Figure 6

Effects of DPI on behavior in the novelty-suppressed feeding test on days 1 and 3 after surgery. a Images show the testing arena and food platform used in the novelty-suppressed feeding test. b, e The bar summary shows the feeding latency for the food on the novel platform. n = 8–9 mice for each group shown in the figure. *P < 0.05, N.S. non-significant difference, sham vs. DPI, unpaired Student’s t test. c, f Cumulative curves showing the effect of DPI on the distribution of feeding latency for food on the novel platform. N.S. non-significant difference, **P < 0.01, sham vs. DPI, one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. d, g The bar summary shows the feeding latency for the food in the home cage. n = 8–9 mice for each group shown in the figure. N.S. not significant difference, sham vs. DPI, unpaired Student’s t test.