Open Access

Vascularization of the dorsal root ganglia and peripheral nerve of the mouse: Implications for chemical-induced peripheral sensory neuropathies

  • Juan M Jimenez-Andrade1,
  • Monica B Herrera1,
  • Joseph R Ghilardi2,
  • Marina Vardanyan1,
  • Ohannes K Melemedjian1 and
  • Patrick W Mantyh1, 2Email author
Molecular Pain20084:10

DOI: 10.1186/1744-8069-4-10

Received: 11 February 2008

Accepted: 19 March 2008

Published: 19 March 2008

Abstract

Although a variety of industrial chemicals, as well as several chemotherapeutic agents used to treat cancer or HIV, preferentially induce a peripheral sensory neuropathy what remains unclear is why these agents induce a sensory vs. a motor or mixed neuropathy. Previous studies have shown that the endothelial cells that vascularize the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), which houses the primary afferent sensory neurons, are unique in that they have large fenestrations and are permeable to a variety of low and high molecular weight agents. In the present report we used whole-mount preparations, immunohistochemistry, and confocal laser scanning microscopy to show that the cell body-rich area of the L4 mouse DRG has a 7 fold higher density of CD31+ capillaries than cell fiber rich area of the DRG or the distal or proximal aspect of the sciatic nerve. This dense vascularization, coupled with the high permeability of these capillaries, may synergistically contribute, and in part explain, why many potentially neurotoxic agents preferentially accumulate and injure cells within the DRG. Currently, cancer survivors and HIV patients constitute the largest and most rapidly expanding groups that have chemically induced peripheral sensory neuropathy. Understanding the unique aspects of the vascularization of the DRG and closing the endothelial fenestrations of the rich vascular bed of capillaries that vascularize the DRG before intravenous administration of anti-neoplastic or anti-HIV therapies, may offer a mechanism based approach to attenuate these chemically induced peripheral neuropathies in these patients.

Background

Previous reports in both humans with accidental exposure, and in experimental animals, have shown that a variety of industrial agents and heavy metals produce a predominant sensory neuropathy. This list includes cloramphenicol [1], disulfiram [1], nitrofurantoin [1], thalidomide [2], adriamycin [3], chlorobiphenyl [4], chlorodinitrobenzene [5], dinitrobenzene [5], clioquinol [2], arsenic [6], cadmium [7] and methyl mercury [8]. It is still not completely understood why these agents induce primarily a sensory and not a motor peripheral neuropathy although it has been shown that the vascular supply to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) is unique in that it is highly permeable to a variety of low and high molecular weight compounds and that agents such a cadmium and methylmercury preferentially accumulate in the DRG [9, 10].

Peripheral neuropathy is also a major side effect of many commonly used anti-neoplastic agents including taxanes (eg, paclitaxel, docetaxel), vinca alkaloids, platinum-based compounds (eg, cisplatin and oxaliplatin) and the proteosome inhibitor bortezomib [1114]. Interestingly, a similar, predominately peripheral neuropathy is also frequently observed in HIV patients receiving commonly utilized antiretroviral agents such as didanosine, zalcitabine, stavudine and indinavir [1521]. This peripheral neuropathy is the de facto toxicity that limits the administration of many commonly used anti-neoplastic and anti-HIV agents [1114, 20, 21]. This is significant as the current trend is towards more aggressive chemotherapy as is evident in recent studies demonstrating that in many chemotherapeutic regimens increased dose is associated with a clear increase in patient survival [13, 2224].

In the present report we quantitatively examined the density of the vascular supply of the cell body rich area (CBRA), the nerve fiber rich area (NFRA) of the lumbar (L4) DRG of the mouse and compared these to the vascular supply of the proximal and distal aspect of the sciatic nerve. To accomplish this we used immunohistochemical staining of CD31 (which is also known as platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule) in both whole-mount, and sectioned DRG and examined and quantified this staining using confocal microscopy, three dimensional reconstruction and quantitative histomorphometry.

Results

In order to determine the CD31+ blood vessel density within the peripheral nervous system, we performed immunohistochemical analysis using an antibody raised against platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule CD31. The antibody against CD31 has been used as a pan-endothelial marker and stains endothelial cells present in blood vessels [25]. CD31+ immunostaining has been reported to be weak or absent in endothelial cells of murine lymphatic vessels [26, 27].

Whole mount lumbar DRG with adjacent roots and spinal nerve attached were isolated from C3H/HeJ mice. While CD31+ blood vessels were present only sparsely within the endoneurium of the sciatic nerve, a dense network of CD31+ blood vessels was observed within the L4 DRG (Figure 1). In order to elucidate the association of blood vessels with cell bodies and axons of the sensory neurons within the DRG, CD31 immunohistochemical analysis on whole-mount preparations was conducted in L4 DRG of transgenic C57/B6 mice which constitutively express yellow fluorescence protein (YFP) in axons and cell bodies of sensory neurons (Fig 2A) [28, 29]. YFP immunofluorescence was readily visible in cell bodies and axons of sensory neurons without signal amplification (Fig 2A). The 3D reconstructions of the confocal scans show the cell body-rich area (CBRA) is vascularized by an extensive network of CD31+ blood vessels that encapsulate and encircle the cell body of the YFP-expressing sensory neurons (Fig 2B,C). In contrast, the nerve fiber-rich area (NFRA) of the DRG contains relatively few CD31+ blood vessels (Fig 2B,D), and when present, run parallel to the bundles of nerve fibers.
Figure 1

Whole mount preparation showing the vascularization of the cell body rich area of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) vs. the dorsal and ventral roots and sciatic nerve at L4 in the C3H mouse. Bright-field photomicrograph of a whole-mount L4 DRG preparation for anatomical reference. Dashed line demarks the cell body-rich area from the sciatic nerve and dorsal and ventral spinal roots (A). Representative confocal micrograph of a mouse L4 DRG labeled with the endothelial cell marker CD31 showing the marked difference in the density of the vascular supply within the sensory ganglia as compared to the corresponding spinal nerve and dorsal root (B). This dense vascularization of the DRG along with the large fenestrations of the blood vessels in the DRG may partially explain why certain neurotoxics preferential accumulate in the DRG and produce a primarily sensory vs. motor neuropathy. The confocal image in (B) was assembled from 280 optical sections acquired at 0.5 μm z-plane intervals so that the total z stack is 140 μm-thick. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Figure 2

The density of CD31+ vessels is site dependent within the mouse lumbar dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Representative 3D reconstructed confocal images of L4 DRG whole mount preparation from thy1-YFP transgenic mice where the cell body and axons of sensory neurons constitutively express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP, pseudocolored violet). In contrast, the endothelial cells were immunohistochemically labeled with a marker of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule, CD31+ (green) (A, B). Note that a dense vascular plexus surrounds sensory neuron cell bodies within cell body-rich areas (C), whereas the nerve fiber-rich areas have a lower density of CD31+ vascular labeling (D). The confocal image in A-D were acquired at 0.5 μm z-plane intervals and the total z-plane for (A) 90 μm, (B) 60 μm and (C&D) 15 μm. Scale bar A-D = 50 μm.

To determine these regional differences in the density of CD31+ blood vessels within L4 DRG, we quantified the CD31+ blood vessels in CBRA and NFRA (Fig 3). The density of CD31+ blood vessels in CBRA (351 ± 27 CD31+ blood vessels/mm2) was significantly higher than that in NFRA (53 ± 8 CD31+ blood vessels/mm2). In order to compare the CD31+ blood vessel density of the CBRA to the peripheral nerves, we quantified CD31+ blood vessel density in two regions of the sciatic nerve. CD31+ blood vessels were observed mainly to run longitudinally along the endoneurium of the sciatic nerve (data not shown). No significant differences in the CD31+ blood vessel density were found between distal (47 ± 2 CD31+ blood vessels/mm2) and proximal (42 ± 6 CD31+ blood vessels/mm2) regions of the sciatic nerve (Fig 3). While the CD31+ blood vessel density in the sciatic nerve was similar in magnitude compared to that in NFRA, it was significantly lower as compared to that in CBRA (Fig 3). Finally, we quantified the CD31+ blood vessel density in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, as this tissue is highly vascularized [30, 31]. Results show that dorsal spinal cord is significantly higher than CBRA and has the highest blood vessel density (555 ± 17 CD31+ blood vessels/mm2) of the tissues evaluated in this study (Fig 3).
Figure 3

CD31 + blood vessel density is significantly higher in cell body-rich areas (CBRA) as compared to nerve fiber-rich areas (NFRA) of the L4 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and distal and proximal sciatic nerve of the C3H mouse. Regional differences in blood vessel density were determined by quantifying the CD31+ blood vessels/mm2 in 15 μm cut sections of the L4 DRG and attached nerve roots. Each bar of the histograms represents the mean +/- SEM of at least 4 mice and * indicates a difference of p < 0.05 vs CBRA of the L4 DRG.

Discussion

The unique vascularization and permeability of the CBRA in the DRG

In the present study, we have shown that the CBRA of the DRG has approximately a seven fold higher density of the CD31+ blood vessels (which are mostly capillaries) than the NFRA of the DRG or the proximal and distal regions of the sciatic nerve. Interestingly, previous reports have shown similar striking regional differences in the expression of tight junction proteins and the presence of a functional blood-nerve barrier in the NFRA of the DRG but not in the CBRA of the rat DRG [32]. Previous studies have also shown that the blood vessels that vascularize the CBRA of the DRG have large fenestrations when compared to the peripheral nerves [3335]. Thus, when large molecules such as albumin [32, 36] or horseradish peroxidase [35, 37] are injected into the rat tail vein these molecules remain in the vessels in the NFRA of the DRG and the vessels of the peripheral nerve but avidly leak out of the vessels that vascularize the CBRA of the DRG. Thus, the dense vascularization, lack of the full repertoire of tight junction proteins and the highly fenestrated blood vessels that are present in the CBRA of the DRG makes this area of the peripheral nerve uniquely open and accessible to a variety of low and high molecular weight agents [33]. Thus, even intravenous administration of fluorescently labeled Evans-blue albumin (MW 68,000) results in dense deposition of this tracer immediately adjacent to the plasma membrane of the soma of rat DRG neurons [32].

Together, these results suggest that a blood-nerve barrier is largely lacking in aspects of the peripheral nerve that house the cell bodies of sensory neurons. In addition to this relatively unrestricted access, there are high metabolic demands placed on the cell bodies [38] that support the long axons that innervate the most distal extremities. This may in part explain why intravenous administration of potentially neurotoxic agents such as methyl mercury show preferential access [33, 39], accumulation [3941] and toxicity [33, 4143] to sensory neurons when compared to motor neurons whose cell bodies are housed within the blood brain barrier within the ventral horn of the spinal cord.

Chemical agents-induced peripheral neuropathy

Neurotoxicity is a major side effect of many commonly used anti-neoplastic and anti-HIV agents [1119, 44]. Previously, the dose limiting toxicity of many chemotherapeutic agents was hypersensitivity and neutropenia, but since the former can now be treated with antihistamines or steroids and the latter with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [45], peripheral neuropathy is the de facto toxicity that limits the administration of many commonly used anti-neoplastic agents [1114]. This is significant as the current trend in oncology is towards more aggressive chemotherapy as is evident in recent studies demonstrating that in many chemotherapeutic regimens increased dose is associated with a clear increase in patient survival [13, 2224].

In previous studies we showed that intravenous administration of paclitaxel, a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent, leads to the development of peripheral neuropathy characterized by injury of neuronal and non-neuronal cells in the DRG [46, 47]. To define the location of the cells that showed the first sign of injury we administered this agent intravenously and then looked for the appearance of markers of cell injury in the rat DRG, peripheral nerve and spinal cord at 1, 3, 6 and 10 days following initial intravenous infusion of paclitaxel [42]. Using this strategy, it was found that at day 1 post-infusion there was a marked up-regulation of activated transcription factor-3 (ATF3), wich is a marker of cell injury/regeneration [48, 49] in a subpopulation of large and small DRG neurons. In contrast, markers of cell injury in the proximal or distal aspects of the sciatic nerve were not observed until 10 days post-infusion of paclitaxel, suggesting that one of the initial sites of paclitaxel induced injury was in the CBRA of the DRG. Interestingly, by 10 days post-paclitaxel infusion there were clusters of satellite cells in the DRG which have been suggested to be a "tombstone" of dead sensory neuron cell bodies [47]. Similar "tombstones" have been observed in DRGs obtained at autopsies of cancer patients treated with cisplatin [50] and in AIDS patients treated with antiretroviral agents [15, 51], which also frequently produce a predominantly sensory chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) [1618, 20, 21]. Together these preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that there are signs of injury and death of the cell body of sensory neurons of rats and patients receiving chemotherapeutic drugs and that direct drug-induced injury to the cell body and its supporting cells may participate in the generation of CIPN.

Implications and future directions

Defining the mechanisms and developing new therapies to attenuate or prevent therapy induced neuropathy in cancer and HIV patients are both needed and possible. Thus, in many cases these neuropathies are frequently the dose limiting toxicity that limits the ability of clinicians to pursue an aggressive chemotherapeutic regimen that will in large part determine the survival of the patient [5254]. For example, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin therapy offers clear dose-related benefits in promoting disease free survival [55]. However, in many cases optimal and aggressive dosing of oxaliplatin is limited by CIPN which results in reduction or cessation of chemotherapy resulting in decreased survival rates for these patients [5254, 56, 57].

Therapy induced peripheral neuropathy presents a unique opportunity in neuropathobiology in that preemptive therapy can be commenced before the chemotherapeutic regimen begins. Previous studies in preclinical models of stroke and spinal cord injury have shown the significant advantages in preemptive versus post-injury administration of neuroprotective strategies [58]. However, the clinical reality in stroke and spinal cord injury is that neuroprotective therapies can usually only be initiated after the neuronal injury has occurred [58]. In contrast, anti-neoplastic or anti-HIV therapies offer a unique opportunity in that the precise time and extent of neuronal injury induced by the chemotherapeutic agent is known allowing preemptive trials to be conducted in both the preclinical and clinical setting.

Currently cancer and AIDS survivors constitute the largest and most rapidly expanding group of patients that have peripheral neuropathy and neuropathic pain [19, 20, 44, 59]. Thus, developing a mechanism based understanding of how these chemotherapeutic agents induce this primarily peripheral sensory neuropathy and developing mechanism based therapies to prevent and/or attenuate these neuropathies offers a significant opportunity to impact both the survival and quality of life of these patients.

Conclusion

The high density of the CD31+ capillaries in the cell body rich area of the DRG, coupled with relative lack of a functional nerve-blood barrier in these capillaries, may partly explain why many circulating neurotoxic agents preferentially accumulate and injure cells within the DRG and induce a sensory rather than a motor neuropathy. Understanding the unique aspects of the vascularization of the DRG and using this knowledge to modulate the permeability of the capillaries that vascularize the DRG, before intravenous administration of anti-neoplastic or anti-HIV therapies, may offer a mechanism based approach to blocking or attenuating chemically induced peripheral neuropathies in these patients.

Methods

Animal model

Experiments were performed on a total of 12 adult male C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine) and 12 adult C57 B6.Cg-Tg(Thy1-YFP)16Jrs/J mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine), weighing 20–25 g. The transgenic mice constitutively express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in motor and sensory neurons under the control of neuron-specific regulatory elements from the Thy1 gene [28, 29]. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Minnesota.

Preparation of tissue

Mice were sacrificed with CO2 and perfused intracardially with 20 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 20 ml of 4% formaldehyde/12.5% picric acid solution in 0.1 M PBS. For whole-mount DRG preparations, the L3-L5 DRG of Thy1-YFP mice and C3H mice were harvested together with its adjacent spinal roots and nerve, post-fixed for 4 h in the perfusion fixative and then processed for immunohistochemistry (see below). For sectioned tissue, the lumbar (L3-L5) DRG, sciatic nerves, and lumbar spinal cord of C3H mice were removed, post-fixed for 4 h in the perfusion fixative, and cryoprotected for 24 h in 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS all at 4°C and then processed for immunohistochemistry. Longitudinal sciatic nerve sections (1.5 cm segment) were obtained at mid thigh level approximately 1.0 cm proximal to the trifurcation.

Immunohistochemistry on whole-mount preparations

Qualitative analysis indicated no differences in the CD31+ blood vessel density in L3 to L5 DRG. Thus for quantification and presentation purposes only L4 DRG were used. The L4 DRG and attached nerves were incubated for 60 min at room temperature (RT) in a blocking solution of 3% normal donkey serum in PBS with 0.3% Triton-X 100 and then incubated overnight at RT in primary antisera against the platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule CD31, a marker of endothelial cells present in blood vessels [26, 27] (monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD31, 1:500, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). YFP immunofluorescence in Thy1-YFP mice was readily visible under an epifluorescence microscope, thus no amplification of the signal was performed. Tissue was washed in PBS and incubated for 3 h at RT with a secondary antibody (Cy3 anti-rat; 1:600, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Finally, the DRG and attached nerves were washed 3 × 10 min in PBS, mounted on gelatin-coated slides, dried, dehydrated via an alcohol gradient (70, 90, and 100%), cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with DPX.

Immunohistochemistry on sectioned tissue

Serial frozen sections of L4 DRG, lumbar spinal cord (coronal sections) and sciatic nerve (longitudinal sections) were cut at 15 μm on a cryostat and mounted onto gelatin-coated slides for immunohistochemical analysis. In this case, sectioned tissues were incubated overnight at RT in primary antisera against CD31. Secondary antibodies conjugated to various fluorescent markers (Cy2 1:200, Cy3 1:600; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) were used and further immunohistochemical steps were performed as described above. To confirm the specificity of the primary antibody, controls included preabsorption with the corresponding synthetic peptide or omission of the primary antibody.

Laser scanning confocal microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction

Laser scanning confocal microscopy of the whole mount preparations was performed with a BX-61 microscope equipped with the Fluoview 1000 imaging software 5.0 (Olympus America Inc, Melville, NY). Confocal z-series at 0.5 μm intervals were acquired for each observation area and filtered by two-frame Kalman low-speed scans. YFP was excited by a laser wavelength of 488 nm, and emissions were detected using a 522-nm emission filter. Sequential acquisition mode was used to reduce bleed through. Z-series of the different experiments were imported from the Olympus Fluoview format to the Imaris Pro Software 5.7.0 (Bitplane AG, Zurich, CH). Image threshold and channel pseudocolors were adjusted, and 3D reconstruction was performed in the Surpass module. Images were cropped with Adobe Photoshop CS and thereafter assembled in Adobe Illustrator CS.

Quantification of CD31+ blood vessels

Quantification of blood vessels was performed by determining the number of CD31 positive (+) blood vessels per unit area [30, 60]. Only sectioned tissue from C3H mice was used to perform this quantification. Microvessel profiles were identified using criteria described by Weidner and colleagues [61] where the presence of a vessel lumen was not required to identify vessel profiles. Only CD31+ blood vessels that were 2–10 μm in diameter were counted and CD31+ branched blood vessels were counted as one vessel. The number of CD31+ blood vessels was determined in cell body-rich area (CBRA) and nerve fiber-rich area (NFRA) [32]. Images of the DRG sections were captured on an Olympus BX51 epifluorescent microscope fitted with an Olympus DP70 digital camera and areas of interest were determined using Image Pro Plus version 3.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). The number of CD31+ blood vessels per outlined area from 4 sections per ganglion spaced 100 μm apart was averaged for each animal and results were expressed as total number of CD31+ blood vessels per unit area (mm2). Random 250 μm × 250 μm areas of the sciatic nerve and medial dorsal horn of the spinal cord were viewed at ×400 magnification and the number of CD31+ blood vessels was quantified. Distal (approximately 1.2–1.5 cm distance from tribifurcation) and proximal areas (approximately 2.2–2.5 cm distance from tribifurcation) of the sciatic nerve segment were used for quantification. Two areas were counted per section of 4 sections of spinal cord and sciatic nerve (proximal and distal) spaced 100 μm apart. Results are expressed as the mean number of CD31+ blood vessels per unit area (mm2) ± SEM. Statistical differences were determined using ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants (NS23970, NS048021) and a Merit Review from the Veterans Administration.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona
(2)
Research Service, VA Medical Center

References

  1. Le Quesne PM: Neuropathy due to drugs. In Peripheral Neuropathy. Edited by: Dyck PF, Thomas PK, Lambert EH. Philadelphia , Saunders; 1975.Google Scholar
  2. Cavanagh JB: Peripheral neuropathy caused by chemical agents. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 1973, 2(3):365–417. 10.3109/10408447309082021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho ES, Schaumburg HH, Spencer PS: Adriamycin produces ganglioradiculopathy in rats. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1977, 36: 907–915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hopkins A: Toxic neuropathy due to industrial agents. In Peripheral Neuropathy. Edited by: Dyck PF, Thomas PK, Lambert EH. Philadelphia , Saunders; 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Grant MW: Toxicology of the eye. In Toxicology of the eye. Edited by: Thomas CC. Illinois , Springfield; 1974:96.Google Scholar
  6. Le Quesne PM, McLeod JG: Peripheral neuropathy following a single exposure to arsenic. Clincal course in four patients with electrophysiological and histological studies. J Neurol Sci 1977, 32(3):437–451. 10.1016/0022-510X(77)90025-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Viaene MK, Roels HA, Leenders J, De Groof M, Swerts LJ, Lison D, Masschelein R: Cadmium: a possible etiological factor in peripheral polyneuropathy. Neurotoxicology 1999, 20(1):7–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ikeda Y, Tobe M, Kobayashi K, Suzuki S, Kawasaki Y: Long-term toxicity study of methylmercuric chloride in monkeys (first report). Toxicology 1973, 1(4):361–375. 10.1016/0300-483X(73)90043-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Somjen GG, Herman SP, Klein R, Brubaker PE, Briner WH, Goodrich JK, Krigman MR, Haseman JK: The uptake of methyl mercury (203Hg) in different tissues related to its neurotoxic effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1973, 187(3):602–611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arvidson B, Tjalve H: Distribution of 109Cd in the nervous system of rats after intravenous injection. Acta Neuropathol 1986, 69(1–2):111–116. 10.1007/BF00687046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee JJ, Swain SM: Peripheral neuropathy induced by microtubule-stabilizing agents. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(10):1633–1642. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.0543View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Quasthoff S, Hartung HP: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol 2002, 249(1):9–17. 10.1007/PL00007853View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mielke S, Sparreboom A, Mross K: Peripheral neuropathy: A persisting challenge in paclitaxel-based regimes. Eur J Cancer 2006, 42(1):24–30. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pignata S, De Placido S, Biamonte R, Scambia G, Di Vagno G, Colucci G, Febbraro A, Marinaccio M, Lombardi AV, Manzione L, Carteni G, Nardi M, Danese S, Valerio MR, de Matteis A, Massidda B, Gasparini G, Di Maio M, Pisano C, Perrone F: Residual neurotoxicity in ovarian cancer patients in clinical remission after first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel: the Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer (MITO-4) retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2006, 6: 5. 10.1186/1471-2407-6-5PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pardo CA, McArthur JC, Griffin JW: HIV neuropathy: insights in the pathology of HIV peripheral nerve disease. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2001, 6(1):21–27. 10.1046/j.1529-8027.2001.006001021.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pettersen JA, Jones G, Worthington C, Krentz HB, Keppler OT, Hoke A, Gill MJ, Power C: Sensory neuropathy in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients: protease inhibitor-mediated neurotoxicity. Ann Neurol 2006, 59(5):816–824. 10.1002/ana.20816View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McArthur JC, Brew BJ, Nath A: Neurological complications of HIV infection. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4(9):543–555. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70165-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Berger AR, Arezzo JC, Schaumburg HH, Skowron G, Merigan T, Bozzette S, Richman D, Soo W: 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC) toxic neuropathy: a study of 52 patients. Neurology 1993, 43(2):358–362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Keswani SC, Pardo CA, Cherry CL, Hoke A, McArthur JC: HIV-associated sensory neuropathies. Aids 2002, 16(16):2105–2117. 10.1097/00002030-200211080-00002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholas PK, Mauceri L, Slate Ciampa A, Corless IB, Raymond N, Barry DJ, Viamonte Ros A: Distal sensory polyneuropathy in the context of HIV/AIDS. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2007, 18(4):32–40. 10.1016/j.jana.2007.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicholas PK, Kemppainen JK, Canaval GE, Corless IB, Sefcik EF, Nokes KM, Bain CA, Kirksey KM, Eller LS, Dole PJ, Hamilton MJ, Coleman CL, Holzemer WL, Reynolds NR, Portillo CJ, Bunch EH, Wantland DJ, Voss J, Phillips R, Tsai YF, Mendez MR, Lindgren TG, Davis SM, Gallagher DM: Symptom management and self-care for peripheral neuropathy in HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care 2007, 19(2):179–189. 10.1080/09540120600971083View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Aghajanian C, Fennelly D, Shapiro F, Waltzman R, Almadrones L, O'Flaherty C, O'Conner K, Venkatraman E, Barakat R, Curtin J, Brown C, Reich L, Wuest D, Norton L, Hoskins W, Spriggs DR: Phase II study of "dose-dense" high-dose chemotherapy treatment with peripheral-blood progenitor-cell support as primary treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998, 16(5):1852–1860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pasini F, Durante E, De Manzoni D, Rosti G, Pelosi G: High-dose chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2002, 22(6B):3465–3472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cocconi G, Bella M, Lottici R, Leonardi F, Ceci G, Passalacqua R, Di Blasio B, Bordi C, Biscottini B, Melpignano M, De Biasi D, Finardi C, Bacchi M: Mature results of a prospective randomized trial comparing a three-weekly with an accelerated weekly schedule of cisplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1999, 22(6):559–567. 10.1097/00000421-199912000-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sleeman JP, Krishnan J, Kirkin V, Baumann P: Markers for the lymphatic endothelium: in search of the holy grail? Microsc Res Tech 2001, 55(2):61–69. 10.1002/jemt.1157View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kivela R, Havas E, Vihko V: Localisation of lymphatic vessels and vascular endothelial growth factors-C and -D in human and mouse skeletal muscle with immunohistochemistry. Histochem Cell Biol 2007, 127(1):31–40. 10.1007/s00418-006-0226-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Odaka C, Morisada T, Oike Y, Suda T: Distribution of lymphatic vessels in mouse thymus: immunofluorescence analysis. Cell Tissue Res 2006, 325(1):13–22. 10.1007/s00441-005-0139-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR: Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 2000, 28(1):41–51. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00084-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen YS, Chung SS, Chung SK: Noninvasive monitoring of diabetes-induced cutaneous nerve fiber loss and hypoalgesia in thy1-YFP transgenic mice. Diabetes 2005, 54(11):3112–3118. 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3112View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ireland WP, Fletcher TF, Bingham C: Quantification of microvasculature in the canine spinal cord. Anat Rec 1981, 200(1):102–113. 10.1002/ar.1092000110View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dunning HS, Wolff HG: The relative vascularity of various parts of the central and peripheral nervous system of the cat and its relation to function. J Comp Neurol 1937, 31(3):433–450. 10.1002/cne.900670305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirakawa H, Okajima S, Nagaoka T, Kubo T, Takamatsu T, Oyamada M: Regional differences in blood-nerve barrier function and tight-junction protein expression within the rat dorsal root ganglion. Neuroreport 2004, 15(3):405–408. 10.1097/00001756-200403010-00004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobs JM: Vascular permeability and neurotoxicity. Environ Health Perspect 1978, 26: 107–116. 10.2307/3428830PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Anzil AP, Blinzinger K, Herrlinger H: Fenestrated blood capillaries in rat cranio-spinal sensory ganglia. Cell Tissue Res 1976, 167(4):563–567. 10.1007/BF00215185View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacobs JM, Macfarlane RM, Cavanagh JB: Vascular leakage in the dorsal root ganglia of the rat, studied with horseradish peroxidase. J Neurol Sci 1976, 29(1):95–107. 10.1016/0022-510X(76)90083-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Olsson Y: Topographical differences in the vascular permeability of the peripheral nervous system. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1968, 10(1):26–33. 10.1007/BF00690507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Arvidson B: Distribution of intravenously injected protein tracers in peripheral ganglia of adult mice. Exp Neurol 1979, 63(2):388–410. 10.1016/0014-4886(79)90134-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Devor M: Unexplained peculiarities of the dorsal root ganglion. Pain 1999, Suppl 6: S27–35. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00135-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schionning JD, Danscher G: Autometallographic mercury correlates with degenerative changes in dorsal root ganglia of rats intoxicated with organic mercury. Apmis 1999, 107(3):303–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cavaletti G, Cavalletti E, Oggioni N, Sottani C, Minoia C, D'Incalci M, Zucchetti M, Marmiroli P, Tredici G: Distribution of paclitaxel within the nervous system of the rat after repeated intravenous administration. Neurotoxicology 2000, 21(3):389–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Holmes J, Stanko J, Varchenko M, Ding H, Madden VJ, Bagnell CR, Wyrick SD, Chaney SG: Comparative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and ormaplatin in a Wistar rat model. Toxicol Sci 1998, 46(2):342–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Peters CM, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Ghilardi JR, Mantyh PW: An evolving cellular pathology occurs in dorsal root ganglia, peripheral nerve and spinal cord following intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. Brain Res 2007, 1168: 46–59. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.066PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kumamoto T, Fukuhara N, Miyatake T, Araki K, Takahashi Y, Araki S: Experimental neuropathy induced by methyl mercury compounds: autoradiographic study of GABA uptake by dorsal root ganglia. Eur Neurol 1986, 25(4):269–277. 10.1159/000116020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sacktor N: The epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurological disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Neurovirol 2002, 8 Suppl 2: 115–121. 10.1080/13550280290101094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Einzig AI, Wiernik PH, Wadler S, Kaplan J, Benson LT, Tentoramano L, Tan V: Phase I study of paclitaxel (taxol) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with unresectable malignancy. Invest New Drugs 1998, 16(1):29–36. 10.1023/A:1006004809169View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jimenez-Andrade JM, Peters CM, Mejia NA, Ghilardi JR, Mantyh PW: Sensory neurons and their supporting cells located in the trigeminal, thoracic and lumbar ganglia differentially express markers of injury follwing intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. Neurosci Lett 2006, 405(1–2):62–67. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.043View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters CM, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Jonas BM, Sevcik MA, Koewler NJ, Ghilardi JR, Wong GY, Mantyh PW: Intravenous paclitaxel administration in the rat induces a peripheral sensory neuropathy characterized by macrophage infiltration and injury to sensory neurons and their supporting cells. Exp Neurol 2007, 203(1):42–54. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.07.022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Seijffers R, Allchorne AJ, Woolf CJ: The transcription factor ATF-3 promotes neurite outgrowth. Mol Cell Neurosci 2006, 32(1–2):143–154. 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.03.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsujino H, Kondo E, Fukuoka T, Dai Y, Tokunaga A, Miki K, Yonenobu K, Ochi T, Noguchi K: Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) induction by axotomy in sensory and motoneurons: A novel neuronal marker of nerve injury. Mol Cell Neurosci 2000, 15(2):170–182. 10.1006/mcne.1999.0814View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Krarup-Hansen A, Rietz B, Krarup C, Heydorn K, Rorth M, Schmalbruch H: Histology and platinum content of sensory ganglia and sural nerves in patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin: an autopsy study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1999, 25(1):29–40. 10.1046/j.1365-2990.1999.00160.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Bradley WG, Shapshak P, Delgado S, Nagano I, Stewart R, Rocha B: Morphometric analysis of the peripheral neuropathy of AIDS. Muscle Nerve 1998, 21(9):1188–1195. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199809)21:9<1188::AID-MUS10>3.0.CO;2-OView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N, du Bois A, Delaloye JF, Kristensen GB, Wheeler S, Swart AM, Qian W, Torri V, Floriani I, Jayson G, Lamont A, Trope C: Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet 2003, 361(9375):2099–2106. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13718-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Bhagra A, Rao RD: Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy. Curr Oncol Rep 2007, 9(4):290–299. 10.1007/s11912-007-0036-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Forman AD: Peripheral neuropathy and cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2004, 6(1):20–25. 10.1007/s11912-996-0005-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Maindrault-Goebel F, de Gramont A, Louvet C, Andre T, Carola E, Mabro M, Artru P, Gilles V, Lotz JP, Izrael V, Krulik M: High-dose intensity oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFOX 7). Eur J Cancer 2001, 37(8):1000–1005. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00068-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Grothey A: Oxaliplatin-safety profile: neurotoxicity. Semin Oncol 2003, 30(4 Suppl 15):5–13. 10.1016/S0093-7754(03)00399-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mantyh PW: Cancer pain and its impact on diagnosis, survival and quality of life. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7(10):797–809. 10.1038/nrn1914View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Faden AI, Stoica B: Neuroprotection: challenges and opportunities. Arch Neurol 2007, 64(6):794–800. 10.1001/archneur.64.6.794View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Cata JP, Weng HR, Lee BN, Reuben JM, Dougherty PM: Clinical and experimental findings in humans and animals with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Minerva Anestesiol 2006, 72(3):151–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Glaser J, Gonzalez R, Perreau VM, Cotman CW, Keirstead HS: Neutralization of the chemokine CXCL10 enhances tissue sparing and angiogenesis following spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res 2004, 77(5):701–708. 10.1002/jnr.20204View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991, 324(1):1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jimenez-Andrade et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement