Skip to main content
Download PDF

Phospholipase C-related but catalytically inactive protein modulates pain behavior in a neuropathic pain model in mice

Molecular Pain volume 9, Article number: 23 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

An inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate binding protein, comprising 2 isoforms termed PRIP-1 and PRIP-2, was identified as a novel modulator for GABAA receptor trafficking. It has been reported that naive PRIP-1 knockout mice have hyperalgesic responses.

Findings

To determine the involvement of PRIP in pain sensation, a hind paw withdrawal test was performed before and after partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) in PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 double knockout (DKO) mice. We found that naive DKO mice exhibited normal pain sensitivity. However, DKO mice that underwent PSNL surgery showed increased ipsilateral paw withdrawal threshold. To further investigate the inverse phenotype in PRIP-1 KO and DKO mice, we produced mice with specific siRNA-mediated knockdown of PRIP s in the spinal cord. Consistent with the phenotypes of KO mice, PRIP-1 knockdown mice showed allodynia, while PRIP double knockdown (DKD) mice with PSNL showed decreased pain-related behavior. This indicates that reduced expression of both PRIPs in the spinal cord induces resistance towards a painful sensation. GABAA receptor subunit expression pattern was similar between PRIP-1 KO and DKO spinal cord, while expression of K+-Cl--cotransporter-2 (KCC2), which controls the balance of neuronal excitation and inhibition, was significantly upregulated in DKO mice. Furthermore, in the DKD PSNL model, an inhibitor-induced KCC2 inhibition exhibited an altered phenotype from painless to painful sensations.

Conclusions

Suppressed expression of PRIPs induces an elevated expression of KCC2 in the spinal cord, resulting in inhibition of nociception and amelioration of neuropathic pain in DKO mice.

Findings

Background

We identified a d-myo-inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-binding protein with a domain organization similar to phospholipase C-δ, but with no enzymatic activity. We therefore termed this protein phospholipase C-related but catalytically inactive protein (PRIP) [1–3]. PRIP exists in 2 subtypes and can bind to GABAA receptor β subunits [4], GABAA receptor associated protein [5], and protein phosphatase 1 and 2A [6, 7].

Naive PRIP-1 knockout (KO) mice demonstrate a marked decrease in the withdrawal threshold in the von Frey hair test because of altered expression of GABAA receptor subunit in their central nervous system [8]. In the present study, we investigated the role of PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 in pain sensation using PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 double knockout (DKO) mice, and PRIP-1 and/or PRIP-2 knockdown (KD) mice.

Materials and methods

Animals

Ten- to fourteen-week-old male PRIP-1 KO [5, 8] and DKO [7, 9] mice, in a C57BL/6J mouse background, and ddY mice were used. All procedures and handling of animals were performed with permission according to the guidelines of Hiroshima University.

Seltzer model and paw withdrawal threshold test

Partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) was performed according to the procedure described by Seltzer et al. [10]. A paw withdrawal threshold in response to probing with von Frey hair (gram weight to buckling) was measured.

Generation of PRIP knockdown mice by intrathecal injection with siRNA

Three siRNA target sequences for each PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 gene were designed using a manufacturer-provided software (see Table 1). Synthetic siRNAs (0.45 pmol [0.15 pmol for each]/5 μl/animal, purchased from iGENE, Therapeutics Inc., Tokyo, Japan) were injected into the subarachnoid space between L5 and L6 vertebrae of mice using hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope (HVJ-E) vector system (GenomeONE; Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) [11].

Table 1 The sequences used in siRNA knockdown methods
Full size table

Immunoblot analysis

The region of L5 and L6 vertebrae, into which siRNAs were injected, was homogenized at 3 days postinjection with a homogenization buffer, and whole-cell fractions (for PRIPs, K+-Cl--cotransporter-2 [KCC2], Na+-K+-Cl--cotransporter-1 [NKCC1], glycine receptor [GlyR] α1, and tubulin) or cell membrane fractions (for GABAA receptor subunits) were obtained [12]. The homogenates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using specific primary antibodies of interest. Antibodies used are as follows: anti-PRIP-1 antibody [5], anti-PRIP-2 antibody [13], anti-β tubulin (Thermo Scientific, CA), anti-GABAA receptor α1 subunit, anti-NKCC1 (Alpha Diagnostic International, TX), anti-GABAA receptor α2 subunit (Aviva Systems Biology, CA), anti-GABAA receptor α5 subunit (R&B Systems, MN), anti-GABAA receptor α6 subunit (Imgenex, CA), anti-GABAA receptor α4, β2/3, and γ2 subunit, anti-GlyRα1 (Merck Millipore, MA), anti-KCC2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA), and anti-phosphoserine (Acris antibodies, CA) antibodies. An enhanced chemiluminescence western detection system (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) was used for development (ImageQuant™ LAS 4000 mini detection system; GE Healthcare Japan).

Statistical analyses

The density of each band was analyzed using NIH ImageJ software, and the densitometric units were corrected for tubulin. The data were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analyses are described in the figure legends.

Results and discussion

To examine pain-related behavior in DKO mice, PSNL was performed, and the withdrawal threshold of the hind paw was measured by applying von Frey filaments. Naive DKO mice had normal sensation levels in terms of withdrawal threshold (Figure 1A). This differed greatly from the significant reduction in the withdrawal threshold observed in PRIP-1 KO mice [8]. After PSNL, the withdrawal threshold in the contralateral hind paw of DKO mice was not significantly different from presurgical baselines (Figure 1A and B). The significant reduction of the withdrawal threshold of wild-type (WT) ipsilateral hind paw was dramatically ameliorated in the DKO mice (Figure 1B), suggesting that DKO mice exhibit a neuropathic pain-resistant phenotype. Since PRIP expression in WT mice was similar to that in the PSNL and sham-operated mice (Figure 1C), the onset of neuropathic pain was not induced by the change of PRIP expression.

Figure 1
figure 1

Pain-related behavior in WT and DKO mice. (A, B) Paw withdrawal threshold in the von Frey hair test was measured 10 days after nerve injury by using naive mice (A) or neuropathic pain model mice (B). The thresholds of PSNL-operated contralateral (Contra) and ipsilateral (Ipsi) sides were assessed in (B). Column chart shows withdrawal threshold in WT (open column) and DKO (closed column) mice (mean ± S.E.M., n = 7–10). *P < 0.05 versus the corresponding WT values (Student’s t-test). (C) Alteration of spinal PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 expression 10 days after sham operation (open column) or PSNL (close column) in naive C57BL/6 mice assessed by immunoblotting. The levels of immunoreactivity were normalized to that of β-tubulin and represented as % induction compared with the values of WT mice (means ± S.E.M., n = 4).

Full size image

To better understand the involvement of PRIP in nociceptive signaling, we produced the spinal cord-specific PRIP-1 knockdown (PRIP-1 KD), PRIP-2 knockdown (PRIP-2 KD), and PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 double knockdown (DKD) mice by using molecular specific siRNAs (Table 1) in the ddY mouse strain. We reported that a peak of gene suppression following intrathecal injection of a siRNA occurs at 2–3 days postinjection, and this recovers to original levels approximately 8 days after injection [14]. The significantly reduced expression of PRIP-1 in PRIP-1 KD and DKD mice, or of PRIP-2 in PRIP-2 KD and DKD mice, was observed 3 days after the siRNA injection (Figure 2A and B). We then examined mechanical allodynia by using the von Frey hair test in animals 3 days after siRNA injection. Allodynia was observed in the PRIP-1 KD mice, but not in the other mice (Figure 2C), indicating that the PRIP-1 KD mice mimicked the phenotypes of pain sensitivity observed in PRIP-1 KO mice.

Figure 2
figure 2

Involvement of PRIPs in the pain-related behavior. (A, B) Expression of PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 in the spinal cord of PRIP-1 KD, PRIP-2 KD and DKD mice 3 days after intrathecal siRNA injection. Immunoblot analyses were conducted using anti-PRIP-1 (A) and anti-PRIP-2 (B) antibodies. HVJ-envelope (HVJ-E) or scrambled siRNA (SC) was used as a negative control. For each, a representative image is shown in the upper panel. The level of immunoreactivity was normalized to β-tubulin and represented as % induction compared with the values of untreated mice (control) (means ± S.E.M., n = 4). *P < 0.05, † P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.05, §P < 0.05 and ¶P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding values in untreated, SC, HVJ-E, PRIP-1 KD, and PRIP-2 KD mice, respectively (Tukey-Kramer test). (C) Influence on pain sensitivity by the suppression of the PRIP gene using intrathecal siRNA injection in mice. Paw withdrawal threshold was measured the day before (open column) and 3 days after (closed column) injection. Values represent withdrawal threshold (mean ± S.E.M., n = 5–10). **P < 0.01 compared with the corresponding values from before injection (Student’s t-test). (D, E) Influence on pain sensitivity by the suppression of the PRIP gene in PSNL-operated mice. Paw withdrawal threshold of both contralateral (D) and ipsilateral (E) sides were measured each day after the intrathecal siRNA injection (day 0). The values before the PSNL surgery represent as “naive.” Lines used in graphs are as follows: green, violet, blue, black, and red are for PRIP-1 KD, PRIP-2 KD, DKD, HVJ-envelope, and scrambled siRNA-injected mice, respectively. Values represent withdrawal threshold (mean ± S.E.M., n = 7). *P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding values of untreated mice (day 0) (Dunnet test).

Full size image

Next, we observed the influence of suppression of the PRIP gene on pain sensation by using a PSNL model. PSNL was performed on ddY mice 10 days before intrathecal siRNA injection, after which an allodynia score of contralateral and ipsilateral sides was analyzed during the 8 days after the injection of PRIP siRNA. In the contralateral paw, PRIP-1 KD mice showed an allodynia in accordance with PRIP-1 fluctuation 2–5 days after siRNA injection (initial score, 1.17 ± 0.09 at day 0; peak score, 0.46 ± 0.117 at day 2; and recovered score, 1.22 ± 0.08 at day 8) (Figure 2D). The PRIP-1 protein expression was analyzed by immunoblotting (data not shown). The allodynia observed in PRIP-1 KD mice was not seen in PRIP-2 KD, DKD, and other control mice (Figure 2D). However, the withdrawal threshold for the ipsilateral paw was dramatically increased in DKD mice (initial score, 0.104 ± 0.02 at day 0 and peak score, 0.628 ± 0.068 at day 3), but not other experimental mice, including PRIP-1 KD and PRIP-2 KD mice; the relief gradually reverted to painful levels within 7 days (Figure 2E). This suggested that suppression of both PRIP genes, but not either, induces resistance for pain sensation associated with allodynia.

Neuropathic pain in a model animal induces an altered expression of GABAA receptors, including the downregulation of γ2 subunit-containing receptors [15, 16]. PRIP is a modulator for GABAA receptor intracellular trafficking [7, 9, 17]. The β 2/3 subunit is upregulated, and the γ2 subunit is downregulated in the spinal cord of PRIP-1 KO or DKO mice [8, 18]. Therefore, we examined the expression levels of GABAA receptor subunits by immunoblotting using commercially available subunit-specific antibodies. The examined expressions were similar between the genotypes, with the exception of α5 expression, which was increased in DKO mice (Figure 3A). Knabel et al. reported that α2 and α3 contribute to diazepam-induced antihyperalgesia actions, but that α1 and α5 subunits do not [19], suggesting less involvement of spinal α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors in nociception [16]. Therefore, the different pain sensation between PRIP-1 KO and DKO mice is probably not due to the alteration of GABAA receptor expression in the spinal cord.

Figure 3
figure 3

Alteration of expression of GABA A receptor subunits and KCC2 in KO or KD mice. (A) Expression of GABAA receptor subunits in PRIP-1 KO (open column) and DKO (close column) mice. Expression levels of PRIP-1 KO and DKO are based on the corresponding WT (represented as 100%, n = 5). *P < 0.05, for values in DKO vs PRIP-1 KO mice (Student’s t-test). (B) Expression of KCC2 in PRIP-1 KO (open column) and DKO (close column) mice. Expression levels represent each corresponding WT value as 100%. *P < 0.05, for values in DKO vs PRIP-1 KO mice (Student’s t-test). (C) Expression of GlyRα1 subunit, NKCC1 and KCC2 in WT and DKO 1 day after PSNL or sham operation (sham). The level of immunoreactivity was normalized to β-tubulin (mean ± S.E.M., n = 5–7). *P < 0.05, compared with values in WT sham-operated mice (Dunnet test). (D) R-DIOA administration induces pain relation behavior. Intrathecal administration of R-DIOA dose-dependently induced a decreased pain withdrawal threshold in WT mice. (E) Influence of KCC2 activity on pain sensitivity in PSNL mice. Each siRNA injection was performed 10 days after PSNL surgery. After 3 days of siRNA injection, R-DIOA (3 μg/mouse) was administrated intrathecally, and a paw withdrawal test was carried out 30 min after the injection. PSNL-operated WT mice were also treated with R-DIOA at 8 days after the surgery (representing as 8 in graph) and performed a paw withdrawal test. Naive represents prior to the surgery. Lines used in graph are as follows: black, green, violet, and blue are for WT, PRIP-1 KD, PRIP-2 KD, and DKD mice, respectively. The graph shows the withdrawal threshold value (mean ± S.E.M., n = 8). *P < 0.05, for values in 30 min after injection vs before injection (Student’s t-test).

Full size image

Inhibitory signaling is regulated by the intracellular chloride ion concentration, which is established in part via KCC2. Therefore, a high level of KCC2 expression drives chloride extrusion from neurons and maintains a low intracellular chloride ion concentration, i.e., GABAergic input may even acquire a net cell inhibitory response [20]. We next examined KCC2 expression by immunoblotting. The expression in PRIP-1 KO spinal cord was similar to that in WT; however, the expression in DKO mice was significantly increased compared with WT and PRIP-1 KO mice (Figure 3B). We then investigated the influence of PSNL surgery on expression of NKCC1 and KCC2, both of which are required for maintaining a fine balance between chloride ion influx and efflux, respectively (Figure 3C). KCC2 expression was higher in DKO sham-operated mice than in corresponding WT mice. PSNL surgery induced decreased KCC2 expressions in WT and DKO mice compared with sham-operated mice. Despite the decrease, KCC2 levels in DKO PSNL mice were similar to those in WT sham-operated mice. On the other hand, expression levels of NKCC1 were similar, and PSNL surgery did not affect the expressions (Figure 3C). We also examined expression of GlyR, contributing as a chloride ion channel dominantly expressing in the spinal cord, whose activation is known to ameliorates neuropathic pain [14]. Expressions of GlyRα1, a most prevalent subunit in central nervous system [21], were similar in the genotypes and were not changed by PSNL operation (Figure 3C). These data suggested that PRIP deficiency affects the expression of KCC2 at basal and after PSNL surgery. Since PRIP-2 KO mice are not currently available, we were unable to define changes of GABAA receptor, KCC2, NKCC2, and GlyRα1 expressions as a result of PRIP-2 KO alone.

In immature neurons, a low expression of KCC2 results in a physiologically high concentration of intracellular chloride ions, which leads to the depolarization of cells [22]. Similarly, when PSNL was performed in mice, KCC2 expression was decreased in the spinal cord, resulting in a high concentration of intracellular chloride ion and reduced nociceptive threshold [23]. In addition, upregulation of KCC2 induced inhibitory postsynaptic potentials [24], suggesting that high expression level of KCC2 observed with DKO spinal cord enhances inhibitory synaptic transmission. We then tested if inactivation of KCC2 by R-(+)-[(dihydroindenyl)oxy] alkanoic acid (R-DIOA), an inhibitor of KCC2, affects pain sensitivity. The paw withdrawal threshold was decreased dose-dependently by intrathecal administration of R-DIOA (Figure 3D), indicating the importance of KCC2 activity. Therefore, similar KCC2 expression in the spinal cord of naive WT and DKO PSNL mice (Figure 3C) may cause the allodynia-resistant phenotype observed in the DKO PSNL model (Figure 1B).

To further confirm the involvement of KCC2 in neuropathic pain regulated by PRIP, we performed a hind paw withdrawal test by using WT, PRIP-1 and PRIP-2 KD, and DKD mice with R-DIOA. Withdrawal thresholds were not changed in PSNL-operated WT and a single gene KD mice, and R-DIOA administration did not affect the pain threshold (Figure 3E). However, relief from pain (as indicated by the increase of the threshold) in the DKD PSNL model was significantly inhibited by the administration of R-DIOA 3 days postinjection (Figure 3E).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the regular expression of KCC2 in DKO mice even after PSNL surgery induces the inhibition of nociceptive transmission and ameliorates PSNL-mediated neuropathic pain, even though the alteration of GABAA receptor subunits in PRIP-1 KO mice causes allodynia [8]. The current findings led us to hypothesize that regulation of KCC2 expression is a critical modulator of pain sensation.

Abbreviations

DIOA:

[(dihydroindenyl)oxy] alkanoic acid

DKD:

PRIP-1 and 2 gene double knockdown

DKO:

PRIP-1 and 2 gene double homologous knockout

GABA:

γ-aminobutyric acid

GlyR:

Glycine receptor

KCC2:

K+-Cl--cotransporter-2

NKCC1:

Na+-K+-Cl--cotransporter-1

PSNL:

Partial sciatic nerve ligation

PRIP:

Phospholipase C-related but catalytically inactive protein

PRIP-1 KO:

PRIP-1 gene homologous knockout

WT:

Wild type

References

  1. Kanematsu T, Takeya H, Watanabe Y, Ozaki S, Yoshida M, Koga T, Iwanaga S, Hirata M: Putative inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate binding protein in rat brain cytosol. J Biol Chem 1992, 267: 6518–6525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanematsu T, Misumi Y, Watanabe Y, Ozaki S, Koga T, Iwanaga S, Ikehara Y, Hirata M: A new inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate binding protein similar to phosphalipase C-δ1. Biochem J 1996, 313: 319–325.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takeuchi H, Kanematsu T, Misumi Y, Yaakob HB, Yagisawa H, Ikehara Y, Watanabe Y, Tan Z, Shears SB, Hirata M: Localization of a high affinity inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate/inositol 1, 4, 5, 6-tetrakisphosphate binding domain to the pleckstrin homology module of a new 130-kDa protein; characterization of the determinants of structural specificity. Biochem J 1996, 318: 561–568.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Terunuma M, Jang IS, Ha SH, Kittler JT, Kanematsu T, Jovanovic JN, Nakayama KI, Akaike N, Ryu SH, Moss SJ, Hirata M: GABA A receptor phospho-dependent modulation is regulated by, a novel protein phosphatase 1 anchoring protein. J Neurosci 2004, 24: 7074–7084. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1323-04.2004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanematsu T, Jang IS, Yamaguchi T, Nagahama H, Yoshimura K, Hidake K, Matsuda M, Takeuchi H, Misumi Y, Yamamoto T, Akaike N, Hirata M, Nakayama K: Role of the PLC-related, catalytically inactive protein p130 in GABA A receptor function. EMBO J 2002, 21: 1004–1011. 10.1093/emboj/21.5.1004

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshimura K, Takeuchi H, Sato O, Hidaka K, Doira N, Terunuma M, Harada K, Ogawa Y, Ito Y, Kanematsu T, Hirata M: Interaction of p130 with, and consequent inhibition of, the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1α. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 17908–17913. 10.1074/jbc.M009677200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanematsu T, Yasunaga A, Mizoguchi Y, Kuratani A, Kittler JT, Jovanovic JN, Takenaka K, Nakayama KI, Fukami K, Takenawa T, Moss SJ, Nabekura J, Hirata M: Modulation of GABA A receptor phosphorylation and membrane trafficking by phosphalipase C-related inactive protein/protein phosphatase 1 and 2A signaling complex underlying BDNF-dependent regulation of GABAergic inhibition. J Biol Chem 2006, 281: 22180–22189. 10.1074/jbc.M603118200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Migita K, Tomiyama M, Yamada J, Fukuzawa M, Kanematsu T, Hirata M, Ueno S: Phenotypes of pain behavior in phospholipase C-related but catalytically inactive protein type 1 knockout mice. Mol Pain 2011, 7: 79–86. 10.1186/1744-8069-7-79

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizokami A, Kanematsu T, Ishimashi H, Yamaguchi T, Tanida I, Takenaka K, Nakayama KI, Fukami K, Takenawa T, Kominami E, Moss SJ, Yamamoto T, Nabekura J, Hirata M: Phospholipase C-related inactive protein is involved in trafficking of γ2 subunit-containing GABA A receptors to the cell surface. J Neurosci 2007, 27: 1692–1701. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3155-06.2007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seltzer Z, Dubner R, Shir Y: A novel behavioral model of neuropathic pain disorders produced in rats by partial sciatic nerve injury. Pain 1990, 43: 205–218. 10.1016/0304-3959(90)91074-S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaneda Y, Nakajima T, Nishikawa T, Yamamoto S, Ikegami H, Suzuki N, Nakamura H, Morishita R, Kotani H: Hemagglutinating virus of Japan (HVJ) envelope vector as a versatile gene delivery system. Mol Ther 2002, 6: 219–226. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Song L, Kitayama T, Morita K, Morioka N, Dohi T: Down-regulation of norepinephrine transporter expression on membrane surface induced by chronic administration of desipramine and the antagonism by co-administration of local anesthetics in mice. Neurochem Int 2008, 52: 826–833. 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.09.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takenaka K, Fukami K, Otsuki M, Nakamura Y, Kataoka Y, Wada M, Tsuji K, Nishikawa S, Yoshida N, Takenawa T: Role of phospholipase C-L2, a novel phospholipase C-like protein that lacks lipase activity, in B-cell receptor signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23: 7329–7338. 10.1128/MCB.23.20.7329-7338.2003

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morita K, Motoyama N, Kitayama T, Morioka N, Kifune K, Dohi T: Spinal anti-allodynia action of glycine transporter inhibitors in neuropathic pain models in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008, 326: 633–645. 10.1124/jpet.108.136267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukuoka T, Tokunaga A, Kondo E, Miki K, Tachibana T, Noguchi K: Change in mRNAs for neuropeptides and the GABA A receptor in dorsal root ganglion neurons in a rat experimental neuropathic pain model. Pain 1998, 78: 13–26. 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00111-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munro G, Ahring PK, Mirza NR: Developing analgesics by enhancing spinal inhibition after injury: GABA A receptor subtypes as novel targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009, 30: 453–459. 10.1016/j.tips.2009.06.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujii M, Kanematsu T, Ishibashi H, Fukami K, Takenawa T, Nakayama KI, Moss SJ, Nabekura J, Hirata M: Phospholipase C-related but catalytically inactive protein is required for insulin-induced cell surface expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. J Biol Chem 2010, 285: 4837–4846. 10.1074/jbc.M109.070045

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seo K, Seino H, Yoshikawa H, Petrenko AB, Baba H, Fujiwara N, Someya G, Kawano Y, Maeda T, Matsuda M, Kanematsu T, Hirata M: Genetic reduction of GABA A receptor subunit expression potentiates the immobilizing action of isoflurane. Neurosci Lett 2010, 472: 1–4. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Knabl J, Witschi R, Hösl K, Reinold H, Zeilhofer UB, Ahmadi S, Brockhaus J, Sergejeva M, Hess A, Brune K, Fritschy J-M, Rudolph U, Möhler H, Zeilhofer HU: Reversal of pathological pain through specific spinal GABA A receptor subtypes. Nature 2008, 451: 330–334. 10.1038/nature06493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Payne JA, Stevenson TJ, Donaldson LF: Molecular characterization of a putative K-Cl cotransporter in rat brain. A neuronal-specific isoform. J Biol Chem 1996, 271: 16245–16252. 10.1074/jbc.271.27.16245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeilhofer HU, Wildner H, Yévenes GE: Fast synaptic inhibition in spinal sensory processing and pain control. Physiol Rev 2012, 92: 193–235. 10.1152/physrev.00043.2010

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu J, Karadshen M, Delpire E: Developmental regulation of the neuronal-specific isoform of K-Cl cotransporter KCC2 in postnatal rat brains. J Neurobiol 1999, 39: 558–568. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19990615)39:4<558::AID-NEU9>3.0.CO;2-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coull JAM, Boudreau D, Bachand K, Prescott SA, Nault F, De Koninck P, De Koninck Y: Trans-synaptic shift in anion gradient in spinal lamina I neurons as a mechanism of neuropathic pain. Nature 2003, 424: 938–942. 10.1038/nature01868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bos R, Sadlaoud K, Boulenguez P, Buttigieg D, Liabeuf S, Brocard C, Haase G, Bras H, Vinay L: Activation of 5-HT2A receptors upregulates the function of the neuronal K-Cl cotransporter KCC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110: 348–353. 10.1073/pnas.1213680110

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the staff of the Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development (NBARD), Hiroshima University, for assistance with mouse breeding. We would like to thank Editage for providing editorial assistance. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (24592798 and 22390349) to TK and KM, and by the Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers (LS087) to TK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Division of Basic Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan

    Tomoya Kitayama, Katsuya Morita, Rizia Sultana, Nami Kikushige & Takashi Kanematsu

  2. Department of Neurophysiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan

    Keisuke Mgita & Shinya Ueno

  3. Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Masato Hirata

Authors
  1. Tomoya Kitayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katsuya Morita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rizia Sultana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nami Kikushige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keisuke Mgita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shinya Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masato Hirata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Takashi Kanematsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Kanematsu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

TK carried out the paw withdrawal threshold test, immunoblotting, and data analyses. KM performed PSNL surgery and intrathecal siRNA injection. SR, NK, and KM participated in the data analyses. SU and MH provided the knockout mice and participated in the design of the study. TK conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination of the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitayama, T., Morita, K., Sultana, R. et al. Phospholipase C-related but catalytically inactive protein modulates pain behavior in a neuropathic pain model in mice. Mol Pain 9, 23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-9-23

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-9-23

Keywords

Molecular Pain

ISSN: 1744-8069

Contact us