Skip to main content
Figure 5 | Molecular Pain

Figure 5

From: Prophylactic cannabinoid administration blocks the development of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic nociception during analgesic treatment and following cessation of drug delivery

Figure 5

Pharmacological specificity of cannabinoid agonist-induced suppression of paclitaxel-induced mechanical and cold allodynia. a. WIN55,212-2 (0.5 mg/kg/day s.c.)-mediated suppression of paclitaxel-induced mechanical allodynia was dominated by CB1 receptor activation with some involvement of CB2 receptors. b. The AM1710 (3.2 mg/kg/day s.c.)-induced suppression of paclitaxel-induced mechanical allodynia was blocked by AM630 (3 mg/kg/day s.c.) but not AM251 (3 mg/kg/day s.c.)). c. Neither AM630 (3 mg/kg/day s.c.) nor AM251 (3 mg/kg/day s.c.) reliably altered the anti-allodynic effects of WIN55,212-2 (0.5 mg/kg/day s.c.) following acetone application. d. AM630 (3 mg/kg/day s.c.), but not AM251 (3 mg/kg/day s.c.), blocked the anti-allodynic effects of AM1710 (3.2 mg/kg/day s.c.) to cold stimulation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. Cremophor-Vehicle, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 vs. Taxol-Vehicle, ++ P < 0.01 vs. Taxol-Agonist, xx P < 0.01, xxx P < 0.001 Taxol-Agonist and Taxol-Agonist + AM251 (3) vs. Taxol-Vehicle, t P < 0.05 vs. Taxol-Agonist, Taxol-Agonist + AM630 (3), and Cremophor-Vehicle, Ï• P < 0.05, Ï•Ï• P < 0.01, Ï•Ï•Ï• P < 0.001 Taxol-Agonist + AM630 (3) and Taxol-Agonist + AM251 (3) vs. Taxol-Agonist, ⟂ P < 0.05, ⟂⟂ P < 0.01, ⟂⟂⟂ P < 0.001 vs. Taxol-Agonist, Taxol-Agonist + AM251 (3), and Cremophor-Vehicle, δ P < 0.05, δδδ P <0.001 Taxol-Agonist, Taxol-Agonist + AM251 (3), and Taxol-Agonist + AM630 (3) vs. Taxol-Vehicle. Doses are in mg/kg/day s.c. (ANOVA; Dunnett and Tukey post-hoc tests). N = 10–18 per group.

Back to article page