Open Access

Sodium channel expression in the ventral posterolateral nucleus of the thalamus after peripheral nerve injury

Molecular Pain20062:27

DOI: 10.1186/1744-8069-2-27

Received: 19 July 2006

Accepted: 17 August 2006

Published: 17 August 2006


Peripheral nerve injury is known to up-regulate the expression of rapidly-repriming Nav1.3 sodium channel within first-order dorsal root ganglion neurons and second-order dorsal horn nociceptive neurons, but it is not known if pain-processing neurons higher along the neuraxis also undergo changes in sodium channel expression. In this study, we hypothesized that after peripheral nerve injury, third-order neurons in the ventral posterolateral (VPL) nucleus of the thalamus undergo changes in expression of sodium channels. To test this hypothesis, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve. Ten days after CCI, when allodynia and hyperalgesia were evident, in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical analysis revealed up-regulation of Nav1.3 mRNA, but no changes in expression of Nav1.1, Nav1.2, or Nav1.6 in VPL neurons, and unit recordings demonstrated increased background firing, which persisted after spinal cord transection, and evoked hyperresponsiveness to peripheral stimuli. These results demonstrate that injury to the peripheral nervous system induces alterations in sodium channel expression within higher-order VPL neurons, and suggest that misexpression of the Nav1.3 sodium channel increases the excitability of VPL neurons injury, contributing to neuropathic pain.


Peripheral nerve injury can result in the development of chronic pain that is associated with hyperexcitability of sensory neurons within the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) [1, 2] and the spinal cord dorsal horn [35]. Changes in sodium channel expression are known to contribute to neuronal hyperexcitability, and to reductions in behavioral nociceptive thresholds after nerve injury. It is now well-established that peripheral axotomy and chronic constriction injury (CCI) trigger upregulated expression of the Nav1.3 sodium channel within DRG neurons [68] and that CCI is followed by upregulation of Nav1.3 within nociceptive dorsal horn neurons [9]. This is functionally important because Nav1.3 produces a persistent current [10] and a ramp response which amplifies small depolarizations close to resting potential, and reprimes rapidly from inactivation [11, 12], thereby contributing to hyperexcitability of these neurons [9].

Questions remain regarding molecular changes in supraspinal sensory neurons after nerve injury. Of particular interest is the ventral posterolateral (VPL) nucleus of the thalamus which receives input from spinal sensory neurons, and is involved in sensory-discriminative aspects of pain processing [13]. Previous work has demonstrated that VPL neurons sensitize to mechanical and thermal stimuli after peripheral neuropathy [14], and that NMDA blockade can decrease nociceptive transmission [15]. However, whether there are changes in sodium channel expression within the thalamus that might contribute to neuronal hyperresponsiveness after injury is not yet known.

In this study we asked whether peripheral nerve injury can also trigger supraspinal changes in sodium channel expression within the thalamus. We hypothesized that upregulated expression of Nav1.3, and possibly other isoforms, occurs in third-order VPL neurons after peripheral nerve injury.


Behavioral testing

Testing of behavioral nociceptive thresholds was performed to confirm that animals had developed pain-related behaviors following CCI, at the time of histological or electrophysiological analysis. Ten days following CCI, animals demonstrated significantly reduced hindlimb mechanical thresholds on the ipsilateral side (4.1 ± 2.5 g) when compared to the contralateral side (18.8 ± 4.7 g) or sham-operated animals (21.9 ± 2.6 g) (data not shown), indicating the development of mechanical allodynia. Thermal paw withdrawal latencies were also significantly reduced for the ipsilateral hindlimb 10 d after CCI (4.3 ± 2.0 sec) relative to the contralateral side (9.8 ± 2.4 sec) or sham-operated animals (10.2 ± 2.6 sec) (not shown), indicating the development of thermal hyperalgesia.

Extracellular unit recordings

Examination of sections corresponding to the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus at bregma -3.14 mm confirmed that the tip of the recording electrode was within the VPL (Figure 1A). Representative unit recording locations are shown for intact as well as CCI animals for ipsilateral and contralateral sides at 10 days after injury, superimposed on a schematic diagram of the thalamus [16]. Typically the track of the electrode passed through the hippocampus and VPM. All units analyzed were located within the atlas boundaries of the VPL.
Figure 1

Two-dimensional distribution of 10 histologically identified recording sites plotted on a schematic diagram [16] of the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus corresponding to bregma -3.14 mm, which delineates the posterior nucleus group (Po), ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM), and VPL. Units from intact control (open circles), 10 days after chronic constriction injury (CCI) ipsilateral side (open squares), and CCI contralateral side (filled triangles) groups are shown (A). All units used in this analysis were confined to the VPL. Representative extracellular multireceptive unit recordings plotted as peristimulus time histograms as well as unit activity are shown for intact (B), and ipsilateral (C) and contralateral (D) sides after CCI in response to phasic brush, 144 g/mm2 press, and 583 g/mm2 pinch, stimulation (10 sec) of peripheral receptive fields located on the corresponding hindpaw. Quantification (E) of spikes/second show that 10 days after CCI, on the contralateral side, evoked discharge rates were significantly (*p < 0.05) elevated in response to all peripheral stimuli compared to intact animals and the ipsilateral side of CCI animals.

Representative peristimulus time histograms from an intact animal (Figure 1B), as well as from sides ipsilateral (Figure 1C) and contralateral (Figure 1D) to the CCI 10 days after injury, show that in comparison to MR units recorded from intact and the ipsilateral VPL after CCI, units recorded from the contralateral side exhibited elevated evoked firing rates. Quantification of mean evoked rates (Figure 1E) revealed that in intact animals, mean evoked discharge rates to phasic brush (17.5 ± 2.4 Hz), 144 g/mm2 (19.1 ± 3.6 Hz), and 583 g/mm2 (22.1 ± 4.4 Hz) compressive stimuli were in accordance with previously published reports [17]. Ten days after induction of CCI, on the side ipsilateral to the CCI, evoked responses to brush (23.9 ± 4.2 Hz), 144 g/mm2 (19.4 ± 4.2 Hz), and 583 g/mm2 (24.5 ± 5.9 Hz) were not significantly different from intact animals. In contrast, on the contralateral side, discharge rates during application of brush (42.1 ± 4.8 Hz), 144 g/mm2 (50.6 ± 11.4 Hz), and 583 g/mm2 (69.2 ± 13.6 Hz) were significantly (p < 0.05) increased compared to intact and ipsilateral CCI units.

Spontaneous thalamic activity independent of spinal afferent barrage

Recordings from VPL neurons with hindlimb receptive fields demonstrated a high rate of background firing 10 days after CCI. To ascertain whether this high rate of firing was the result of increased afferent barrage from sites below the VPL, we recorded from VPL neurons before and after application of 2% lidocaine and subsequent spinal cord transection at T6. In a representative record from an animal with CCI (Figure 2A), spontaneous background activity was present in the contralateral VPL and occurred at 5–11 Hz (Figure 2B), and a response was evoked upon brush and press stimulation of the hindpaw (Figure 2a). Topical lidocaine application and cord transection (at t = 120 s) at T6 had no effect on spontaneous firing rates of thalamic units which remained high (5–12 Hz) (Figure 2B), although it abolished the evoked response to peripheral stimulation of the hindpaw (Figure 2b). In this series of experiments, after blockade of evoked afferent activity, increased spontaneous activity of VPL units was present for the duration of the experiment (up to 1450 sec). Compared to intact animals, background activity was significantly higher in the contralateral VPL of CCI animals (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Representative recording of spontaneous and evoked activity of a contralateral VPL neuron with a hindlimb receptive field demonstrated spontaneous discharge 10 days after CCI (A). The VPL unit was continuously recorded, and the spinal cord was acutely transected at T6 following application of 2% lidocaine (lido+tx, at t = 120 s). The corresponding unit waveform is shown. Spontaneous background (BK) activity and evoked responses to brush and press (PR, bar) stimuli are shown on an expanded time scale before (a, t = 50–59 sec) and after (b, t = 300–309 sec) cord transection. In CCI animals, spontaneous firing of VPL neurons was unaffected and occurred at a frequency of 5–12 spikes/s following cord transection, but no evoked responses to PR could be elicited (b). Quantification (B) revealed that evoked responses could no longer be elicited after cord transection in intact and CCI (contralateral) groups, and that background activity remained significantly (*p < 0.05) elevated in CCI animals before (pre) and after interruption (tx) of ascending afferent barrage compared with intact animals.

In situ hybridization

In situ hybridization studies were performed on intact and CCI brains for detection of mRNA for neuronal sodium channels Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3, and Nav1.6 in the VPL. Sections from the ipsilateral and contralateral sides 10 days after CCI probing for Nav1.3 are shown in Figure 3. A coronal brain slice corresponding to bregma -3.14 mm illustrates the location of image fields (Figure 3A) and location of the VPL. On the side ipsilateral to the CCI, very little hybridization signal for Nav1.3 is detectable (Figure 3B). On the contralateral side, however, Nav1.3 hybridization signal was clearly present within small (5–20 μm diameter) neurons in the VPL (Figure 3C). Signal was punctuate and easily discernable from background. Neurons expressing Nav1.3 mRNA were localized to the VPL exclusively, and no signal was observed in the VPM, intralaminar, or adjacent thalamic nuclei. The number of Nav1.3-positive neurons ranged from 22–54 (mean 38.2 ± 8.4 neurons) per section on the contralateral side, significantly higher compared to 0–4 (2.4 ± 1.9 neurons) in intact animals and in CCI animals on the side ipsilateral to CCI (1.9 ± 1.2 neurons) (Figure 3D). Signal intensity within Nav1.3-positive neurons was significantly elevated only on the side contralateral to CCI (Figure 3E). In intact animals, the signal intensity was relatively low (7.4 ± 4.2 arbitrary units), and was not different from the ipsilateral side of CCI animals (5.4 ± 4.6 units). In contrast, the contralateral side of CCI rats displayed significantly increased Nav1.3 signal intensity (57.6 ± 15.4 units).
Figure 3

Schematic representation of a coronal brain section corresponding to bregma -3.14 [16] showing the location of the VPL and image locations. Ten days after CCI, representative images from in situ hybridization for detection of Nav1.3 mRNA are shown for the ipsilateral (B) and contralateral (C) sides. On the ipsilateral side, only very light Nav1.3 signal was detectable. On the contralateral side, punctuate Nav1.3 signal was present in CCI animals. Higher magnification insets are shown for the ipsilateral (B') and contralateral (C') sides. Quantification of the number of Nav1.3-positive cells exhibiting a neuronal morphology from each group is shown in (D). Compared to intact animals, and to the ipsilateral side after CCI, the contralateral VPL exhibited a significantly (*p < 0.05) increased number of Nav1.3-positive profiles after CCI. Nav1.3 signal intensity was very low in intact animals, and on the ipsilateral side after CCI, whereas on the contralateral side signal intensity was significantly increased after CCI.

In intact animals, Nav1.1, Nav1.2, and Nav1.6 were constitutively expressed within the VPL. Nav1.1 was expressed on both ipsilateral (mean 13.9 ± 4.0 neurons per section) and contralateral (16.1 ± 7.1 neurons) VPL after injury, which was not changed relative to intact (15.2 ± 4.4 neurons) animals. Similarly, Nav1.2 was expressed but was not different from control (31.2 ± 3.0 neurons) in either the ipsilateral (34.1 ± 2.6 neurons) or contralateral (30.0 ± 4.7 neurons) sides after CCI. Differences in Nav1.6 expression were not detected relative to intact animals (23.6 ± 4.9 neurons) in either ipsilateral (26.1 ± 5.2 neurons) or contralateral (22.5 ± 6.5 neurons) sides after CCI.

In situ hybridization for Nav1.1 revealed widespread punctuate staining. Quantification of signal intensity in ipsilateral (36.1 ± 3.2 arbitrary units) (Figure 4A) and contralateral (36.4 ± 4.6 units) (Figure 4B) revealed no significant difference 10 days following CCI. Similarly, Nav1.2 signal intensity between ipsilateral (64.5 ± 11.1 units) (Figure 4C) and contralateral sides (74.8 ± 13.8 units) (Figure 4D) were not significantly different after CCI. Finally, Nav1.6 signal intensity was not significantly different between ipsilateral (44.1 ± 9.2 units) (Figure 4E) and contralateral (50.2 ± 6.5 units) (Figure 4F) sides after CCI. Compared to intact animals, no significant differences were observed after CCI (Figure 4H).
Figure 4

Representative images showing Nav1.1 (A, B), Nav1.2 (C, D), and Nav1.6 (E, F) mRNA transcripts within regions corresponding to the ipsilateral (A, C, E) and contralateral (B, D, F) VPL in coronal brain sections collected at bregma -3.14 10 days following CCI. Signal was detectable in cells exhibiting a neuronal morphology. Quantification of the number of neurons per section expressing each sodium channel isoforms (G) did not reveal any significant differences in ipsilateral or contralateral expression after CCI when compared to intact animals. Quantification of sodium channel in situ signal intensity (H) showed moderate expression of all channel isoforms in intact animals, and that 10 days after CCI no isoforms exhibited changes in signal intensity.


In the present study we confirm that peripheral nerve injury (CCI) results in long-distance changes in responsiveness to peripheral stimulation in third-order pain-processing neurons of the ventral posterolateral (VPL) nucleus of the thalamus that receive inputs from the injured contralateral sciatic nerve in animals that display lowered behavioral nociceptive thresholds [14, 18]. These changes include increased rates of firing in response to natural peripheral stimuli equivalent to light touch, pressing of the skin, and pinching of the skin. Our new data also document the abnormal expression of the Nav1.3 voltage-gated sodium channel transcripts in the VPL during this time of neuronal hyperresponsiveness and reduced nociceptive thresholds. We observed no changes in the expression of neuronal sodium channels Nav1.1, Nav1.2, or Nav1.6 in VPL neurons, although we can not rule out a contribution of other channels that could have an affect on firing thresholds [19, 20]. Our results demonstrate for the first time, that changes in sodium channel expression within the thalamus are associated with abnormal sensory processing and chronic neuropathic pain after CCI.

The abnormal expression of Nav1.3 in third-order neurons suggests a mechanism whereby injury to a peripheral nerve can propagate pathological molecular changes to sequentially-ordered upstream targets. Second-order dorsal horn nociceptive neurons receive input from the periphery via the dorsal root ganglia, and project rostrally to third-order neurons within a pain-signaling pathway, located within the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus. Most of these spinothalamic projections terminate in the VPL, and this pathway underlies most of the transmission of nociceptive information from the periphery to the brain [21]. No changes in expression of Nav1.3 were observed in other thalamic nuclei, such as the intralaminar nuclei [22], which is important in processing affective components of pain. This could be related to the relatively few number of projections from the lumbar spinal cord, or low levels of Nav1.3 transcript upregulation after CCI. We have previously demonstrated that Nav1.3 contributes directly to hyperresponsiveness of second-order dorsal horn neurons after CCI [9], and that knock-down of Nav1.3 expression with intrathecally-delivered antisense oligonucleotides that selectively target Nav1.3 mRNA can reduce Nav1.3 expression in NK1R-positive dorsal horn nociceptive neurons, quiet hyperresponsive dorsal horn neurons, and return behavioral nociceptive thresholds to near-normal levels.

In this study, we document Nav1.3 misexpression in third-order neurons after nerve injury. The number of Nav1.3-expressing neurons is quite low, and may reflect the fact that only a subset of neurons receives pathological input from dorsal horn neurons rendered hyperresponsive by DRG efferents. Through FosB immunoreactivity, the number of neurons of the VPL that are responsive to noxious stimulation has been studied and is also low [23]; the number of Nav1.3-positive neurons in our study closely approximates this number.

The factors that drive expression of Nav1.3 in these neurons are not yet clear, and a number of possibilities exist. First, if we assume that Nav1.3 enables a neuron to fire at higher-than-normal frequencies, it is possible that VPL neurons are upregulating Nav1.3 in order to accommodate high-frequency information received from the spinal cord. As soon as 3 days after injury, ectopic and inappropriate discharges originate in the injured axons and their cell bodies within the DRG [1, 2426]. This abnormal firing could drive dorsal horn neurons to relay higher frequency afferent information supraspinally towards the VPL, which in turn also become hyperresponsive in response to increased drive and upregulate Nav1.3 to accommodate higher than normal firing frequencies. Second, VPL neurons may undergo reactive changes that make them hyperresponsive. Abnormal firing has been shown to originate and persist within the dorsal horn after peripheral injury [35, 27], as well as the thalamus after spinal cord injury after interruption of spinal afferent barrage [17]. Activity-dependent central sensitization can outlast the conditioning stimulus for hours [28]. Third, while the up-regulated expression of Nav1.3 within DRG neurons following axotomy appears to be due in part to deprivation from peripheral pools of neurotrophic factors [2931], the signals that trigger Nav1.3 upregulation within third-order neurons have not been identified. It is known that after peripheral nerve injury 2-deoxyglucose metabolic activity [32] and regional blood flow [33] are increased in the thalamus, and that changes in cannabinoid receptors [34] and monoamine release [35] occur, but whether these are linked to Nav1.3 expression is unclear.

Nav1.3 recovers from inactivation rapidly and produces a depolarizing response to small stimuli close to resting potential, and produces a persistent current – increasing the excitability of cells that express Nav1.3 [7, 1012]. The Nav1.3 sodium channel has been linked to pain-related phenomena in a variety of model systems. Increased expression of Nav1.3 occurs in DRG and dorsal horn neurons following injury to the sciatic nerve [6, 7, 9, 36, 37], and while expression of Nav1.3 is not increased in axotomized cortical pyramidal neurons [38]. Up-regulation of Nav1.3 expression in DRG neurons is associated with allodynia and hyperalgesia [8]. Similarly, pain after spinal cord injury is ameliorated after knock-down of Nav1.3 [9, 17, 39].

Sodium channel blockade after peripheral [40] or central [41] injury with systemic lidocaine administration has been shown to be effective in the amelioration of chronic pain. It is not yet known how lidocaine, for example, might affect sodium channel dysregulation after experimental injury, but this is an important question to ask.


In sum, our findings demonstrate changes in excitability and expression of Nav1.3, but not other neuronal sodium channels (Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.6), within contralateral VPL neurons following CCI. Together with our earlier results on dorsal root ganglion [8] and dorsal horn neurons [9], these results provide evidence suggesting that dysregulated Nav1.3 expression at both spinal and supraspinal levels after peripheral nerve injury contributes to altered processing of somatosensory information and chronic neuropathic pain.


Animal care

Experiments were carried out in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals, and adhered to the guidelines of the Committee for Research and Ethical Issues of International Association for the Study of Pain; all animal protocols were approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Use Committee. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–225 g) were used for this study. Animals were housed under a 12 h light-dark cycle in a pathogen-free area with free access to water and food.

Chronic constriction injury

Rats (n = 24) were deeply anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (80/5 mg/kg i.p.) and the left sciatic nerve exposed at the mid-thigh level by blunt dissection of the biceps femoris. For chronic constriction injury (CCI) (n = 12), four chromic gut (4-0) ligatures were tied loosely around the nerve, about 1 mm apart, proximal to its trifurcation, as described by [42]. For sham surgery (n = 12), the sciatic nerve was isolated but not ligated. After sham or CCI surgery, the overlying muscles and skin were closed in layers with 4-0 silk sutures and staples, respectively, and the animal recovered on a 30°C heating pad. Postoperative treatments included saline (2.0 cc s.c.) for rehydration, and Baytril (0.3 cc, 22.7 mg/ml s.c.) to prevent urinary tract infection.

Behavioral analysis

Testing of nociceptive thresholds was performed (n = 6 animals/group) 10 days after sham or CCI surgery to confirm that CCI animals had developed behavioral signs of chronic pain (for all experiments we used only animals that demonstrated the development of chronic pain). After acclimation to the testing area (30 min), mechanical sensory thresholds were determined by paw withdrawal to application of a series of von Frey filaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA) to the glabrous surface of the paw. Following application of calibrated von Frey filaments (0.4–26 g) with enough force to cause buckling of the filament, a modification of the 'up-down' method of [43] was used to determine the value at which paw withdrawal occurred 50% of the time [44], interpreted to be the mechanical nociceptive threshold.

After acclimation to the test chamber, thermal hyperalgesia was assessed by measuring the latency of paw withdrawal in response to a radiant heat source [45]. Animals were placed in Plexiglas boxes on an elevated glass plate under which a radiant heat source (4.7 A) was applied to the glabrous surface of the paw through the glass plate. The heat source was turned off automatically by a photocell upon limb-lift, allowing the measurement of paw withdrawal latency. If no response was detected, the heat source was automatically shut off at 20 s. Three minutes were allowed between each trial and four trials were averaged for each limb.


Animals that had been sham-operated (n = 6), and CCI animals (n = 6) that exhibited reduced behavioral nociceptive thresholds 10 days after injury, underwent extracellular single unit recording according to established methods [9]. The activity of 3–7 units/animal was recorded, yielding 18–42 cells/group. Rats were initially anaesthetized with halothane (4% in induction chamber), and maintained by tracheal intubation (1.1%, 2–2.5 ml tidal volume, 60–70 strokes/min). Halothane anesthesia lasted ~2 h, until the end of each experiment. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37°C.

For unit recording, the head was fixed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA) and skin incision and a limited craniotomy exposed the brain surface vertical to the recording sites within the thalamus. Neuronal units were isolated bilaterally from the VPL nucleus of the thalamus [stereotaxic coordinates in mm: bregma (-3.30); lateral (2.6); vertical (4.8)]. Extracellular single-unit recordings were made with low-impedance 5 MΩ tungsten insulated microelectrodes (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA, USA). Electrical signals were amplified and filtered at 300–3000 Hz (DAM80, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA), processed by a data collection system (CED 1401+; Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, UK), and stored on a computer (Pentium 4 PC, Dell, Austin, TX, USA) to construct peristimulus time histograms or Wavemark records. The stored digital record of individual unit activity was retrieved and analyzed off-line with Spike2 software (v3.13, Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK).

Once a cell was identified by a gentle probing of the body surface, its receptive field was mapped and stimulated by an experimenter blinded to the treatment of the animal. Background (BK) activity was measured followed by cutaneous receptive field mapping with von Frey filaments and/or brief pinches. Receptive fields for VPM units were exclusively mapped to the head, whereas those for VPL units were mapped to the rest of the body. Three mechanical stimuli were routinely applied: (i) phasic brush (PB) stimulation of the skin with a cotton brush; (ii) increasing intensity von Frey filaments (0.39 g; 1.01 g; 20.8 g forces); (iii) pressure (PR), by attaching a large arterial clip with a weak grip to a fold of the skin (144 g/mm2); and (iv) pinch (PI), by applying a small arterial clip with a strong grip to a fold of skin (583 g/mm2). Multireceptive units were identified by their responsiveness to brush, press and pinch, and with increasing responsiveness to incrementing strength von Frey stimuli. Low threshold or high threshold units were classified as such based on their high (>30%) rate of response to brush, von Frey stimulation or pinch. BK activity was recorded for 20 s and stimuli applied serially for 20 s, separated by 20 s of baseline activity. Care was taken to ensure that the responses were maximal, that each stimulus was applied to the unit's primary receptive field, and that isolated units remained intact and held for the duration of each experiment using Spike2 template matching routines. Neurons responding mainly to joint movement or to probing subcutaneous tissue were excluded from analysis. Evoked responses were calculated by subtracting the prestimulus baseline activity to yield net number of spikes per response.

At the conclusion of recording, a direct current (1 μA for 20 s) was passed through the recording electrode to identify the location of unit recording sites. Recording sites were plotted from 3–4 animals in each group. The brain was removed and fixed in 4% cold buffered paraformaldehyde in PBS for 48 h at 4°C in 30% sucrose before frozen sectioning at 20 μm. Sections were mounted on gelatin/potassium chromium sulfate-coated slides and stained with cresyl violet (0.1%) for visualization and photomicroscopy.

Blockade of afferent barrage to the thalamus

In a second group, sham-operated animals (n = 4) and animals 10 days after CCI (n = 4) were prepared for standard electrophysiological recording within the VPL. In these experiments, the spinal cord was exposed by laminectomy at the T6 level, and topical application of 2% lidocaine (20 mg/ml, pH 6.5; Abbott Labs, North Chicago, IL, USA) to the dorsal and lateral surfaces of the spinal cord was followed by complete cord transection at the same site with iridectomy scissors at t = 120 sec. Following cord transection, responses to press stimulation of the hindlimb were abolished in all animals. For each animal one unit was isolated in the VPL that had an identifiable contralateral (injury side) hindlimb receptive field. The unit's activity was continuously recorded for the duration of each experiment. Background and evoked activity were recorded before and after lidocaine and transection.

In situ hybridization

Following perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde PBS and cryoprotection in 30% sucrose, coronal sections were collected from the brain at levels corresponding to the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus (bregma -3.14 mm) from animals that had been sham-operated (n = 6), and that exhibited reduced behavioral nociceptive thresholds 10 days after CCI (n = 6). Twelve micron transverse cryosections (n = 5 sections/animal) from each group were processed for detection of mRNA for the neuronal sodium channels Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3, and Nav1.6 as previously described [46, 47], with incubation in 4% paraformaldehyde increased to 12 min and permeabilization with proteinase K reduced to 6 min. DIG-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes were synthesized as previously described by our group [46, 47]. Sense riboprobes yielded no signal on in situ hybridization (data not shown). Nav1.4 (which is normally expressed within skeletal muscle), Nav1.5 (cardiac muscle), Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 (normally expressed in peripheral ganglia and not in brain) were not studied.

Quantitative image analysis

Images were captured with a Nikon Eclipse E800 light microscope equipped with epifluorescence and Nomarski optics, using a Photometrics CoolSnap HQ camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) and MetaVue v6.2r6 software (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downingtown, PA). Quantitative analysis was performed by a blinded observer using MetaVue and IPLab Spectrum v3.0 software (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA) where the number of positively labeled neurons was counted for ipsilateral and contralateral VPL regions. Cells were sampled only if the nucleus was visible within the plane of section and if cell profiles exhibited distinctly delineated borders. Signal intensity of reaction products was determined by software functions. Background levels of signal were subtracted, and control and experimental conditions evaluated in identical manners.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were performed at the alpha level of significance of 0.05 by two-tailed analyses using parametric tests. Pair-wise comparisons were applied with either the paired Student's t-test or the two sample Student's t-test. Data involving multiple timepoints for individual animals was tested for significance using repeated-measure ANOVA. Data management and statistical analyses were performed using SAS (1992) statistical procedures with Jandel SigmaStat (v1.0), and graphed using Jandel SigmaPlot (v7.0) as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.).





chronic constriction injury


dorsal root ganglion


phasic brush






ventral posterolateral


ventral posteromedial



The authors thank Dr. Joel Black for valuable experimental advice. This work was supported in part by grants from the Medical Research Service and Rehabilitation Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. The Center for Neuroscience and Regeneration Research is a Collaboration of the Paralyzed Veterans of America and the United Spinal Association. BCH was funded by Pfizer (Scholar's Grant in Pain Medicine).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroscience and Regeneration Research, Yale University School of Medicine
Rehabilitation Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System


  1. Wall PD, Devor M: Sensory afferent impulses originate from dorsal root ganglia as well as from the periphery in normal and nerve injured rats. Pain 1983, 17: 321–339. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90164-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Study RE, Kral MG: Spontaneous action potential activity in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons from rats with a painful neuropathy. Pain 1996, 65: 235–242. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00216-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Woolf CJ: Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983, 306: 686–688. 10.1038/306686a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sotgiu ML, Lacerenza M, Marchettini P: Effect of systemic lidocaine on dorsal horn neuron hyperactivity following chronic peripheral nerve injury in rats. Somatosens Mot Res 1992, 9: 227–233.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Laird JM, Bennett GJ: An electrophysiological study of dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord of rats with an experimental peripheral neuropathy. J Neurophysiol 1993, 69: 2072–2085.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Waxman SG, Kocsis JD, Black JA: Type III sodium channel mRNA is expressed in embryonic but not adult spinal sensory neurons, and is re-expressed following axotomy. J Neurophysiol 1994, 72: 466–471.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Black JA, Cummins TR, Plumpton C, Chen YH, Hormuzdiar W, Clare JJ, Waxman SG: Upregulation of a silent sodium channel after peripheral, but not central, nerve injury in DRG neurons. J Neurophysiol 1999, 82: 2776–2785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dib-Hajj SD, Fjell J, Cummins TR, Zheng Z, Fried K, LaMotte R, Black JA, Waxman SG: Plasticity of sodium channel expression in DRG neurons in the chronic constriction model of neuropathic pain. Pain 1999, 83: 591–600. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00169-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hains BC, Saab CY, Klein JP, Craner MJ, Waxman SG: Altered sodium channel expression in second-order spinal sensory neurons contributes to pain after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci 2004, 24: 4832–4839. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0300-04.2004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lampert A, Hains BC, Waxman SG: Dorsal horn neurons express ramp currents, and accelerated repriming associated with Nav1.3 upregulation after spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res 2006, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Cummins TR, Waxman SG: Down-regulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium currents and up-regulation of a rapidly repriming tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium current in small spinal sensory neurons following nerve injury. J Neurosci 1997, 17: 3503–3514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins TR, Aglieco F, Renganathan M, Herzog RI, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG: Nav1.3 sodium channels: rapid repriming and slow closed-state inactivation display quantitative differences after expression in a mammalian cell line and in spinal sensory neurons. J Neurosci 2001, 21: 5952–5961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Price DD, Dubner R: Neurons that subserve the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain. Pain 1977, 3: 307–338. 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90063-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Guilbaud G, Benoist JM, Jazat F, Gautron M: Neuronal responsiveness in the ventrobasal thalamic complex of rats with an experimental peripheral mononeuropathy. J Neurophysiol 1990, 64: 1537–1554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bordi F, Quartaroli M: Modulation of nociceptive transmission by NMDA/glycine site receptor in the ventroposterolateral nucleus of the thalamus. Pain 2000, 84: 213–224. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00205-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Paxinos G, Watson C: The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4th edition. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Hains BC, Saab CY, Waxman SG: Changes in electrophysiological properties and sodium channel Nav1.3 expression in thalamic neurons after spinal cord injury. Brain 2005, 128: 2359–2371. 10.1093/brain/awh623PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Miki K, Iwata K, Tsuboi Y, Morimoto T, Kondo E, Dai Y, Ren K, Noguchi K: Dorsal column-thalamic pathway is involved in thalamic hyperexcitability following peripheral nerve injury: a lesion study in rats with experimental mononeuropathy. Pain 2000, 85: 263–271. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00279-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Llinas R, Jahnsen H: Electrophysiology of mammalian thalamic neurones in vitro. Nature 1982, 297: 406–408. 10.1038/297406a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Ekftekharpour E, Fehlings MG: Temporal and spatial patterns of Kv1.1 and Kv1.2 protein and gene expression in spinal cord white matter after acute and chronic spinal cord injury in rats: implications for axonal pathophysiology after neurotrauma. Eur J Neurosci 2004, 19: 577–589. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03164.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Willis WD, Coggeshall RE: Sensory mechanisms of the spinal cord. 3rd edition. New York: Plenum Press; 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang X, Giesler GJ Jr: Response characterstics of spinothalamic tract neurons that project to the posterior thalamus in rats. J Neurophysiol 2005, 93: 2552–64. 10.1152/jn.01237.2004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearse DD, Bushell G, Leah JD: Jun, Fos and Krox in the thalamus after C-fiber stimulation: coincident-input-dependent expression, expression across somatotopic boundaries, and nucleolar translocation. Neuroscience 2001, 107: 143–159. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00320-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Govrin-Lippmann R, Devor M: Ongoing activity in severed nerves: source and variation with time. Brain Res 1978, 159: 406–410. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90548-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kajander KC, Wakisaka S, Bennett GJ: Spontaneous discharge originates in the dorsal root ganglion at the onset of a painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1992, 138: 225–228. 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90920-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kral MG, Xiong Z, Study RE: Alteration of Na+ currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons from rats with a painful neuropathy. Pain 1999, 81: 15–24. 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00264-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Basbaum AI, Wall PD: Chronic changes in the response of cells in adult cat dorsal horn following partial deafferentation: the appearance of responding cells in a previously non-responsive region. Brain Res 1976, 116: 181–204. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90899-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Woolf CJ, Wall PD: Relative effectiveness of C primary afferent fibers of different origins in evoking a prolonged facilitation of the flexor reflex in the rat. J Neurosci 1986, 6: 1433–1442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Black JA, Langworthy K, Hinson AW, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG: NGF has opposing effects on Na+ channel III and SNS gene expression in spinal sensory neurons. Neuroreport 1997, 8: 2331–2335.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Boucher TJ, Okuse K, Bennett DL, Munson JB, Wood JN, McMahon SB: Potent analgesic effects of GDNF in neuropathic pain states. Science 2000, 290: 124–127. 10.1126/science.290.5489.124PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Leffler A, Cummins TR, Dib-Hajj SD, Hormuzdiar WN, Black JA, Waxman SG: GDNF and NGF reverse changes in repriming of TTX-sensitive Na+ currents following axotomy of dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88: 650–658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mao J, Mayer DJ, Price DD: Patterns of increased brain activity indicative of pain in a rat model of peripheral mononeuropathy. J Neurosci 1993, 13: 2689–2702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Paulson PE, Casey KL, Morrow TJ: Long-term changes in behavior and regional cerebral blood flow associated with painful peripheral mononeuropathy in the rat. Pain 2002, 95: 31–40. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00370-0PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegling A, Hofmann HA, Denzer D, Mauler F, De Vry J: Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor upregulation in a rat model of chronic neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 2001, 415: 5–7. 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)00798-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Goettl VM, Huang Y, Hackshaw KV, Stephens RL: Reduced basal release of serotonin from the ventrobasal thalamus of the rat in a model of neuropathic pain. Pain 2002, 99: 359–366. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00209-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Dib-Hajj S, Black JA, Felts P, Waxman SG: Down-regulation of transcripts for Na channel -SNS in spinal sensory neurons following axotomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1996, 93: 14950–14954. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14950PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim CH, Oh Y, Chung JM, Chung K: The changes in expression of three subtypes of TTX sensitive sodium channels in sensory neurons after spinal nerve ligation. Brain Res 2001, 95: 153–161. 10.1016/S0169-328X(01)00226-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Hains BC, Black JA, Waxman SG: Primary motor neurons fail to up-regulate voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.3/brain type III following axotomy resulting from spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res 2002, 70: 546–552. 10.1002/jnr.10402PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Waxman SG, Hains BC: Fire and phantoms after spinal cord injury: Na+ channels and central pain. Trends Neurosci 2006, 29: 207–215. 10.1016/j.tins.2006.02.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Gottrup H, Bach FW, Juhl G, Jensen TS: Differential effect of ketamine and lidocaine on spontaneous and mechanical evoked pain in patients with nerve injury pain. Anesthesiology 2006, 104: 527–536. 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00021PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Finnerup NB, Biering-Sorensen F, Johannesen IL, Terkelsen AJ, Juhl GI, Kristensen AD, Sindrup SH, Bach FW, Jensen TS: Intravenous lidocaine relieves spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2005, 102: 1023–1030. 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00023PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bennett GJ, Xie YK: A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man. Pain 1988, 33: 87–107. 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90209-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL: Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods 1994, 53: 55–63. 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Dirig DM, Salami A, Rathbun ML, Ozaki GT, Yaksh TL: Characterization of variables defining hindpaw withdrawal latency evoked by radiant thermal stimuli. J Neurosci Methods 1997, 76: 183–191. 10.1016/S0165-0270(97)00097-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Dixon WJ: Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1980, 20: 441–462. 10.1146/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Black JA, Dib-Hajj S, McNabola K, Jeste S, Rizzo MA, Kocsis JD, Waxman SG: Spinal sensory neurons express multiple sodium channel alpha-subunit mRNAs. Mol Brain Res 1996, 43: 117–131. 10.1016/S0169-328X(96)00163-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Black JA, Liu S, Tanaka M, Cummins TR, Waxman SG: Changes in the expression of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium channels within dorsal root ganglia neurons in inflammatory pain. Pain 2004, 108: 237–247. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.035PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Zhao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.