Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Molecular Pain

Open Access

Intraperitoneal administration of AAV9-shRNA inhibits target gene expression in the dorsal root ganglia of neonatal mice

  • Akira Machida1,
  • Hiroya Kuwahara1, 4,
  • Azat Mayra1,
  • Takayuki Kubodera1,
  • Takashi Hirai2,
  • Fumiko Sunaga1,
  • Mio Tajiri1,
  • Yukihiko Hirai3,
  • Takashi Shimada3,
  • Hidehiro Mizusawa1 and
  • Takanori Yokota1, 4, 5Email author
Molecular Pain20139:36

https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-9-36

Received: 13 November 2012

Accepted: 26 June 2013

Published: 18 July 2013

Abstract

Background

There is considerable interest in inducing RNA interference (RNAi) in neurons to study gene function and identify new targets for disease intervention. Although short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have been used to silence genes in neurons, in vivo delivery of RNAi remains a major challenge, especially by systemic administration. We have developed a highly efficient method for in vivo gene silencing in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) by using short hairpin RNA–expressing single-stranded adeno-associated virus 9 (ssAAV9-shRNA).

Results

Intraperitoneal administration of ssAAV9-shRNA to neonatal mice resulted in highly effective and specific silencing of a target gene in DRG. We observed an approximately 80% reduction in target mRNA in the DRG, and 74.7% suppression of the protein was confirmed by Western blot analysis. There were no major side effects, and the suppression effect lasted for more than three months after the injection of ssAAV9-shRNA.

Conclusions

Although we previously showed substantial inhibition of target gene expression in DRG via intrathecal ssAAV9-shRNA administration, here we succeeded in inhibiting target gene expression in DRG neurons via intraperitoneal injection of ssAAV9-shRNA. AAV9-mediated delivery of shRNA will pave the way for creating animal models for investigating the molecular biology of the mechanisms of pain and sensory ganglionopathies.

Keywords

RNA interferenceAdeno-associated virus 9Dorsal root gangliaBlood–nerve barrier

Background

Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are nodules that contain the cell bodies of primary sensory neurons, which send out afferent axons and convey sensory information from the periphery to the spinal cord. The loss of sensory neurons in DRG causes the degeneration of peripheral axons and central sensory projections in the posterior columns. Dysfunction of small DRG neurons may cause intractable sensory symptoms, including severe pain and allodynia, and that of large neurons may cause motor symptoms due to sensory ataxia.

To investigate the mechanisms of pain and systemic sensory neuronopathies, it is necessary to establish methods other than knockout mouse techniques to postnatally regulate genes in the DRG, because genetic deletion of endogenous DRG genes may cause compensatory modulation of other genes during developmental or lead to embryonic lethality in mice [1].

RNA interference (RNAi) has emerged as a powerful tool to induce loss-of-function phenotypes through the post-transcriptional silencing of gene expression [2, 3], not only because of its potential application in functional genomic studies and target validation, but also because of its potential use as a therapeutic strategy to silence disease-causing genes. The RNAi pathway is initiated by the Dicer enzyme, which cleaves long, double-stranded RNAs into short (21- to 23-nucleotide) interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that mediate sequence-specific gene silencing [4, 5]. siRNAs can also be derived from short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) expressed from a viral vector [6].

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are an effective tool for delivering genes into the central nervous system (CNS) because of their ability to infect post-mitotic neurons and mediate efficient and stable transduction with little immunogenicity or toxicity [7, 8]. A number of serotypes have been identified, which have varying efficiency and tropism [9, 10]. Ourselves and another group have reported that, when administered intrathecally, AAV5 and AAV9 are efficient vehicles to deliver siRNA to DRG neurons [11, 12]. Zheng et al. demonstrated that AAV8 is effective in retrograde transport from muscle to spinal cord and DRG [13]. Foust et al. reported that a single intravenous injection of self-complementary AAV9 into newborn mice provided gene transfer across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and into the CNS [14]. Subsequently, other researchers have reported that intravenous administration of single-stranded AAV9 vector can deliver a target gene with extensive CNS expression [15, 16]. However, all of these past reports are related to the expression of a reporter or functional protein; there have been no reports demonstrating silencing of a target gene in the nervous system via intraperitoneal injection.

In the present study, we injected single-stranded AAV9-shRNA (ssAAV9-shRNA) intraperitoneally to neonatal mice and sufficiently inhibited a target gene in the DRG without any side effects. We chose superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) as the target gene because it is an appropriate endogenous gene for evaluating the side effects associated with both shRNA and AAV administration. SOD1 is ubiquitously expressed in the CNS, and SOD1-knockout mice exhibit no obvious neurological phenotypes [17, 18].

Results

Efficient transfer of GFP to DRG after intraperitoneal administration of ssAAV9 vector

To investigate whether AAV9 vector can transfer a gene to DRG, we intraperitoneally injected neonatal mice with ssAAV9 vector encoding green fluorescent protein (ssAAV9-GFP, Figure 1). Four weeks after the injection, the mice were euthanized, and GFP expression in the DRG was assessed. We detected efficient GFP expression in the DRG (Figure 2), indicating that the ssAAV9 vector can deliver the GFP gene to the DRG. In the CNS, GFP expression was not detected except in the posterior column and posterior horn, into which the axons of the DRG neurons project (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Figure 1

Constructions of ssAAV9-GFP and ssAAV9-sh SOD1 vector. CMV = cytomegalovirus, hrGFP = humanized Renilla Green Fluorescent Protein, hGH poly A = human growth hormone polyadenylation, L-ITR and R ITR = left and right inverted terminal repeats, respectively.

Figure 2

Efficient gene transfer to DRG after neonatal intraperitoneal delivery. Identification of efficient GFP expression in DRG 4 weeks after intraperitoneal injection of ssAAV9-GFP vector. Scale bars: 100 μm.

SOD1 mRNA and protein expression in DRG after intraperitoneal administration of anti-SOD1 ssAAV9-shRNA (ssAAV9-shSOD1)

We next intraperitoneally injected neonatal mice with ssAAV9-shSOD1 vector to determine its ability to suppress the expression of SOD1 in DRG (Figure 1). Four weeks after injection, SOD1 expression in the DRG was assessed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). In order to evaluate the reduction level of SOD1, we used the DRG of ssAAV9-GFP injected mice as a control. The expression level of SOD1 mRNA in the DRG of injected mice was about 80% lower than that of controls (Figure 3A) and lasted for at least 12 weeks (Figure 3B). We did not detect any SOD1 silencing in the spinal cord (Figure 3C). The knockdown effect was specific for the target gene (SOD1), given that the levels of other endogenous mRNAs—those encoding GAPDH, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase, and β-tubulin—did not change (data not shown), suggesting that ssAAV9-shSOD1 did not affect the expression of unrelated endogenous genes. Western blot analysis confirmed decreased SOD1 levels in the DRG of the mice injected with ssAAV9-shSOD1 (Figure 4A). Compared with that in control mice, the mean level of SOD1 expression in anti-SOD1 mice was 74.7% and 69.6% lower after 4 and 12 weeks, respectively (Figure 4B).
Figure 3

Silencing effect of ssAAV9-sh SOD1 vector on mRNA expression level of SOD1. The qRT-PCR of SOD1 mRNA in DRG at 4 weeks (A) and 12 weeks (B) after injection with ssAAV9-shRNA vector shows that superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) expression was significantly inhibited (*P < 0.05). There is no significant difference of the expression level of SOD1 mRNA between ssAAV9-shSOD1 and control in the spinal cord (C).

Figure 4

Silencing effect of ssAAV9-sh SOD1 vector on protein level of SOD1 . The SOD1 protein level was reduced in DRG as assessed by Western blot analysis at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after injection (A). Densitometric analysis of Western blot bands confirmed significant downregulation of SOD1 in the injected mice at both 4 and 12 weeks (B). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05, n = 7 for each group).

Histological evaluation of DRG

We histologically evaluated whether any anatomical abnormalities occurred in the DRG after ssAAV9-shSOD1 injection. Hematoxylin and eosin and Nissl staining of the DRG showed no inflammatory, necrotic, or degenerative lesions (Figure 5A, B). In order to confirm the neuroinflammation, we performed the following immunohistochemical staining; Iba1 (Figure 5C) for microglial activation and CD68 (Figure 5D) for macrophage invasion. Although we detected the slight microglial activation and macrophage invasion, there was no deference between AAV9-shSOD1 and control.
Figure 5

Pathological examination of DRG. Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin staining (A), Nissl staining (B), Iba1 (C) and CD68 (D) immunohistochemical staining of DRG neurons from ssAAV9-shSOD1–injected mice showed no differences between ssAAV9-shSOD1 and control (scale bars: 20 μm).

Body weight and locomotive and sensory functions

To assess their general health and the motor and sensory functions of their hind limbs, we observed the mice at 4 and 12 weeks after injection with ssAAV9-shSOD1. Body weights of the mice in the ssAAV9-shSOD1–injected group were similar to those in the control group (Figure 6A). Importantly, there were no significant differences between the groups at 4 and 12 weeks after injection, according to tactile (Figure 6B) and acetone (Figure 6C) tests. Furthermore, accelerating rotarod tests revealed no significant differences in motor function between controls and ssAAV9-shSOD1–injected mice (Figure 6D). We previously reported that the serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, total protein, and albumin values are similar in both groups [19]. All of these data demonstrate that the injected mice grow and develop without any side effects from the ssAAV9-shSOD1 vector.
Figure 6

Sensory and locomotive function and growth of the mice. At 4 weeks and 12 weeks, none of the ssAAV9-shSOD1–injected mice showed any significant differences in body weight compared with controls (A). Similarly, in the von Frey test (B) and acetone test (C), none of the injected mice showed significant differences in sensory function compared with controls. In the accelerating rotarod test, all of the injected mice could perform the task similar to that of the controls (D). Each mouse was examined in 4 trials each day (T1–T4), for 4 consecutive days (D1–D4). There was no significant difference between the injected mice group and the control group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7 for each group, P < 0.05).

Discussion

We report that a single intraperitoneal injection of ssAAV9-shSOD1 inhibits SOD1 expression in neonatal DRG without any adverse effects. Although the successful delivery of reporter genes (e.g., GFP and LacZ) and functional genes encoding therapeutic or pathogenic proteins (e.g., Survival of Motor Neuron, prepro-β-endorphin a, TAR DNA-binding protein 43) have been reported previously [1316, 20, 21], our current data are the first to show sufficient inhibition of a target gene in neurons after a single intraperitoneal administration of vector-mediated delivery of shRNA. In previous reports, gene knockdown in DRG was achieved by direct injection into these structures [22] or by retrograde transport after sciatic nerve injection [23]. Recently, we and another group showed efficient gene knockdown in DRG after intrathecal delivery [11, 12]. These approaches enable viral vectors to bypass the blood–nerve barrier (BNB) and are therefore suitable for silencing the DRG neurons local to where the vectors are injected. However, to utilize gene delivery methods in pain research, frequent and multiple injections are needed to transduce DRG neurons throughout the whole body, practice that leads to increased viral load and risk of an immune response [24]. In contrast, intraperitoneal delivery methods provide extensive and global inhibition of the target gene in all DRG neurons through a simple procedure. In this respect, the simplicity of intraperitoneal injection makes the technique superior for inducing RNAi in DRG neurons throughout the whole body.

In this study, we inhibited target gene expression in neonatal DRG neurons despite the known hepatotropism of AAV vectors after intraperitoneal administration. Although it is ultimately desirable to minimize target gene expression in adult mice, administration of high doses of AAV vectors interferes with endogenous microRNA processing, causing microRNA saturation and ultimately fatal liver toxicity because of the hepatotropism of AAV[25]. In the case of neonates, however, expression of shRNA in the liver is followed by rapid dilution of the shRNA during liver growth and hepatocyte division [26, 27]. We previously demonstrated low reduction of target gene expression in neonatal liver by intraperitoneal injection of ssAAV9-shRNA [19], a finding that indicates that shRNA-induced silencing has different features in dividing compared with non-dividing cells and that neonatal DRG are a suitable target for intraperitoneally administered AAV9-shRNA.

Using intraperitoneal administration, we successfully bypassed the BNB and delivered ssAAV9-shSOD1 vector to DRG. The BNB is formed by the tight junctions between the endothelial cells of capillaries, and it restricts the transport and diffusion of solutes from blood to nerves [2830]. We consider the following three possible routes for AAV9 to cross the BNB: (1) AAV9 directly crosses the BNB and reaches the DRG. Some evidence suggests that the barrier function of the BNB is especially vulnerable during the neonatal period, when the capillaries supplying the DRG are fenestrated, leading to a loose BNB that might not give full protection against toxins and antibodies [30]. Therefore, DRG exist outside of the protection of the BNB and are exposed to circulating solutes in the blood, including AAV vectors. (2) AAV9 enters the ventricles across the blood–cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF) barrier and is then distributed to DRG by the circulating CSF. Miyake et al. demonstrated that stronger GFP signals were detected in areas in contact with the CSF after intravenous injection of AAV9-GFP and suggested a promising mechanism by which AAV9 vectors pass through the BBB [15]. Furthermore, the perineurium of the DRG has fewer layers of perineurial cells and larger gaps than do peripheral nerves [31]. (3) AAV9 are transported from muscle to the DRG. Systemically delivered AAV9 may infect sensory axons innervating skeletal muscle and thus are transported to neurons within the DRG. Foust et al. suggested the possibility that transport from muscle to DRG occurs after systemic injection of AAV8 vector [32]. Although the precise mechanism by which AAV9 vectors pass through the BNB is unclear currently, AAV9 vectors have a specific and favorable character for the induction of RNAi in DRG.

With intraperitoneal administration of ssAAV9-shRNA, we could not detect any substantial silencing effect in the nervous system, except for in the DRG neurons. Considering that we inhibited gene expression only in DRG neurons, this method appears to have potential for pain research. The study of pain is an important area of biomedical research that is necessary for the development of treatments for intractable pain. Knockout animal models have produced remarkable advances in the understanding of the mechanisms of pain. Several molecules within DRG such as the δ-opioid receptor [33]; the transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channel family: TRPC, TRPV, TRPM, TRPA, TRPP, and TRPML [34]; and the NR1 [35] and NR2B [36] subunits of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor may work together in the development of pain-related symptoms. It has been suggested that the expression of some of these molecules (e.g., TRPV1 and TRPA1) largely overlaps various subsets of nociceptors and that these molecules are functionally linked to and interact with sensory neurons in vivo[34]. Therefore simultaneous silencing of multiple genes may be necessary to elucidate the mechanism of individual molecules in noxious sensation. However, it will lead to the embryonic lethal phenotype when multiple genes are silenced in knockout animal models. On the other hand, our method enables to target plural genes by injecting ssAAV9-shRNA vectors that silence different targets without any side effects. The advantage of our method of gene silencing is that it makes it possible to down-regulate multiple genes at once to investigate the compensatory interaction of these genes while escaping from the embryonic lethal phenotype of the genes.

Although we confirmed that the gene-silencing effect in DRG lasted for as long as 3 months in our mice, we did not examine the full duration of this silencing effect. Prior exposure to the AAV capsid reportedly leads to the activation of memory CD8+ T cells and results in the elimination of AAV capsid-harboring cells and the reduction of transgene expression [37]. However, these reports all used human subjects, which are naturally infected by AAV during childhood, and all experimental animals other than humans have shown long-term expression of the transgene after AAV-mediated gene transfer [37]. In addition, unlike in adults, there are no memory CD8+ T cells in the neonatal immune system. Furthermore, we previously demonstrated that shRNA-transgenic mice expressing the same shRNA used in the present study showed marked significant suppression of SOD1 for more than 1 year [38]. Considering these combined results, we think that the ssAAV9-shSOD1 used in this report can stably achieve long-term suppression of target gene expression in DRG.

Conclusions

We succeeded in silencing target gene expression in DRG after a single intraperitoneal injection of ssAAV9-shSOD1 vectors without any adverse effects, such as liver dysfunction, developmental abnormalities, and sensory disturbance. Intraperitoneal injection of AAV9 will be examined in further studies for potential uses in the development of treatments for diseases affecting DRG neurons. DRG transduction may have potential applications in models of chronic pain and other sensory neuronopathies.

Methods

Construction, production, and titration of the ssAAV9-shSOD1 vector

We prepared the anti-SOD1 shRNA cassette as previously reported [39]. The anti-SOD1 shRNA cassette was cloned downstream of polymerase III human U6 promoter in the AAV vector plasmid (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) (Figure 1). The silencing efficiency of the anti-SOD1 shRNA sequence was verified by using several cultured cell lines and transgenic mice expressing the anti-SOD1 shRNA, as previously described [38]. The human growth hormone polyadenylation (hGH poly A) cassette (Stratagene) was inserted downstream of the shRNA sequence for the titration assay using qRT PCR (Figure 1). The recombinant viral vector was produced according to the three-plasmid transfection protocol by using the calcium phosphate method as previously reported [40]. AAV vectors were purified using ammonium sulfate precipitation and iodixanol (Axis-Shield, Norton, MA) continuous gradient centrifugation. Genome titers of the AAV vectors were determined by qRT-PCR using the TaqMan system [41]. The following primers and probes targeting the poly(A) signal were used: 5’-CAGGCTGGTCTCCAACTCCTC-3’ and 5’-GCAGTGGTTCACGCCTGTAA-3’ served as the primer set, and 5’-TACCCACCTTGGCCTC-3’ served as the probe.

Animals

All of the animal procedures were performed in accordance with the protocols approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (protocol nos., 0100101 and 0130113A). Imprinting control region (ICR) mice were obtained from Oriental Yeast Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Postnatal day-1 ICR mice were injected intraperitoneally with a volume of 200 μl (1.0 × 1013 viral genomes/ml) of ssAAV9-shSOD1 vector (n = 7). ssAAV9-GFP injected mice were used as the control group (n = 7). The body weights of the mice were measured throughout the experimental period. At 4 or 12 weeks after injection, all of the mice were euthanized after performing rotarod tests and a series of sensory behavioral tests. DRG, spinal cord and brain were collected for analysis.

Measurement of RNA reduction by qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the collected tissues by using Isogen (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan). DNase-treated total RNA (0.2 μg) was reverse-transcribed by using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was amplified by means of the quantitative Taq Man system on a Light Cycle 480 Real-Time PCR Instrument (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The SOD1 mRNA expression level in each tissue was measured by using the following primers and probe: forward primer, 5′-GGTGCAGGGAACCATCCA-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CCCATGCTGGCCTTCAGT-3′; and probe, 5′-AGGCAAGCGGTGAACCAGTTGTGTTG-3′. To normalize the real-time PCR values, cDNA was also amplified quantitatively with the TaqMan primers and probe sets for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). The ratio of the SOD1 mRNA expression level to the GAPDH expression level was calculated to estimate the shRNA silencing efficiency. Significant differences between the two groups were calculated with Welch’s t-test and significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Western blotting

Proteins were extracted from DRG samples. The tissues were homogenized in cold homogenization buffer containing 0.1% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, together with a protein inhibitor cocktail (Roche). A 4-μg aliquot of the protein extracted from each sample was mixed with Laemmli sample buffer (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), denatured at 95°C for 5 min, and separated on a 15% SDS–PAGE gel. The separated proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (BioRad) and incubated with rabbit anti-SOD1 antibody (StressGen Biotechnologies, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada) and mouse anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (Biodesign, Saco, ME, USA) as the primary antibody. After incubation, the membrane was rinsed and incubated with 0.1% horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit HRP IgG, and goat anti-mouse HRP IgG (Thermo Science, Rockford, IL, USA). Protein–antibody interactions were visualized by using Supersignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Science). The quantification of the band intensity was measured by NIH Image J software (version 1.47). We calculated the relative expression levels and performed the statistical analysis.

Pathological examinations

Mice were anesthetized and the perfused with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. The DRG and spinal cords were the dissected out, fixed again overnight at 4°C, and immersed in PBS containing 30% sucrose. Thereafter, the specimens were placed in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetek, Japan) and snap-frozen in liquid-nitrogen, and tissue sections were cut to a thickness of 10 μm with LEICA CM3050 S cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and mounted on glass slides. DRG and spinal cord were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Nissl staining. GFP was detected by means of native fluorescence using LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). For immunostaining with Iba1 and CD68, blocking of endogenous peroxidase (1% H2O2 in PBS for 30 min), heat induced epitope retrieval was applied. Sections were heated in citrate buffer in a microwave oven at 100% power (700 W) for 9 min, then left to cool down at room temperature. After rinsing in ddH2O and PBS, sections were blocked in 10% Normal Goat Serum and incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-Iba1 antibody (1:500, Proteintech) and monoclonal mouse anti-human CD68 antibody (Dako) overnight at 4°C. The sections were then rinsed in PBS and incubated with the horseradish peroxidase-labeled polymer (N-Histofine Simple Stain MAXPO, Nichirei) for 1 h at room temperature. After rinsing again, the immunohistochemical reactions was visualized using 3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetroxide (DAB-4HCl, Dojin Kagaku). The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin.

Rotarod test

The rotarod test was performed by using an accelerating rotarod (Ugo Basile Biological Research Apparatus, Varese, Italy). The 12-week-old mice in both groups were placed on the rod (diameter, 3 cm) in four trials each day, for a series of 4 days. Each trial lasted a maximum of 10 min; the time spent on the rod without falling was recorded. The average time for each group was calculated, and statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Sensory behavioral tests

The animals were placed in Plexiglas boxes (9.5 × 21 × 25 cm) to become acclimated to the testing environment. These boxes were then placed on an elevated perforated plastic surface for at least 30 min before all behavioral tests [42]. A blinded observer conducted the behavioral testing.

Tactile threshold

Mechanical sensitivity was measured by applying a series of calibrated von Frey filaments (0.02–8 g) to the plantar aspect of a hind paw. Each filament was applied once to each mouse. Beginning with the 1-g filament, each filament was applied perpendicularly to the hind paw for 4 to 6 sec. Brisk withdrawal of the hind paw indicated a positive response, and a lack of withdrawal indicated a negative response. This filament testing was repeated a maximum of two additional times, and at least two positive responses among the three applications of the filament indicated an overall positive response. If the mouse demonstrated an overall positive response, the next lower force filament was applied as described previously. If no overall positive response was observed (zero or one response in three), the next greater force filament was applied as described previously. Once the crossover threshold could be determined (i.e., from response to no response, or vice versa) the responses to the next five filaments were recorded to determine the median withdrawal threshold.

Response to acetone

By using a plastic tube connected to a 1-ml syringe and without touching the skin, 100 μl of acetone was applied to the plantar surface of the paw. Acetone was applied five times to each paw at an interval of at least 30 sec, and the number of brisk foot withdrawals in response to the acetone application was recorded.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means –standard error of mean (SEM; n =7). We performed D’Agositino-Pearson normality test and confirmed a normal distribution for performing parametric analyses. We performed the statistical analysis by Student t test for comparisons between the two groups for all experiments, with the exception of the Rotarod test. For the Rotarod test, the average time of each group was calculated, and statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Significance was defined as p values less than 0.05.

Abbreviations

RNAi: 

RNA interference

siRNAs: 

Short interfering RNAs

shRNA: 

Short hairpin RNAs

DRG: 

Dorsal root ganglia

AAV: 

Adeno-associated virus

SOD1: 

Superoxide dismutase 1

ssAAV9-shRNA: 

Single-stranded short hairpin RNA–expressing adeno-associated virus 9

CNS: 

Central nervous system

BNB: 

Blood–nerve barrier.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following grants; grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan (#2212070 and #2212148), a grant from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (#20659138), and Strategic Research Program for Brain Science, Field E from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Technology, Japan and a grant for Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) to T.Y.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
(2)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
(3)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Nippon Medical School
(4)
Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
(5)
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University

References

  1. Chen Y, Willcockson HH, Valtschanoff JG: Increased expression of CGRP in sensory afferents of arthritic mice–effect of genetic deletion of the vanilloid receptor TRPV1. Neuropeptides 2008, 42: 551–556. 10.1016/j.npep.2008.08.001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC: Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391: 806–811. 10.1038/35888View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorn G, Patel S, Wotherspoon G, Hemmings-Mieszczak M, Barclay J, Natt FJ, Martin P, Bevan S, Fox A, Ganju P, et al.: siRNA relieves chronic neuropathic pain. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32: e49. 10.1093/nar/gnh044PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mikami M, Yang J: Short hairpin RNA-mediated selective knockdown of NaV1.8 tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Anesthesiology 2005, 103: 828–836. 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Li G, Li D, Xie Q, Shi Y, Jiang S, Jin Y: RNA interfering connective tissue growth factor prevents rat hepatic stellate cell activation and extracellular matrix production. J Gene Med 2008, 10: 1039–1047. 10.1002/jgm.1223View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R: A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Sci (New York, NY) 2002, 296: 550–553. 10.1126/science.1068999View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. McCown TJ: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors in the CNS. Curr Gene Ther 2005, 5: 333–338. 10.2174/1566523054064995View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Terzi D, Zachariou V: Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery approaches for the treatment of CNS disorders. Biotechnol J 2008, 3: 1555–1563. 10.1002/biot.200800284View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Van Vliet K, Mohiuddin Y, McClung S, Blouin V, Rolling F, Moullier P, Agbandje-McKenna M, Snyder RO: Adeno-associated virus capsid serotype identification: analytical methods development and application. J Virol Meth 2009, 159: 167–177. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.03.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vandenberghe LH, Wilson JM, Gao G: Tailoring the AAV vector capsid for gene therapy. Gene Ther 2009, 16: 311–319. 10.1038/gt.2008.170View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Xu Q, Chou B, Fitzsimmons B, Miyanohara A, Shubayev V, Santucci C, Hefferan M, Marsala M, Hua XY: In vivo gene knockdown in rat dorsal root ganglia mediated by self-complementary adeno-associated virus serotype 5 following intrathecal delivery. PLoS One 2012, 7: e32581. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032581PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirai T, Enomoto M, Machida A, Yamamoto M, Kuwahara H, Tajiri M, Hirai Y, Sotome S, Mizusawa H, Shinomiya K, et al.: Intrathecal shRNA-AAV9 inhibits target protein expression in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia of adult mice. Hum Gene Ther Part B Meth 2012, 23: 119–127. 10.1089/hgtb.2012.035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zheng H, Qiao C, Wang CH, Li J, Li J, Yuan Z, Zhang C, Xiao X: Efficient retrograde transport of adeno-associated virus type 8 to spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion after vector delivery in muscle. Hum Gene Ther 2010, 21: 87–97. 10.1089/hum.2009.131PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Foust KD, Nurre E, Montgomery CL, Hernandez A, Chan CM, Kaspar BK: Intravascular AAV9 preferentially targets neonatal neurons and adult astrocytes. Nat Biotechnol 2009, 27: 59–65. 10.1038/nbt.1515PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miyake N, Miyake K, Yamamoto M, Hirai Y, Shimada T: Global gene transfer into the CNS across the BBB after neonatal systemic delivery of single-stranded AAV vectors. Brain Res 2011, 1389: 19–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang DB, Dayton RD, Henning PP, Cain CD, Zhao LR, Schrott LM, Orchard EA, Knight DS, Klein RL: Expansive gene transfer in the rat CNS rapidly produces amyotrophic lateral sclerosis relevant sequelae when TDP-43 is overexpressed. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 2010, 18: 2064–2074. 10.1038/mt.2010.191View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Reaume AG, Elliott JL, Hoffman EK, Kowall NW, Ferrante RJ, Siwek DF, Wilcox HM, Flood DG, Beal MF, Brown RH Jr, et al.: Motor neurons in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase-deficient mice develop normally but exhibit enhanced cell death after axonal injury. Nat Genet 1996, 13: 43–47. 10.1038/ng0596-43View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kawase M, Murakami K, Fujimura M, Morita-Fujimura Y, Gasche Y, Kondo T, Scott RW, Chan PH: Exacerbation of delayed cell injury after transient global ischemia in mutant mice with CuZn superoxide dismutase deficiency. Stroke J Cereb Circ 1999, 30: 1962–1968. 10.1161/01.STR.30.9.1962View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayra A, Tomimitsu H, Kubodera T, Kobayashi M, Piao W, Sunaga F, Hirai Y, Shimada T, Mizusawa H, Yokota T: Intraperitoneal AAV9-shRNA inhibits target expression in neonatal skeletal and cardiac muscles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011, 405: 204–209. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Storek B, Reinhardt M, Wang C, Janssen WG, Harder NM, Banck MS, Morrison JH, Beutler AS: Sensory neuron targeting by self-complementary AAV8 via lumbar puncture for chronic pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 1055–1060. 10.1073/pnas.0708003105PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Foust KD, Wang X, McGovern VL, Braun L, Bevan AK, Haidet AM, Le TT, Morales PR, Rich MM, Burghes AH, Kaspar BK: Rescue of the spinal muscular atrophy phenotype in a mouse model by early postnatal delivery of SMN. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28: 271–274. 10.1038/nbt.1610PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehlert EM, Eggers R, Niclou SP, Verhaagen J: Cellular toxicity following application of adeno-associated viral vector-mediated RNA interference in the nervous system. BMC Neurosci 2010, 11: 20. 10.1186/1471-2202-11-20PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Anesti AM, Peeters PJ, Royaux I, Coffin RS: Efficient delivery of RNA Interference to peripheral neurons in vivo using herpes simplex virus. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36: e86. 10.1093/nar/gkn371PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Flotte TR, Conlon TJ, Poirier A, Campbell-Thompson M, Byrne BJ: Preclinical characterization of a recombinant adeno-associated virus type 1-pseudotyped vector demonstrates dose-dependent injection site inflammation and dissemination of vector genomes to distant sites. Hum Gene Ther 2007, 18: 245–256. 10.1089/hum.2006.113View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Grimm D, Streetz KL, Jopling CL, Storm TA, Pandey K, Davis CR, Marion P, Salazar F, Kay MA: Fatality in mice due to oversaturation of cellular microRNA/short hairpin RNA pathways. Nature 2006, 441: 537–541. 10.1038/nature04791View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang Z, Zhu T, Qiao C, Zhou L, Wang B, Zhang J, Chen C, Li J, Xiao X: Adeno-associated virus serotype 8 efficiently delivers genes to muscle and heart. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23: 321–328. 10.1038/nbt1073View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bostick B, Ghosh A, Yue Y, Long C, Duan D: Systemic AAV-9 transduction in mice is influenced by animal age but not by the route of administration. Gene Ther 2007, 14: 1605–1609. 10.1038/sj.gt.3303029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ: Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis 2010, 37: 13–25. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Persidsky Y, Ramirez SH, Haorah J, Kanmogne GD: Blood-brain barrier: structural components and function under physiologic and pathologic conditions. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Offic J Soc NeuroImmune Pharmacol 2006, 1: 223–236. 10.1007/s11481-006-9025-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirakawa H, Okajima S, Nagaoka T, Kubo T, Takamatsu T, Oyamada M: Regional differences in blood-nerve barrier function and tight-junction protein expression within the rat dorsal root ganglion. Neuroreport 2004, 15: 405–408. 10.1097/00001756-200403010-00004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yaksh TL: Spinal Drug Delivery. The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Science; 2009.Google Scholar
  32. Foust KD, Poirier A, Pacak CA, Mandel RJ, Flotte TR: Neonatal intraperitoneal or intravenous injections of recombinant adeno-associated virus type 8 transduce dorsal root ganglia and lower motor neurons. Hum Gene Ther 2008, 19: 61–70. 10.1089/hum.2007.093View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Luo MC, Zhang DQ, Ma SW, Huang YY, Shuster SJ, Porreca F, Lai J: An efficient intrathecal delivery of small interfering RNA to the spinal cord and peripheral neurons. Mol Pain 2005, 1: 29. 10.1186/1744-8069-1-29PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stucky CL, Dubin AE, Jeske NA, Malin SA, McKemy DD, Story GM: Roles of transient receptor potential channels in pain. Brain Res Rev 2009, 60: 2–23. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.018PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Garraway SM, Xu Q, Inturrisi CE: siRNA-mediated knockdown of the NR1 subunit gene of the NMDA receptor attenuates formalin-induced pain behaviors in adult rats. J Pain Offic J Am Pain Soc 2009, 10: 380–390. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tan PH, Yang LC, Shih HC, Lan KC, Cheng JT: Gene knockdown with intrathecal siRNA of NMDA receptor NR2B subunit reduces formalin-induced nociception in the rat. Gene Ther 2005, 12: 59–66. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302376View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Manno CS, Pierce GF, Arruda VR, Glader B, Ragni M, Rasko JJ, Ozelo MC, Hoots K, Blatt P, Konkle B, et al.: Successful transduction of liver in hemophilia by AAV-Factor IX and limitations imposed by the host immune response. Nat Med 2006, 12: 342–347. 10.1038/nm1358View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Saito Y, Yokota T, Mitani T, Ito K, Anzai M, Miyagishi M, Taira K, Mizusawa H: Transgenic small interfering RNA halts amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a mouse model. J Biol Chem 2005, 280: 42826–42830. 10.1074/jbc.M507685200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yokota T, Miyagishi M, Hino T, Matsumura R, Tasinato A, Urushitani M, Rao RV, Takahashi R, Bredesen DE, Taira K, Mizusawa H: siRNA-based inhibition specific for mutant SOD1 with single nucleotide alternation in familial ALS, compared with ribozyme and DNA enzyme. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004, 314: 283–291. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.12.098View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hermens WT, ter Brake O, Dijkhuizen PA, Sonnemans MA, Grimm D, Kleinschmidt JA, Verhaagen J: Purification of recombinant adeno-associated virus by iodixanol gradient ultracentrifugation allows rapid and reproducible preparation of vector stocks for gene transfer in the nervous system. Hum Gene Ther 1999, 10: 1885–1891. 10.1089/10430349950017563View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Taymans JM, Vandenberghe LH, Haute CV, Thiry I, Deroose CM, Mortelmans L, Wilson JM, Debyser Z, Baekelandt V: Comparative analysis of adeno-associated viral vector serotypes 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 in mouse brain. Hum Gene Ther 2007, 18: 195–206. 10.1089/hum.2006.178View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hargreaves K, Dubner R, Brown F, Flores C, Joris J: A new and sensitive method for measuring thermal nociception in cutaneous hyperalgesia. Pain 1988, 32: 77–88. 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90026-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Machida et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement