Skip to main content
Download PDF

Gene transfer of GLT-1, a glial glutamate transporter, into the spinal cord by recombinant adenovirus attenuates inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats

Molecular Pain volume 4, Article number: 65 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 is abundantly expressed in astrocytes and is crucial for glutamate removal from the synaptic cleft. Decreases in glutamate uptake activity and expression of spinal glutamate transporters are reported in animal models of pathological pain. However, the lack of available specific inhibitors and/or activators for GLT-1 makes it difficult to determine the roles of spinal GLT-1 in inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In this study, we examined the effect of gene transfer of GLT-1 into the spinal cord with recombinant adenoviruses on the inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats.

Results

Intraspinal infusion of adenoviral vectors expressing the GLT-1 gene increased GLT-1 expression in the spinal cord 2–21 days after the infusion. Transgene expression was primarily localized to astrocytes. The spinal GLT-1 gene transfer had no effect on acute mechanical and thermal nociceptive responses in naive rats, whereas it significantly reduced the inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia induced by hindlimb intraplantar injection of carrageenan/kaolin. Spinal GLT-1 gene transfer 7 days before partial sciatic nerve ligation recovered the extent of the spinal GLT-1 expression in the membrane fraction that was decreased following the nerve ligation, and prevented the induction of tactile allodynia. However, the partial sciatic nerve ligation-induced allodynia was not reversed when the adenoviruses were infused 7 or 14 days after the nerve ligation.

Conclusion

These results suggest that overexpression of GLT-1 on astrocytes in the spinal cord by recombinant adenoviruses attenuates the induction, but not maintenance, of inflammatory and neuropathic pain, probably by preventing the induction of central sensitization, without affecting acute pain sensation. Upregulation or functional enhancement of spinal GLT-1 could be a novel strategy for the prevention of pathological pain.

Background

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. The spinal glutamatergic system plays a key role in normal pain transmission and in the induction of central sensitization, the neuronal plasticity underlying pathological pain at the spinal level. Glutamate release in the spinal dorsal horn is elicited following peripheral inflammation or nerve injury [1–5]. Excessive and prolonged stimulation of glutamate receptors, including N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid/kainate, and metabotropic glutamate receptors, in the spinal dorsal horn neurons triggers the development of the central sensitization that generates and maintains inflammatory and neuropathic pain [6–8].

Extracellular glutamate released from nerve terminals is removed from the synaptic cleft via high-affinity, Na+-dependent glutamate transporters that surround excitatory synapses. This removal maintains the extracellular glutamate concentration in the physiological range, preventing the glutamate overexcitation and neurotoxicity that can occur under a variety of pathological conditions and modulating glutamate-mediated neuronal plasticity [9–11]. To date, five subtypes of glutamate transporters (excitatory amino acid transporters; EAATs) have been cloned and characterized in neurons (EAAC1/EAAT3, EAAT4, and EAAT5) and glial cells (GLT-1/EAAT2 and GLAST/EAAT1). Among these five subtypes, GLT-1 enriched in astrocytic processes appears to be the most abundant EAAT and may represent the predominant route for clearance of extracellular glutamate in the spinal cord [11]. Furthermore, astrocytes are able to specifically metabolize incorporated glutamate into glutamine with the enzyme glutamine synthetase [10]. The altered expression and function of glutamate transporters modulate glutamatergic signal transmission [9, 12] and neuronal plasticity-based events such as long-term potentiation [13, 14]. Indeed, the altered expression of glutamate transporters and altered glutamate uptake activity have been associated with neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, and stroke [11, 15–17]. In addition, several lines of evidence suggest that glutamate transporters have important roles in pathological pain [18]. Downregulation or functional deficiency of glutamate transporters in the spinal dorsal horn are associated with neuropathic pain following chronic constriction nerve injury [5, 19, 20], spinal nerve ligation [21] and spinal nerve transection [22], and hyperalgesia produced by paclitaxel (taxol), which is used for chemotherapy in cancer patients [23, 24]. Pharmacological inhibition of glutamate transporters in the spinal cord leads to spontaneous nociceptive behaviors and hyperalgesia to mechanical and thermal nociceptive stimuli [25, 26] by facilitating spinal glutamatergic synaptic activity [27]. In addition, riluzole, which increases glutamate uptake activity [28], attenuates neuropathic pain following chronic constriction nerve injury [19]. However, the lack of specific inhibitors and/or activators for glutamate transporter subtypes makes it difficult to determine the roles and subtypes of spinal glutamate transporters in pathological pain.

We previously constructed a recombinant adenovirus, termed Ad-GLT-1, to deliver the GLT-1 gene in vitro and in vivo [29, 30]. In this study, to elucidate the role of a glial glutamate transporter, GLT-1, in the pathological pain, we examined the effect of recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of GLT-1 into the spinal cord on inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats.

Results

Recombinant adenovirus-mediated GLT-1 expression in the spinal cord

We first infused control adenoviruses, Ad-EGFP, into the spinal cord, which delivered the enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) gene. Seven days after the intraspinal infusion of Ad-EGFP, fluorescence from EGFP expression was observed in the injected side of the dorsal horn and a part of the ventral horn of the spinal cord, with some transgene expression appearing within motor neurons (Fig. 1A). The infusion of adenoviruses was accompanied by minimal tissue damage and gliosis in the spinal cord, similar to that produced by infusion of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; data not shown). In a Western blot, although immunoreactivities for endogenous GLT-1 were observed in the L4-L6 spinal cord, the expression of GLT-1 in the spinal cord was increased by intraspinal infusion of Ad-GLT-1, which delivered the GLT-1 gene (Fig. 1B). The significant increases in GLT-1 expression were observed between 2 and 21 days (F = 8.79, P < 0.001), which peaked between 2 and 14 days after the adenoviral infusion.

Figure 1
figure 1

GLT-1 and EGFP expression from recombinant adenoviruses in the spinal cord. A) Representative fluorescence photomicrograph in the spinal cord 7 days after intraspinal infusion of Ad-EGFP. The asterisk indicates the infusion site. Scale bar = 300 μm. B, C) Western blot for GLT-1 in the ipsilateral spinal cord from rats 2, 7, 14 and 21 days after intraspinal infusions of Ad-GLT-1. B) Representative immunoblots show GLT-1 and actin immunoreactivity. C) Quantification of GLT-1 immunoreactivity. The signals were calculated by summing the monomer and multimer GLT-1 immunoreactivities. GLT-1 levels were normalized against the corresponding actin levels. The data present the means ± S.E.M. and are expressed as a percentage of the control (no intraspinal infusion). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs control, n = 4. D, E, F) Immunofluorescence labelling of GFAP (D; red), a marker of astrocytes; OX-42 (E; red), a marker of microglia; and NeuN (F; red), a marker of neurons, with EGFP fluorescence (green) in the spinal cord 7 days after intraspinal infusion of Ad-EGFP. Most EGFP-positive cells are double-labelled (yellow) with GFAP. Some EGFP-positive cells are double-labelled with OX-42, but not with NeuN. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Full size image

To examine the cell types that expressed the transgene, the sections from animals infused intraspinally with Ad-EGFP were immunostained with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker of astrocytes, OX-42, a marker of microglia, or neuronal nuclei (NeuN), a marker of neurons. Throughout the dorsal horn of spinal cord, transgene expression was primarily localized to GFAP-positive astrocytes within the white and gray matter (Fig. 1C). A part of transgene expression was observed in OX-42-positive microglia (Fig. 1D), but not in NeuN-positive neurons (Fig. 1E). In the ventral horn, transgene expression was observed in motor neurons (Fig. 1F).

Effects of spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 on acute nociceptive responses

We examined the effects of PBS, Ad-EGFP, and Ad-GLT-1 on the acute mechanical and thermal nociceptive responses of naive rats 7 days after their intraspinal infusion. Intraspinal infusion of adenoviruses produced no apparent behavioral abnormalities and abnormal gait. In the paw pressure test, there was no significant difference in the mechanical nociceptive threshold among the groups infused intraspinally with PBS, Ad-EGFP, and Ad-GLT-1 (F = 2.04, P = 0.147; Fig. 2A). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the thermal nociceptive latency in the hot plate test (Fig. 2B) between the three groups at 52°C (F = 1.00, P = 0.379), 55°C (F = 0.40, P = 0.674), or 57°C (F = 0.60, P = 0.552).

Figure 2
figure 2

Effects of spinal GLT-1 gene transfer on the acute mechanical and thermal nociceptive responses in naive rats. Seven days after an intraspinal infusion of PBS (open bars), Ad-EGFP (hatched bars), or Ad-GLT-1 (closed bars), the mechanical nociceptive threshold (g) was measured in naive rats using the paw pressure test (A) and thermal nociceptive latency (sec) to 52, 55 and 57°C was measured using the hot plate test (B). Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M., n = 12.

Full size image

Effect of spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 on inflammatory hyperalgesia

We next infused PBS, Ad-EGFP, or Ad-GLT-1 into the spinal cord 7 days before intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of carrageenan/kaolin and examined the effect on inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia in the paw pressure test (Fig. 3). In the animals that received an intraspinal infusion of PBS, i.pl. injection of carrageenan/kaolin decreased the mechanical nociceptive threshold of the ipsilateral hindpaw, which was maximal at 3–4 hours and diminished within 24 hours after the injection (Fig. 3A). The i.pl. carrageenan/kaolin did not change the mechanical nociceptive threshold of the contralateral hindpaw in the PBS group (Fig. 3B). Intraspinal infusion of Ad-EGFP also did not change the mechanical hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral paw in response to carrageenan/kaolin, similar to the group infused with PBS, but intraspinal infusion of Ad-GLT-1 significantly reduced the hyperalgesia compared with the groups infused with PBS and Ad-EGFP (F2,144 = 10.6, P < 0.001). Neither Ad-EGFP nor Ad-GLT-1 changed the mechanical nociceptive threshold in the contralateral paw compared with the group infused with PBS (F2,144 = 2.29, P = 0.105).

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of spinal GLT-1 gene transfer on mechanical inflammatory hyperalgesia. Seven days after an intraspinal infusion of PBS (open circle), Ad-EGFP (open square), or Ad-GLT-1 (closed square), the mechanical nociceptive thresholds of the ipsilateral (A) and contralateral (B) paws were measured in the paw pressure test following i.pl. injection of 2% carrageenan/kaolin at time 0. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M., *P < 0.05 vs PBS, #P < 0.05 vs Ad-EGFP, n = 6–8.

Full size image

Effect of spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 on neuropathic pain

To investigate the effect of spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 on the induction of neuropathic pain following partial sciatic nerve ligation (pSNL), we performed pSNL 7 days after the intraspinal infusion of the adenoviruses (Fig. 4). In the animals that received PBS, pSNL decreased the 50% withdrawal threshold of the ipsilateral hindpaw to tactile stimulation with von Frey filaments, a decrease that lasted for at least 21 days. The contralateral hindpaw also showed substantial tactile allodynia, although it was weaker than that in the ipsilateral hindpaw. Intraspinal infusion of Ad-EGFP did not change the tactile allodynia in the ipsilateral and contralateral hindpaw, which was similar to that in the group infused with PBS. In the group infused with Ad-GLT-1, the pSNL-induced tactile allodynia was completely prevented, a significant change from the results in the PBS- and Ad-EGFP-infused groups (F2,168 = 35.1, P < 0.001). Intraspinal infusion of Ad-GLT-1 similarly significantly prevented the pSNL-induced allodynia in the contralateral hindpaw (F2,168 = 9.96, P < 0.001). The GLT-1 expression in the total and membrane fractions obtained from ipsilateral spinal cord was examined by Western blot (Fig. 5). In the animals infused with Ad-EGFP, total amount of GLT-1 protein was not changed, while the GLT-1 level in the membrane fraction decreased at 7 days following pSNL (14 days after intraspinal infusion). Intraspinal infusion of Ad-GLT-1 to pSNL-treated animals increased the GLT-1 expression in the total and membrane fractions. The recovery of the extent of GLT-1 expression was significant, compared with pSNL-treated animals infused with Ad-EGFP.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of spinal GLT-1 gene transfer on the induction of allodynia in the pSNL-induced neuropathic pain model. PBS (open circle), Ad-EGFP (open square), or Ad-GLT-1 (closed square) was infused intraspinally (arrows in the graph). Seven days later (day 0), pSNL was performed (arrows) and 50% withdrawal thresholds of the ipsilateral (A) and contralateral (B) paws were measured with the von Frey filament test on the indicated days. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs PBS; #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001 vs Ad-EGFP, n = 6–9.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Effect of spinal GLT-1 gene transfer on the spinal GLT-1 expression in the total and membrane fraction following pSNL. Seven days after Ad-EGFP or Ad-GLT-1 was infused intraspinally, pSNL or sham surgery was performed. Seven days later (14 days after the intraspinal infusion), the GLT-1 expression in the total (A, B) and membrane (C, D) fractions obtained from ipsilateral spinal cord was assessed by Western blot. A, C) Representative immunoblots show GLT-1 and actin immunoreactivity in total and membrane fractions. No actin band was observed in the membrane fraction. B, D) Quantification of GLT-1 immunoreactivity in the total and membrane fractions. The signals were calculated by summing the monomer and multimer GLT-1 immunoreactivities. Total GLT-1 levels were normalized against the corresponding actin levels. The data present the means ± S.E.M. and are expressed as a percentage of the control (intraspinal infusion of Ad-EGFP and sham surgery) for each fraction. *P < 0.05, n = 3–4.

Full size image

Finally, to investigate the effect of spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 on the maintenance of neuropathic pain, we intraspinally infused PBS or recombinant adenoviruses 7 or 14 days after pSNL (Fig. 6). However, intraspinal infusion of Ad-GLT-1 had no effect on the established tactile allodynia in the ipsilateral hindpaw at 7 or 14 days following pSNL, compared with the PBS- and Ad-EGFP-infused groups (F2,70 = 0.29, P = 0.750 and F2,91 = 1.73, P = 0.183, respectively).

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of spinal GLT-1 gene transfer on the maintenance of allodynia in the pSNL-induced neuropathic pain model. PBS (open circle), Ad-EGFP (open square), or Ad-GLT-1 (closed square) was intraspinally infused 7 (A) or 14 (B) days after pSNL (arrows in the graph). 50% withdrawal thresholds of ipsilateral paw were measured with the von Frey filament test on the indicated days following pSNL at day 0. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M., n = 4–6.

Full size image

Discussion

We previously reported that an infusion of Ad-GLT-1 into specific brain areas efficiently increased GLT-1 expression at 2 and 5 days, and this expression remained stable up to 8 days after the infusion [29, 30]. In the present study, we confirmed that intraspinal infusion of the recombinant adenovirus successfully transferred the GLT-1 gene into the spinal cord surrounding the infusion site between 2 and 21 days. Our previous finding showed that infusion of the recombinant adenovirus was accompanied by minimal tissue damage and had no effect on the immunoreactivity of GFAP surrounding the infusion site [29, 30], suggesting that no toxicity or gliosis resulted from the adenoviral infection. Although an adenovirus transferred the LacZ gene efficiently into both neurons and glial cells [31], the majority of cells with adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in the dorsal horn were astrocytes when the adenoviruses were infused into the spinal cord, consistent with previous reports [32]. Because GLT-1 is expressed mainly in astrocytes, the adenovirus-mediated expression system seemed likely to be suitable for the present study. In the ventral horn, the transgene expression was observed in astrocytes and motor neurons. Of all the neurons within the spinal cord, motor neurons have been shown to efficiently uptake and express recombinant adenoviruses [32, 33]. Although we did not determine the influence of GLT-1 gene transfer in motor neurons in this study, at least, it did not induce behavioral abnormalities and abnormal gait, and had no effect on the escape behaviors from the mechanical and thermal nociceptive stimuli.

Using the recombinant adenoviruses, we showed that gene transfer of GLT-1 into the spinal cord had no effect on the acute nociceptive responses to mechanical and thermal stimuli in naive rats. These data are supported by previous studies using glutamate transporter activators such as MS-153 [34] and riluzole [4, 19]. In contrast, intrathecal injection of glutamate transporter inhibitors into naive animals elevates the spinal extracellular glutamate level and produces spontaneous nociceptive behaviors and hyperalgesia [25–27]. These results suggest that maintaining a low extracellular glutamate level following an increase in spinal GLT-1 protein does not affect acute spinal pain transmission under normal conditions. In addition, the important finding in this experiment is to show no evidence that adenoviral infection in the spinal cord influenced the basal nociceptive threshold.

Here we showed that spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 reduced i.pl. carrageenan/kaolin-induced inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia and pSNL-induced tactile allodynia, when the spinal infusion of the adenoviruses was performed 7 days before i.pl. injection of carrageenan/kaolin and pSNL surgery, respectively. Furthermore, it recovered the extent of the spinal GLT-1 expression in the membrane fraction that was decreased at 7 days following pSNL. These results suggest that adenovirus-mediated overexpression of GLT-1 in the spinal cord prevents the induction of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Consistent with the present data, riluzole, which reduces extracellular glutamate by activating glutamate transporters [28], inhibits the induction of inflammatory and neuropathic pain [4, 19]. Glutamate release from primary afferent neurons in the spinal dorsal horn is enhanced by peripheral inflammation and nerve injury [1–5]. Excessive and prolonged activation of spinal glutamate receptors and subsequent intracellular adaptation in the postsynaptic dorsal horn neurons lead to a prolonged increase in neuronal excitability, called central sensitization, which produces pathological pain [7, 8]. Indeed, inhibition of glutamate release by anticonvulsant agents attenuates the induction of hyperalgesia following peripheral inflammation or nerve injury [4, 35]. Our results suggest that the increase of glutamate uptake activity following overexpression of spinal GLT-1 protein decreases the excessive extracellular glutamate level; this in turn inhibits the generation of neuronal plasticity related to central sensitization following peripheral inflammation and nerve injury.

In the present pSNL model, tactile allodynia was produced also in the contralateral to the nerve injury site, called mirror-image pain. It is considered that mirror-image pain arises from altered contralateral spinal processing of incoming sensory information [36]. The present study showed that contralateral allodynia was also prevented by the unilateral gene transfer of GLT-1 into the ipsilateral spinal cord, although the unilateral gene transfer did not spread to the contralateral spinal cord. Milligan et al. demonstrated that mirror-image pain may be due to spinal glial activation and release of proinflammatory cytokines, which may spread and reach the contralateral spinal cord to generate sensitization of the contralateral dorsal horn neurons [37]. The spinal glial activation following peripheral nerve injury is dependent on spinal NMDA receptor activation [38, 39]. Consequently, it is conceivable that the ipsilateral gene transfer of GLT-1 may attenuate the activation of glial cells and the release of proinflammatory cytokines in the ipsilateral spinal cord by inhibiting a glutamate-dependent pathway, which has the effect of preventing the induction of sensitization of contralateral, as well as ipsilateral, dorsal horn neurons.

In contrast to the ability of exogenous GLT-1 to prevent the induction of pathological pain, when the spinal infusion of the adenoviruses was performed 7 or 14 days after pSNL, spinal gene transfer of GLT-1 did not reverse the established allodynia. Many previous studies have shown that the expression of GLT-1 and glutamate uptake activity are decreased 7–14 days after nerve injury [5, 19, 20, 22]. Similarly, we found a decrease in GLT-1 expression in the membrane fraction of the spinal cord at 7 days following pSNL, although the total amount of GLT-1 protein was not changed in the present pSNL-induced neuropathic pain model in contrast to previous reports using other neuropathic pain models [19, 22]. The spinal glutamatergic system contributes to not only the induction of pathological pain, but also to its maintenance [6, 40, 41]. Sung et al. reported that riluzole twice daily for 4 days beginning on postoperative day 5 gradually reversed the maintenance of thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia after chronic constriction nerve injury [19]. However, riluzole has multiple actions in addition to activating glutamate transporters, including blockade of sodium channel α-subunits, glutamate receptors, and γ-aminobutyric acid uptake and the stabilization of voltage-gated ion channels [42]. The inhibitory effect of riluzole on the maintenance of neuropathic pain may therefore be due to actions other than the activation of glutamate transporters. Our present findings suggest that the expression of GLT-1 in the spinal cord plays little role in the maintenance of neuropathic pain, at least in the present conditions. Otherwise, the expression of other EAAT subtypes, GLAST and EAAC1, was also decreased in the spinal cord of neuropathic pain model animals [19, 20, 22–24]. Reduction of glutamate uptake activity via GLAST and EAAC1 may contribute to the maintenance of neuropathic pain.

An accumulating amount of evidence suggests that spinal astrocytes, as well as microglia, contribute to pathological pain [43, 44]. Early studies indicated that spinal astrocytes are activated in diverse models of pathological pain [37, 45, 46], and blocking the activation and function of spinal astrocytes prevents and reverses hyperalgesia and allodynia [37, 47, 48]. Because GLT-1 is expressed mainly in astrocytes, the present findings may further support the importance of spinal astrocytes in pathological pain.

Conclusion

The present study showed that recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of GLT-1 into the spinal cord reduces the induction of inflammatory and neuropathic pain without affecting basal nociceptive responses. These findings support the idea that altered expression or function of GLT-1 in the spinal cord contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Therefore, upregulation or functional enhancement of spinal GLT-1 may prevent the induction and progression of pathological pain. Glutamate receptor antagonists are effective in reducing pathological pain in animal models and clinical settings, but their usefulness is limited by adverse side-effects [49]. Further studies to delineate the roles of spinal glutamate transporters in pathological pain states might lead to better strategies for the prevention of pathological pain.

Methods

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats initially weighting 180–220 g were used. They were kept at a constant ambient temperature of 24 ± 1°C under a 12-hr light/dark cycle and provided free access to food and water. The rats were individually housed in plastic cages with wood-chip bedding for at least 1 day before surgery. All experimental procedures were approved by the Kyoto University Animal Experimentation Committee and complied with the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Pain [50].

Construction of recombinant adenoviruses

Construction of the recombinant adenoviruses was described previously [29]. Briefly, fragments of rat GLT-1 and EGFP cDNAs were subcloned, respectively, into multiple cloning sites 1 and 2 of the vector pIRES (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA). A 3.5-kb fragment containing the GLT-1-internal ribosome entry site-EGFP sequence was then subcloned into the cosmid vector pAxCAwt (Takara, Kyoto, Japan), which contains the CAG promoter (cytomegalovirus enhancer and β-actin promoter) and the rabbit β-globin polyadenylation signal [51]. For the control adenovirus, only the EGFP fragment was subcloned into pAxCAwt. The recombinant adenoviruses were generated using an Adenovirus Expression Vector kit (Takara) according to the manufacturer's instructions and named Ad-GLT-1 and Ad-EGFP. They were propagated in HEK293 cells and purified using the Viraprep Adenovirus Purification Kit (Virapur, San Diego, CA). The titers of Ad-GLT-1 and Ad-EGFP were 5.6 × 108 to 1.0 × 1010 plaque-forming units/ml.

Intraspinal infusions of recombinant adenoviruses

Infusions of the recombinant adenoviruses into the spinal cord were performed as reported previously [32]. Briefly, animals that were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, i.p.) underwent hemilaminectomies at the L1-L4 vertebral segments. Intraspinal infusion was performed unilaterally on the right side. After exposure of the spinal cord, each animal received four injections (0.4 μl; 0.8 mm apart and 0.5 mm deep) of PBS or individual adenoviral vectors along the L4-L5 dorsal root entry zone using a beveled glass micropipette. In this procedure, the tip of glass micropipette reached lamina IV-VI of the spinal cord. The dorsal muscle and skin were then sutured. The animals were placed on a 37°C heat pad and monitored continually until recovery from the effects of the anesthetic.

Tissue preparation and Western blot

Animals were rapidly sacrificed by decapitation. The L4-L6 lumber spinal cord was rapidly removed, and cut into a left and right half from the ventral midline. Then, the right lumbar spinal cord segments were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until use. The segments were homogenized with a polytron homogenizer in ice-cold 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.32 M sucrose, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.5 mM ethyleneglycol-bis (β-aminoethyl)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Some of the homogenate was separated and saved for western blot as total fraction. Remains were centrifuged (1,000 × g, 5 min, 4°C) to remove nuclear debris. The resulting supernatants were centrifuged (18,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C) to obtain the synaptosomal pellet. The synaptosomal pellets were resuspended in ice cold water containing p a cocktail of protease inhibitors to lyse the synaptosomal membranes for 45 min on ice. The lysed synaptosomal sample was centrifuged (40,000 × g, 15 min, 4°C) to pellet synaptosomal membranes, which was then resuspended in 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100 and a cocktail of protease inhibitors, and saved for western blot (membrane fraction). The protein concentrations were measured. Samples were stored at -20°C until the Western blot analysis.

Aliquots of protein sample (2 μg) prepared from total or membrane fractions were diluted with an equal volume of sample buffer (124 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 4% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 10% glycerol, 4% 2-mercaptoethanol and 0.02% bromophenol blue), subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Blots were blocked for 1 hr with 10% blocking reagent (Blocking-One, Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.5) containing 0.1% Tween-20, and then incubated with goat anti-GLT-1 (1:2,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and goat anti-actin (1:20,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 hr at room temperature. Then, the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG (1:25,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) for 1 hr at room temperature. The immunoreactive proteins were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and visualized by exposure to X-ray film. For the quantification of Western signals, the signal for each lane was calculated by summing the (area × [density-background]) measurement for the monomer and multimer GLT-1 bands with a computer-assisted imaging analysis system (Image J 1.39).

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Animals were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and perfused transcardially through the ascending aorta with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4), immediately followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The L4-L6 lumbar spinal cord was removed, post-fixed in the same fixative for 3 hr, cryoprotected with 15% sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer overnight at 4°C, and then frozen in liquid nitrogen. Coronal sections (30 μm) were thaw-mounted onto MAS coat slide glasses (Matsunami, Osaka, Japan).

For histological examination of EGFP fluorescence, each section was examined by fluorescent microscopy for EGFP. For immunohistochemical examination of cell markers with EGFP fluorescence, the sections were gently washed three times (10 min each) in PBS, and then permeabilized and blocked at room temperature for 1 hr in 4% normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. For immunofluorescence imaging of the marker proteins for neurons, astrocyte and microglia, spinal the spinal sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-NeuN (1:100, Chemicon, Temecula, CA), mouse anti-GFAP (1:100, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or mouse anti-OX-42 (1:100, Serotic, Ltd., Oxford, UK) monoclonal antibody in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 4% normal goat serum. The sections were washed three times in PBS, and incubated with Alexa Fluoro 568-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:200; Molecular Probes) in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 4% normal goat serum for 1 hr at room temperature. Images were constructed by measuring the fluorescence signal using a Nikon Diaphot 200 microscope equipped with a laser scanning confocal imaging system (MRC-1024 system; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) with excitation lines of 488 and 568 nm.

Inflammatory and neuropathic pain models

Inflammatory pain model

Acute inflammation was produced by subcutaneous injection with a mixture of 2% λ-carrageenan and 2% kaolin dissolved in saline (0.1 ml) into the plantar region of the right hind paw, as previously described [52].

Neuropathic pain model

pSNL, a well-characterized rat model of neuropathic pain, was performed as previously described [53]. Briefly, under diethylether anesthesia, a skin incision was made, and the right sciatic nerve was exposed just distal to the branch leading to the posterior biceps femoris/semitendinosus muscles. The 1/3–1/2 dorsal section of the sciatic nerve was ligated tightly with 7-0 silk suture. The wound was closed by suturing the muscle and skin layers. After recovering from the anesthesia, almost all animals showed guarding of the hind paw, but none engaged in autotomy.

Behavioral tests

Hot plate test

Thermal nociception was evaluated by the hot plate test using a hot plate analgesy meter (Ugo Basile, Milan, Italy). The animal was placed on a plate heated to 52, 55, or 57°C and the latency to licking a hindpaw or jumping was measured. The cut-off time was 60 sec to prevent tissue damage.

Paw pressure test

For assessing the mechanical nociceptive threshold, the paw pressure test was performed using an analgesimeter with a cuneate piston (Ugo Basile). The piston was loaded at a rate of 16 g/sec. The pressure-elicited paw-withdrawal behavior was determined as a nociceptive threshold. The procedure for paw pressure testing was carried out 3 times per day for habituation. After 2 days of habituation, the threshold was measured following three additional habituation procedures and the value was taken as a control.

Von Frey filament test

Tactile allodynia was measured by the up-down method as described previously [54]. Animals were individually placed on a wire mesh floor and acclimatized to the environment for at least 30 minutes. After acclimatization, the tactile stimulus was applied to the middle plantar surface of the paw by placing one of a series of von Frey filaments (0.4, 0.6. 1.4, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 15.0 g) perpendicular to the surface of the paw. The testing was initiated at 2.0 g. In the absence of a paw withdrawal response to the initially selected filament, a stronger stimulus was presented; in the event of paw withdrawal, the next weaker stimulus was chosen. Four additional responses were observed after the first withdrawal response, and the 50% withdrawal threshold was calculated [55]. In cases where continuous positive or negative responses were observed to the exhaustion of the stimulus set, values of 15.00 g and 0.4 g were assigned, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means ± S.E.M. In the behavioral tests and Western blot analyses, the statistical significance was calculated using one-way and two-way analysis of variance, followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered significant.

Abbreviations

EAAT:

excitatory amino acid (glutamate) transporters

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

EGFP:

enhanced green fluorescence protein

EGTA:

ethyleneglycol-bis (β-aminoethyl)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid

i.pl.:

intraplantar

GFAP:

glial fibrillary acidic protein

NeuN:

neuronal nuclei

NMDA:

N-methyl-D-aspartate

PBS:

phosphate-buffered saline

pSNL:

partial sciatic nerve ligation

SDS:

sodium dodecyl sulphate.

References

  1. Sluka KA, Westlund KN: An experimental arthritis in rats: dorsal horn aspartate and glutamate increases. Neurosci Lett 1992, 145: 141–144. 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90006-S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawamata M, Omote K: Involvement of increased excitatory amino acids and intracellular Ca2+concentration in the spinal dorsal horn in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Pain 1996, 68: 85–96. 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03222-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sasaki M, Tohda C, Kuraishi Y: Region-specific increase in glutamate release from dorsal horn of rats with adjuvant inflammation. Neuroreport 1998, 9: 3219–3222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coderre TJ, Kumar N, Lefebvre CD, Yu JS: A comparison of the glutamate release inhibition and anti-allodynic effects of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and riluzole in a model of neuropathic pain. J Neurochem 2007, 100: 1289–1299. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04304.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sung B, Wang S, Zhou B, Lim G, Yang L, Zeng Q, Lim JA, Wang JD, Kang JX, Mao J: Altered spinal arachidonic acid turnover after peripheral nerve injury regulates regional glutamate concentration and neuropathic pain behaviors in rats. Pain 2007, 131: 121–131. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.020

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Millan MJ: The induction of pain: an integrative review. Prog Neurobiol 1999, 57: 1–164. 10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00048-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fundytus ME: Glutamate receptors and nociception: implications for the drug treatment of pain. CNS Drugs 2001, 15: 29–58. 10.2165/00023210-200115010-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ji RR, Kohno T, Moore KA, Woolf CJ: Central sensitization and LTP: do pain and memory share similar mechanisms? Trends Neurosci 2003, 26: 696–705. 10.1016/j.tins.2003.09.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rothstein JD, Dykes-Hoberg M, Pardo CA, Bristol LA, Jin L, Kuncl RW, Kanai Y, Hediger MA, Wang Y, Schielke JP, Welty DF: Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate. Neuron 1996, 16: 675–686. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80086-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hertz L, Zielke HR: Astrocytic control of glutamatergic activity: astrocytes as stars of the show. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27: 735–743. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beart PM, O'Shea RD: Transporters for L-glutamate: an update on their molecular pharmacology and pathological involvement. Br J Pharmacol 2007, 150: 5–17. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706949

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka K, Watase K, Manabe T, Yamada K, Watanabe M, Takahashi K, Iwama H, Nishikawa T, Ichihara N, Kikuchi T, Okuyama S, Kawashima N, Hori S, Takimoto M, Wada K: Epilepsy and exacerbation of brain injury in mice lacking the glutamate transporter GLT-1. Science 1997, 276: 1699–1702. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katagiri H, Tanaka K, Manabe T: Requirement of appropriate glutamate concentrations in the synaptic cleft for hippocampal LTP induction. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 14: 547–553. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01664.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levenson J, Weeber E, Selcher JC, Kategaya LS, Sweatt JD, Eskin A: Long-term potentiation and contextual fear conditioning increase neuronal glutamate uptake. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5: 155–161. 10.1038/nn791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunlop J, Beal McIlvain H, She Y, Howland DS: Impaired spinal cord glutamate transport capacity and reduced sensitivity to riluzole in a transgenic superoxide dismutase mutant rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 1688–1696.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheldon AL, Robinson MB: The role of glutamate transporters in neurodegenerative diseases and potential opportunities for intervention. Neurochem Int 2007, 51: 333–355. 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.03.012

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han F, Shioda N, Moriguchi S, Qin ZH, Fukunaga K: Downregulation of glutamate transporters is associated with elevation in extracellular glutamate concentration following rat microsphere embolism. Neurosci Lett 2008, 43: 275–280. 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tao YX, Gu J, Stephens RL Jr: Role of spinal cord glutamate transporter during normal sensory transmission and pathological pain states. Mol Pain 2005, 1: 30. 10.1186/1744-8069-1-30

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung B, Lim G, Mao J: Altered expression and uptake activity of spinal glutamate transporters after nerve injury contribute to the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain in rats. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 2899–2910.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang S, Lim G, Yang L, Sung B, Mao J: Downregulation of spinal glutamate transporter EAAC1 following nerve injury is regulated by central glucocorticoid receptors in rats. Pain 2006, 120: 78–85. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Binns BC, Huang Y, Goettl VM, Hackshaw KV, Stephens RL Jr: Glutamate uptake is attenuated in spinal deep dorsal and ventral horn in the rat spinal nerve ligation model. Brain Res 2005, 1041: 38–47. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.01.088

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tawfik VL, Regan MR, Haenggeli C, Lacroix-Fralish ML, Nutile-McMenemy N, Perez N, Rothstein JD, DeLeo JA: Propentofylline-induced astrocyte modulation leads to alterations in glial glutamate promoter activation following spinal nerve transection. Neuroscience 2008, 152: 1086–1092. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.065

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cata JP, Weng HR, Chen JH, Dougherty PM: Altered discharges of spinal wide dynamic range neurons and down-regulation of glutamate transporter expression in rats with paclitaxel-induced hyperalgesia. Neuroscience 2006, 138: 329–338. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weng HR, Aravindan N, Cata JP, Chen JH, Shaw AD, Dougherty PM: Spinal glial glutamate transporters downregulate in rats with taxol-induced hyperalgesia. Neurosci Lett 2005, 386: 18–22. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liaw WJ, Stephens RL Jr, Binns BC, Chu Y, Sepkuty JP, Johns RA, Rothstein JD, Tao YX: Spinal glutamate uptake is critical for maintaining normal sensory transmission in rat spinal cord. Pain 2005, 115: 60–70. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.02.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weng HR, Chen JH, Cata JP: Inhibition of glutamate uptake in the spinal cord induces hyperalgesia and increased responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons to peripheral afferent stimulation. Neuroscience 2006, 138: 1351–1360. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weng HR, Chen JH, Pan ZZ, Nie H: Glial glutamate transporter 1 regulates the spatial and temporal coding of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in spinal lamina II neurons. Neuroscience 2007, 149: 898–907. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Azbill RD, Mu X, Springer JE: Riluzole increases high-affinity glutamate uptake in rat spinal cord synaptosomes. Brain Res 2000, 871: 175–180. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02430-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozawa T, Nakagawa T, Sekiya Y, Minami M, Satoh M: Effect of gene transfer of GLT-1, a glutamate transporter, into the locus coeruleus by recombinant adenoviruses on morphine physical dependence in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1999, 386: 263–270. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00735-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fujio M, Nakagawa T, Sekiya Y, Ozawa T, Suzuki Y, Minami M, Satoh M, Kaneko S: Gene transfer of GLT-1, a glutamate transporter, into the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates methamphetamine- and morphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22: 2744–2754. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04467.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Le Gal , La Sale G, Robert JJ, Berrard S, Ridoux V, Stratford-Perricaudet LD, Perricaudet M, Mallet J: An adenovirus vector for gene transfer into neurons and glia in the brain. Science 1993, 259: 988–990. 10.1126/science.8382374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Romero MI, Rangappa N, Li L, Lightfoot E, Garry MG, Smith GM: Extensive sprouting of sensory afferents and hyperalgesia induced by conditional expression of nerve growth factor in the adult spinal cord. J Neurosci 2000, 20: 4435–4445.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gravel C, Götz R, Lorrain A, Sendtner M: Adenoviral gene transfer of ciliary neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor leads to long-term survival of axotomized motor neurons. Nat Med 1997, 3: 765–770. 10.1038/nm0797-765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakagawa T, Ozawa T, Shige K, Yamamoto R, Minami M, Satoh M: Inhibition of morphine tolerance and dependence by MS-153, a glutamate transporter activator. Eur J Pharmacol 2001, 419: 39–45. 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)00965-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Klamt JG: Effects of intrathecally administered lamotrigine, a glutamate release inhibitor, on short- and long-term models of hyperalgesia in rats. Anesthesiology 1998, 88: 487–494. 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Watkins LR, Maier SF: Glia: a novel drug discovery target for clinical pain. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003, 2: 973–985. 10.1038/nrd1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Milligan ED, Twining C, Chacur M, Biedenkapp J, O'Connor K, Poole S, Tracey K, Martin D, Maier SF, Watkins LR: Spinal glia and proinflammatory cytokines mediate mirror-image neuropathic pain in rats. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 1026–1040.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garrison CJ, Dougherty PM, Carlton SM: GFAP expression in lumbar spinal cord of naive and neuropathic rats treated with MK-801. Exp Neurol 1994, 129: 237–243. 10.1006/exnr.1994.1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bursztajn S, Rutkowski MD, Deleo JA: The role of the N -methyl-D-aspartate receptor NR1 subunit in peripheral nerve injury-induced mechanical allodynia, glial activation and chemokine expression in the mouse. Neuroscience 2004, 125: 269–275. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.01.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Woolf CJ, Thompson SW: The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N -methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation; implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain 1991, 44: 293–299. 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90100-C

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ren K, Williams GM, Hylden JL, Ruda MA, Dubner R: The intrathecal administration of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists selectively attenuated carrageenan-induced behavioral hyperalgesia in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1992, 219: 235–243. 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90301-J

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Doble A: The pharmacology and mechanism of action of riluzole. Neurology 1996, 47: S233–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Watkins LR, Maier SF: Beyond neurons: evidence that immune and glial cells contribute to pathological pain states. Physiol Rev 2002, 82: 981–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marchand F, Perretti M, McMahon SB: Role of the immune system in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6: 521–532. 10.1038/nrn1700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Garrison CJ, Dougherty PM, Kajander KC, Carlton SM: Staining of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in lumbar spinal cord increases following a sciatic nerve constriction injury. Brain Res 1991, 565: 1–7. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91729-K

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Coyle DE: Partial peripheral nerve injury leads to activation of astroglia and microglia which parallels the development of allodynic behavior. Glia 1998, 23: 75–83. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199805)23:1<75::AID-GLIA7>3.0.CO;2-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Meller ST, Dykstra C, Grzybycki D, Murphy S, Gebhart GF: The possible role of glia in nociceptive processing and hyperalgesia in the spinal cord of the rat. Neuropharmacology 1994, 33: 1471–1478. 10.1016/0028-3908(94)90051-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakagawa T, Wakamatsu K, Zhang N, Maeda S, Minami M, Satoh M, Kaneko S: Intrathecal administration of ATP produces long-lasting allodynia in rats: differential mechanisms in the phase of the induction and maintenance. Neuroscience 2007, 147: 445–455. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen HS, Lipton SA: The chemical biology of clinically tolerated NMDA receptor antagonists. J Neurochem 2006, 97: 1611–1626. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03991.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zimmermann M: Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 1983, 16: 109–110. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Miyake S, Makimura M, Kanegae Y, Harada S, Sato Y, Takamori K, Tokuda C, Saito I: Efficient generation of recombinant adenoviruses using adenovirus DNA-terminal protein complex and a cosmid bearing the full-length virus genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93: 1320–1324. 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1320

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nakagawa T, Kaneko M, Inamura S, Satoh M: Intracerebroventricular administration of nocistatin reduces inflammatory hyperalgesia in rats. Neurosci Lett 1999, 265: 64–66. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00202-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Okada M, Nakagawa T, Minami M, Satoh M: Analgesic effects of intrathecal administration of P2Y nucleotide receptor agonists UTP and UDP in normal and neuropathic pain model rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002, 303: 66–73. 10.1124/jpet.102.036079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL: Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods 1994, 53: 55–63. 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dixon WJ: Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1980, 20: 441–462. 10.1146/annurev.pa.20.040180.002301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, 46-29 Yoshida-Shimoadachi-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Sanae Maeda, Ai Kawamoto, Yumi Yatani, Hisashi Shirakawa, Takayuki Nakagawa & Shuji Kaneko

Authors
  1. Sanae Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ai Kawamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yumi Yatani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hisashi Shirakawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takayuki Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuji Kaneko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Nakagawa.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SM carried out all experiments, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. AK assisted with the behavioral experiments. YY generated the recombinant adenoviruses. HS participated in the data analysis and interpretation. TN contributed to the design of the study, the behavioral experiments, the data analysis and interpretation, and drafting and critical review the manuscript. SK participated in the data analysis and interpretation and contributed to drafting and final review of the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maeda, S., Kawamoto, A., Yatani, Y. et al. Gene transfer of GLT-1, a glial glutamate transporter, into the spinal cord by recombinant adenovirus attenuates inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats. Mol Pain 4, 65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-4-65

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-4-65

Keywords

Molecular Pain

ISSN: 1744-8069

Contact us