Open Access

Antinociceptive action of oxytocin involves inhibition of potassium channel currents in lamina II neurons of the rat spinal cord

Molecular Pain20095:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-5-63

Received: 29 June 2009

Accepted: 12 November 2009

Published: 12 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Growing evidence in the literature shows that oxytocin (OT) has a strong spinal anti-nociceptive action. Oxytocinergic axons originating from a subpopulation of paraventricular hypothalamic neurons establish synaptic contacts with lamina II interneurons but little is known about the functional role of OT with respect to neuronal firing and excitability.

Results

Using the patch-clamp technique, we have recorded lamina II interneurons in acute transverse lumbar spinal cord slices of rats (15 to 30 days old) and analyzed the OT effects on action potential firing ability. In the current clamp mode, we found that bath application of a selective OT-receptor agonist (TGOT) reduced firing in the majority of lamina II interneurons exhibiting a bursting firing profile, but never in those exhibiting a single spike discharge upon depolarization. Interestingly, OT-induced reduction in spike frequency and increase of firing threshold were often observed, leading to a conversion of the firing profile from repetitive and delayed profiles into phasic ones and sometimes further into single spike profile. The observed effects following OT-receptor activation were completely abolished when the OT-receptor agonist was co-applied with a selective OT-receptor antagonist. In current and voltage clamp modes, we show that these changes in firing are strongly controlled by voltage-gated potassium currents. More precisely, transient IA currents and delayed-rectifier currents were reduced in amplitude and transient IA current was predominantly inactivated after OT bath application.

Conclusion

This effect of OT on the firing profile of lamina II neurons is in good agreement with the antinociceptive and analgesic properties of OT described in vivo.

Background

Oxytocin (OT), a peptide hormone well known for its role in female parturition and lactation [1], has received recently a considerable attention for its implication in the regulation of complex brain functions [2] in both male and female. OT is synthesized and secreted by a subpopulation of hypothalamic neurons [3]. From the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, OT-containing parvocellular neurons send direct axonal projections to various structures of the central nervous system (CNS) including the spinal cord [47]. In the spinal cord, oxytocinergic terminals are found mainly in the most superficial layers of the dorsal horn and in the autonomic nuclei [4, 7]. These spinal target structures contain an important density of OT binding sites [811] and synapses have been described in electron microscopy [12]. The colocalization of oxytocinergic terminals and OT binding sites in the superficial layers of the spinal cord strongly suggest that oxytocinergic transmission could modulate nociceptive processing. In good agreement, OT secreted in the spinal cord after PVN stimulation or exogenously-applied by intrathecal infusion, displayed antinociceptive properties in naïve rodents [1316] or during the development of inflammatory [1719] or neuropathic pain [20, 21]. To explain some of these antinociceptive properties, it has been recently demonstrated that stimulation of the PVN reduced the spinal integration of nociceptive afferent messages mediated by C and Aδ fibers [22] presumably by elevating the GABAergic inhibition in the superficial layers of the spinal cord [23] while reducing glutamatergic sensorispinal transmission [24].

Little is known regarding the mechanism of action of OT on neuronal firing and therefore neuronal excitability. In most CNS structures, OT is generally described as excitatory, but inhibitory effects are also often seen depending on the concentration used, brain developmental stages, neuronal cell types and hormonal status [25]. To illustrate this complexity, OT was shown recently to induce spontaneous action potentials together with a presynaptic increase in GABAergic inhibitory transmission in hypothalamic magnocellular neurons grown in organotypic culture [26]. In this particular situation, where OT did not change the resting membrane potential, low threshold spikes were triggered by the IPSP-mediated rebound depolarization and were not seen in the presence of T-type calcium channel inhibitors. In the spinal cord, OT induced membrane depolarization in somatic motoneurons [27] and sympathetic preganglionic neurons [28, 29] by a cellular mechanism likely involving TTX-resistant Na+ conductances.

To investigate the effect of OT on electrophysiological properties of spinal nociceptive neurons, we chose to record lamina II interneurons which play a crucial role in the integration and initial filtering of peripheral nociceptive messages [3032]. The main objective of this study was to characterize the effects of OT on the firing properties of lamina II neuron and to examine the possible contribution of K+ channels to this modulation. Although they received little attention so far in the case of OT action, K+ currents in the spinal cord play a major role in the control of the neuronal firing and excitability [3336] and have already been shown to control the firing properties of lamina II neurons [37, 38]. Two main voltage-gated K+ currents have been described in spinal cord dorsal horn: a tetraethylammonium (TEA)-sensitive delayed rectifier K+ current (IKDR) [39] and a (TEA)-insensitive fast inactivating K+ current (IA) [3941]. Moreover it has been shown that these currents are involved in the reduction of excitability produced by anesthetics in superficial dorsal horn neurons [36, 42]. We have focused our attention on A-type K+ currents which could play a crucial role in spinal pain processing [43].

Results

Oxytocin reduces the firing ability of a subpopulation of lamina II neurons

In the current clamp mode, perfusion of the specific OT receptor agonist TGOT (1 μM, n = 21), for up to 15 minutes, had no significant effect on the resting membrane potential (RMP) of lamina II neurons. In the absence of any current injection, the mean RMP was -63.6 ± 1.7 mV in control and -60.8 ± 2.0 mV in TGOT (n = 21; Student's t-test, p > 0.05). In line with what is generally observed in the absence of stimulation in vivo (see for example [44]), we also found that lamina II neurons recorded from our in vitro slice preparation never displayed spontaneously occurring action potentials at their resting membrane potential. Since no obvious effects on the resting membrane potential were observed, we next checked whether OT receptor agonists could affect the firing profile of lamina II neurons.

As illustrated in figure 1A, we could easily identify the four main types of firing profile seen classically in the superficial layers of the spinal cord but sometimes in a different proportion. Using depolarizing current steps (see methods), we found here that lamina II neurons, recorded blindly, often displayed a repetitive ("R": 33.3%, n = 28/84 neurons, RMP = -59,4 ± 1.7 mV) or phasic ("P": 29.8%, n = 25/84 neurons, RMP = -59.3 ± 1.7 mV) firing profile whereas delayed firing ("D": 21.4%, n = 18/84 neurons, RMP = -60.9 ± 2.5 mV) and single spike ("S": 15.5%, n = 13/84 neurons, RMP = -60.5 ± 3.3 mV) were less frequent (Figure 1A).
Figure 1

Firing profiles of lamina II neurons recorded in rat spinal cord slices. A: In the current clamp configuration of the whole-cell patch clamp, four distinct firing profiles were recorded in lamina II neurons in response to incremental depolarizing currents steps of 900 ms every 20 s. They are referred to as repetitive (R), phasic (P), delayed (D) and single spike (S). Typical repetitive firing profile is characterized by the tonic generation of action potentials during the depolarization. The phasic profile is characterized by a strong accommodation leading to a plateau. The delayed firing profile exhibits a time-dependent silent phase before bursting. Lastly, a small proportion of lamina II neurons displays only a single spike (sometimes two) at the beginning of the depolarization. Stars show characteristic firing profile at longer time-scale. Dashed lines represent -60 mV. As shown on the right diagram, no correlation could be found between the firing profile and the location of the recorded neuron. B: Biocytin revelation (images) and reconstruction (drawings) of recorded cells illustrating the large variety of morphology of lamina II neurons. In our hands, no correlation was observed between a specific morphology and the firing pattern.

Bath application of the selective agonist TGOT (1 μM) induced a progressive reduction in the number of spikes emitted during a 900 ms current pulse in the majority of the recorded lamina II neurons (76%; n = 16/21; Figure 2). This change in firing ability was generally found stable and maximal after a minimal superfusion time of 15 minutes. A similar effect was obtained while using of the natural agonist OT (1 μM). In this case, bath-applied OT triggered a change in the firing pattern of 63% of the recorded neurons (n = 5/8). TGOT- and OT-mediated effects were both seen as a reduction in the number of action potentials generated during the 900 ms depolarizing current pulse of constant amplitude and, in 19 out of 29 neurons, as a progressive conversion of the firing profile (Figure 2A). The grey inset in Figure 2A summarizes the conversion scheme of lamina II neurons observed after superfusion of OT-receptor agonists.
Figure 2

Oxytocin reduces the firing ability of lamina II neurons. A: Effects of TGOT (1 μM), a selective agonist of OT-receptor bath-applied for 15 minutes, on the different firing profiles expressed by lamina II neurons. Four different examples of firing profile conversion induced by TGOT. Diagram in the grey box gives the scheme of profile conversion observed after TGOT application. B: Example of a lamina II neuron exhibiting a repetitive profile that was not converted after a 15-min application of TGOT. Dashed lines represent -60 mV.

We found that most of the neurons expressing a repetitive firing (n = 12/16) and all those with a delayed firing (n = 4/4) progressively showed a phasic profile. Out of these 16 OT-sensitive neurons, four were also further converted to a single spike profile. Moreover, neurons initially classified as phasic, were also sometimes converted into single spike profile (n = 3/5). It should be noted here that neurons exhibiting a single spike were unaffected by OT-receptor agonists application (n = 4). A subpopulation of "repetitive" lamina II neurons was also OT-insensitive (25%: 4/16 repetitive neurons; Figure 2A and 2B). We failed to reveal any change in the firing profile (e.g. no change in spike number and/or frequency) when OT was applied at lower concentration (10 nM, n = 8 and 100 nM, n = 8) and when OT (1 μM) or TGOT (1 μM) were co-applied with dOVT (1 μM, n = 6), a selective antagonist of OT receptor. Furthermore, dOVT (1 μM) alone did not affect the firing ability of the recorded neurons (n = 6). Lastly, the reduction in the firing ability induced by OT-receptor agonist was long-lasting since, even after a 1 hour washout, only a partial recovery could be observed.

After superfusion of OT-receptor agonists, the distribution of lamina II neurons based on their firing pattern was strongly modified. The majority of the neurons could now be classified as "single spike" (45%: n = 13/29) or "phasic" (41%: n = 12/29) whereas neurons with repetitive firing pattern represented only 14% (n = 4/29) of the total neuronal population instead of 41% in control condition (Chi-square test, p < 0.001). Neurons exhibiting a delayed action potential discharge were no longer seen after superfusion with OT-receptor agonists.

Inhibition of A-type K+ currents in lamina II neurons mimics the reduction of action potential firing ability induced by OT-receptor agonists

In order to better understand how OT-receptor agonists could affect the firing profile of lamina II neurons, we focused our attention on the possible implication of potassium currents in this phenomenon. In a first step, we checked whether fast transient K+ currents (A-type K+ current: IA) could account for changes in the firing profiles observed in lamina II neurons. To do so, we recorded the action potential discharge in lamina II neurons, before and after the application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP, 0.5 mM), a blocker of IA. As illustrated in Figure 3A, 4-AP mimicked the effects of TGOT (n = 5) but K+ current inhibition was achieved within seconds after starting the superfusion. In delayed neurons, as expected, 4-AP suppressed the delay before the first spike and then converted them into phasic neurons. In repetitive neurons, 4-AP reduced the number of spikes emitted causing a conversion to phasic neurons. As expected, 4-AP also rapidly increased the initial firing frequency (at the beginning of the current pulse) by decreasing the interspike intervals. To summarize, the direct pharmacological blockade of IA mimicked the action of OT by reducing the number of emitted spikes and by eventually converting the firing profile (delayed into phasic, repetitive into phasic and phasic into single spike). However, OT did not reproduce the reduction of interspike interval, suggesting the involvement of an additional mechanism.
Figure 3

Transient potassium current shapes the firing profile. A: Modulation of the firing profile following the application of 4-AP, a blocker of transient K+ currents (IA), in three different lamina II neurons. B: Firing profile changes exhibited by a phasic neuron (left panels, standard protocol) submitted to conditioning hyperpolarizing (middle panels) or depolarizing prepulse (right panels) aimed at maximizing or minimizing IA current, respectively. In these three conditions, the effect of TGOT application (bottom traces) is compared to the control situation (upper trace). Black arrowheads indicate the accommodation in spike frequency. White arrowheads show the delay time before obtaining the first action potential. C: Effect of 4-AP on a neuron exhibiting a delayed firing profile after a conditioning hyperpolarizing prepulse producing a large IA current. Dashed lines represent -60 mV.

In addition to this preliminary experiment, we designed a protocol to manipulate the availability of IA channels (Figure 3B) in a separate set of neurons (n = 14; 7 repetitive, 5 phasic and 2 delayed profiles). To do so, a conditioning hyperpolarizing or depolarizing prepulse current injection was applied to the neurons in order to maximize or minimize the contribution of IA currents, respectively. As illustrated in figure 3B in the case of a "phasic" neuron, minimization of IA currents (IA minimization protocol, upper right) was sufficient to decrease the total number of spikes during the test pulse, thus mimicking the effect of OT. Interestingly, the maximization of IA currents (IA maximization protocol) converted the phasic firing pattern into a delayed one (n = 4/5 neurons) or increased even more the delay in one out of two delayed neurons. This procedure did not alter the repetitive pattern (n = 7). After IA current maximization, the delayed firing profile was suppressed after the application of TGOT since the delay to get the first action potential was no longer detectable (Figure 3B middle traces). Moreover, TGOT application induced a massive reduction in the number of emitted action potentials leading ultimately to a single spike profile (Figure 3B, right traces). As seen in figure 3C, the delayed firing profile resulting from the conditioning hyperpolarizing prepulse (IA maximization protocol) was also suppressed by 4-AP (0.5 mM, n = 2/2), similarly to what was seen after TGOT bath perfusion (Figure 3B). Taken together, these experiments indicated that A-type K+ currents constituted an important functional target involved in the reduction of action potential firing ability induced by OT-receptor activation.

OT modulation of potassium currents in lamina II neurons

To better understand how OT could modulate voltage-gated K+ currents, we have recorded another set of lamina II neurons (n = 16) in the voltage-clamp mode and in the presence of TTX (0.5 μM). Under these conditions, we have been able to isolate the sustained (IKDR) and the transient (IA) component of total potassium currents (IK) in every lamina II neuron recorded (see methods for K+ current isolation procedures). IA current was blocked by 4-AP (2 mM, n = 4, not shown), while TEA (10 mM) blocked IKDR currents (n = 4, not shown).

After 15 minutes of bath application, we found that TGOT (1 μM) progressively reduced to a steady-state the peak amplitude of both sustained (IKDR: Figure 4A) and transient potassium currents (IA: Figure 4A) in 11 out of 16 lamina II neurons. This effect was never observed in the presence of dOVT (n = 6; not shown). The amplitude of IKDR, in response to a depolarization to +50 mV, was decreased by 42 ± 6.7% (n = 11; p < 0.001, Student's t-test) by TGOT (Figure 4A, left graph) but this effect was not accompanied by a change of the activation (Figure 4B, left) or inactivation properties (Figure 4C, left). In particular, the half-activation potentials (V0.5) were similar with mean values of 4.44 ± 1.4 mV in control and of -1.94 ± 2.22 mV after TGOT (n = 11; p > 0.05, Student's t-test). The slope factors (k) remained also unchanged (14.82 ± 0.72 mV in control and 15.17 ± 0.61 mV after TGOT). The amplitude of IA was also decreased after superfusion of TGOT (-44.2 ± 11.9%, n = 11; p < 0.01, Student's t-test) in response to a depolarization to +50 mV (Figure 4A, right graph). The parameters best describing the activation properties remained unaffected after application of TGOT (Control: V0.5 = -39.99 ± 4.31 mV, k = 12.27 ± 2.04 mV; TGOT: V0.5 = -40.90 ± 3.02 mV, k = 13.74 ± 4.31 mV; n = 11; p > 0.05, Student's t test; Figure 4B, right graph), whereas the inactivation curve (Figure 4C, right graph) was shifted toward more negative values in 4 out of 7 recorded neurons (control: V0.5 = -64.56 ± 3.13 mV vs. TGOT: V0.5 = -89.71 ± 5.57 mV; n = 4; p < 0.01, Student's t-test). The slope factor of the inactivation curve (Figure 4C, right graph) was, however, not significantly changed (control: k = 5.62 ± 1.99 mV vs. TGOT k = 3.90 ± 0.42 mV; n = 4, p > 0.05, Student's t test). The OT-associated shift of the inactivation curve toward a more negative value indicated that IA channels were inactivated at resting membrane potential values and therefore not available for spikes and interspike interval tuning.
Figure 4

Modulation induced by TGOT on properties of sustained (IKDR) and transient (I A ) potassium currents. A: Voltage/current relationship of the sustained (left graph) and transient K+ currents (right graph) observed in a lamina II neuron in control (black circles) and after bath application of TGOT (1 μM, white circles). A typical current, obtained at a membrane potential of +50 mV, is shown in inset for both current components in control condition (black line) and after TGOT (dotted line). B, C: Activation (B) and inactivation curves (C) of sustained (left graphs) and transient components of K+ currents (right graphs), respectively. Mean data are shown for 11 neurons, each recorded in the control situation (black circles and lines) and after application of 1 μM TGOT (white circles and dotted lines). All experiments were conducted in the presence of a steady-state concentration of TTX (0.5 μM). Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M.

Discussion

Several studies are now supporting the idea that OT exerts a potent anti-nociceptive control after its release in the spinal cord from hypothalamo-hypophysal descending projections [14, 15, 45]. We have recently shown that this antinociceptive action is mediated, in part, by an increase in synaptic inhibition within the most superficial layers of the spinal cord [22, 23], a mechanism which can also account for the previously described reduction of glutamatergic sensorispinal ascending messages [24]. In the present study, we now demonstrate that the effect of OT on synaptic transmission is accompanied by a modulation of potassium currents, which finely tunes the output properties of lamina II neurons receiving nociceptive information coming from peripheral nociceptive afferents. The observed reduction of A-type K+ currents is particularly efficient in the firing profile coding. This mechanism is robust and compatible with a long-lasting antinociceptive action at the spinal level. Indeed pharmacological blockade or electrophysiological modulation of IA reproduced the main features of OT action on lamina II neurons.

Action potential firing properties of lamina II neurons

As proposed by Prescott and De Koninck [46] for lamina I neurons, the firing profiles reflect differences in neuronal input-output functions. The diversity of input-output functions in lamina II neurons, which are the first relay in the nociceptive pathway, is therefore important determinant of the spinal pain processing. In this study, we found the four main classes of firing profiles (i.e. repetitive, phasic, delayed, single spike) already described in rat using various electrophysiological approaches [33, 37, 38, 4651]. Among these four firing profiles, repetitive and delayed firing neurons are both ideally suited to encode the intensity, the duration and the termination of afferent excitation. In contrast, phasic and single-spike neurons may predominantly operate as coincidence detectors [46], discharging only at the onset of multiple simultaneous afferent arrival inputs. Between studies, there is a large variability in the percentage of cells exhibiting the above described firing profiles, suggesting that the action potential discharge of lamina II interneurons, at least for a part of them, could be finely controlled by the activity of specific membrane voltage-gated ionic channels.

OT-induced changes in lamina II neuronal firing

During our patch-clamp whole-cell experiments, we found that the recorded firing profiles were very stable over time (maximum 80 minutes) and this has also been shown in other reports [46, 52]. While studying the effects of OT in the absence of synaptic activity, we never observed any significant changes of the resting membrane potential values while recording from lamina II neurons. With regards to our previously published results [23], only a very small fraction of lamina II neurons were capable of producing action potentials and this was the result of a rare OT-induced excitatory synaptic current summation. In contrast with these observations, a reduction in their firing ability was seen in the vast majority (> 70%) of the recorded neurons. The lack of effects of OT on membrane potential was also recently described for organotypic culture of magnocellular hypothalamic slices despite a major OT-induced increase in IPSPs frequency [26]. In line with this observation, OT did not induce any change in membrane current in superficial layer neurons grown in culture and recorded in the voltage-clamp mode [51]. Our findings are also in good agreement with the limited number of c-fos positive OT-activated lamina II neurons following a PVN stimulation [23]. We cannot exclude, however, that lamina I neurons might respond to OT by a depolarization and the emission of action potential. This was never the case while recording from lamina II neurons under our experimental conditions regardless of the OT-associated changes in excitatory and inhibitory synaptic controls [23].

In a large subpopulation of lamina II neurons, OT strongly and durably affected the action potential discharge. This effect, blocked by the selective OT-receptor antagonist dOVT, was seen as a progressive reduction of the number of emitted spikes and, in most cases, as a conversion of the initial firing profile. This phenomenon was also observed in a similar preparation after application of a μ opioid agonist [53]. Based on our experimental results, a preferential conversion scheme (Figure 2A, inset) can be proposed leading to a predominance of neurons with phasic and single spike firing after OT superfusion. Data obtained using unitary spinal cord neurons recording in vivo are already available in the literature to support this model [45, 54], although little is known about the mechanisms involved. In the present study and as seen in figure 1A, lamina II neurons exhibiting a single spike had a high rheobase i.e. they required a higher current injection or more synaptic inputs to trigger their first and single spike. We can conclude here that these OT-sensitive lamina II neurons are becoming less excitable in comparison with "Repetitive", "Phasic" or "Delayed" cells which usually had a lower rheobase. The proportion changes among the different firing profiles should also modify the processing of nociceptive information. Indeed, OT reduced the number of integrators (repetitive/delayed) and increased the number of coincidence detectors (phasic/single spike) which are less prone to encode intensity of the stimulus according to Prescott and De Koninck [46].

The inhibitory or excitatory nature of lamina II interneurons has also to be taken into account while analyzing OT-induced changes in excitability. Previous studies have attempted to establish a correlation between firing discharge profile and the neurochemical nature of lamina II interneurons. Repetitive firing seems to be mainly expressed by islet cells [55], which are very likely to be inhibitory [5558]. In our hands, OT-induced reduction of excitability is affecting a large population of these neurons (75%). Phasic firing patterns have been reported for either excitatory interneurons [57] or inhibitory interneurons [56] and it is difficult to predict the consequence of OT action without knowing their precise connectivity in the network. Delayed firing neurons are all OT-sensitive. They are likely to be excitatory interneurons and possibly serve as output towards lamina I projecting neurons [57]. If true, the OT-induced decrease in neuronal excitability will then reinforce the filter function of lamina II while processing peripheral afferent nociceptive messages.

Together, OT-receptor activation is likely to alter the processing of the nociceptive signal by lamina II neuronal network before its forwarding to supraspinal centers. Establishing the relative contribution of this mechanism in comparison to others previously described, that also affect synaptic transmission onto lamina II neurons [23, 24], will require further investigation in order to better understand how OT produces its antinociceptive action.

Lamina II neuron firing and OT modulation of K+ currents

The major K+ currents involved in the control of action potential firing of superficial dorsal horn neurons are a TEA-sensitive delayed rectifier K+ current, IKDR [39], and a TEA-insensitive fast inactivating K+ current, IA [3941]. Studies analyzing the action of anesthetics at the superficial spinal level have shown that reduction of potassium currents could lead to excitability reduction [36, 42]. Any modulation of these currents could therefore modify the firing profile and the excitability of lamina II neurons. Our experiments showed that a reduction of IA, in addition to the expected suppression of the delay before the first spike, induced a reduction of the number of emitted spikes as well as an augmentation of the firing frequency. This is in full agreement with the known action of IA. Moreover, we confirmed that OT conversion of the firing profiles was actually involving the modulation of A-type K+ current by (i) minimizing/maximizing IA currents (Figure 3B), (ii) mimicking the effect of OT with the IA blocker, 4-AP (Figure 3A), and (iii) showing that OT reduced the IA current amplitude and shifted the inactivation curve to more negative (hyperpolarized) values in voltage-clamp mode (Figure 4A, C). This suggests that IA is progressively unable to be reactivated after the first spike as shown with 4-AP (Figure 3A). However, IA blockade induced an expected decrease in interspike interval which is not seen with OT. We have to keep in mind, however, that OT acts on both K+ currents. Indeed, Olschewski et al. [36] have shown that a reduction of IKDR increased the interspike intervals duration in lamina II neurons via a stronger inactivation of voltage-gated Na+channels during prolonged action potential, leading to an increased of the time needed for the channel to recover from inactivation. In summary, OT action on both K+ currents has multiple consequences: a decrease in firing frequency due to a reduction of IKDR concomitant with a reduction in the number of emitted spikes leading to a firing profile conversion, from repetitive profile to phasic profile to single spike profile.

Lastly, we have noticed that OT action persisted long after its washout. During our whole-cell patch-clamp experiments, we were only able to get a partial recovery after 1 hour of washout. This long lasting effect of OT on spinal neuronal excitability is in good agreement with the specific reduction in C/Aδ-associated discharge of superficial layer neurons obtained with extracellular unit recording after PVN stimulation or topical application of OT in anesthetized rats [45]. This observation suggests that OT-receptor activation may stimulate intracellular amplification cascades involving enzymatic processes, which are difficult to stop or reverse. ERK 1/2 might be involved in this process because it was shown to exert an inhibitory regulation on transient IA currents in dorsal horn neurons [34]. This ERK pathway may also result from the convergence of PKA and PKC pathways, leading to a reduction of neuronal excitability [33, 34] and could be recruited by OT-receptor activation, which uses the same intracellular pathway [59].

Conclusion

In summary, we show here that the reduction of the firing ability induced by OT in lamina II neurons is associated with a reduction in transient (IA) and delayed (IKDR) K+ currents. With regards to our previous study, we can propose that OT anti-nociceptive action is, at least, mediated by an increased inhibitory synaptic tone controlled by presynaptic OT-receptors [23] and a reduced neuronal firing ability involving an important OT-receptor-dependent inhibition of K+ currents (this study). With regards to the interesting properties of OT in the spinal nociceptive system, it will be of fundamental importance to identify the intracellular partners recruited after OT-receptor activation in order to target this endogenous pain modulation pathway for therapeutical purpose.

Methods

Ethical approval

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the directive set by the European Community Council Directive (86/69/EEC, November 24, 1986) and authorization of the French Department of Agriculture (License no. 67-116 to PP).

Spinal cord slice preparation

In this study we used 15 to 30 day-old Wistar rats (Depré, St Doulchard, France) anesthetized with a single i.p. injection of ketamine (150 mg/kg, Imalgène™, Meriel, France). Dissection procedure was described in detail previously [60]. Briefly, the spinal cord was removed by hydraulic extrusion and placed into ice-cold sucrose artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 248 sucrose, 11 glucose, 23 NaHCO3, 2 KCl, 1.25 KH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgSO4 continuously bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2. Transverse slices (600 μm thick) were cut from the lumbar segment of spinal cord using a Leica fresh tissue slicer (V1000S) and stored at room temperature into regular ACSF (in mM): 126 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 Glucose, pH = 7.35, continuously bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2. Spinal cord slices were incubated at least 1 hour before recording. During the recordings, slices were continuously superfused with oxygenated ACSF at a mean flow-rate of a 3 ml per minute.

Electrophysiological recordings, data acquisition

All electrophysiological experiments were performed at room temperature. Lamina II neurons were recorded blindly in the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique and filled with biocytin (see composition of the intracellular solutions below) in order to confirm their general morphology and their location within lamina II (Figure 1B).

Fast current-clamp and voltage-clamp recordings were obtained using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, USA). Electrophysiological recordings were sampled at 13 kHz in current-clamp and 10 kHz in voltage-clamp mode, respectively, then low-pass filtered at 5 kHz, digitized, and stored using pClamp 6.0 software (Axon Instruments, USA). Patch pipettes were made from borosilicate glass capillaries (Clark Electromedical Instruments, UK) using a horizontal laser puller (P-2000; Sutter Instruments, USA). The electrode resistance was 3.5-4.5 MΩ. The patch pipettes were filled with an intracellular solution containing (in mM): 80 K2SO4, 8 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 1 Mg-ATP, 10 Biocytin, pH 7.3 (adjusted with KOH). Capacitance transients, series resistance were compensated electronically. In our experimental conditions, cell dialysis was without effect on the firing properties exhibited by lamina II neurons, sometimes recorded for more than an hour. During the pharmacological experiments, we have recorded only one neuron per spinal cord slice.

Experimental protocols and analysis

In current-clamp mode, the membrane potential was adjusted at -60 mV. Firing profiles were then characterized (Figure 1A, left) using current step injections (from -80 to 200 pA, 10 pA increments for 900 ms, repeated every 20 seconds). This characterization was performed 5-10 minutes after the beginning of the recording in order to ensure stable recordings and optimal dialysis of the intracellular compartment. To investigate the possible role of washout on cell firing properties, some neurons were recorded for more than an hour (n = 7). No significant changes in the firing profiles (spike frequency and spike amplitude), passive membrane properties and resting membrane potential were noted indicating that the intracellular dialysis with our experimental intracellular solution had no effect on the passive and active membrane properties of lamina II neurons (not shown). As seen in figure 1A, we found the four main firing profiles (Figure 1A) which have been described previously [38, 47, 49]. We were unable to reveal a positive correlation between location in lamina II (Figure 1A, right) or morphology and firing profile (Figure 1B). Neurons were kept for analysis only if they displayed stable resting membrane potentials more negative than -45 mV, proper spike overshoots (> 15 mV) and series resistance below 20 MΩ along the experiment.

In voltage-clamp mode, the membrane was held at -60 mV to study voltage-dependent potassium currents. Sodium currents were blocked by the addition of tetrodotoxin (0.5 μM TTX, Latoxan, France). Capacitive transient and leak conductance were subtracted using the P/4 protocol built-in function of pClamp software. Two different potassium current families could be recorded in lamina II neurons. The sustained outward potassium current (IKDR) blocked by tetraethylammonium (TEA, 10 mM; Fluka, Switzerland) and the transient outward potassium current (IA) blocked by 4-aminopyridine (4-AP, 2 mM; Sigma, France). Alternatively, these potassium currents could be separated on the basis of their electrophysiological properties. The total potassium current was obtained from a holding potential of -60 mV; through a series of voltage steps (from -100 to 50 mV, duration of 250 ms every 5 s) preceded by a conditioning step to -100 mV (250 ms). To record IKDR, the conditioning step was set to -40 mV to inactivate IA current. IA was calculated by a trace by trace subtraction between the two previous protocols. IKDR amplitude was measured at steady state, at the end of the step. IA amplitude was measured has the difference between the peak amplitude value and the steady state value. Activation and inactivation properties of both currents were obtained using a variable conditioning pulse (from -120 to +40 mV, steps of 250 ms) before a test pulse to 0 mV (250 ms). Activation and inactivation curves were well fitted with a Boltzmann function: y = 1/[1 + e(V0.5-V)/k ] and y = 1/[1 + e(V-V0.5)/k ], respectively; where V0.5 is the voltage of half-maximal activation, V is the holding membrane potential and k is the slope factor.

All recorded cells were analyzed using the pClamp 9.0.2 (Axon Instrument, USA). Quantitative results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis was performed using the parametric one-way ANOVA with Student's t-tests to compare means as indicated in the result section or chi-squared test. Statistical significance was considered to be reached for p < 0.05.

Drug application and perfusion solution

We used different ligands of OT-receptor: natural oxytocin (OT), selective OT-receptor agonist [Thr4, Gly7]-oxytocin (TGOT; both from Sigma, France) and selective OT-receptor antagonist d(CH2)5- [Tyr(Me)2, Thr4, Orn8, des-Gly-NH2 9]-vasotocin (dOVT; Bachem, Germany). These drugs were bath-applied at their final concentration for a minimal time period of 15 minutes. Drugs were prepared as ×1000 stock solutions in distilled water, except OT, TGOT and dOVT that were dissolved in a molar acetic acid solution 0.25% (v/v) in distilled water. This vehicle had no effects on the membrane voltage, neuronal firing properties or K+ current kinetics in the present study.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Mrs. Francine Herzog and Fatima Harrouche for excellent technical assistance, Rémy Schlichter for helpful discussion regarding some key issues of this work, and Jean-Luc Rodeau for his kind help all along this work. This work was supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Louis Pasteur, ANR Jeunes Chercheuses et Jeunes Chercheurs. PP is a fellow of the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF). JDB was supported by a PhD scholarship from the Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie (MENRT).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nociception and Pain Department, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Unité propre de recherche 3212 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg

References

  1. Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F: The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev 2001,81(2):629–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Neumann ID: Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. J Neuroendocrinol 2008,20(6):858–65. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01726.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Swanson LW, Sawchenko PE: Hypothalamic integration: organization of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. Annu Rev Neurosci 1983, 6: 269–324. 10.1146/annurev.ne.06.030183.001413PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cechetto DF, Saper CB: Neurochemical organization of the hypothalamic projection to the spinal cord in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1998,272(4):579–604. 10.1002/cne.902720410View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Saper CB, Loewy AD, Swanson LW, Cowan WM: Direct hypothalamo-autonomic connections. Brain Res 1976,117(2):305–12. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90738-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sawchenko PE, Swanson LW: Immunohistochemical identification of neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that project to the medulla or to the spinal cord in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1982,205(3):260–72. 10.1002/cne.902050306PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Swanson LW, McKellar S: The distribution of oxytocin- and neurophysin-stained fibers in the spinal cord of the rat and monkey. J Comp Neurol 1979,188(1):87–106. 10.1002/cne.901880108PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Reiter MK, Kremarik P, Freund-Mercier MJ, Stoeckel ME, Desaulles E, Feltz P: Localization of oxytocin binding sites in the thoracic and upper lumbar spinal cord of the adult and postnatal rat: a histoautoradiographic study. Eur J Neurosci 1994,6(1):98–104. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00251.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Uhl-Bronner S, Waltisperger E, Martinez-Lorenzana G, Condes Lara M, Freund-Mercier MJ: Sexually dimorphic expression of oxytocin binding sites in forebrain and spinal cord of the rat. Neuroscience 2005,135(1):147–54. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.025PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Veronneau-Longueville F, Rampin O, Freund-Mercier MJ, Tang Y, Calas A, Marson L, McKenna KE, Stoeckel ME, Benoit G, Giuliano F: Oxytocinergic innervation of autonomic nuclei controlling penile erection in the rat. Neuroscience 1999,93(4):1437–47. 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00262-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tribollet E, Barberis C, Arsenijevic Y: Distribution of vasopressin and oxytocin receptors in the rat spinal cord: sex-related differences and effect of castration in pudendal motor nuclei. Neuroscience 1997,78(2):499–509. 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00591-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Rousselot P, Papadopoulos G, Merighi A, Poulain DA, Theodosis DT: Oxytocinergic innervation of the rat spinal cord. An electron microscopic study. Brain Res 1990,529(1–2):178–84. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90825-VPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lundeberg T, Uvnas-Moberg K, Agren G, Bruzelius G: Anti-nociceptive effects of oxytocin in rats and mice. Neurosci Lett 1994,170(1):153–7. 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90262-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shiraishi T, Onoe M, Kojima T, Sameshima Y, Kageyama T: Effects of hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus: electrical stimulation produce marked analgesia in rats. Neurobiology (Bp) 1995,3(3–4):393–403.Google Scholar
  15. Yirmiya R, Ben-Eliyahu S, Shavit Y, Marek P, Liebeskind JC: Stimulation of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus produces analgesia not mediated by vasopressin or endogenous opioids. Brain Res 1990,537(1–2):169–74. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90354-EPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang J: Intrathecal administration of oxytocin induces analgesia in low back pain involving the endogenous opiate peptide system. Spine 1994,19(8):867–71. 10.1097/00007632-199404150-00001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lundeberg T, Meister B, Bjorkstrand E, Uvnas-Moberg K: Oxytocin modulates the effects of galanin in carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia in rats. Brain Res 1993,608(2):181–5. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91456-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Petersson M, Wiberg U, Lundeberg T, Uvnas-Moberg K: Oxytocin decreases carrageenan induced inflammation in rats. Peptides 2001,22(9):1479–84. 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00469-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Yu SQ, Lundeberg T, Yu LC: Involvement of oxytocin in spinal antinociception in rats with inflammation. Brain Res 2003,983(1–2):13–22. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)03019-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Condes-Lara M, Maie IA, Dickenson AH: Oxytocin actions on afferent evoked spinal cord neuronal activities in neuropathic but not in normal rats. Brain Res 2005,1045(1–2):124–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Martinez-Lorenzana G, Espinosa-Lopez L, Carranza M, Aramburo C, Paz-Tres C, Rojas-Piloni G, Condes-Lara M: PVN electrical stimulation prolongs withdrawal latencies and releases oxytocin in cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, and spinal cord tissue in intact and neuropathic rats. Pain 2008,140(2):265–73. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.015PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Condes-Lara M, Rojas-Piloni G, Martinez-Lorenzana G, Lopez-Hidalgo M, Rodriguez-Jimenez J: Hypothalamospinal oxytocinergic antinociception is mediated by GABAergic and opiate neurons that reduce A-delta and C fiber primary afferent excitation of spinal cord cells. Brain Res 2009, 1247: 38–49. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.030PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Breton JD, Veinante P, Uhl-Bronner S, Vergnano AM, Freund-Mercier MJ, Schlichter R, Poisbeau P: Oxytocin-induced antinociception in the spinal cord is mediated by a subpopulation of glutamatergic neurons in lamina I-II which amplify GABAergic inhibition. Mol Pain 2008, 4: 19. 10.1186/1744-8069-4-19PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson DA, Wei F, Wang GD, Li P, Kim SJ, Vogt SK, Muglia LJ, Zhuo M: Oxytocin mediates stress-induced analgesia in adult mice. J Physiol 2002,540(Pt 2):593–606. 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013492PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Raggenbass M: Vasopressin- and oxytocin-induced activity in the central nervous system: electrophysiological studies using in-vitro systems. Prog Neurobiol 2001,64(3):307–26. 10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00064-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Israel JM, Poulain DA, Oliet SH: Oxytocin-induced postinhibitory rebound firing facilitates bursting activity in oxytocin neurons. J Neurosci 2008,28(2):385–94. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5198-07.2008PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Suzue T, Yanaihara N, Otsuka M: Actions of vasopressin, gastrin releasing peptide and other peptides on neurons on newborn rat spinal cord in vitro. Neurosci Lett 1981,26(2):137–42. 10.1016/0304-3940(81)90339-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Desaulles E, Reiter MK, Feltz P: Electrophysiological evidence for oxytocin receptors on sympathetic preganglionic neurones-an in vitro study on the neonatal rat. Brain Res 1995,699(1):139–42. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01019-RPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sermasi E, Coote JH: Oxytocin acts at V1 receptors to excite sympathetic preganglionic neurones in neonate rat spinal cord in vitro. Brain Res 1994,647(2):323–32. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91331-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewin GR, Lu Y, Park TJ: A plethora of painful molecules. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004,14(4):443–9. 10.1016/j.conb.2004.07.009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bishop B: Pain: its physiology and rationale for management. Part I. Neuroanatomical substrate of pain. Phys Ther 1980,60(1):13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Furue H, Katafuchi T, Yoshimura M: Sensory processing and functional reorganization of sensory transmission under pathological conditions in the spinal dorsal horn. Neurosci Res 2004,48(4):361–8. 10.1016/j.neures.2003.12.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu HJ, Gereau RW 4th: ERK integrates PKA and PKC signaling in superficial dorsal horn neurons. II. Modulation of neuronal excitability. J Neurophysiol 2003,90(3):1680–8. 10.1152/jn.00341.2003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hu HJ, Glauner KS, Gereau RW 4th: ERK integrates PKA and PKC signaling in superficial dorsal horn neurons. I. Modulation of A-type K+ currents. J Neurophysiol 2003,90(3):1671–9. 10.1152/jn.00340.2003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Melnick IV, Santos SF, Safronov BV: Mechanism of spike frequency adaptation in substantia gelatinosa neurones of rat. J Physiol 2004,559(Pt 2):383–95. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066415PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Olschewski A, Hempelmann G, Vogel W, Safronov BV: Suppression of potassium conductance by droperidol has influence on excitability of spinal sensory neurons. Anesthesiology 2001,94(2):280–9. 10.1097/00000542-200102000-00018PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoshimura M, Jessell TM: Membrane properties of rat substantia gelatinosa neurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 1989,62(1):109–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruscheweyh R, Sandkuhler J: Lamina-specific membrane and discharge properties of rat spinal dorsal horn neurones in vitro. J Physiol 2002,541(Pt 1):231–44. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.017756PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolff M, Vogel W, Safronov BV: Uneven distribution of K+ channels in soma, axon and dendrites of rat spinal neurones: functional role of the soma in generation of action potentials. J Physiol 1998,509(Pt 3):767–76. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.767bm.xPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang HY, Cheng JK, Shih YH, Chen PH, Wang CL, Tsaur ML: Expression of A-type K channel alpha subunits Kv 4.2 and Kv 4.3 in rat spinal lamina II excitatory interneurons and colocalization with pain-modulating molecules. Eur J Neurosci 2005,22(5):1149–57. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04283.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang HY, Liao CW, Chen PH, Tsaur ML: Transient expression of A-type K channel alpha subunits Kv4.2 and Kv4.3 in rat spinal neurons during development. Eur J Neurosci 2006,23(5):1142–50. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04660.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Schnoebel R, Wolff M, Peters SC, Brau ME, Scholz A, Hempelmann G, Olschewski H, Olschewski A: Ketamine impairs excitability in superficial dorsal horn neurones by blocking sodium and voltage-gated potassium currents. Br J Pharmacol 2005,146(6):826–33. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706385PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hu HJ, Carrasquillo Y, Karim F, Jung WE, Nerbonne JM, Schwarz TL, Gereau RW 4th: The kv4.2 potassium channel subunit is required for pain plasticity. Neuron 2006,50(1):89–100. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Stanfa LC, Dickenson AH: In vivo electrophysiology of dorsal-horn neurons. Methods Mol Med 2004, 99: 139–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Condes-Lara M, Rojas-Piloni G, Martinez-Lorenzana G, Rodriguez-Jimenez J, Lopez Hidalgo M, Freund-Mercier MJ: Paraventricular hypothalamic influences on spinal nociceptive processing. Brain Res 2006,1081(1):126–37. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.050PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Prescott SA, De Koninck Y: Four cell types with distinctive membrane properties and morphologies in lamina I of the spinal dorsal horn of the adult rat. J Physiol 2002,539(Pt 3):817–36. 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013437PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Lopez-Garcia JA, King AE: Membrane properties of physiologically classified rat dorsal horn neurons in vitro: correlation with cutaneous sensory afferent input. Eur J Neurosci 1994,6(6):998–1007. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00594.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Lu Y, Perl ER: A specific inhibitory pathway between substantia gelatinosa neurons receiving direct C-fiber input. J Neurosci 2003,23(25):8752–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomson AM, West DC, Headley PM: Membrane Characteristics and Synaptic Responsiveness of Superficial Dorsal Horn Neurons in a Slice Preparation of Adult Rat Spinal Cord. Eur J Neurosci 1989,1(5):479–488. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00354.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Grudt TJ, Perl ER: Correlations between neuronal morphology and electrophysiological features in the rodent superficial dorsal horn. J Physiol 2002,540(Pt 1):189–207. 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012890PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Jo YH, Stoeckel ME, Freund-Mercier MJ, Schlichter R: Oxytocin modulates glutamatergic synaptic transmission between cultured neonatal spinal cord dorsal horn neurons. J Neurosci 1998,18(7):2377–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Santos SF, Rebelo S, Derkach VA, Safronov BV: Excitatory interneurons dominate sensory processing in the spinal substantia gelatinosa of rat. J Physiol 2007,581(Pt 1):241–54. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126912PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Santos SF, Melnick IV, Safronov BV: Selective postsynaptic inhibition of tonic-firing neurons in substantia gelatinosa by mu-opioid agonist. Anesthesiology 2004,101(5):1177–83. 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00018PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Rojas-Piloni G, Lopez-Hidalgo M, Martinez-Lorenzana G, Rodriguez-Jimenez J, Condes-Lara M: GABA-mediated oxytocinergic inhibition in dorsal horn neurons by hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus stimulation. Brain Res 2007,1137(1):69–77. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.045PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Lu VB, Biggs JE, Stebbing MJ, Balasubramanyan S, Todd KG, Lai AY, Colmers WF, Dawbarn D, Ballanyi K, Smith PA: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor drives the changes in excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat superficial dorsal horn that follow sciatic nerve injury. J Physiol 2009,587(Pt 5):1013–32. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.166306PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Heinke B, Ruscheweyh R, Forsthuber L, Wunderbaldinger G, Sandkuhler J: Physiological, neurochemical and morphological properties of a subgroup of GABAergic spinal lamina II neurones identified by expression of green fluorescent protein in mice. J Physiol 2004,560(Pt 1):249–66. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.070540PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Lu Y, Perl ER: Modular organization of excitatory circuits between neurons of the spinal superficial dorsal horn (laminae I and II). J Neurosci 2005,25(15):3900–7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0102-05.2005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Maxwell DJ, Belle MD, Cheunsuang O, Stewart A, Morris R: Morphology of inhibitory and excitatory interneurons in superficial laminae of the rat dorsal horn. J Physiol 2007,584(Pt 2):521–33. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140996PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Blume A, Bosch OJ, Miklos S, Torner L, Wales L, Waldherr M, Neumann ID: Oxytocin reduces anxiety via ERK1/2 activation: local effect within the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Eur J Neurosci 2008,27(8):1947–56. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06184.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Keller AF, Coull JA, Chery N, Poisbeau P, De Koninck Y: Region-specific developmental specialization of GABA-glycine cosynapses in laminas I-II of the rat spinal dorsal horn. J Neurosci 2001,21(20):7871–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Breton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement