|
Sheep i.d.
|
Lame Leg
|
DAY 0
|
DAY 3
|
|---|
| | |
Lameness Score
|
Pathology Score
|
Emax (%)
|
Lameness Score
|
Pathology Score
|
Emax (%)
|
|
Y45
|
LH
|
8
|
4
|
62.6
|
2
|
4
|
19.2
|
|
W140
|
RH
|
8
|
4
|
47.7
|
1
|
4
|
25.5
|
|
G122
|
LF
|
7
|
4
|
59
|
3
|
2
|
-7.2
|
|
R5
|
RF
|
7
|
4
|
71.4
|
2
|
1
|
19.8
|
|
Y36
|
RH
|
8
|
3
|
29.3
|
1
|
1
|
3.7
|
|
G97
|
LF
|
6
|
4
|
62.9
|
4
|
4
|
62.9
|
|
B93
|
RF
|
8
|
2
|
40.7
|
1
|
0
|
27.9
|
|
Y56
|
RF
|
6
|
4
|
38.5
|
3
|
2
|
41.4
|
|
W15
|
LF
|
5
|
3
|
33.4
|
4
|
3
|
-13.0
|
|
237
|
LH
|
7
|
2
|
29.9
|
2
|
0
|
5.1
|
|
G117
|
RF
|
6
|
2
|
16.7
|
0
|
0
|
8.75
|
|
394
|
LH
|
4
|
4
|
25.5
|
5
|
3
|
3.3
|
|
B83a
|
RH
|
8
|
4
|
58.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
G60a
|
LH
|
6
|
4
|
32.7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
G146a
|
RH
|
7
|
3
|
63.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
B23a
|
RH
|
5
|
2
|
52.7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
W110a
|
LH
|
5
|
2
|
42.5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
B801a
|
RH
|
5
|
2
|
55.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
B1b
|
RH
|
6
|
3
|
47.4
|
3
|
3
|
-8.27
|
|
RSb
|
RH
|
5
|
4
|
49.5
|
5
|
3
|
48.9
|
|
Y192b
|
LH
|
5
|
4
|
52.0
|
4
|
3
|
31.7
|
|
B24b
|
RH
|
4
|
4
|
41.0
|
4
|
3
|
-17.5
|
|
B69b
|
LH
|
4
|
2
|
31.6
|
1
|
1
|
2.6
|
|
B93b
|
LH
|
4
|
4
|
37.6
|
2
|
1
|
2.6
|
|
MEAN (± sem)
| |
6.6 ± 0.3
| |
45.1 ± 2.9
|
2.6 ± 0.3
| |
15.0 ± 4.6
|
|
MEDIAN (range)
| | |
4 (2-4)
| | |
2.5 (0-4)
| |
- Mean lameness (± SEM) and median pathology (range) scores and mean magnitude of hyperalgesia (Emax), represented as the percentage change in response threshold from the non-lame limbs, for 24 sheep affected by unilateral lameness recorded on day 0 before treatment, then on day 3 after treatment. LH-left hindleg; RH-right hindleg; LF-left foreleg; RF-right foreleg; a - sheep euthanased on day 0 before treatment; b - sheep euthanased 3 days after treatment.
