we assessed the impact of acute muscle inflammation on the synaptic and intrinsic properties of SDH neurons in the mouse upper cervical spinal cord. After two hours of acute inflammation of the rectus capitus major (RCM) muscle we find excitatory synaptic drive to SDH neurons and the rapid A-type potassium current are reduced in SDH neurons. We hypothesise that two hours post inflammation is an important epoch during the cascade of events where aberrant nociceptive signaling transitions from a peripheral to central locus.
The University of Newcastle Animal Care & Ethics Committee approved all experimental procedures. Male C57/Bl6 mice (P24 - P40) were deeply anaesthetised with urethane (2.2 g/kg i.p) and underwent the following treatments: control animals remained anaesthetised for 2 hrs; sham animals received a unilateral injection of 40 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) via a 26 gauge needle into the RCM muscle; experimental animals received an injection of 2% carrageenan (in phosphate buffered saline - PBS) into the RCM. This muscle is particularly large in rodents and runs from the spinous process of C2 to the skull. It is easily located by palpating the external occipital protuberance (inion) and the spinous process of the C7 vertebrae. The location of the C1 spinous process in the mouse is one-fifth the distance between the inion and the C7 spinous process. The needle was inserted just lateral to the midline at the level of C1 (angled ~45° to the horizontal). The needle was inserted until it reached the occiput and withdrawn so the tip remained in the RCM muscle belly. Mice were maintained under anaesthetic for 2 hours prior to preparation for immunohistochemistry or electrophysiology.
After 2 hours of urethane anaesthesia animals were further injected with Ketamine (100 mg/kg), and perfused through the ascending aorta with PBS (20 ml), followed by 20 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.4). The cervical spinal cord (obex - C5) was removed and post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (2 hours) prior to washing with PB and cryoprotection in PB containing 30% sucrose at 4°C for 48 hrs. Serial transverse sections (60 μm) were cut and every 5th section was processed for Fos-like immunoreactivity.
Sections from carrageenan-injected (n = 3), sham 128 (PBS; n = 3), and control (uninjected; n = 4) animals were incubated in 50% ethanol for 30 minutes to enhance antibody penetration and then incubated in 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in PB for 20 minutes to block endogenous peroxide activity. Sections were then incubated for 72 hours with a polyclonal goat anti-fos antibody (diluted 1:1000 in PBS; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), followed by a biotinylated donkey anti-goat IgG secondary antibody (1:500; Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) for an additional 24 hours. Sections were then incubated in ExtrAvidin-peroxidase (diluted 1:1000. Sigma-Aldrich; Cat no. E2886) and peroxidase labeling visualised using 3′3′-diamino-benzadine (DAB) as a chromagen. All antibodies and the peroxidase-labelled ExtrAvidin were diluted in PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100. Sections were then dehydrated, cleared and mounted in serial order on slides. The relative position of all c-Fos positive cells within the C1 and C2 segments were plotted onto templates of the appropriate spinal segment (adapted from ) using Adobe Illustrator CS4 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Mean number of c-Fos positive cells per spinal segment was calculated from these data.
Sham (n = 15 mice) and carrageenan injected mice (n = 10) were decapitated as close as possible to the thorax while still under urethane anaesthesia. Control animals (uninjected; n = 16 mice) were anaesthetised with ketamine (100 mg/kg i.p) before decapitation. The cervical vertebral column was isolated and immersed in ice-cold oxygenated sucrose substituted artificial cerebrospinal fluid (s-ACSF) containing (in mM): 250 sucrose, 25 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, 2.5 KCl, 1 NaH2PO4, 1 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2. The spinal cord was removed and a shallow cut made down the contralateral side of the spinal cord (ventral surface) to identify the ipsilateral side for recording. Transverse slices (300 μm thick) were obtained from the C1-C2 region using a vibratome (Leica VT-1000S; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). All slices were transferred to an interface storage chamber containing oxygenated ACSF (118 mM NaCl substituted for sucrose in s-ACSF), and allowed to equilibrate for 1 hr at room temperature (approximately 22-24°C), prior to recording.
Slices were placed in a recording bath and continually superfused (4–6 bath volumes/min) with ACSF maintained at near-physiological temperature (33°C). Whole cell patch clamp recordings were obtained from visualised SDH neurons (lamina I-II) using infrared differential interference contrast optics and an infrared-sensitive camera (Hamamatsu C2400-79C, Hamamatsu City, Japan). Recordings were restricted to the SDH by targeting neurons within or dorsal to the substantia gelatinosa (lamina II), which appears as a translucent band in transverse spinal cord slices. Patch pipettes (2–5 MΩ) were filled with a K+-based internal solution containing (in mM): 135 KCH3SO4, 6 NaCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.1 EGTA, 2 MgATP, 0.3 NaGTP, adjusted to a pH of 7.3 with KOH. Whole cell recordings were obtained using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), connected to a Macintosh G4 computer via an InstruTECH ITC18 digitiser (HEKA Instruments, Bellmore, NY, USA).
The whole cell recording configuration was first established in voltage clamp (holding potential −60 mV). Series resistance (Rs), input resistance (RIN), and capacitance were measured from the averaged response (5 repetitions) to a 5 mV hyperpolarising voltage step. These parameters were observed following each protocol, and data were rejected if values changed by >20%. Initially, spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic currents (sEPSCs) were recorded for each neuron in voltage-clamp (holding potential −60 mV; 60 s duration). The recording mode was then switched to current clamp. The membrane potential recorded following this switch (~15 s later) was designated resting membrane potential (RMP). A series of depolarising ‘step-current’ injections (20 pA increments; 800 ms, delivered every 8 s) were then injected in order to study action potential (AP) discharge in each recorded neuron. Finally, the recording configuration was returned to voltage clamp and a protocol was run to study voltage-gated subthreshold ionic currents. This protocol first hyperpolarised the membrane potential to −90 mV (for 1 s) before delivering a depolarising step to −40 mV (for 200 ms) before returning to −60 mV. All membrane currents were filtered at 2 kHz and stored on a Macintosh G4 computer using Axograph v.10 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA) for future analysis.
All data were analysed off-line using semi-automated procedures within Axograph software. sEPSCs were detected and captured using a scaled template method and subsequently inspected . Some events were rejected if they overlapped or did not include a stable baseline before the rising phase of the captured event. For each recording, stationary plots of sEPSC interevent interval were constructed for the duration of the analysis period. These plots were inspected to ensure no time dependent change or heavy clustering of data points, which would both be indicative of burst activity, were included in the analysis. Several sEPSC parameters were measured including mean amplitude, rise time, decay time and instantaneous frequency. Individual APs evoked during step current injection were detected and captured using the derivative threshold method for spike initiation (set at dV/dt ≥ 20 Vs−1). The pattern of AP discharge was classified into categories using previously described criteria [15, 16] as; single spiking, initial bursting, tonic firing, delayed firing, or reluctant firing. Likewise, subthreshold currents (IAr, IAs, T-type calcium, Ih, & mixed) were classified and compared between control, sham and experimental (carrageenan-injected) animals.
All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS statistics software v.18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way ANOVA coupled with Student-Newman-Keuls and Scheffe post-hoc tests were used to compare variables from control, sham and experimental animals. Data with unequal variances were compared using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Chi-square tests were utilised to determine whether the prevalence of discharge categories and subthreshold currents differed between the groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All values are presented as the mean ± S.E.M.
c-Fos expression remained below detectable levels in the C1-C2 spinal segments of control (un-injected; n = 4) and sham (PBS-injected; n = 3) mice. In contrast, spinal cord sections from carrageenan-injected animals contained substantial c-Fos expression in both ipsilateral and contralateral dorsal horns (Figure 1). This expression was concentrated in the SDH region (laminae I - II) in C1 and C2 spinal segments, with some scattered expression in lateral lamina V. The number of c-Fos positive neurons was much higher in the ipsilateral versus contralateral dorsal horn (C1, 40 ± 9 vs. 6 ± 4 cells/section; C2, 23 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 4 cells/section). Our analysis also showed that carrageenan injection into the RCM muscle resulted in greater neuronal activation in the C1 versus C2 spinal segment and the ipsilateral versus contralateral bias was more pronounced in C1 segments (i.e. C1 - ipsi 87% versus contra 13% of c-Fos positive cells; C2 - ipsi 62% vs. contra 38% of c-Fos positive cells). In summary, the greatest degree of neuronal activation following acute inflammation of the RCM muscle occurred in the ipsilateral SDH of the C1 spinal segment. Electrophysiological recordings were therefore obtained on the ipsilateral side of slices prepared from C1 and C2 spinal cord segments from control, sham, or carrageenan-injected animals.
Several passive membrane properties did not differ in neurons from carrageenan-injected, sham and control mice. These included input resistance (447.9 ± 33.1 MΩ vs. 395.1 ± 28.6 MΩ vs. 401.9 ± 23.8 MΩ, carrageenan-injected, sham and control, n = 58, 68, & 79 respectively, p = 0.42) and RMP (−59.2 ± 1.5 mV vs. −58.0 ± 1.4 mV vs. −60.7 ± 1.3 mV; p = 0.39). These results suggest acute neck muscle inflammation does not alter the passive properties of upper cervical SDH neurons.
Each of the four subthreshold currents was present in neurons from control, sham, and carrageenan-injected animals (Figure 5B). Under each condition, IAr and IAs were the dominant currents, while ICa and Ih was observed in < 30% of neurons. Collectively, the relative proportion of each subthreshold current did not differ across groups (Figure 5B, χ2; p = 0.27). Further analysis showed the properties of IAs, ICa and Ih were similar under control, sham and carrageenan-injection conditions. Specifically, the mean amplitude of IAs (606 ± 309 pA vs. 617 ± 107 pA vs. 475 ± 113 pA, for carrageenan-injected, sham and control; n = 4, 6, & 5 respectively, p = 0.81) and mean inactivation time constant (130.1 ± 15.5 ms vs. 140.9 ± 14.1 ms vs. 181.0 ± 38.2 ms, respectively; p = 0.30) were similar across experimental conditions. Mean amplitude of ICa (153 ± 43 pA vs. 273 ± 137 pA vs. 194 ± 80 pA, for carrageenan-injected, sham and control; n = 7, 5, & 8 respectively, p = 0.61) and mean inactivation time constant (37.0 ± 13.4 ms vs. 39.3 ± 6.9 ms vs. 31.6 ± 11.0 ms, respectively; p = 0.90) did not differ. Finally, the amplitude (79.1 ± 7.2 pA vs. 52.3 ± 5.3 pA vs. 50.6 ± 21.7 pA, for carrageenan-injected, sham and control; n = 3, 3, & 7 respectively, p = 0.66) and mean activation time constant (112.4 ± 17.5 ms vs. 108.7 ± 55.8 ms vs. 149.7 ± 31.0 ms, respectively; p = 0.68) of Ih were similar under each condition.
In contrast, several properties of IAr were altered in the carrageenan-injected animals. The amplitude (238 ± 33 vs. 593 ± 167 pA vs. 494 ± 96 for carrageenan-injected, sham and control, n = 19, 14, & 18 respectively, p = 0.045) and inactivation time constant (12.9 ± 1.5 vs. 15.3 ± 1.4 ms vs. 22.1 ± 3.6, respectively; p = 0.031) were both reduced. Together, these results suggest the effect of IAr, the dominant subthreshold current in upper cervical SDH neurons (Figure 5B), is reduced in following acute neck muscle inflammation.
We assessed the impact of two hours of acute neck muscle inflammation on the properties of SDH neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord. Our c-Fos experiments showed carrageenan-induced muscle inflammation produced neuronal activation in both ipsilateral and contralateral laminae I – II, and to a lesser extent in lamina V of the C1 and C2 spinal segments. These findings confirmed that neurons in laminae I - II should be the principal target in subsequent electrophysiological recordings from acutely prepared spinal cord slices.
Assessment of c-Fos expression, the protein product of the proto-oncogene c-fos, is a well-established method for determining neuronal activation after noxious peripheral stimulation [19, 20]. In our study, c-Fos expression occurred in neurons located predominantly in laminae I - II. This matches the terminal field distribution of nociceptive afferent fibres , and the location of c-Fos expressing neurons after application of noxious peripheral stimuli . Some c-Fos labelling was also observed in deeper layers (lateral lamina V) of the dorsal horn. These superficial and deep locations closely match those noted in other rodent injury models involving deep tissues, such as muscle. For example in rat, chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve , adjuvant-induced arthritis , and nerve growth factor injection into semispinal neck muscles  resulted in c-Fos labelling in laminae I-II and V-VII. In contrast, capsaicin injection into the trapezius and splenius muscles of cats does not label many neurons in lamina II . Thus, some differences exist in the extent to which neurons in laminae II are involved in processing noxious input from muscle across species.
No labelling was observed in control or sham (saline injection) animals in our c-Fos experiments. These data suggest neither handling nor the manipulation of muscle tissue associated with the injection protocol resulted in significant activation of dorsal horn interneurons. Similar results have been observed for limb muscles when c-Fos expression has been compared with that in vehicle-injected animals . Our unilateral carrageenan injections resulted in c-Fos labelling in both ipsilateral and contralateral superficial laminae (I-II) with some labelling in deeper laminae. Bilateral c-Fos expression has been observed after capsaicin injection into other neck muscles (trapezius and splenius capitis) in cats . This contrasts with the data for limb muscles where inflammation produces neuronal activation that is confined to the ipsilateral side of the spinal cord. Thus, the major pattern of c-Fos activation we described following carrageenan injection into RCM, fits with activation of muscle nociceptive pathways in axial musculature. Thus, recording from neurons in ipsilateral laminae I-II should detect inflammation-related changes in the spinal dorsal horn.
In our electrophysiological analysis of SDH neurons in spinal cord slices prepared two hours after RCM inflammation we observed two major changes: i) AMPA-mediated excitatory drive decreased and ii) the amplitude and kinetics of the rapid, but not slow IA type potassium current were altered. Assuming acute neck muscle inflammation enhanced nociceptive signaling (cf. our c-Fos results above), it is surprising that we found excitatory drive to SDH neurons was reduced (as assessed by sEPSC amplitude and charge). It is noteworthy, however, that other studies have also described reduced excitatory drive to SDH neurons in pain models, specifically in GAD67 positive inhibitory interneurons . In these experiments the frequency of spontaneous excitatory input, rather than amplitude, was reduced in neuropathic animals. The authors proposed that reduced excitatory drive to inhibitory interneurons, when placed in the context of nociceptive signaling, would reduce inhibitory drive in the SDH and contribute to hyperalgesia. While our data does not allow us to identify recorded neurons as excitatory or inhibitory, similar plasticity in the form of reduced sEPSCs onto inhibitory interneurons would contribute to enhanced nociceptive signaling in acute neck muscle inflammation.
Regardless of the identity of neurons that undergo reduced excitatory drive in our model, numerous studies have confirmed that inflammation alters the expression of AMPA type glutamate receptors. For example, expression of calcium permeable AMPA receptors containing GluR1 subunits has been shown to increase, whereas expression of calcium impermeable GluR2 containing subunits was reduced [27–31]. Importantly, all these studies assessed receptor expression 24 hours after peripheral inflammation. In contrast, our data showing sEPSC kinetics were unaltered in carrageenan-injected recordings imply that AMPA receptor expression is unchanged at the two-hour time point used following axial muscle inflammation. Phosphorylation of GluR1 and GluR2 has, however, been demonstrated at time points commensurate with those in our study . This would enhance excitatory drive in SDH neurons. Importantly, most GluR1/2 subunit expression and phosphorylation studies have used biomolecular techniques in spinal cord homogenates where synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors and the precise laminae location of neurons are not known. Thus our experiments, which assessed synaptic receptor function in specific laminae, suggest levels of GluR plasticity vary according to time after inflammatory insult.
Several electrophysiological studies have examined the properties of primary afferent synapses in the SDH after peripheral inflammation, and report that primary afferent synaptic function was generally enhanced [33, 34]. Again this contrasts with the reduced excitatory drive that we observed. However, our sEPSCs recordings will have included excitatory currents arising from local interneurons, descending systems, as well as primary afferents. Relevant to this point, previous work has shown that ablation of afferent input by dorsal rhizotomy, or selective removal of peptidergic afferents with neonatal capsacin treatment, does not reduce mEPSC frequency recorded from SDH neurons in spinal slices [35, 36]. This suggests that the majority of sEPSCs recorded in an isolated spinal slice such as that in our experiments, come from local interneurons and not primary afferent terminals. Thus, any change to primary afferent synapses may have gone undetected in our experiments.
When sEPSCs have been recorded in the SDH in peripheral inflammation models it appears their properties are not altered within the first 24 hours after inflammation [37, 38]. Interestingly, the Li et al. study showed that sEPSC frequency was enhanced when inflammatory insults were delivered to neonates but not in animals older than P14. The most likely explanation for the reduced sEPSC amplitudes we observed comes from work that has assessed the contribution of the initial primary afferent barrage and its time course during an inflammatory insult. For example, peripheral nerve block with lignocaine during muscle inflammation prevents the development of plasticity (or central sensitisation) in spinal neurons, whereas nerve block outside the first two hours of inflammation does not protect against central sensitisation . This finding suggests primary afferent input within the first two hours of inflammation plays a crucial role in establishing central sensitisation. In our experiments, the barrage of primary afferent input would be expected to be the principle driver of central sensitisation, which is reflected as the expression of c-Fos in certain neuronal populations. The fact, however, that we did not observe an enhancement of sEPSC frequency or amplitude may partly be explained by the in vitro slice preparation we used. Specifically, previous work has shown that the removal of populations of primary afferent inputs either by dorsal rhizotomy or neonatal capsacin does not affect the properties of sEPSCs recorded in slices [35, 38]. This implies that most sEPSCs recorded in slices originate from local interneurons rather than primary afferents. Further support of our interpretation comes from work in an in vitro hemisected spinal cord preparation where inflammation-induced central sensitisation was only detected six hours after inflammation in the absence of peripheral input . These data, when combined with our finding that excitatory drive is decreased two hours after acute muscle inflammation, suggests a complex sequence of events occurs over the onset, establishment and maintenance of inflammatory pain and associated central sensitisation.
The reduced excitatory drive we observed two hours after acute neck muscle activation was accompanied by a reduction in the amplitude and time course of the IAr - type potassium current. IAr currents are expressed widely in the CNS and regulate AP discharge and neuronal output. In the dorsal horn, IAr currents are thought to play an important role in reducing neuronal excitability. For example, IAr currents are preferentially associated with the delayed firing pattern of AP discharge (Figure 4A). Likewise, SDH neurons expressing delayed firing and IAr currents exhibit reduced AP discharge compared to tonic firing and initial bursting neurons when activated by current protocols they are likely to receive in vivo (synaptic vs. square step current injection) . Furthermore, a number of studies have suggested IAr expression is a feature of excitatory interneurons [41, 42]. This suggests that diminished IAr would substantially increase excitability and nociceptive signaling in the dorsal horn. Thus, any intervention that reduces IAr current in SDH neurons leads to enhanced excitability.
Comparable modulation of IAr in the dorsal horn has been reported after peripheral inflammation. For example, enhanced excitability in dorsal horn neurons is observed as early as one hour after carrageenan injection into the hindpaw of young (P7-12) mice . A detailed analysis of IAr potassium currents in these animals identified a shift in the current’s steady state inactivation. The authors suggested this would act like “a relaxation of the brake on excitability at physiologically meaningful potentials”. Interestingly, we have previously demonstrated the converse (i.e., enhanced braking) in spastic mice with glycine receptor mutations . In this case, modulation of IAr was seen as a compensatory mechanism to enhance neuronal inhibition and maintain stable sensory processing. Together, this work suggests IAr can be strongly modulated to maintain an excitability set-point in the SDH. Importantly, a signalling pathway involving metabotropic glutamate receptor activation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase dependent phosphorylation of Kv4.2 channels has been shown to regulate IAr currents in SDH neurons [44, 45]. Furthermore, this work demonstrated that inflammation of peripheral tissues can activate this pathway and reduce IAr. This provides a potential mechanism for our observations during acute neck muscle inflammation.
Given IAr currents are diminished in SDH neurons from carrageenan-injected animals one might expect this to impact on neurons with the delayed- and reluctant firing AP discharge pattern as the two have been associated in a number of previous studies [18, 46, 47]. For example, diminished IAr would either reduce the delay before AP discharge or reduce the proportion of neurons exhibiting delayed and reluctant firing and convert them to more excitable forms of discharge such as tonic firing or initial bursting. There was, however, no difference in the incidence of AP discharge patterns across the three conditions: control, sham and carrageenan-injected. This finding may be explained, at least partly, by the biophysical properties of IAr currents, which are inactivated at depolarised membrane potentials [16, 47]. The membrane potential of neurons in our recordings was approximately −60 mV across all three conditions. At this potential much of IAr (~80 - 90%) is inactivated and therefore not able to reduce or delay AP discharge. Under in vivo conditions, however, when membrane potential is fluctuating due to the combination of inhibitory and excitatory synaptic input, IAr currents could have a greater impact on neuronal output. Thus, under in vivo conditions the reduction in IAr we observed could enhance excitation and disrupt normal sensory processing.
Ultimately, our findings must be placed in the context of the whole animal. Fortunately, relevant data are available on the time course of pain related behaviours following carrageenan injections. Most of this work has involved carrageenan injection into the plantar surface of the hindpaw [48–52] (rather than muscle). Carrageenan causes rapid edema, which peaks 3–4 hours post injection and largely resolves by 24–72 hours . Behaviourally, carrageenan’s capacity to induce thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia is highly reproducible. These indices of altered pain sensation have been detected as early as 15 minutes after carrageenan injection , though typically studies report effects to be fully developed at 1–4 hours . Following onset, some variability exists in duration of the carrageenan-induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgeisa. This variability might reflect the carrageenan concentration (typically 1-3% is injected) as well as the species studied. However all work suggests mechanical and thermal hyperalgeisa persists for at least 24 hours . The few studies that have injected carrageenan into muscle also support a rapid onset for mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia, which is fully developed by two hours and can last as long as 4–8 weeks [54, 55]. Thus our study has described a number of central changes to both the synaptic and intrinsic membrane properties of SDH neurons that equate to a relatively early time point in the carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain model.
In summary, the present study suggests two hours of acute neck muscle inflammation represents a transition point between the involvements of peripheral and/or central sensitisation. As our study was undertaken at one time point post inflammation it is difficult to predict where each of the alterations we observed lies in terms of the train of events that leads to central sensitisation. The surprising result that sEPSC amplitude and charge are reduced, suggest some excitatory inputs are depressed in the hours following inflammation. This may reduce local excitatory drive in the face of the initial excitatory barrage arising from the periphery. Alternatively, if the neurons that experience a reduction in excitatory drive were inhibitory, an associated reduction in the activity of this population would reduce inhibition in the SDH and contribute to enhanced nociceptive signaling. It will be important in future studies to assess whether our observation persists after peripheral drive abates following the resolution of inflammation in the periphery. The diminished IAr-current after two hours of acute inflammation is, however, consistent with inflammation-induced hyperexcitability in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Furthermore, there is a clear signalling pathway that links hyperexcitation (and neuronal depolarisation), with ERK kinase-dependent down regulation of A-currents . Thus, the early barrage of afferent input from inflamed muscle could underpin this observation. Our findings when combined with the existing literature on altered spinal cord processing, albeit at longer times after acute insult, suggest a complex sequence of events occurs in the dorsal horn following neck muscle inflammation. A greater understanding of the order and duration of these changes may help to uncover new strategies for blocking the transition from peripheral to central sensitisation.
Rectus capitis major
Spontaneous excitatory post synaptic current
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (project grant 569206 and 631000), The Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (Grant BB/J000620/1), The Hunter Medical Research Institute, and The University of Newcastle.
- Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ: Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain 2009,10(9):895–926. 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Todd AJ: Neuronal circuitry for pain processing in the dorsal horn. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010,11(12):823–836. 10.1038/nrn2947PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Perl ER: Current approaches to pathological pain. Bioessays 2004,26(4):454–456. 10.1002/bies.20011PubMedView Article
- Woolf CJ: Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983,306(5944):686–688. 10.1038/306686a0PubMedView Article
- Baranauskas G, Nistri A: Sensitization of pain pathways in the spinal cord: cellular mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol 1998,54(3):349–365. 10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00067-1PubMedView Article
- Ikeda H, Heinke B, Ruscheweyh R, Sandkuhler J: Synaptic plasticity in spinal lamina I projection neurons that mediate hyperalgesia. Science 2003,299(5610):1237–1240. 10.1126/science.1080659PubMedView Article
- Vernon H: What is different about spinal pain? Chiropr Man Ther 2012,20(1):22. 10.1186/2045-709X-20-22View Article
- Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Whiplash injury. Pain 1994,58(3):283–307. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90123-6PubMedView Article
- Sterling M, Kenardy J, Jull G, Vicenzino B: The development of psychological changes following whiplash injury. Pain 2003,106(3):481–489. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.013PubMedView Article
- Morch CD, Hu JW, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ: Convergence of cutaneous, musculoskeletal, dural and visceral afferents onto nociceptive neurons in the first cervical dorsal horn. Eur J Neurosci 2007,26(1):142–154. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05608.xPubMedView Article
- Olesen J, Burstein R, Ashina M, Tfelt-Hansen P: Origin of pain in migraine: evidence for peripheral sensitisation. Lancet Neurol 2009,8(7):679–690. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70090-0PubMedView Article
- Hu JW, Sun KQ, Vernon H, Sessle BJ: Craniofacial inputs to upper cervical dorsal horn: implications for somatosensory information processing. Brain Res 2005,1044(1):93–106. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.03.004PubMedView Article
- Watson C, Paxinos G, Kayalioglu G: The Spinal Cord: A Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation Text and Atlas. London, UK: Elsevier; 2009.
- Graham BA, Tadros MA, Schofield PR, Callister RJ: Probing glycine receptor stoichiometry in superficial dorsal horn neurones using the spasmodic mouse. J Physiol 2011, 589: 2459–2474. 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.206326PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Graham BA: In vivo responses of mouse superficial dorsal horn neurones to both current injection and peripheral cutaneous stimulation. J Physiol 2004, 561: 749–763. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072645PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Graham BA, Brichta AM, Callister RJ: Recording temperature affects the excitability of mouse superficial dorsal horn neurons, in vitro. J Neurophysiol 2008, 99: 2048–2059. 10.1152/jn.01176.2007PubMedView Article
- Tadros MA, Harris BM, Anderson WB, Brichta AM, Graham BA, Callister RJ: Are all spinal segments equal: intrinsic membrane properties of superficial dorsal horn neurons in the developing and mature mouse spinal cord. J Physiol 2012, 590: 2409–2425.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Graham BA, Brichta AM, Schofield PR, Callister RJ: Altered potassium channel function in the superficial dorsal horn of the spastic mouse. J Physiol 2007, 584: 121–136. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.138198PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Gao Y-J, Ji RR: c-Fos or pERK, Which is a better marker for neuronal activation and central sensitization after noxious stimulation and tissue injury? Open Pain J 2009, 2: 11–17. 10.2174/1876386300902010011PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Hunt S, Pini A, Evan G: Induction of C-Fos-like protein in spinal-cord neurons following sensory stimulation. Nature 1987, 328: 632–634. 10.1038/328632a0PubMedView Article
- Ro L-S, Li HY, Huang KF, Chen ST: Territorial and extra-territorial distribution of Fos protein in the lumbar spinal dorsal horn neurons in rats with chronic constriction nerve injuries. Brain Res 2004, 1004: 177–187. 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.12.047PubMedView Article
- Abbadie C, Besson JM: C-fos expression in rat lumbar spinal cord following peripheral stimulation in adjuvant-induced arthritic and normal rats. Brain Res 1993, 607: 195–204. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91507-OPubMedView Article
- Panfil C, Makowska A, Ellrich J: Brainstem and cervical spinal cord Fos immunoreactivity evoked by nerve growth factor injection into neck muscles in mice. Cephalalgia 2006, 26: 128–135. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01005.xPubMedView Article
- Kalezic I, Pilyavskii AI, Maisky VA, Kostyukov AI, Windhorst U, Johansson H: Distinctive pattern of c-fos expression in the feline cervico-lumbar spinal cord after stimulation of vanilloid receptors in dorsal neck muscles. Neurosci Lett 2004, 364: 94–97. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.04.019PubMedView Article
- Hu JY, Zhao ZQ: Differential contributions of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors to spinal Fos expression evoked by superficial tissue and muscle inflammation in the rat. Neuroscience 2001, 106: 823–831. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00299-8PubMedView Article
- Leitner J, Westerholz S, Heinke B, Forsthuber L, Wunderbaldinger G, Jäger T, Gruber-Schoffnegger D, Braun K, Sandkühler J: Impaired excitatory drive to spinal gabaergic neurons of neuropathic mice. PLoS One 2013, 8: e73370. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073370PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Katano T, Furue H, Okuda-Ashitaka E, Tagaya M, Watanabe M, Yoshimura M, Ito S: N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) is involved in central sensitization in the spinal cord through GluR2 subunit composition switch after inflammation. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 27: 3161–3170. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06293.xPubMedView Article
- Kopach O, Kao SC, Petralia RS, Belan P, Tao YX, Voitenko N: Inflammation alters trafficking of extrasynaptic AMPA receptors in tonically firing lamina II neurons of the rat spinal dorsal horn. Pain 2011,152(4):912–923. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.016PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Kopach O, Viatchenko-Karpinski V, Belan P, Voitenko N: Development of inflammation-induced hyperalgesia and allodynia is associated with the upregulation of extrasynaptic AMPA receptors in tonically firing lamina II dorsal horn neurons. Front Physiol 2012, 3: 391.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Park JS, Voitenko N, Petralia RS, Guan X, Xu JT, Steinberg JP, Takamiya K, Sotnik A, Kopach O, Huganir RL, Tao YX: Persistent inflammation induces GluR2 internalization via NMDA receptor-triggered PKC activation in dorsal horn neurons. J Neurosci 2009, 29: 3206–3219. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4514-08.2009PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Zhou Q-Q, Imbe H, Zou S, Dubner R, Ren K: Selective upregulation of the flip-flop splice variants of AMPA receptor subunits in the rat spinal cord after hindpaw inflammation. Mol Brain Res 2001, 88: 186–193. 10.1016/S0169-328X(01)00041-9PubMedView Article
- Lu Y, Sun YN, Wu X, Sun Q, Liu FY, Xing GG, Wan Y: Role of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptor subunit GluR1 in spinal dorsal horn in inflammatory nociception and neuropathic nociception in rat. Brain Res 2008, 1200: 19–26.PubMedView Article
- Baba H, Doubell TP, Woolf CJ: Peripheral inflammation facilitates Aβ fiber-mediated synaptic input to the substantia gelatinosa of the adult Rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1999, 19: 859–867.PubMed
- Hedo G, Laird JMA, Lopez-Garcia JA: Time-course of spinal sensitization following carrageenan-induced inflammation in the young rat: a comparative electrophysiological and behavioural study in vitro and in vivo. Neuroscience 1999, 92: 309–318. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00734-9PubMedView Article
- Baccei ML, Bardoni R, Fitzgerald M: Development of nociceptive synaptic inputs to the neonatal rat dorsal horn: glutamate release by capsaicin and menthol. J Physiol 2003, 549: 231–242. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.040451PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Li J, Baccei ML: Neonatal tissue damage facilitates nociceptive synaptic input to the developing superficial dorsal horn via NGF-dependent mechanisms. Pain 2011, 152: 1846–1855. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.04.001PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Lappin SC, Randall AD, Gunthorpe MJ, Morisset V: TRPV1 antagonist, SB-366791, inhibits glutamatergic synaptic transmission in rat spinal dorsal horn following peripheral inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol 2006, 540: 73–81. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.04.046PubMedView Article
- Li J, Baccei ML: Excitatory synapses in the rat superficial dorsal horn are strengthened following peripheral inflammation during early postnatal development. Pain 2009, 143: 56–64. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.023PubMedView Article
- Hoheisel U, Sardy M, Mense S: Experiments on the nature of the signal that induces spinal neuroplastic changes following a peripheral lesion. Eur J Pain 1997, 1: 243–259. 10.1016/S1090-3801(97)90034-3PubMedView Article
- Graham BA, Brichta AM, Callister RJ: Pinch-current injection defines two discharge profiles in mouse superficial dorsal horn neurones, in vitro. J Physiol 2007, 578: 787–798. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.123349PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Huang H-Y, Cheng J-K, Shih Y-H, Chen P-H, Wang C-L, Tsaur M-L: Expression of A-type K + channel α subunits Kv4.2 and Kv4.3 in rat spinal lamina II excitatory interneurons and colocalization with pain-modulating molecules. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22: 1149–1157. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04283.xPubMedView Article
- Yasaka T, Tiong SY, Hughes DI, Riddell JS, Todd AJ: Populations of inhibitory and excitatory interneurons in lamina II of the adult rat spinal dorsal horn revealed by a combined electrophysiological and anatomical approach. Pain 2010, 151: 475–488. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.008PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Rivera-Arconada I, Lopez-Garcia JA: Changes in membrane excitability and potassium currents in sensitized dorsal horn neurons of mice pups. J Neurosci 2010, 30: 5376–5383. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4359-09.2010PubMedView Article
- Hu H-J, Carrasquillo Y, Karim F, Jung WE, Nerbonne JM, Schwarz TL, Gereau I, Robert W: The Kv4.2 potassium channel subunit is required for pain plasticity. Neuron 2006, 50: 89–100. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.010PubMedView Article
- Hu HJ, Alter BJ, Carrasquillo Y, Qiu CS, Gereau RW: Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 modulates nociceptive plasticity via extracellular signal-regulated kinase Kv4.2 signaling in spinal cord dorsal horn neurons. J Neurosci 2007, 27: 13181–13191. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0269-07.2007PubMedView Article
- Melnick IV: A-type K (+) current dominates somatic excitability of delayed firing neurons in rat substantia gelatinosa. Synapse 2010, 65: 601–607.PubMedView Article
- Ruscheweyh R, Sandkuhler J: Lamina-specific membrane and discharge properties of rat spinal dorsal horn neurones in vitro. J Physiol 2002, 541: 231–244. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.017756PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Kayser V, Guilbaud G: Local and remote modifications of nociceptive sensitivity during carrageenin-induced inflammation in the rat. Pain 1986, 28: 99–107.View Article
- Ren K, Dubner R: Inflammatory Models of Pain and Hyperalgesia. ILAR J 1999, 40: 111–118. 10.1093/ilar.40.3.111PubMedView Article
- Wheeler-Aceto H, Porreca F, Cowan A: The rat paw formalin test: comparison of noxious agents. Pain 1990, 40: 229–238. 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90073-MPubMedView Article
- Wu WP, Hao JX, Halldner-Henriksson L, Xu XJ, Jacobson MA, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Fredholm BB: Decreased inflammatory pain due to reduced carrageenan-induced inflammation in mice lacking adenosine A3 receptors. Neuroscience 2002, 114: 523–527. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00273-7PubMedView Article
- Yang D, Gereau I, Robert W: Peripheral group II metabotropic glutamate receptors mediate endogenous anti-allodynia in inflammation. Pain 2003, 106: 411–417. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.011PubMedView Article
- Stanfa LC, Sullivan AF, Dickenson AH: Alterations in neuronal excitability and the potency of spinal mu, delta and kappa opioids after carrageenan-induced inflammation. Pain 1992, 50: 345–354. 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90040-IPubMedView Article
- Vadakkan KI, Wang H, Ko SW, Zastepa E, Petrovic MJ, Sluka KA, Zhuo M: Genetic reduction of chronic muscle pain in mice lacking calcium/calmodulin-stimulated adenylyl cyclases. Mol Pain 2006, 2: 7. 10.1186/1744-8069-2-7PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Radhakrishnan R, Moore SA, Sluka KA: Unilateral carrageenan injection into muscle or joint induces chronic bilateral hyperalgesia in rats. Pain 2003, 104: 567–577. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00114-3PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
- Hu HJ: ERK Integrates PKA and PKC Signaling in Superficial Dorsal Horn Neurons. I. Modulation of A-Type K + Currents. J Neurophysiol 2003, 90: 1671–1679. 10.1152/jn.00340.2003PubMedView Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.