Skip to main content

Long-term potentiation in spinal nociceptive pathways as a novel target for pain therapy


Long-term potentiation (LTP) in nociceptive spinal pathways shares several features with hyperalgesia and has been proposed to be a cellular mechanism of pain amplification in acute and chronic pain states. Spinal LTP is typically induced by noxious input and has therefore been hypothesized to contribute to acute postoperative pain and to forms of chronic pain that develop from an initial painful event, peripheral inflammation or neuropathy. Under this assumption, preventing LTP induction may help to prevent the development of exaggerated postoperative pain and reversing established LTP may help to treat patients who have an LTP component to their chronic pain. Spinal LTP is also induced by abrupt opioid withdrawal, making it a possible mechanism of some forms of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Here, we give an overview of targets for preventing LTP induction and modifying established LTP as identified in animal studies. We discuss which of the various symptoms of human experimental and clinical pain may be manifestations of spinal LTP, review the pharmacology of these possible human LTP manifestations and compare it to the pharmacology of spinal LTP in rodents.


Pain arising from impending or actual tissue injury has an important physiological role, protecting the body from injury and promoting healing once injury has occurred. Pain persisting in the absence of ongoing nociceptive input from the periphery, or exceeding the pain normally caused by ongoing nociceptive input, has lost its physiological function and is therefore called maladaptive or dysfunctional [1]. Dysfunctional pain is thought to arise from altered processing of nociceptive information in the central nervous system.

One of the symptoms of clinically relevant pain is hyperalgesia, i.e. increased pain perception in response to painful stimuli [1, 2]. This implies the presence of a mechanism that amplifies nociceptive excitation somewhere along the central nociceptive system. A synaptic amplifier of nociception has been identified at the synapses between primary afferent C-fibres, many of which are nociceptive, and neurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord in rodents [3, 4]. Amplification of nociceptive signals at this site can be "switched on" by noxious stimulation ("conditioning stimulation") of the associated nociceptive primary afferents. The underlying cellular mechanism is long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic strength, a mechanism also described in cortical regions like the hippocampus where it is thought to be the basis of memory formation [5].

Therefore, LTP at the first nociceptive synapse is currently regarded as a cellular model of hyperalgesia induced by noxious stimulation. As general anaesthesia without additional analgesia is not sufficient to protect the spinal cord from intraoperative noxious input [6, 7], LTP in spinal nociceptive pathways may heighten acute postoperative pain. Moreover, in many patients with chronic dysfunctional pain, pain started to develop following an initial strong noxious input. Examples are chronic postoperative pain following intraoperative noxious input, chronic back pain developing from acute lumbago or sciatica and persistent idiopathic facial pain following major dental treatment [810]. Although there is currently no direct proof of the role of spinal LTP in human acute postoperative or chronic pain, some arguments have accumulated in favour:

  1. (1)

    In rodents, LTP can be induced not only by electrical stimulation of primary afferents, but also by natural noxious stimulation, e.g. by peripheral inflammation and nerve injury [4, 1113].

  2. (2)

    The same conditioning stimulation that induces LTP also leads to long-lasting hyperalgesia in freely behaving rodents [14, 15].

  3. (3)

    In rodents, LTP is preferentially expressed at synapses between nociceptive primary afferents and neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor expressing projection neurons in lamina I, i.e. neurons that (a) relay nociceptive information directly to the brain and (b) have been shown to be necessary for the development of chronic pain [4, 1618].

  4. (4)

    In rodents, the pharmacology of the induction of LTP is very similar to the pharmacology of induction of long-lasting hyperalgesia by models of chronic pain (inflammation, nerve injury), i.e. drugs that block LTP induction also block hyperalgesia induction (Table 2).

  5. (5)

    Conditioning electrical stimulation of the same type that induces LTP in rodents has been shown to induce long-lasting potentiation of pain perception in humans [19, 20].

In addition, is has recently been discovered that LTP at synapses between C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons can also be induced by abrupt withdrawal of opioids [21]. Amplification of nociceptive information by LTP may therefore not only contribute to human hyperalgesia following an initial painful event but also to the clinically important phenomenon of hyperalgesia following opioid withdrawal [22].

A critical point regarding the significance of spinal LTP for long-lasting and chronic pain is its duration. In the hippocampus and other cortical regions, LTP may last between a few hours and the lifetime of the animal, depending upon the conditioning stimulus, its repetition and the experimental conditions [23, 24]. Duration of LTP in spinal cord has not been studied directly. In one study, the hyperalgesia induced by LTP-inducing conditioning stimulation in healthy rodents reversed without further intervention after seven days [14]. In human volunteers, relatively mild conditioning stimulation causes hyperalgesia that lasts for about one day [25]. This time course seems consistent with a contribution of LTP to hyperalgesia following strong noxious stimulation, such as acute postoperative pain. In chronic pain patients, several factors may coincide to perpetuate LTP expression in nociceptive pathways, such as decreased activity of endogenous antinociceptive systems [13, 26] or the presence of intermittent low-level nociceptive input from the periphery that might "boost" the maintenance of LTP, counteracting its natural reversal. Determining the factors influencing LTP duration beyond the first hours after induction will be important to understand the exact relationship between LTP and hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients.

In conclusion, LTP in spinal nociceptive pathways is in many respects an attractive model of short-term and possibly also long-term hyperalgesia and pain following noxious stimulation or opioid withdrawal. Preventing LTP induction, e.g. in the intraoperative setting, may prevent the development of exaggerated postoperative pain. Reversing established LTP may help to treat chronic pain patients who have an LTP component to their chronic pain.

In the present review, we first summarize current techniques for induction and recording of LTP in nociceptive pathways in rodents, then we give an overview of pharmacological and other possibilities to prevent the induction of LTP and disrupt the maintenance of established LTP in rodents. In the second part, potential manifestations of LTP in humans and the corresponding experimental and clinical models are discussed. Finally, the pharmacology of induction and maintenance of hyperalgesia in these human models is reviewed and compared to the pharmacology of LTP in rodents.

Recording and induction of LTP in rodent spinal nociceptive pathways

Recording of LTP in rodent spinal nociceptive pathways

LTP is defined as a long-lasting increase of synaptic strength [5] that can be mediated by either pre- or postsynaptic mechanisms, or both. Synaptic strength is the magnitude of the postsynaptic response (i.e. postsynaptic current or potential) in response to a single presynaptic action potential at a monosynaptic connection. Recording of LTP therefore has two prerequisites (1) investigation of a monosynaptic connection and (2) recording of postsynaptic currents or potentials. In the spinal cord, there are currently two methods to record synaptic strength in nociceptive pathways that fulfil the above requirements [2, 27]. Both investigate the synaptic connection between primary afferent C-fibres (many of which are nociceptive) and superficial dorsal horn neurons, which is therefore the focus of the present review. In vivo, synaptic strength between primary afferent C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons can be measured in adult rodents by stimulating the sciatic nerve and recording C-fibre-evoked field potentials in superficial dorsal horn that are known to reflect summation of postsynaptic, mainly monosynaptically evoked currents [3, 28]. In vitro, spinal cord slice preparations from young rodents with long dorsal roots are most often used to selectively investigate the synapse between C-fibres and neurons with a known role in nociceptive processing, e.g. lamina I projection neurons that express the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor [4, 17].

Several alternative methods have been used to investigate spinal LTP, but may not fulfil all of the above requirements. C-fibre evoked field potentials recorded in deep dorsal horn [14, 29] are very similar to those recorded in superficial dorsal horn, but it is not clear if they reflect monosynaptic transmission from C-fibres. Action-potential firing recorded extracellularly from deep dorsal horn wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons [30, 31] may in part reflect synaptic strength at the first nociceptive synapse but may also be affected by modifications of membrane excitability and synaptic inhibition. Optical imaging after bulk-loading of spinal cord slices with voltage-sensitive dyes does not allow distinction between neuronal and non-neuronal structures and between pre- and postsynaptic structures [4, 32]. Where data from these studies is used in the text or tables, it is specifically indicated.

Voltage-sensitive dye can also be loaded into the presynaptic terminals of primary afferents over the dorsal root. This approach allows to selectively monitor presynaptic electrical activity, but the exact relationship to transmitter release is not known [32].

Induction of LTP in rodent spinal nociceptive pathways

LTP at the synapse between primary afferent C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons can be induced by various protocols, including strong noxious stimulation of the input pathway and application of certain drugs (Table 1). Most studies use noxious electrical stimulation of the dorsal root or sciatic nerve that can be exactly controlled regarding stimulus intensity and duration and is therefore highly reproducible. Both high frequency stimulation (HFS, several bursts at 100 Hz) and low frequency stimulation (LFS, 2 Hz for several min) of primary afferent C-fibres induce LTP at the first nociceptive synapse in vivo [3, 4] and in vitro [4, 17]. While HFS may reflect the discharge of a subtype of C-fibres at the beginning of noxious mechanical stimuli [33], LFS is similar to discharge rates of C-fibres during peripheral inflammation [34]. Indeed, LTP can also be induced by peripheral inflammation (injection of formalin into the hindpaw, [4]) and, after removal of descending inhibition, by noxious heat or mechanical stimulation of the skin [13]. Mechanical nerve injury is a frequently used animal model of neuropathic pain and also induces LTP [11, 13]. A subset of primary afferent C-fibres express the transient receptor potential channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) that is activated by both noxious heat and capsaicin and plays a major role in the induction of heat hyperalgesia [35]. Selective activation of these fibres by injection of capsaicin into the hindpaw has been shown to be sufficient for LTP induction [4], making TRPV1 antagonists or other methods that target the function of TRPV1-expressing C-fibres a potentially attractive target for prevention or modification of LTP at nociceptive spinal synapses. However, this has not been tested directly.

Table 1 Methods to induce LTP.

LTP at the synapse between primary afferent C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons can also be induced by manipulations not directly activating the input pathway. In spinalized animals, prolonged burst stimulation of primary afferent Aδ-fibres induces LTP of C-fibre-evoked field potentials, possibly reflecting heterosynaptic potentiation [36]. LTP can also be induced in the absence of presynaptic activity by application of certain drugs (Table 1). Of special interest may be the induction of LTP by abrupt opioid withdrawal that may represent a cellular mechanism of opioid-induced hyperalgesia [21].

Modulation of spinal LTP in rodents by drugs and counterirritation

Prevention of spinal LTP induction in rodents

Intracellular Ca2+ rise in the postsynaptic neuron is a central step in the induction of many forms of LTP [5, 37], including LTP in spinal dorsal horn [4, 17, 21, 38]. When spinal LTP is induced by HFS or LFS, the massive release of glutamate from nociceptive primary afferents is thought to induce a postsynaptic depolarisation (primarily via α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid [AMPA] receptors) strong enough to remove the Mg2+ block from the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Ca2+ influx through the NMDA receptor is one of the key signals that activates the intracellular machinery involved in LTP induction [2, 27, 39]. However, the postsynaptic Ca2+ rise achieved by NMDA receptor activation alone seems to be insufficient to induce LTP, as several parallel pathways that increase intracellular Ca2+ have been shown to be necessary for LTP induction (e.g., Ca2+ influx through T-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels [VGCCs] and Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, triggered by activation of NK1 receptors and metabotropic glutamate receptors of group I [mGluRIs], see [3, 4, 7, 17, 38, 40]).

Therefore, LTP induction by conditioning stimulation can be interfered with at different stages: (1) Manipulations that reduce basal synaptic transmission at the first nociceptive synapse have the potential to prevent induction of LTP by indirectly preventing NMDA receptor activation. This is likely the case for μ-opioid-receptor antagonists (reduction of transmitter release and reduction of postsynaptic depolarization), AMPA receptor antagonists and γ-aminobutyric acid receptors of type A (GABAAR) agonists/current enhancers (prevention of postsynaptic depolarization) (2) Drugs that directly interfere with NMDA receptor activation (e.g. NMDA receptor antagonists, Xenon, possibly EphB receptor antagonists) (3) Drugs that interfere with additional sources of activity-dependent intracellular Ca2+ rise (e.g. antagonists of T-type VGCCs, NK1 receptors or mGluRIs) (4) Drugs that interfere with intracellular pathways downstream from Ca2+ influx (see section on signal transduction pathways). Targets for prevention of LTP induction are summarized in Table 2, illustrated in Figure 1 and are discussed below. Table 2 also shows that the pharmacology of prevention of LTP induction is equivalent to the pharmacology of the prevention of hyperalgesia induction in animal models of inflammation and neuropathic pain.

Table 2 Targets for prevention of LTP induction.
Figure 1

Targets for prevention of spinal LTP induction in rodents.

Synaptic strength between primary afferent C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons can be modified bidirectionally, with LTP or long-term depression (LTD) being induced depending on modalities of stimulation and on the stimulated pathway [36]. For cortical synapses, it has been proposed that the quantitative level of the activity-dependent rise in postsynaptic Ca2+ determines whether synaptic strength will increase or decrease. LTP is believed to occur with higher Ca2+ elevations that activate protein kinases while LTD would occur at lower Ca2+ elevations that activate protein phosphatases, possibly with a large "neutral" Ca2+ range between both states, where neither LTP nor LTD is induced [37, 41]. In spinal cord, this has not been tested directly. However, drugs that interfere with intracellular Ca2+ levels, like mGluRI receptor antagonists, can convert spinal LTP into LTD when applied during conditioning stimulation [38], suggesting that Ca2+ dependence of LTP vs. LTD may be similar in spinal cord and cortex.

In addition to conditioning stimulation, LTP between primary afferent C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons can also be induced by abrupt opioid withdrawal [21]. It has been proposed that this novel form of LTP is induced postsynaptically, sharing mechanisms with stimulation-induced LTP, as it is abolished by preventing postsynaptic Ca2+ rise and by blocking postsynaptic G-protein coupled receptors or postsynaptic NMDA receptors [21]. The pre- vs. postsynaptic expression of opioid withdrawal LTP is currently a matter of debate, see [42] and our eLetter commenting on this paper available on the journal's web site.

Glutamate receptors

The induction of nearly all forms of spinal LTP is blocked by application of NMDA receptor antagonists (Table 2). This makes Ca2+ influx through the NMDA receptor and consequent activation of downstream Ca2+ dependent signal transduction one of the central requirements for the induction of spinal LTP [2, 27].

At normal resting potential levels, such as present during baseline synaptic transmission, glutamate that binds to the NMDA receptor may or may not induce Ca2+ influx because, depending on its subunit composition [43], the NMDA receptor channel may be blocked by Mg2+ ions [44]. During LFS or HFS, massive glutamate release followed by strong activation of AMPA receptors is thought to provide the postsynaptic depolarization necessary to remove the Mg2+ block from the NMDA receptor channel and enable LTP induction. The role of AMPA receptors has not been tested directly in superficial dorsal horn LTP, but induction of long-lasting facilitation of action potential discharges in WDR neurons is reduced by submaximal block of AMPA receptors [30].

While most types of AMPA receptors are permeable only for Na+, AMPA receptors lacking the GluR2 subunit are in addition permeable for Ca2+ [45]. Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors have been found on superficial dorsal horn neurons, including NK1 receptor expressing projection neurons [46, 47], making them potentially suited to play a prominent role in spinal LTP. However, it is currently not known whether Ca2+ influx through Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors contributes to spinal LTP under normal conditions. GluR2 knockout mice, where presumably all AMPA receptors are permeable to Ca2+, show enhanced spinal LTP that is independent of NMDA receptors [48], demonstrating that under these conditions, Ca2+ influx through AMPA receptors can substitute for Ca2+ influx through NMDA receptors.

Intracellular Ca2+ rise may also be initiated by activation of metabotropic receptors, e.g. mGluRIs, which mobilize intracellular Ca2+ from intracellular stores by activation of ryanodine- and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptors via phospholipase C (PLC) [49]. Indeed, induction of spinal LTP requires activation of mGluRIs [38, 40]. In contrast, inhibition of group II and III mGluRs, that do not couple to the PLC/IP3 pathway [50, 51], does not affect spinal LTP [40]. mGluRIs are also present on astrocytes [52], where they are thought to be involved in long-lasting facilitation of electrical activity in primary afferent terminals via the release of nitric oxide (NO) [32].

Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs)

The strong postsynaptic depolarization achieved during HFS or LFS leads to activation of VGCCs that may thus also contribute to the activity-dependent Ca2+ rise necessary for LTP induction. VGCCs are present on both primary afferent C-fibres and superficial dorsal horn neurons [53, 54], and can be classified according to their activation threshold (high- or low-voltage gated channels), their subunit composition and their pharmacology [55]. Low-threshold T-type VGCCs open below action potential threshold [56] and their expression in superficial dorsal horn neurons is associated with a steep rise of intracellular Ca2+ during conditioning stimulation that is necessary for induction of spinal LTP [4, 7, 17].

The α2δ-subunit is an auxiliary subunit of high-threshold VGCCs [57, 58] that has recently become a focus of interest as it is a target of gabapentin and pregabalin, drugs that are successfully used in the therapy of neuropathic pain [59]. Gabapentin has little effect on basal synaptic transmission or acute pain [6064]. Consistently, gabapentin does not affect LTP induction [65]. Results are different for actions of gabapentin on established neuropathic or inflammatory pain and established LTP (see below).

Neurokinin-1 receptors (NK1 receptors)

Repetitive stimulation of nociceptive primary afferents such as during HFS or LFS releases substance P into the dorsal horn [66], activating NK1 receptors located primarily on projection neurons with cell bodies in lamina I, III and IV [67, 68]. Block of spinal NK1 receptors attenuates the induction of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia [69]. This effect seems to rely on NK1 receptor expressing lamina I neurons because ablation of these neurons reduces the expression of hyperalgesia following nerve lesion or chronic inflammation [16, 18]. Consistently, NK1 receptor antagonists block LTP induction by HFS and LFS of primary afferent C-fibres both in field potential recordings in vivo [3, 7] and in patch-clamp recordings from NK1 receptor expressing lamina I projection neurons in vitro [4, 17].

It has been proposed that activation of NK1 receptors during HFS or LFS contributes to the intracellular Ca2+ elevation necessary for the induction of LTP by (1) inducing Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive intracellular stores via activation of PLC and (2) by increasing Ca2+ influx through NMDA receptors via receptor phosphorylation by PLC-activated protein kinase C (PKC) [7, 17].

GABA and glycine receptors

GABA, acting on GABAA and GABAB receptors, and glycine, acting on glycine receptors, are the main inhibitory transmitters in spinal cord. Of the three receptor types mentioned, only the GABAA receptor has been studied in relation to spinal LTP, using application of benzodiazepines [70] that enhance the action of GABA at the GABAA receptor by increasing the frequency of receptor channel openings [71]. Application of benzodiazepines prevents LTP induction [70]. As benzodiazepines do not open the GABAA receptor channel in the absence of GABA [71], this means that there is ongoing or HFS-induced GABA release in spinal cord dorsal horn that is not sufficient to block LTP induction on its own but becomes sufficient when amplified by the action of benzodiazepines. GABAA receptors are present both on the central terminals of primary afferent C-fibres, decreasing transmitter release, and on nociceptive superficial dorsal horn neurons, inducing hyperpolarization and/or shunting excitatory currents [72]. It is currently not clear whether the block of LTP induction by benzodiazepines is primarily due to reduced transmitter release during conditioning stimulation or prevention of the strong postsynaptic depolarization necessary for removal of the Mg2+ block of the NMDA receptor channel and subsequent LTP induction.

Opioid receptors

Opioids are the gold standard for treatment of moderate to severe pain, and spinal actions seem to have a prominent role in their analgesic effect [73]. Of the three major subtypes of opioid receptors, μ-, δ- and κ-receptors, μ-opioid receptors predominate in spinal dorsal horn and are present on both primary afferent C-fibres and excitatory superficial dorsal horn neurons [74, 75]. κ- and δ-opioid receptors have also been identified on primary afferent fibres and/or superficial dorsal horn neurons [7678].

Opioid receptors are mostly coupled to Gi/o proteins. Activation leads to inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, opening of G-protein coupled inwardly rectifying K+-channels (GIRKs) and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase [79]. These mechanisms decrease synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability of spinal neurons by both pre- and postsynaptic actions, i.e. by induction of hyperpolarisation, by inhibition of transmitter release from neuronal terminals and/or by interfering with intracellular protein kinases and gene transcription [80].

Most of the opioids in clinical use target the μ-opioid receptor. At the synapse between primary afferent C-fibres and spinal dorsal horn neurons, μ-opioid receptor agonists acutely inhibit synaptic transmission by a predominantly presynaptic mechanism involving inhibition of N- and P/Q-type VGCCs [21, 81, 82]. As described above, depression of basal synaptic transmission is able to interfere with LTP induction by conditioning stimulation. Indeed, μ-opioid receptor agonists block LTP induction when administered prior to conditioning stimulation both in vitro and in vivo [6, 83]. Interestingly, in vivo this effect is present only at medium doses but not at high doses of i.v. fentanyl, possibly due to an activation of NMDA receptors by opioid receptor agonists [84]. μ-opioid receptor agonists may activate NMDA receptors either directly [85] or indirectly via activation of PKC or cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) [86, 87]. Although a strong depression of basal synaptic transmission by reducing presynaptic transmitter release should probably be sufficient to prevent LTP induction, it has not been tested directly which of the above described actions of μ-opioids are crucial in preventing spinal LTP. The effect of application of δ- or κ-opioid receptor agonists during induction of spinal LTP has not been studied so far.

Receptor systems targeted by descending pathways: Adrenergic, dopaminergic and serotonin receptors

Spinal nociception is subject to descending control from several brain regions, including midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG), the nucleus locus coeruleus, the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). Descending control can have both inhibitory and facilitatory effects on nociceptive spinal transmission and critically influences the pain experience in acute and chronic pain states [88]. The descending control systems exert their effects by releasing a variety of neurotransmitters and/or neuromodulators, such as norepinephrine, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and dopamine [89].

Removing descending control in deeply anaesthetized adult rats by spinalization leads to a potentiation of C-fibre evoked field potentials by up to 250% of control [36]. Prolonged burst stimulation of the sciatic nerve at Aδ-fibre strength produces LTD of C-fibre-evoked field potentials in intact rats but LTP in spinalized animals [36]. Similarly, spinalization facilitates LTP induction by natural noxious stimulation [13]. These results demonstrate that the descending control system has an overall tonic inhibitory effect on C-fibre-mediated synaptic transmission that counteracts LTP induction. Consistently, mimicking activation of descending inhibitory pathways by spinal application of the α2-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine before HFS prevents LTP induction [90]. The effects of 5-HT or dopamine agonists on LTP induction have not been examined. Block of D1/D5 dopamine receptors does not affect LTP induction [91]. Block of the excitatory 5-HT3 receptor, hypothesized to be involved in descending facilitatory pathways, reduces the long-lasting increase in WDR neuron action potential firing induced by HFS [31].

Anaesthetic gases

Deep surgical levels of anaesthesia with either urethane, isoflurane or sevoflurane are insufficient to prevent LTP induction of C-fibre-evoked field potentials following HFS [6], LFS [4, 7] or opioid withdrawal [21] in vivo. In contrast, the noble gas xenon, which has not only anaesthetic but also NMDA receptor blocking properties, prevents induction of LTP at C-fibre synapses in intact rats [92].

Neurotrophin receptors

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is constitutively synthesized in a subpopulation of primary afferent C-fibres [93] and is released into the superficial layers of the spinal dorsal horn along with substance P and glutamate in an activity-dependent manner [94]. Its receptor TrkB, a tyrosine kinase, had been found on both primary afferents and superficial dorsal horn neurons [95]. BDNF is not necessary for induction of LTP [12] but has been reported to be involved in LTP maintenance and can induce LTP in the absence of primary afferent input (see Table 1 and below).

Transsynaptic Eph-ephrin interactions

The ephrins (ephrinA and B with subtypes) are membrane-bound presynaptic proteins that bind to postsynaptic Eph receptor tyrosine kinases (EphA and EphB receptors with subtypes), regulating dendritic spine formation and controlling synaptic organization by interaction with AMPA, NMDA and mGluR receptors [9699]. Within the B subclass, which has been studied in spinal cord, ligand-receptor binding is not subtype-specific (e.g., ephrinB2 is able to activate the EphB1 receptor) [98].

EphrinB2 is present in small, nociceptive dorsal root ganglion neurons, and EphB1 receptors have been detected in superficial dorsal horn, suggesting that the transsynaptic Eph-ephrin interaction may be involved in spinal nociceptive processing [100]. Indeed, EphB-ephrinB signalling is necessary for both the induction of LTP by HFS and the induction of hyperalgesia in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain [100102]. It has been proposed that this is due to interactions between EphB receptors and NMDA receptors. Activated EphB receptors associate with synaptic NMDA receptors [96] and induce NMDA receptor phosphorylation, possibly via phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit involving Src kinase activity, thereby increasing Ca2+ influx through the NMDA receptor [103, 104]. Consistently, administration of exogenous EphB receptor activators lowers the threshold for LTP induction by electrical stimulation in an NMDA receptor dependent manner [102].

Nitric oxide (NO) pathway

The gaseous molecule NO is a cell-permeant neuromodulator that is synthesized on demand by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) that exists in different isoforms (neuronal, endothelial, inducible: nNOS, eNOS, iNOS). NO-imaging has shown that NO is released into the dorsal horn by repetitive stimulation of nociceptive primary afferents such as during LFS [105]. Consistently, LTP induction by HFS and LFS is blocked when NO production is suppressed, when NO is prevented from crossing the extracellular space, or when the primary target of NO, soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), is inhibited [4, 14, 29]. In contrast, activation of ADP-ribosyltransferases (ADPRTs), an alternative intracellular target of NO, is not necessary for LTP induction [29]. As NOS is very scarce both in lamina I projection neurons and in primary afferents [106], NO seems to act neither as an anterograde nor as a retrograde transmitter at the first nociceptive synapse during LTP induction between primary afferent C-fibres and lamina I projection neurons. It has been proposed that NO is produced in neighboring interneurons, glial cells or blood vessels, crosses the extracellular space and acts in lamina I projection neurons (most of which express sGC) and/or nociceptive primary afferents (some of which also express sGC) [4, 32, 106].

Intracellular signal transduction pathways

Signal transduction pathways involved in spinal LTP are similar to those reported for hippocampal LTP [107]. Specifically, inhibitors of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), PKA, PKC and PLC all have been shown to prevent induction of spinal LTP (Table 2). PLC may induce Ca2+ release from intracellular stores via IP3 receptors, providing part of the intracellular Ca2+ rise necessary for LTP induction [4, 17]. Ca2+ release from intracellular stores via ryanodine receptors (RyRs) has also been shown to be necessary for spinal LTP induction [4, 7, 108].

Activation (phosphorylation) of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) under different persistent pain conditions is involved in the induction and maintenance of pain hypersensitivity. In particular, nociceptive activity induces phosphorylation of spinal extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) via multiple neurotransmitter receptors. Activated ERK, using different second messenger pathways, regulates the activity of glutamate receptors and potassium channels and induces gene transcription [109], and is therefore positioned to participate in both LTP induction and maintenance. Indeed, inhibition of ERK phosphorylation prevents LTP induction by HFS. This is likely to rely on neuronal ERK phosphorylation as HFS leads to a transient increase of phosphorylated ERK followed by a lasting increase of phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in ipsilateral spinal dorsal horn neurons, but not in glial cells [110]. In contrast, block of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK does not prevent LTP induction [111].

Less is presently known about the intracellular signal transduction pathways required during induction of opioid-withdrawal LTP. While CaMKII does not seem to be necessary, block of PKC or RyRs has been shown to prevent LTP induction by opioid withdrawal [21].

Glia cells

Both microglia and astrocytes have a role in the generation and maintenance of hyperalgesia following inflammation or nerve injury [112]. Consistently, HFS or LFS of the sciatic nerve induce activation of spinal glia cells [15, 113], and administration of an unspecific (fluorocitrate) or a microglia-specific glial metabolism inhibitor (minocycline) prevents induction of spinal LTP by HFS. At higher doses of these blockers, LTD is induced by HFS instead of LTP [113, 114], suggesting that spinal glia have a role in the determination of the direction of synaptic plasticity. Similarly, the long-lasting facilitation of presynaptic excitation induced by LFS, as quantified by optical imaging, is prevented by glial metabolism inhibitors [32].

Microglia can be activated, e.g., by ATP that is released by primary afferent fibres, interneurons or astrocytes [115117]. Activated microglia release proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), which increase excitability of spinal neurons [118121]. Spinal application of ATP induces LTP which depends on activation of microglia via P2X4 receptors and subsequent activation of p38 MAPK in microglia [122]. Similarly, bath application of the P2X receptor agonist αβmeATP leads to long-lasting facilitation of excitation in superficial dorsal horn (quantified by optical imaging) which is prevented by blocking glial metabolism or block of p38 MAPK or by administration of antibodies against the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 [123].

Recent studies have shown that peripheral nerve injury induces activation of Src-family kinases (SFK) exclusively in spinal dorsal horn microglia [124]. Similarly to the effect of minocycline, blockers of SFKs not only prevent LTP induction following HFS, but instead lead to induction of LTD, an effect that is not present during simultaneous application of TNF-α [113]. Together, these results show that activation of microglia is necessary for the induction of HFS-induced LTP, and that stimulation of microglia by ATP is sufficient for the induction of spinal LTP. However, HFS-induced LTP and ATP-induced LTP seem to use different signal transduction pathways as ATP-induced LTP is blocked by p38 MAPK inhibitors while HFS-induced LTP is not [111, 122]. In addition, spinal application of BDNF, which induces LTP of C-fibre evoked field potentials, activates microglia and up-regulates p- SFKs and p-p38 in microglia. Pre-treatment with minocycline, SFKs inhibitors or p38 MAPK inhibitors prevents both microglial activation and spinal LTP induced by BDNF [12].

Astrocytes are in close contact to neuronal synapses where they actively regulate synaptic transmission, e.g. by reuptake of glutamate from the synaptic cleft by the glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) [125127]. Inhibition of GLT-1 prevents induction of spinal LTP following HFS [128]. This effect could be mimicked by intrathecal application of exogenous glutamate, suggesting that accumulation of glutamate in the synaptic cleft impairs LTP induction. Interestingly, this does not seem to be due to glutamate excitotoxicity [128]. It has been suggested that over-activation of NMDA receptors impairs LTP [129]. Indeed, impaired hippocampal LTP induction in GLT1-/- mice could be overcome in the presence of low doses of NMDA receptor antagonists [129]. Similarly, the induction of spinal LTP in the presence of fluorocitrate could be restored by application of low concentrations of an NMDA receptor antagonist [114].

Interference with spinal LTP consolidation and modification of established spinal LTP in rodents

In the clinical context, patients often present with already established hyperalgesia, e.g. in the form of chronic pain. If LTP indeed contributes to certain forms of chronic pain, then the question arises how established LTP can be therapeutically modified. Reduction of synaptic strength during established LTP may be differentiated into transient ("symptomatic") and permanent ("causal") approaches. Symptomatic approaches will temporarily suppress synaptic transmission at the potentiated synapse but not affect the causal processes that maintain LTP, so that synaptic strength will return to elevated levels after wash-out of the drug. In contrast, causal approaches will reverse the intracellular modifications that maintain LTP and thus permanently revert (depotentiate) synaptic strength towards normal values.

In hippocampus, the maintenance of LTP induced by electrical stimulation can be divided into two distinct phases [107, 130]. The early phase of LTP (E-LTP) sets in immediately after LTP induction but gradually fades away over the first few hours. It involves modification of pre-existing proteins like phosphorylation of synaptic AMPA receptors [131]. Consolidation of LTP requires expression of the late phase of LTP (L-LTP), which slowly develops during the hours after LTP induction and relies on de novo protein synthesis and gene transcription, e.g. resulting in the insertion of new AMPA receptors in the subsynaptic membrane [132]. According to the different mechanisms underlying the two phases of LTP, they may be affected by different drugs. In the rat spinal cord, the late, protein-synthesis-dependent consolidation phase of LTP slowly develops during the first few hours after stimulation, reaching its full expression between 3 and 6 hours after LTP induction [133]. Some drugs do not affect LTP induction but selectively interfere with spinal LTP consolidation by inhibiting the development of L-LTP when given before spinal LTP induction (antagonists at D1/D5 dopamine receptors, TrkB receptors, poly-ADRPTs, see Table 3). Other drugs induce a slow decay of LTP when given very early (15 min) but not later (30 min) after LTP induction (inhibitors of PKA, PKC, ERK, see Table 3). Kinetics and time course suggest that these drugs act by interfering with L-LTP development while leaving established E-LTP unaffected.

Table 3 Targets for interference with LTP consolidation and modification of established LTP.

Although the time course of the different phases of LTP in humans is currently unknown, modification of fully established L-LTP is presumably most important for possible clinical applications. Thus, animal experiments identifying drugs or interventions of possible clinical interest for the causal treatment of established LTP-associated hyperalgesia should be designed as follows: (1) induction of LTP by HFS, LFS, natural noxious stimulation or opioid withdrawal, (2) application of the drug during fully established L-LTP (i.e. at least 3 h, better 6 h after LTP induction [133]) and (3) if LTP is depressed, true reversal should be differentiated from prolonged drug action by application of an antagonistic drug to ensure that the effect persists after the drug action has been terminated. Alternatively, recording should be continued for a time period ensuring complete washout of the drug. Few studies have tested the effect of drugs or interventions during established L-LTP (≥ 3 h after LTP induction, see Table 3). Currently, only two drugs have been identified that depress established L-LTP (diazepam and clonidine), and only for diazepam, true reversal of L-LTP has been corroborated by use of an antagonistic drug.

Targets for modification of LTP during the maintenance phase are summarized in Table 3, illustrated in Figure 2 and are discussed below.

Figure 2

Targets for modification of established spinal LTP in rodents.

Glutamate receptors

Despite the prominent role of the NMDA receptor in induction of most forms of spinal LTP, it does not seem to be required during the maintenance phase of LTP. Blockade of NMDA receptors with the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 30 min after LTP induction in mice does not interfere with LTP maintenance [101]. Similarly, systemic pre-treatment with S(+)-ketamine effectively prevents LTP induction, but does not affect established LTP when given 60 min after conditioning stimulation [134].


The auxiliary VGCC subunit α2δ is a target of gabapentin and pregabalin, drugs successfully used in the therapy of neuropathic pain [59]. Their exact mechanisms of action remain unknown. Part of their action may be presynaptic, possibly affecting VGCCs of the N-type or P/Q-type on central terminals of C-fibres, as gabapentin reduces the release of substance P and CGRP from rat spinal cord slices after inflammation [64]. In addition, systemic gabapentin has been shown to activate descending noradrenergic systems, inducing spinal noradrenaline release [63, 135] that has the potential to reduce synaptic transmission at nociceptive spinal synapses both at presynaptic and postsynaptic sites [136]. Evidence is converging that gabapentin has little effect on basal synaptic transmission or acute pain but inhibits established neuropathic or inflammatory pain [6064]. Consistently, gabapentin depresses established LTP (given 60 min after LTP induction) but does not affect LTP induction [65]. As this study used systemic application of gabapentin, it is not possible to decide if the observed effect was mediated by local action the spinal cord level or by modulation of descending pathways.

NK1 receptors

Block of NK1 receptors does not affect established LTP [3]. Consistently, block of NK1 receptors does not affect established hyperalgesia [69]. This is in line with the notion that substance P is released from primary afferents during repetitive stimulation such as HFS, but not at the low frequencies used for test stimulation (e.g., 0.1 Hz) [66, 137].

GABAA receptors

While administration of a GABAA receptor agonist only evokes a transient depression of LTP, benzodiazepines applied early (30 min) or late (3 h) after LTP induction completely or partially reverse LTP. This seems to be due to true reversal rather than prolonged drug action, as the depression persists after application of antagonists at the benzodiazepine or GABA binding site of the GABAA receptor [70]. It has been proposed that reversal of LTP by benzodiazepines might be due to inhibition of the cAMP/PKA and/or the NO pathways [70].

Opioid receptors

Morphine, a non-selective μ-opioid receptor agonist with affinity to δ- and κ-opioid receptors as well [138] given intravenously leads to a strong and dose-dependent reduction of C-fibre-evoked field potentials 60 min after induction of LTP by HFS [65]. As μ-opioid receptor agonists also depress baseline synaptic transmission of C-fibre-evoked postsynaptic potentials [82], it is not clear if LTP is reversed by morphine or if responses are acutely depressed similarly to control responses.

Receptor systems targeted by descending pathways: Adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors

Clonidine, applied at a dose that does not affect basal synaptic transmission, partially depresses both developing and established L-LTP (tested 30 min and 3 h after LTP induction, respectively). This action is mediated by activation of α2-adrenergic receptors [90]. The depression is biphasic, with a fast phase lasting 3.5 hours and a slow phase lasting till the end of the experiments at up to 5 hours, and seems to be partially mediated by activation of cholinergic interneurons and the NO-pathway. It was not tested if depression was due to prolonged drug action or to long-lasting modification of intracellular processes.

Block of dopamine receptors of the D1/D5 subtype before spinal LTP induction selectively depresses L-LTP development, while activation of these receptors induces a slowly rising LTP that presumably corresponds to the L-LTP induced by electrical stimulation [91].


BDNF is constitutively synthesized in a subpopulation of unmyelinated primary afferents [93] and is released into the superficial layers of the spinal dorsal horn along with substance P and glutamate in an activity-dependent manner [94]. Among other actions, BDNF increases protein synthesis both globally and locally [139] and is therefore positioned to contribute to L-LTP. Indeed, inhibition of the action of BDNF before LTP induction selectively reduces the L-LTP (but not E-LTP) induced by LFS [140]. In addition, upregulation of BDNF in DRG neurons seems to be a prerequisite for the consolidation of nerve injury-induced LTP, probably involving a BDNF action on microglia [12].


Although intrathecal application of EphB-receptor antagonists inhibits the maintenance of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia following inflammation or nerve injury, it does not affect maintenance of spinal LTP when applied 30 min after LTP induction [102].

NO pathway

In contrast to LTP induction, LTP maintenance is not dependent on NO production, NO diffusion through the extracellular space or sGC action. However, spinal application of an inhibitor of poly-ADPRTs before HFS stimulation interferes with LTP consolidation, preventing L-LTP development [29]. Poly-ADPRTs are primarily nuclear enzymes that attach multiple ADPribose moieties to their substrates. They have been associated with DNA repair but also with DNA transcription [141], possibly explaining their involvement in L-LTP.

Adenosine receptors

Recently, it has been shown [142] that block of spinal adenosine receptor 1 (AR1) by cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) completely depresses spinal LTP at C-fiber synapses when applied 60 min after HFS. As CPA also strongly depresses baseline C-fibre evoked responses, it is not clear if LTP is reversed or if responses are acutely depressed similarly to control responses.

The same study reports that HFS at C-fibre intensity also induces LTP at spinal Aβ-fibre synapses. Aβ-fibre LTP is depressed by CPA applied 60 min after HFS. As basal Aβ-fibre responses are only marginally depressed by CPA, this seems to be due to a specific action of CPA on the potentiated Aβ-fibre response. Further characterization of the origin of the Aβ-fibre evoked field potential (e.g. nociceptive or non-nociceptive spinal neurons) will be necessary before evaluating any role of Aβ-fibre LTP as a potential mechanism underlying hyperaesthesia or allodynia.

Intracellular signal transduction pathways

Inhibition of PKA, PKC or ERK phosphorylation induces a slow decay of spinal LTP when administered during the first 15 min after induction but not when administered at 30 min [110, 143]. Kinetics and time course suggest that these drugs interfere with L-LTP development. Inhibition of CaMKII still led to a slow decay of LTP when administered at 60 min after LTP induction [143], suggesting that L-LTP development can also be prevented at this later time point. However, inhibition of CaMKII does not reverse established L-LTP at 3 h after LTP induction.

Signal transduction pathways have also been investigated in models of pharmacologically induced LTP that may selectively mimic the L-LTP component of HFS-/LFS-induced LTP. Because of their similarity to L-LTP, results are presented here rather than in the LTP induction section. Spinal application of BDNF selectively induces a slowly rising, protein-synthesis-dependent LTP that shares features with L-LTP induced by electrical stimulation [140]. However, the pharmacology of the two forms of LTP only partially overlaps. Both BDNF-induced LTP and HFS-induced LTP are prevented by ERK inhibitors and not affected by JNK inhibitors [111, 140]. However, inhibiting p38 MAPK prevents BDNF-induced LTP but not HFS-induced LTP, also not at time points after LTP induction where an action on L-LTP should be clearly evident [111, 140]. Similarly, application of TNF-α induces a slowly rising LTP in the spinal cords of neuropathic, but not normal animals. Development of this LTP is prevented by inhibition of NF-κB, p38 MAPK and JNK.


LTP and LTD have been suggested to partially rely on opposite cellular mechanisms, e.g. the phosphorylation vs. dephosphorylation of target proteins like CaMKII [41]. Therefore, manipulations that induce LTD at spinal nociceptive synapses may be able to reverse established E-LTP (but not necessarily L-LTP) by reversing LTP-related phosphorylation. Indeed, prolonged burst stimulation of primary afferent Aδ-fibres, that induces LTD of C-fibre evoked field potentials, partially depotentiates LTP induced by HFS of primary afferent C-fibres when applied early (≤1 h) after LTP induction [36, 144]. However, a single prolonged Aδ-fibre burst stimulation does not seem to interfere with the development of L-LTP, as the depotentiation lasts for less than two hours [144]. A single prolonged Aδ-fibre burst stimulation also does not reverse established L-LTP, but rather induces additional potentiation when given late (3 h) after LTP induction [144]. The magnitude of depotentiation cumulates over repeated sessions of Aδ-fibre stimulation, but is it not clear if L-LTP is affected under these conditions [36]. Stimulation of non-nociceptive Aβ-fibres induces neither LTD nor depotentiation of LTP [36].

Translational aspects of LTP in nociceptive pathways

Spinal LTP induced by noxious stimulation

In rodents, LTP in nociceptive spinal pathways can be induced by noxious stimulation. This has led to the notion that human pain following intense noxious stimulation, e.g. acute postoperative pain or chronic pain developing after an initial strongly painful event, may in part be due to LTP in spinal nociceptive pathways.

Clinical pain manifests as a variable combination of spontaneous pain, hyperalgesia and allodynia (Footnote: according to the new definition of allodynia proposed by the IASP task force in 2008, only pain induced by stimuli not capable of activating nociceptors is classified as allodynia. At present, brush-induced allodynia, that has been shown to rely on transmission via primary afferent Aβ-fibres [145], is the only established example of allodynia according to this new definition). In humans, intense noxious stimulation or tissue injury typically evoke thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia within the stimulated/injured region (primary hyperalgesia) and mechanical hyperalgesia and brush-induced allodynia within a larger surrounding region of non-injured skin (secondary hyperalgesia). While primary hyperalgesia reflects sensitization of nociceptive primary afferents and also includes central mechanisms, secondary hyperalgesia is thought to selectively rely on central (spinal and/or supraspinal) mechanisms [2, 146]. In chronic pain, spread of hyperalgesia to sites distant from the initial site of injury or even affecting the whole body, manifesting as a general elevation of pain sensitivity, may occur [26, 147150].

Before discussing the possible implications of injury-induced LTP for human experimental and clinical pain, it is important to determine which of the above manifestations of pain may be due to or enhanced by spinal LTP. LTP at synapses between nociceptive primary afferent C-fibres and superficial spinal dorsal horn neurons amplifies nociceptive signals. Therefore, LTP can account for hyperalgesia and possibly for small reductions in nociceptive thresholds and increases in size of hyperalgesic area. Hyperalgesia to pinprick stimuli is a frequent finding in human experimental or clinical hyperalgesia. Under normal conditions, pinprick stimuli are thought to be conducted by Aδ-fibres [151]. It is presently not known if spinal LTP also affects Aδ-fibre mediated synaptic transmission. However, recent work shows that pinprick hyperalgesia after inflammatory or nerve injury can be mediated by a subclass of C-fibres [152], suggesting that pinprick hyperalgesia might also relay on spinal LTP at C-fibre synapses. Brush-induced allodynia is thought to rely on input via primary afferent non-nociceptive Aβ-fibres [145]. Whether maintenance or modulation of allodynia outside the stimulated or damaged area is dependent on C-fibre sensitization remains controversial [153155]. Therefore, the LTP at spinal C-fibre synapses described in the present review is unlikely to solely account for the origin of brush allodynia, although it might contribute to its modulation or maintenance. Although LTP at C-fibre synapses cannot induce spontaneous pain, it may exacerbate spontaneous pain in the region of an injury. Spontaneous pain appears as the result of spontaneous activity in primary nociceptive afferents or central nociceptive neurons. Spontaneous activity in primary afferents, e.g. resulting from peripheral sensitization or from ectopic activity [1], may be amplified in the spinal cord if LTP is present, leading to enhanced pain intensity.

LTP has a homosynaptic component, expressed at the same synapse that was activated by the conditioning stimulation. Homosynaptic spinal LTP may contribute to primary, but not to secondary hyperalgesia. However, synaptic plasticity may in addition be heterosynaptic, i.e. spread to neighboring synapses that have not been directly affected by the conditioning stimulation [156158]. Studies investigating spinal LTP in rodents typically use supramaximal stimulation of the whole nerve trunk (sciatic nerve in vivo, dorsal root in vitro), presumably activating all intact fibres and consequently reaching all functional synapses between these fibres and second order neurons. Therefore, it is currently not possible to conclude whether this type of LTP is purely homosynaptic or also includes heterosynaptic components.

However, there is some direct evidence that heterosynaptic LTP occurs in spinal cord. When descending inhibition is removed, conditioning stimulation of Aδ-fibres induces LTP of C-fibre-evoked field potentials [36]. In addition, HFS of the tibial nerve or injury of the gastrocnemius/soleus motor nerve induces LTP of spinal field potentials evoked by stimulation of C-fibres in the sural nerve [12].

Heterosynaptic LTP may rely on various mechanisms. One possibility is that increased intracellular Ca2+ and second messengers spread intracellularly to neighboring nociceptive synapses within the same neuron and induce LTP at these synapses. In addition, several neuromodulators, e.g. ATP and BDNF, have been shown to induce LTP in the absence of conditioning stimulation of the input pathway [12, 122]. Intense noxious stimulation is known to release BDNF and ATP into the spinal cord [94, 159]. Diffusion of these substances through the extracellular space may induce heterosynaptic LTP at synapses and neurons not directly activated by the injury or conditioning stimulation and thus contribute to secondary hyperalgesia. In fact, heterotopic LTP has been shown to rely on release of BDNF in spinal cord [12]. It is not known how far these substances can diffuse through the spinal cord. At least, diffusion within the same segment to affect synapses in the termination territory of a neighbouring nerve is possible in rodents [12]. In contrast, diffusion within the spinal cord tissue to distant segments or affecting synaptic transmission in the entire spinal cord seems improbable. On the other hand, more widespread effects could result if sufficient concentrations of these substances reached the cerebrospinal fluid. Whether LTP induced by an initial painful event can account for the spread of hyperalgesia to distant sites of the body or for the generalized hyperalgesia typical for chronic pain [147, 149, 160163] is presently not known. Therefore, this manifestation of clinical pain will not be discussed in the present paper.

Spinal LTP induced by opioid withdrawal

It has recently been discovered that in rodents, LTP in nociceptive spinal pathways can also be induced by abrupt withdrawal from opioids [21]. It has therefore been hypothesized that LTP may also contribute to the clinically important phenomenon of hyperalgesia following opioid withdrawal [21, 22, 42]. Although this has not been demonstrated directly, opioid-withdrawal LTP would be expected to affect nociceptive synapses throughout all spinal segments. Although it seems likely that opioid-withdrawal LTP can also lead to exacerbation of preexisting hyperalgesia or spontaneous pain, this has not been directly studied so far.

Section conclusions

In conclusion, spinal LTP induced by an initial injury or noxious input may contribute to both primary and secondary hyperalgesia. LTP may also contribute to exacerbation of spontaneous pain. However, LTP induced by an initial painful event cannot explain brush allodynia. LTP induced by abrupt opioid withdrawal is proposed to lead to generalized hyperalgesia, possibly also including exacerbation of preexisting hyperalgesia.

It must be emphasized that although the above described sensory phenomena are compatible with spinal LTP, they may also be explained by other mechanisms. This is especially the case in primary hyperalgesia, where a substantial part of the hyperalgesia has been demonstrated to rely on sensitization of primary afferents [146]. The presence of secondary hyperalgesia is not in itself proof of the existence of LTP (i.e. altered synaptic strength), as secondary hyperalgesia can - and has - also been explained by changes in neuronal excitability (e.g. changes in neuronal membrane excitability) as well as changes in segmental or descendng inhibitory control [1, 2, 27, 88, 112, 164167]. Definitive proof of the existence of LTP depends on the direct measurement of synaptic strength, which is currently not feasible in humans. Therefore, we will, for the time being, have to accept that evidence for the existence of LTP in human pain pathways will remain indirect and circumstantial.

The following sections contain a more detailed description of those manifestations of human clinical and experimental pain that may principally be due to or exacerbated by spinal LTP, and compares their pharmacology to the known pharmacology of LTP in rodents. As primary hyperalgesia is in most cases accompanied by sensitization of nociceptive nerve endings, we will focus on secondary hyperalgesia (i.e. mechanical hyperalgesia in unstimulated or undamaged tissues) because this, at least, can safely be assumed to be due to central mechanisms [146, 168]. In order to provide relevance to the clinical situation, we will also mention the impact of secondary hyperalgesia induction - or its modulation - on clinical pain measures. Typical measures of clinical pain outcome are pain scores, particularly on movement, and analgesia consumption, particularly in the acute or postoperative context. However, it must be emphasized that such clinical measures reflecting subjective pain experience are regularly found to be only weakly correlated to alterations in pain processing as quantified by various forms of formal sensory testing [161, 162, 169, 170].

Human volunteer and clinical models of hyperalgesia and LTP in nociceptive pathways

Human volunteer models (Table 4)

Table 4 Methods of experimentally inducing secondary hyperalgesia possibly involving LTP in human volunteers

Electrical HFS, a specific human volunteer model of stimulus-induced LTP

Based on the observation that HFS of C-fibres is able to induce spinal LTP in in vitro and in vivo animal models [3, 171], Klein et al. applied similar patterns of electrical C-fibre HFS transcutaneously via a special punctuate ring electrode in human volunteers [19]. Using psychophysical testing, they were able to demonstrate primary and secondary hyperalgesia. The homotopic perceptual correlate was hyperalgesia to electrical stimulation of C-fibres in the conditioned area up to at least three hours after the end of conditioning stimulation, while the heterotopic perceptual correlates consisted of hyperalgesia to pin-prick stimulation (presumably mediated by Aδ- and/or C-fibres [151, 152]) and allodynia to brushing (presumably mediated by Aβ-fibres [145]), both in the area adjacent to conditioning stimulation, and again lasting at least three hours.

These results have been confirmed and expanded in subsequent psychophysical studies by this group [25, 172174] which are summarised in Table 5. These studies further demonstrated that HFS produces a leftward shift in the stimulus-response curve for heterotopic pinprick stimulation, that higher HFS intensities result in greater mechanical pinprick hyperalgesia, and that the duration of heterosynaptic pinprick hyperalgesia has a mean half-life of 3.3 hours and disappears after a mean of 25.4 hours. A study by another group has recently confirmed these results, further demonstrating that HFS-induced changes in heterotopic processing are also reflected in altered evoked somatosensory potentials, including N1-P2 peak-to-peak and P300 amplitudes [175].

Table 5 Effects of C-fibre HFS on pain perception inside and outside the conditioned skin area

Thermal hyperalgesia at the stimulation/injury site is a typical feature of primary hyperalgesia and has been demonstrated to be largely due to sensitization of primary afferents [146]. The complete absence of thermal hyperalgesia within the conditioned area in the human HFS model therefore suggests that the HFS paradigm does not produce appreciable peripheral sensitisation. The quantitative sensory testing profiles showed hyperalgesia to the same types of stimuli inside and outside the HFS-conditioned areas, with the magnitude of hyperalgesia being 30% less in the surrounding area than in the stimulated area, but with highly correlated magnitudes between both areas. These results suggest that homo- as well as heterotopic amplification of central (e.g. spinal) nociceptive responses results from the HFS stimulation paradigm in intact human subjects, compatible with spinal LTP induction [174]. The time course of the sensory phenomena demonstrated in the human HFS model corresponds to that of early LTP in animal models involving mainly post-translational mechanisms [25].

Other human volunteer models of stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia

Ongoing transdermal electrical stimulation at a high current density (5 Hz, 50 mA) to recruit "sleeping" mechano-insensitive class C-nociceptors has also been used to induce large and stable areas of pinprick secondary hyperalgesia and ongoing pain in human volunteers [176]. These "sleeping" nociceptors are considered to be the same ones involved in capsaicin-induced pain and secondary hyperalgesia [177]. The ongoing pain and secondary hyperalgesia caused by their recruitment has been shown to be stable for at least two hours, making this model particularly suited to the study of secondary hyperalgesia and its therapeutic manipulation.

Using a model of skin incision in human volunteers and pre/post-traumatic local anaesthetic injections, Kawamata et al. showed that the peri-incisional hyperalgesia to punctuate mechanical stimuli, once developed, is more or less independent of peripheral nociceptive input from the incision, demonstrating the central (e.g. spinal) origin of this form of hyperalgesia [178]. The time course of the secondary hyperalgesia in this model is comparable to that resulting from cutaneous HFS, reaching its maximum 30-60 min after incision and lasting at least 6 hours before returning to baseline [25, 178]. Similar findings have been reported for thermal and for chemical injury (e.g. by capsaicin or formalin) (for review see [146, 168, 179, 180]). In all these cases, areas of secondary punctuate mechanical hyperalgesia are present surrounding stimulated/damaged tissue, with characteristics consistent with spinal sensitisation, e.g. due to LTP induction.

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in human volunteers

Abrupt withdrawal of opioids has recently been shown to induce spinal LTP in an in vivo rat model [21]. Such LTP could be expected to manifest as generalised hyperalgesia or possibly also as increases in pre-existing secondary hyperalgesia. That opioids can paradoxically induce hyperalgesia under a variety of circumstances, including precipitate withdrawal, has been increasingly recognised in animal studies over the last decade [181186]. This phenomenon has now also been documented in human volunteer models, either by demonstrating generalised hyperalgesia (e.g. using the cold pressor task) after acute opioid withdrawal (via naloxone) in subjects previously made opioid-tolerant [187], or by demonstrating that acute withdrawal of an opioid (remifentanil) infusion increases the area of cutaneous secondary pinprick hyperalgesia previously induced by either electrical transdermal stimulation [188, 189] or capsaicin injection [190].

Human patient models

Stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia after surgery in patients

General anaesthesia without additional analgesia is not sufficient to protect the spinal cord intraoperatively from the strong noxious input accompanying surgery [6, 7]. Thus such general anaesthesia will not prevent the induction of LTP in the spinal nociceptive pathways, a process likely to increase acute postoperative pain. Consistently, secondary hyperalgesia has been demonstrated to be present peri-incisionally in human patients after surgery using a variety of psychophysical testing techniques. Thus punctuate secondary hyperalgesia has been demonstrated after a variety of surgical procedures by a number of groups [160, 161, 191, 192], who have demonstrated this hyperalgesia to persist at least 7 days after surgery. Other groups have confirmed the presence of such secondary peri-incisional hyperalgesia using either electrical stimulation or pressure algometry with a similar time course [163, 169, 193, 194].

Stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients

The development of chronic pain after human surgery is associated with the persistence and spread of secondary hyperalgesia, as now demonstrated by a number of human clinical studies [160, 161, 163, 192]. While LTP can be postulated to at least partially explain the persistent secondary hyperalgesia in this context, it presently does not explain the delayed spreading, generalizing hyperalgesia, as discussed above.

Hyperalgesia to mechanical and electrical psychophysical testing is also a feature of a wide variety of established chronic pain conditions, including low back pain [150, 195], fibromyalgia [196199], rheumatoid arthritis [200], osteoarthritis [201], chronic widespread pain [202], irritable bowel syndrome [203205], pancreatitis [148, 206, 207], gallstones [208] and headache [209]. Again, both secondary and spreading hyperalgesia are found in this context, with LTP being a possible underlying mechanism for secondary hyperalgesia, but with a presently unknown role in spreading hyperalgesia. It should be emphasized that differentiating secondary hyperalgesia from spreading hyperalgesia is frequently difficult in chronic pain patients.

Many chronic pain patients have an element of neuropathic pain due to peripheral nerve damage [210]. Nerve damage will amplify nociceptive input as well as providing spontaneous nociceptive input, with the resultant intense and ongoing nociceptive barrage to the spinal cord being similar to LTP-inducing conditioning stimulation [211]. Thus the hyperalgesia associated with nerve damage in chronic pain patients may partially reflect LTP in spinal nociceptive pathways.

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients

The phenomenon of opioid-induced hyperalgesia is increasingly recognised in patients (for review see [22]). Thus Joly et al. demonstrated larger postoperative areas of secondary peri-incisional hyperalgesia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery receiving high-dose remifentanil infusion intraoperatively as compared to low-dose remifentanil [212]. It should be noted that these patients all received a loading dose of morphine before end of surgery (and thus before end of remifentanil infusion), followed by further postoperative morphine titration for pain, making the situation not exactly comparable with the opioid withdrawal model for LTP in rodents [21]. The described increases in hyperalgesia were accompanied by poorer postoperative analgesic response to opioids, a finding supported in other studies of intraoperative opioid supplementation [22]. Generalised reductions in pain thresholds and tolerance have further been documented in drug addicts on methadone maintenance [213] and even in chronic low back pain patients after one month on opioid treatment [214]. In rodents, spinal LTP has been demonstrated upon opioid withdrawal [21]. It is presently not known if prolonged exposition to opioids also induces LTP in spinal nociceptive pathways. In addition, other mechanisms such as reduced descending inhibition or enhanced descending facilitation also likely play a role for opioid-associated hyperalgesia [215217].

Pharmacology of human hyperalgesia: Prevention of human hyperalgesia induction

In animal models, a variety of interventions have been found to prevent LTP induction. These can be divided into four basic categories, discussed in detail above, namely interventions: 1) reducing basal synaptic transmission at the first nociceptive synapse; 2) directly interfering with NMDA receptor activation; 3) interfering with additional sources of activity-dependent intracellular Ca2+ rise, and 4) interfering with intracellular pathways downstream from Ca2+ influx. Predominantly interventions in the first three categories have been investigated in humans, this restriction is mainly due to the limited availability of appropriate substances approved for human use.

Conclusions about possible interference with LTP induction can most convincingly be drawn from studies of secondary hyperalgesia in the context of human volunteer studies, e.g. cutaneous electrical high frequency stimulation. Some information may also be obtained from effects on early postoperative hyperalgesia in patients. However, it should be noted that in most cases the duration of the surgical intervention means that the period under investigation will also include the early phase of LTP - and may even include the later consolidation phase of LTP. Thus for the purposes of this review, discussion of prevention of LTP induction in the clinical human context will of necessity include the consolidation phase of LTP. A summary of interventions interfering with LTP induction (and possibly early consolidation phase) is provided in Table 6.

Table 6 Targets for prevention of secondary hyperalgesia induction in humans.

Human volunteer models

Prevention of stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia

Opioid receptor agonists

Application of systemic opioids is one of the classic approaches to achieve reduced synaptic transmission at the first nociceptive synapse, and has been demonstrated to prevent or reduce LTP induction in animal models (Table 2). Using a tailored infusion of alfentanil to produce plasma concentrations of 75 ng ml-1 before capsaicin injection in a human volunteer model, Wallace et al. demonstrated reductions in capsaicin-induced stroking hyperalgesia (or allodynia) and in ongoing pain [218], with similar results being obtained for alfentanil by other researchers [219]. Similarly, Wang et al. showed that, in comparison to placebo, the area of secondary hyperalgesia is reduced by about 24% at 240 min post capsaicin by 10 mg of intravenous morphine applied 25 min prior to capsaicin [220]. Other authors have achieved comparable results for morphine [221], hydromorphone and remifentanil [222, 223] using the heat/capsaicin sensitization model. Using the burn injury model, Warncke et al. also demonstrated significant reductions in secondary hyperalgesia using a morphine infusion started pre-lesionally [224]. It must, however, be said that it is difficult to distinguish between antihyperalgesia and analgesia in these circumstances.

Local anaesthesia and block of fast Na+ channels

Another way of reducing nociceptive input is by local anaesthesia to the damaged tissues involved. In an incisional model in human volunteers, Kawamata et al. demonstrated that local anaesthesia administered before skin incision inhibited the development of secondary hyperalgesia, while post-incisional block did not [178]. Similar results have been found regarding the secondary hyperalgesia surrounding intradermal capsaicin injection [168]. However, systemic application of lamotrigine or 4030W92, thought to provide a use-dependent block of fast Na+ channels, including those on peripheral nerve fibres, has not been shown to inhibit secondary hyperalgesia development when given prior to intradermal capsaicin [225].

NMDA receptor antagonists

LTP induction has been demonstrated to be dependent on NMDA receptor activation in animal models. The effects of ketamine, a non-specific NMDA receptor antagonist, have been studied in the previously presented specific human volunteer model of LTP induction via electrical cutaneous HFS [20]. The study demonstrated that low doses of ketamine (0.25 mg kg-1) given prior to HFS were able to prevent development of hyperalgesia to electrical stimulation within the HFS area, but not pinprick hyperalgesia or tactile allodynia in the area adjacent to HFS. The authors concluded that homotopic hyperalgesia due to HFS is sensitive to NMDA receptor blockade, and represents the human equivalent of the "classic" form of LTP seen in animal models. However, the heterotopic secondary hyperalgesia is not NMDA receptor sensitive, and may thus be the correlate of NMDA receptor independent forms of LTP and/or other central mechanisms of pain amplification. In this context, it should be noted that ketamine is a "dirty" drug, with additional interactions with non-NMDA, acetylcholine (nicotinic and muscarinic), serotonin and opioid-receptors, as well as Na+- and Ca2+-channels. However, at the low concentrations used by Klein et al. ketamine may be considered relatively selective for the NMDA receptor.

In contrast, ketamine has been shown to reduce secondary hyperalgesia in other human volunteer models. Ketamine has been shown to reduce the area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia compared to placebo using both intradermal capsaicin and burn injury models [218, 224, 226]. Ongoing pain from the capsaicin injection was reduced, without effect on area of primary heat hyperalgesia [218].

Voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) modulators (gabapentinoids)

The gabapentinoids pregabalin and gabapentin bind to the α2δ-subunit of VGCCs, possibly interfering with presynaptic transmitter release and/or postsynaptic Ca2+ rise. The effect of chronic oral administration of pregabalin has been tested in the already-mentioned model of secondary hyperalgesia induced by electrical transdermal stimulation [227]. Pregabalin, titrated to 2 × 150 mg per day and given orally for 6 days prior to induction of hyperalgesia, was demonstrated to significantly reduce area of hyperalgesia in comparison to placebo. Using the same model, Segerdahl found that gabapentin applied for 24 hours significantly reduced the area of hyperalgesia compared to placebo, without any reduction in spontaneous or evoked pain intensity [228]. In a study using intradermal capsaicin after 15 days' application of gabapentin, Gottrup et al. demonstrated reduction of allodynia areas - but only a trend for pinprick hyperalgesia areas -compared to placebo, without any reduction in ongoing or evoked pain intensity [229]. Applying gabapentin for 10 days prior to intradermal capsaicin, Wallace and Schultheis showed no effect on secondary hyperalgesia as compared to placebo [230].


Tricyclic antidepressants may modulate nociceptive inputs to the spinal cord by enhancing the action of descending monaminergic inhibitory mechanisms. In a study involving desipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant agent, its chronic application was unable to reduce the induction of secondary hyperalgesia by intradermal capsaicin [226].

NK1 receptor antagonists

NK1 receptor antagonists have been shown to be effective inhibitors of LTP induction in animal models (Table 2). However, in human volunteers, oral application of aprepitant, an NK1 receptor antagonist, titrated to 320 mg per day for 6 days, proved unable to significantly reduce secondary hyperalgesia induced by electrical transdermal stimulation [227].

Prevention of opioid-induced hyperalgesia

The pharmacological modulation of hyperalgesia induced by opioid withdrawal, demonstrated to be associated with LTP induction in rodents [21], has been extensively studied in a human volunteer model involving secondary hyperalgesia induced by electrical transdermal stimulation in combination with remifentanil infusion withdrawal [188]. It must be emphasized that this human model is not fully comparable to the rodent LTP induction model. The human model uses an increase in pre-existent stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia as endpoint for the opioid effect, while in the rodent model, hyperalgesia is induced by opioid withdrawal alone.

NMDA receptor antagonists

Animal models have shown that NMDA receptor block prevents LTP induction by opioid withdrawal [21]. Congruently, a human volunteer study using electrical transdermal stimulation to produce secondary hyperalgesia has demonstrated that the addition of S-ketamine to remifentanil infusion prevents the expansion of stimulus-induced hyperalgesia on acute opioid withdrawal [189].


In the human model under discussion, neither the co-infusion of the anaesthetic agent propofol, the central α2-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine, or of the selective COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib, could be shown to significantly reduce the increased area of stimulus-induced hyperalgesia following abrupt remifentanil infusion withdrawal [189, 231, 232]. Although it did not reduce this hyperalgesia, co-administration of clonidine did reduce rebound of the ongoing pain scores due to conditioning electrical transdermal stimulation after cessation of remifentanil infusion [189]. Currently, no data are available in rodents for these pharmacological targets regarding opioid-withdrawal induction of hyperalgesia.

Human patient models

Perioperative sensory testing of the secondary hyperalgesia surrounding surgical incision is an attractive way of studying the time course of central pain amplification - and hence potentially LTP - in the clinical context. However, as already mentioned, it should be realised that due to the length of surgery, the effects of perioperative therapeutic intervention will not only influence LTP induction, but also its consolidation.

Prevention of stimulus-induced hyperalgesia

Opioid receptor agonists

Opioids, shown to be effective in inhibiting LTP induction in animal models, and in reducing secondary hyperalgesia in human volunteer models, are also effective in reducing peri-incisional secondary hyperalgesia in clinical surgical patients. Thus fentanyl applied before surgical incision has been shown to reduce the degree of secondary hyperalgesia five days after back surgery vs. placebo [169, 193], and morphine given before incision has been demonstrated to reduce peri-incisional hyperalgesia vs. morphine given at the end of abdominal surgery [233]. In contrast, in these and other pre-emptive analgesia studies involving opioids, clinically significant effects on postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption have proven difficult to demonstrate and remain controversial [162]. In this context, it is also worth noting the differences in the use of opioids between these studies and those investigating opioid-induced hyperalgesia. The studies investigating opioid-induced hyperalgesia generally involve the use of a short-acting opioid (typically remifentanil), given as an infusion producing relatively high and constant plasma levels, which is then abruptly discontinued at the end of surgery. In contrast, the pre-emptive analgesia studies quoted [169, 193, 233] entail the application of a bolus of a long-acting opioid in moderate dosages, producing peak plasma concentration with surgical incision, and then gradually tapering off as surgery progresses to its completion.

Locoregional anaesthesia/analgesia

The better blockade of neuraxial sensory input provided by epidural anaesthesia as compared to systemic application would be expected to further reduce basal synaptic transmission at the first nociceptive synapse and thus to more effectively depress spinal mechanisms of central pain amplification, including LTP. Lavand'homme et al. demonstrated that for colon surgery, the groups receiving perioperative epidural anaesthesia (local anaesthetic + opioid + clonidine) vs. purely intravenous perioperative analgesia showed considerably less incisional secondary hyperalgesia up to three days post-operatively [161]. Interestingly, the epidural groups with less early postoperative secondary hyperalgesia also showed less persistent and chronic pain up to one year postoperatively [161]. Similarly, intrathecal clonidine administered before incision reduced secondary hyperalgesia vs. saline placebo up to three days after colon surgery, with reduced secondary hyperalgesia again being associated with less persistence of pain (chronic pain) up to six months postoperatively [192].

NMDA receptor antagonists

In animal and human volunteer models, NMDA receptor blockade prevents LTP induction. Application of the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine before surgical incision has been shown to reduce postoperative peri-incisional hyperalgesia after renal and colon surgery [160, 191], thus supporting the hypothesis that also in the clinical context, NMDA receptor blockade inhibits LTP induction. One of these studies again demonstrated that the associated reduction of postoperative secondary hyperalgesia was linked to lower incidences of chronic pain later on [160]. The efficacy of ketamine in improving perioperative pain outcomes is supported by extensive literature [234239].

There are few data on the effects of other NMDA receptor antagonists used perioperatively. Ilkjaer et al. studied the use of preoperative oral dextromethorphan, also a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, on early and late postoperative hyperalgesia and pain [240]. They were unable to demonstrate differences vs. placebo regarding either hyperalgesia or pain posteroperatively, probably due to inadequate dosage.

VGCC modulators (gabapentinoids)

In rodents, acute application of gabapentin interferes with LTP maintenance but not LTP induction [65]. To date we have been unable to find studies directly documenting effects of these drugs on postoperative secondary hyperalgesia. There is however, a considerable literature available documenting the positive effects of perioperative administration of gabapentinoids on postoperative pain outcomes, particularly acute, but also more long-term [241245].

Prevention of opioid-induced hyperalgesia

Opioid receptor agonists

The effect of pre-emptive opioids in preventing opioid-induced hyperalgesia has not been studied so far using formal sensory testing methods. However, the application of a long-acting opioid before the start of a remifentanil infusion has not been shown to improve postoperative pain outcomes [246, 247]. It has not been determined whether administration of a long-acting opioid before abrupt withdrawal prevents opioid-withdrawal LTP in rodents, but this seems likely as tapered opioid withdrawal does not induce LTP [21].

NMDA receptor antagonists

Regarding opioid-induced hyperalgesia, Joly et al. demonstrated in a clinical study in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery that the large postoperative areas of secondary peri-incisional hyperalgesia associated with high-dose intraoperative remifentanil infusion could be significantly reduced by the concomitant use of small-dose ketamine [212]. These data are supported by studies documenting effects of ketamine on opioid-induced hyperalgesia using acute clinical postoperative pain outcomes [248, 249].

Section summary and conclusions

Prevention of stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia

In the human literature just reviewed, we present data that hyperalgesia induction in human volunteer models and patients and LTP induction in rodents share a similar pharmacology, supporting the hypothesis that LTP in spinal nociceptive pathways is a cellular mechanism of hyperalgesia.

More specifically, there is good evidence that opioid μ-receptor agonists and nerve blockade by local anaesthesia (both reducers of first nociceptive synapse transmission) and NMDA receptor blockade by ketamine effectively inhibit secondary hyperalgesia induction in both volunteers and patients, congruent with animal model results. Similarly, modulation of descending inhibition by spinal application of the α-adrenergic agent clonidine has been demonstrated to inhibit both hyperalgesia induction in patients and LTP induction in rodents.

The evidence for the ability of gabapentinoids (titrated over several days) to inhibit induction of secondary hyperalgesia in humans is inconclusive with both positive and negative effects reported in the literature. In rodents, no effect of acute application of gabapentin was found on LTP induction. Titration over several days has been used in human studies to enhance tolerability. It cannot be excluded that this protocol also enhances the antihyperalgesic effects of gabapentinoids. Similar titration protocols have not been tested in rodents so far.

NK1 receptor antagonists prevent LTP induction in rodents but have no effect on induction of secondary hyperalgesia in humans. However, these studies may be difficult to compare because of different drug application schedules (titration for several days in humans vs. acute spinal application in rodents).

The comparison of pharmacology between human hyperalgesia induction and rodent LTP induction is summarised in Table 8.

Prevention of opioid-induced hyperalgesia

In agreement with the animal literature, both human volunteer and patient models of opioid-induced hyperalgesia show prevention of hyperalgesia induction by effects of NMDA receptor blockade using ketamine. In the human volunteer model, neither general anaesthetics (propofol), α-adrenergic agonists (clonidine) nor COX inhibitors (parecoxib) are effective in preventing the induction of opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

Pharmacology of human hyperalgesia: Modulation of established human hyperalgesia

As mentioned in the section on animal models, LTP induction occurs in two phases. The early phase, involving modification of pre-existing proteins, sets in immediately after induction and then dies away over the first few hours. LTP consolidation occurs in the late phase, based on de novo protein synthesis and gene transcription, and is complete 3 - 6 hours after LTP induction in animal models.

Both causal and symptomatic approaches to modification of established LTP are principally possible. Causal approaches reverse intracellular events maintaining LTP, while symptomatic approaches temporarily inhibit synaptic transmission at the potentiated synapse without affecting intracellular processes maintaining LTP. A major difference between the two approaches would thus be whether hyperalgesia reappears after drug wash-out. A summary of interventions modifying established hyperalgesia in humans is provided in Table 7.

Table 7 Targets for modulation of established secondary hyperalgesia in humans.

Human volunteer models

Interference with stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia

Opioid receptor agonists

Koppert et al. have investigated the effect of a number of clinically available compounds on pre-existent secondary hyperalgesia in the context of their model of ongoing transdermal high current density electrical stimulation. As hyperalgesia was induced only 30 min before drug application, this model might be comparable to drug application during early but not late phase LTP. Using this model, Koppert et al. demonstrated that pure μ-opioid receptor agonists such as alfentanil and remifentanil reduced hyperalgesia during the period of application [176, 189]. The fact that hyperalgesia reappeared after opioid washout strongly suggests a purely symptomatic effect on hyperalgesia and possibly underlying LTP. Conflicting results have been obtained after intradermal capsaicin, with one group reporting transient antihyperalgesic effects with intravenous alfentanil infusion [250], and others no effects for bolus or infusion application of alfentanil [251, 252]. Using an infusion of morphine at 10 μg kg-1 min-1 started 30 min after burn injury, Schulte et al. were unable to detect antihyperalgesic effects 45 and 75 min after start of infusion [253]. Interestingly, the use of buprenorphine, a partial μ-receptor agonist and κ- and δ-receptor antagonist, in the transdermal high current density electrical stimulation model leads to a long-lasting reversal of hyperalgesia outlasting the end of drug application by almost 150 min [254]. Whether this is due to causal effects or a long duration of action of buprenorphine cannot be ascertained from the study.

Local anaesthesia

Regarding local anaesthesia to the damaged tissue, Kawamata et al. demonstrated that local anaesthesia administered after skin incision in volunteers did not inhibit secondary hyperalgesia, in contrast to pre-incisional block, which did [178].

NMDA receptor antagonists

Using a skin burn model in human volunteers, Ilkjaer et al. studied ketamine (intravenous bolus of 0.15 or 0.3 mg kg-1 followed by a 135 min infusion at 0.15 or 0.3 mg kg-1 h-1), compared to placebo infusion, and applied 15 min after lesioning [255]. Ketamine reduced the area of established primary and secondary hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent manner during the period of infusion - but not thereafter. Ketamine further reduced heat-evoked pain responses within the area of primary hyperalgesia, but had no effect on heat-evoked pain responses in skin at sites distant from the burn. Analogous positive results for ketamine have been found based on intradermal capsaicin [250, 256], with other such studies failing to demonstrate antihyperalgesic effects with bolus application (0.07 or 0.29 mg kg-1) or targeted infusion (150 ng ml-1) [251, 252]. A further study based on burn injury to the skin again found reductions in hyperalgesia with ketamine infusion (0.9 μg kg-1 min-1 for 45 min) [253]. The use of S-ketamine infusion (increasing concentrations; slope = 30 ng ml-1 min-1 over 10 min + 10 min plateau) in the context of the transdermal electrical hyperalgesia model also demonstrated significant antihyperalgesic and analgesic properties [176]. However, in this study, the antihyperalgesic effects of S-ketamine outlasted infusion end for at least one hour. These differences in results may be due to the higher doses of ketamine used, differences between ketamine and S-ketamine, or differences in the nature of hyperalgesia produced by the different models. As hyperalgesia was generally induced less than one hour prior to ketamine infusion, all these models again only can be compared to actions on early LTP.

Dextromethorphan, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist too, has also been shown to reduce the area of secondary hyperalgesia induced by a burn injury [257].

VGCC modulators (gabapentinoids)

A single dose of gabapentin given 90 min after induction of secondary hyperalgesia using the heat/capsaicin model significantly attenuated the area of hyperalgesia compared to placebo, and also significantly reduced the area of hyperalgesia when given directly after rekindling some 90 min after initial induction [258]. As hyperalgesia was induced approx. 90 min prior to gabapentin application, this model is again comparable only to the action on early LTP.

Cyclooxygenase (COX) antagonists

The use of the central COX isozyme inhibitors paracetamol and parecoxib also resulted in long-lasting inhibition (at least 150 min after drug infusion) of transdermal electrically induced hyperalgesia [259]. Again, the study design makes it impossible to decide whether this is due to long duration of drug action or causal effects, i.e. permanent reversal of the mechanisms underlying hyperalgesia. The non-selective COX inhibitor ibuprofen applied after burn injury did not, however, reduce secondary hyperalgesia [260].


Other substances which may affect primary nociceptive synaptic transmission studied by the Koppert group include systemic application of adenosine [261], propofol [262] and the Na+ channel blocker lidocaine [176]. For both adenosine and propofol, the significant antihyperalgesic and analgesic effect did not outlast infusion, suggesting symptomatic effects. Lidocaine infusion, however, resulted in significant antihyperalgesic effects which outlasted the infusion by about 50 min. Gottrup et al. found similar effects for lidocaine infusion on pre-existing hyperalgesia induced by intradermal capsaicin [256]. Oral lamotrigine, a use-dependent Na+ channel antagonist, has, however not been shown to have antihyperalgesic effects following heat/capsaicin sensitisation [223].

Human patient models

If LTP is involved in the maintenance of some forms of chronic pain, then therapeutic manoeuvres modifying established LTP in animal models could be expected to impact the hyperalgesia associated with established chronic pain in patients. As already discussed above, we will restrict this discussion to secondary hyperalgesia (i.e. surrounding the initial lesion). Not many human clinical studies using formal sensory testing have been performed in this context; most are small and have been carried out in the context of patients suffering from chronic pain associated with peripheral nerve injury. This is a relevant model as LTP has also been shown to play a role in nerve-injury related pain in rodent models [13].

Interference with stimulus-induced secondary hyperalgesia

Opioid receptor agonists

A small number of studies have looked at the effect of the opioid agonist alfentanil, applied as a short intravenous infusion in patients exhibiting chronic pain linked to peripheral nerve injury. In all of these studies, allodynia as well as mechanical secondary hyperalgesia were studied. It is worth noting here that while secondary mechanical hyperalgesia is compatible with LTP-like mechanisms, Aβ-fibre mediated allodynia is unlikely to involve LTP at C-fibre synapses as a mechanism. Leung et al. applied alfentanil as a target-controlled infusion (target: 25, 50 and 75 ng ml-1) to patients with chronic neuropathic pain and demonstrated dose-dependent decreases in ongoing and von Frey-hair evoked pain without a decrease in area of secondary hyperalgesia, concomitantly with reductions in brush-evoked pain and area of mechanical allodynia [263]. Using a similar design (alfentanil target plasma concentration approx. 44 ng ml-1), Jørum et al. found similar results for mechanical allodynia, but did not study effects on mechanical hyperalgesia [264]. Neither of these studies investigated whether antihyperalgesic effects outlasted the end of drug infusion.

NMDA receptor antagonists

To date, the only NMDA receptor antagonist studied for its effects on secondary hyperalgesia in the context of neuropathic pain is ketamine. Gottrup et al. also investigated ketamine (0.24 mg kg-1 over 30 min), finding that it reduced ongoing pain as well as magnitude of secondary pinprick hyperalgesia and brush allodynia [265]. Using target-controlled infusions of ketamine (50-150 ng ml-1), Leung et al. demonstrated reductions in area of secondary pinprick hyperalgesia together with reduction in allodynic area and allodynia (i.e. brush-evoked pain) [263]. Two studies found comparable results for ketamine regarding mechanical allodynia, but did not study effects on mechanical hyperalgesia [264, 266]. None of these studies reported effects outlasting the period of drug infusion.


As already mentioned, antidepressants may also modulate spinal nociceptive input via descending monoaminergic mechanisms. In quite a large study (n = 55) Yucel et al. studied the effects of chronic venlafaxine administration (8 weeks) on secondary mechanical hyperalgesia in chronic neuropathic pain patients [267]. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine significantly decreased pin-prick hyperalgesia and its area; the same was the case for brush allodynia. The fact that both hyperalgesia and Aβ-fibre mediated allodynia were affected suggest that a significant proportion of the venlafaxine effects must be the results of mechanisms other than LTP at C-fibre synapses in this context.

Na+ channel blockers

Gottrup et al. studied the effects of intravenous lidocaine (5 mg kg-1 over 30 min) in neuropathic pain patients [265]. They were able to demonstrate that the Na+ channel blocker lidocaine reduced evoked pain to repetitive pinprick stimuli, without effects on ongoing pain or brush-evoked pain (allodynia). The study did not investigate areas of hyperalgesia or allodynia.

Section summary and conclusions

Comparison of the human and animal literature presented above shows that established rodent LTP and established human hyperalgesia share a similar pharmacology with one major exception.

μ-opioid agonists decrease established secondary hyperalgesia in human volunteer and patient models. Gabapentinoids, too, have been shown to be effective against established hyperalgesia in human volunteer models. This is consistent with the results from animal models where μ-opioids and gabapentinoids suppress LTP during LTP maintenance phase.

Antidepressants have been shown to be effective against established hyperalgesia in pain patients. As antidepressants and central α2-adrenergic-agonists such as clonidine share central monoaminergic mechanisms, the antihyperalgesic effectiveness of antidepressants in humans might find its animal equivalent in the effectiveness of clonidine in inhibiting established LTP.

However, in animal models, NMDA receptor blockade has no effects on established LTP, which contrasts with the evidence presented that NMDA receptor blockade by ketamine interferes with established secondary hyperalgesia in both human volunteer and patient models. One possible hypothesis explaining this difference would be that in the context of the human models presented, ongoing nociceptive input - albeit at a low level - leads to continuing induction of LTP, contributing to the maintenance of LTP, and thus explaining the sensitivity of apparently established secondary hyperalgesia to NMDA receptor blockade. Alternatively, LTP may be only one of various central mechanisms contributing to established human hyperalgesia and chronic pain, with alternative, NMDA receptor sensitive mechanisms participating in the maintenance phase.

COX inhibition, general anaesthetics, intravenous lidocaine or adenosine, have all been shown to be effective against established hyperalgesia in human volunteer or patient models but have not been tested in animal models of LTP.

Both in human and animal studies, it has often not been tested whether inhibition of established LTP/hyperalgesia outlasts drug effects, precluding differentiation between symptomatic (acute antinociceptive or antihyperalgesic) and causal (reversal of LTP/hyperalgesia) effects. In humans, there is some evidence that for ketamine, lidocaine, paracetamol/parecoxib and the atypical opioid buprenorphine, antihyperalgesia may outlast drug effects, suggesting that causal actions might be operating. However, all of these studies have been performed only in the ongoing transdermal electrical stimulation model, and their applicability to other models and the clinical context remains to be proved.

Our conclusions regarding LTP in rodents vs. humans and its pharmacological modulation are contrasted and summarised in Table 8.

Table 8 Comparison of the pharmacology of stimulus-induced rodent LTP and human secondary hyperalgesia or clinical pain


In rodents, LTP of spinal nociceptive pathways is a cellular model of long-lasting (but not necessarily irreversible) hyperalgesia induced by noxious stimulation or opioid withdrawal. Both noxious stimulation and opioid withdrawal also induce prolonged pain amplification in the human experimental and clinical context. Noxious stimulation of a pattern that is LTP-inducing in rodents induces hyperalgesia in humans. Of the various manifestations of human experimental and clinical pain, some may be related to LTP while others cannot be explained by this mechanism. For prolonged pain after noxious stimulation, LTP may explain hyperalgesia and possibly exacerbation of spontaneous pain at or surrounding the initial lesion site, but not Aβ-fibre mediated allodynia (e.g. brush allodynia). For prolonged pain after opioid withdrawal, LTP may explain generalized hyperalgesia, possibly including exacerbation of preexisting hyperalgesia. Direct proof of the involvement of spinal LTP in pain conditions is at present not feasible in humans. However, the current review shows that rodent spinal LTP and human hyperalgesia share a similar pharmacology, further supporting the role of rodent spinal LTP as a model for prolonged pain and hyperalgesia in humans.

One major issue with respect to the role of spinal LTP as a model of persisting pain in humans is its unknown duration. In principle, LTP may last for hours, days, months or throughout the lifespan of an animal. So far, behavioural correlates of spinal LTP in rodents or human volunteers seem to be in the range of several days, compatible with, e.g., acute postoperative pain but not with chronic pain. One hypothesis would be that in chronic pain, LTP is prolonged by various factors that might "boost" the maintenance of LTP, counteracting its natural decline. Examples might include decreased activity of endogenous antinociceptive systems or the presence of ongoing intermittent low-level nociceptive input from the periphery. Investigating these possibilities in spinal LTP in rodents or LTP of pain perception in humans might be a fruitful approach for future studies.

Inhibition of the induction of hyperalgesia by noxious stimulation is important for prevention of both acute and chronic postoperative pain. Standard general anaesthesia alone is not sufficient to protect the spinal cord from the strong noxious input during surgery. Only locoregional anaesthesia techniques appear to offer some protection in this context. Several drugs have been identified that inhibit induction of rodent LTP and human hyperalgesia, e.g. NMDA receptor antagonists, μ-opioid receptor agonists and clonidine. From the rodent LTP literature, novel promising approaches may include antagonists at T-type VGCCs and (possibly subtype-selective) antagonists at GABAA receptors.

Identification of drugs that reverse the central processes contributing to chronic pain maintenance would be a major advance in chronic pain treatment. Assuming that spinal LTP contributes to chronic pain, animal experiments will likely contribute to the identification of such drugs by investigating their action on established LTP. Differentiating acute antihyperalgesia ("symptomatic" drug action) from long-lasting reversal of the mechanisms maintaining hyperalgesia ("causal" drug action) requires extending the observation period beyond the time of drug action termination by washout or application of an antagonist. In addition, investigation of drug actions on late phase LTP (> 3 h after LTP induction) is likely of greater clinical relevance than on early phase LTP. Up to now, among the compounds that are also in clinical use, rodent studies have identified two drugs which suppress late-phase LTP (clonidine and diazepam). For diazepam, there is evidence that it may not only temporarily suppress, but also reverse established late-phase LTP.


  1. 1.

    Costigan M, Scholz J, Woolf CJ: Neuropathic pain: a maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu Rev Neurosci 2009, 32: 1–32. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135531

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sandkühler J: Models and mechanisms of hyperalgesia and allodynia. Physiol Rev 2009, 89: 707–758.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu X, Sandkühler J: Characterization of long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked potentials in spinal dorsal horn of adult rat: essential role of NK1 and NK2 receptors. J Neurophysiol 1997, 78: 1973–1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ikeda H, Stark J, Fischer H, Wagner M, Drdla R, Jäger T, Sandkühler J: Synaptic amplifier of inflammatory pain in the spinal dorsal horn. Science 2006, 312: 1659–1662. 10.1126/science.1127233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bliss TV, Collingridge GL: A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1993, 361: 31–39. 10.1038/361031a0

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Benrath J, Brechtel C, Martin E, Sandkühler J: Low doses of fentanyl block central sensitization in the rat spinal cord in vivo. Anesthesiology 2004, 100: 1545–1551. 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Drdla R, Sandkühler J: Long-term potentiation at C-fibre synapses by low-level presynaptic activity in vivo . Mol Pain 2008, 4: 18. 10.1186/1744-8069-4-18

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ: Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006, 367: 1618–1625. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society: The international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia 2nd edition. 2004,24(Suppl 1):9–160.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Von Korff M, Saunders K: The course of back pain in primary care. Spine 1996, 21: 2833–2837. 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang HM, Zhou LJ, Hu XD, Hu NW, Zhang T, Liu XG: Acute nerve injury induces long-term potentiation of C-fiber evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn of intact rat. Sheng Li Xue Bao 2004, 56: 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhou LJ, Ren WJ, Zhong Y, Yang T, Wei XH, Xin WJ, Liu CC, Zhou LH, Li YY, Liu XG: Limited BDNF contributes to the failure of injury to skin afferents to produce a neuropathic pain condition. Pain 2010, 148: 148–157. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.032

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sandkühler J, Liu X: Induction of long-term potentiation at spinal synapses by noxious stimulation or nerve injury. Eur J Neurosci 1998, 10: 2476–2480.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang XC, Zhang YQ, Zhao ZQ: Involvement of nitric oxide in long-term potentiation of spinal nociceptive responses in rats. Neuroreport 2005, 16: 1197–1201. 10.1097/00001756-200508010-00013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hathway GJ, Vega-Avelaira D, Moss A, Ingram R, Fitzgerald M: Brief, low frequency stimulation of rat peripheral C-fibres evokes prolonged microglial-induced central sensitization in adults but not in neonates. Pain 2009, 144: 110–118. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.022

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mantyh PW, Rogers SD, Honore P, Allen BJ, Ghilardi JR, Li J, Daughters RS, Lappi DA, Wiley RG, Simone DA: Inhibition of hyperalgesia by ablation of lamina I spinal neurons expressing the substance P receptor. Science 1997, 278: 275–279. 10.1126/science.278.5336.275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ikeda H, Heinke B, Ruscheweyh R, Sandkühler J: Synaptic plasticity in spinal lamina I projection neurons that mediate hyperalgesia. Science 2003, 299: 1237–1240. 10.1126/science.1080659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nichols ML, Allen BJ, Rogers SD, Ghilardi JR, Honore P, Luger NM, Finke MP, Li J, Lappi DA, Simone DA, et al.: Transmission of chronic nociception by spinal neurons expressing the substance P receptor. Science 1999, 286: 1558–1561. 10.1126/science.286.5444.1558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Klein T, Magerl W, Hopf HC, Sandkühler J, Treede RD: Perceptual correlates of nociceptive long-term potentiation and long-term depression in humans. J Neurosci 2004, 24: 964–971. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1222-03.2004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Klein T, Magerl W, Nickel U, Hopf H-C, Sandkühler J, Treede RD: Effects of the NMDA-receptor antagonist ketamine on perceptual correlates of long-term potentiation within the nociceptive system. Neuropharmacology 2007, 52: 655–661. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.09.008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Drdla R, Gassner M, Gingl E, Sandkühler J: Induction of synaptic long-term potentiation after opioid withdrawal. Science 2009, 325: 207–210. 10.1126/science.1171759

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Angst MS, Clark JD: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 2006, 104: 570–587. 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bailey CH, Kandel ER, Si K: The persistence of long-term memory: a molecular approach to self-sustaining changes in learning-induced synaptic growth. Neuron 2004, 44: 49–57. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.017

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Abraham WC, Williams JM: LTP maintenance and its protein synthesis-dependence. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2008, 89: 260–268. 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.10.001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Klein T, Magerl W, Treede RD: Perceptual correlate of nociceptive long-term potentiation (LTP) in humans shares the time course of early-LTP. J Neurophysiol 2006, 96: 3551–3555. 10.1152/jn.00755.2006

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Edwards RR: Individual differences in endogenous pain modulation as a risk factor for chronic pain. Neurology 2005, 65: 437–443. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000171862.17301.84

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sandkühler J: Understanding LTP in pain pathways. Mol Pain 2007, 3: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schouenborg J: Functional and topographical properties of field potentials evoked in rat dorsal horn by cutaneous C-fibre stimulation. J Physiol 1984, 356: 169–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang XC, Zhang YQ, Zhao ZQ: Different roles of two nitric oxide activated pathways in spinal long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked field potentials. Neuropharmacology 2006, 50: 748–754. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.11.021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Svendsen F, Tjolsen A, Hole K: AMPA and NMDA receptor-dependent spinal LTP after nociceptive tetanic stimulation. Neuroreport 1998, 9: 1185–1190. 10.1097/00001756-199804200-00041

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rygh LJ, Suzuki R, Rahman W, Wong Y, Vonsy JL, Sandhu H, Webber M, Hunt S, Dickenson AH: Local and descending circuits regulate long-term potentiation and zif268 expression in spinal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 2006, 24: 761–772. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04968.x

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ikeda H, Murase K: Glial nitric oxide-mediated long-term presynaptic facilitation revealed by optical imaging in rat spinal dorsal horn. J Neurosci 2004, 24: 9888–9896. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2608-04.2004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Handwerker HO, Anton F, Reeh PW: Discharge patterns of afferent cutaneous nerve fibers from the rat's tail during prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation. Exp Brain Res 1987, 65: 493–504. 10.1007/BF00235972

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Puig S, Sorkin LS: Formalin-evoked activity in identified primary afferent fibers: systemic lidocaine suppresses phase-2 activity. Pain 1996, 64: 345–355. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00121-2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Davis JB, Gray J, Gunthorpe MJ, Hatcher JP, Davey PT, Overend P, Harries MH, Latcham J, Clapham C, Atkinson K, et al.: Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia. Nature 2000, 405: 183–187. 10.1038/35012076

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Liu XG, Morton CR, Azkue JJ, Zimmermann M, Sandkühler J: Long-term depression of C-fibre-evoked spinal field potentials by stimulation of primary afferent Aδ-fibres in the adult rat. Eur J Neurosci 1998, 10: 3069–3075. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00310.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lisman J: A mechanism for the Hebb and the anti-Hebb processes underlying learning and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86: 9574–9578. 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9574

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jung SJ, Kim SJ, Park YK, Oh SB, Cho K, Kim J: Group I mGluR regulates the polarity of spike-timing dependent plasticity in substantia gelatinosa neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 347: 509–516. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sandkühler J: Learning and memory in pain pathways. Pain 2000, 88: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Azkue JJ, Liu X-G, Zimmermann M, Sandkühler J: Induction of long-term potentiation of C fibre-evoked spinal field potentials requires recruitment of group I, but not group II/III metabotropic glutamate receptors. Pain 2003, 106: 373–379. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lisman JE: Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land. J Physiol 2001, 532: 285. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0285f.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhou HY, Chen SR, Chen H, Pan HL: Opioid-induced long-term potentiation in the spinal cord is a presynaptic event. J Neurosci 2010, 30: 4460–4466. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5857-09.2010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Qian A, Buller AL, Johnson JW: NR2 subunit-dependence of NMDA receptor channel block by external Mg2+ . J Physiol 2005, 562: 319–331. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mayer ML, Westbrook GL, Guthrie PB: Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones. Nature 1984, 309: 261–263. 10.1038/309261a0

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hollmann M, Hartley M, Heinemann S: Ca2+ permeability of KA-AMPA--gated glutamate receptor channels depends on subunit composition. Science 1991, 252: 851–853. 10.1126/science.1709304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Engelman HS, Allen TB, MacDermott AB: The distribution of neurons expressing calcium-permeable AMPA receptors in the superficial laminae of the spinal cord dorsal horn. J Neurosci 1999, 19: 2081–2089.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tong CK, MacDermott AB: Both Ca2+ -permeable and -impermeable AMPA receptors contribute to primary synaptic drive onto rat dorsal horn neurons. J Physiol 2006, 575: 133–144. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.110072

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Youn D-H, Royle G, Kolaj M, Vissel B, Randic M: Enhanced LTP of primary afferent neurotransmission in AMPA receptor GluR2-deficient mice. Pain 2008, 136: 158–167. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Fagni L, Chavis P, Ango F, Bockaert J: Complex interactions between mGluRs, intracellular Ca2+ stores and ion channels in neurons. Trends Neurosci 2000, 23: 80–88. 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01492-7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tanabe Y, Masu M, Ishii T, Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S: A family of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuron 1992, 8: 169–179. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90118-W

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Tanabe Y, Nomura A, Masu M, Shigemoto R, Mizuno N, Nakanishi S: Signal transduction, pharmacological properties, and expression patterns of two rat metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR3 and mGluR4. J Neurosci 1993, 13: 1372–1378.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Gwak YS, Hulsebosch CE: Upregulation of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in neurons and astrocytes in the dorsal horn following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2005, 195: 236–243. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.05.012

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Yusaf SP, Goodman J, Pinnock RD, Dixon AK, Lee K: Expression of voltage-gated calcium channel subunits in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett 2001, 311: 137–141. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02038-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD: The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2000, 1: 11–21. 10.1038/35036035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Yaksh TL: Calcium channels as therapeutic targets in neuropathic pain. J Pain 2006, 7: S13-S30. 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.09.007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Magee JC, Christofi G, Miyakawa H, Christie B, Lasser-Ross N, Johnston D: Subthreshold synaptic activation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels mediates a localized Ca2+ influx into the dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 1995, 74: 1335–1342.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gee NS, Brown JP, Dissanayake VU, Offord J, Thurlow R, Woodruff GN: The novel anticonvulsant drug, gabapentin (Neurontin), binds to the α 2 δ subunit of a calcium channel. J Biol Chem 1996, 271: 5768–5776. 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Field MJ, Cox PJ, Stott E, Melrose H, Offord J, Su TZ, Bramwell S, Corradini L, England S, Winks J, et al.: Identification of the α 2 δ-1 subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels as a molecular target for pain mediating the analgesic actions of pregabalin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 17537–17542. 10.1073/pnas.0409066103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, Kalso EA, Loeser JD, Miaskowski C, Nurmikko TJ, et al.: Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain 2007, 132: 237–251. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fox A, Gentry C, Patel S, Kesingland A, Bevan S: Comparative activity of the anti-convulsants oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and gabapentin in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat and guinea-pig. Pain 2003, 105: 355–362. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00253-7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Laughlin TM, Tram KV, Wilcox GL, Birnbaum AK: Comparison of antiepileptic drugs tiagabine, lamotrigine, and gabapentin in mouse models of acute, prolonged, and chronic nociception. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002, 302: 1168–1175. 10.1124/jpet.302.3.1168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Field MJ, Holloman EF, McCleary S, Hughes J, Singh L: Evaluation of gabapentin and S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba in a rat model of postoperative pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997, 282: 1242–1246.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Tanabe M, Takasu K, Kasuya N, Shimizu S, Honda M, Ono H: Role of descending noradrenergic system and spinal α 2 -adrenergic receptors in the effects of gabapentin on thermal and mechanical nociception after partial nerve injury in the mouse. Br J Pharmacol 2005, 144: 703–714. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fehrenbacher JC, Taylor CP, Vasko MR: Pregabalin and gabapentin reduce release of substance P and CGRP from rat spinal tissues only after inflammation or activation of protein kinase C. Pain 2003, 105: 133–141. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00173-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Tanabe M, Murakami H, Honda M, Ono H: Gabapentin depresses C-fiber-evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn only after induction of long-term potentiation. Exp Neurol 2006, 202: 280–286. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.06.002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Go VL, Yaksh TL: Release of substance P from the cat spinal cord. J Physiol 1987, 391: 141–167.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Todd AJ, McGill MM, Shehab SA: Neurokinin 1 receptor expression by neurons in laminae I, III and IV of the rat spinal dorsal horn that project to the brainstem. Eur J Neurosci 2000, 12: 689–700. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00950.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Al Ghamdi KS, Polgar E, Todd AJ: Soma size distinguishes projection neurons from neurokinin 1 receptor-expressing interneurons in lamina I of the rat lumbar spinal dorsal horn. Neuroscience 2009, 164: 1794–1804. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.071

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Traub RJ: The spinal contribution of substance P to the generation and maintenance of inflammatory hyperalgesia in the rat. Pain 1996, 67: 151–161. 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03076-X

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Hu XD, Ge YX, Hu NW, Zhang HM, Zhou LJ, Zhang T, Li WM, Han YF, Liu XG: Diazepam inhibits the induction and maintenance of LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn of rats. Neuropharmacology 2006, 50: 238–244. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.09.010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    D'Hulst C, Atack JR, Kooy RF: The complexity of the GABA A receptor shapes unique pharmacological profiles. Drug Discov Today 2009, 14: 866–875.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Malcangio M, Bowery NG: GABA and its receptors in the spinal cord. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1996, 17: 457–462. 10.1016/S0165-6147(96)01013-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Chen SR, Pan HL: Blocking μ opioid receptors in the spinal cord prevents the analgesic action by subsequent systemic opioids. Brain Res 2006, 1081: 119–125. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.053

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Besse D, Lombard MC, Zajac JM, Roques BP, Besson JM: Pre- and postsynaptic distribution of μ, α and κ opioid receptors in the superficial layers of the cervical dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. Brain Res 1990, 521: 15–22. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91519-M

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Marvizón JC, Grady EF, Waszak-McGee J, Mayer EA: Internalization of μ-opioid receptors in rat spinal cord slices. Neuroreport 1999, 10: 2329–2334.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wang Y, Xu W, Huang P, Chavkin C, Van Bockstaele EJ, Liu-Chen LY: Effects of acute agonist treatment on subcellular distribution of κ opioid receptor in rat spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 2009, 87: 1695–1702. 10.1002/jnr.21971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Arvidsson U, Dado RJ, Riedl M, Lee JH, Law PY, Loh HH, Elde R, Wessendorf MW: δ-Opioid receptor immunoreactivity: distribution in brainstem and spinal cord, and relationship to biogenic amines and enkephalin. J Neurosci 1995, 15: 1215–1235.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Scherrer G, Imamachi N, Cao YQ, Contet C, Mennicken F, O'Donnell D, Kieffer BL, Basbaum AI: Dissociation of the opioid receptor mechanisms that control mechanical and heat pain. Cell 2009, 137: 1148–1159. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.019

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Jordan B, Devi LA: Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor signal transduction. Br J Anaesth 1998, 81: 12–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Zöllner C, Stein C: Opioids. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2007, 31–63.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Ikoma M, Kohno T, Baba H: Differential presynaptic effects of opioid agonists on Aδ - and C-afferent glutamatergic transmission to the spinal dorsal horn. Anesthesiology 2007, 107: 807–812. 10.1097/01.anes.0000286985.80301.5e

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Heinke B, Gingl E, Sandkühler J: Multiple targets of μ-opioid receptor mediated presynaptic inhibition at primary afferent Aδ - and C-fibres. J Neurosci 2011, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Terman GW, Eastman CL, Chavkin C: μ opiates inhibit long-term potentiation induction in the spinal cord slice. J Neurophysiol 2001, 85: 485–494.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Mao J: NMDA and opioid receptors: their interactions in antinociception, tolerance and neuroplasticity. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1999, 30: 289–304. 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00020-X

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Hahnenkamp K, Nollet J, Van Aken HK, Buerkle H, Halene T, Schauerte S, Hahnenkamp A, Hollmann MW, Strumper D, Durieux ME, et al.: Remifentanil directly activates human N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Anesthesiology 2004, 100: 1531–1537. 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00028

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Chen L, Huang LY: Sustained potentiation of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate responses through activation of protein kinase C by a μ opioid. Neuron 1991, 7: 319–326. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90270-A

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Harrison C, Smart D, Lambert DG: Stimulatory effects of opioids. Br J Anaesth 1998, 81: 20–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Heinricher MM, Tavares I, Leith JL, Lumb BM: Descending control of nociception: Specificity, recruitment and plasticity. Brain Res Rev 2009, 60: 214–225. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.009

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Wood PB: Role of central dopamine in pain and analgesia. Expert Rev Neurother 2008, 8: 781–797. 10.1586/14737175.8.5.781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ge YX, Xin WJ, Hu NW, Zhang T, Xu JT, Liu XG: Clonidine depresses LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn via NO-cGMP pathway. Brain Res 2006, 1118: 58–65. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.009

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Yang HW, Zhou LJ, Hu NW, Xin WJ, Liu XG: Activation of spinal d1/d5 receptors induces late-phase LTP of C-fiber-evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94: 961–967. 10.1152/jn.01324.2004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Benrath J, Kempf C, Georgieff M, Sandkühler J: Xenon blocks the induction of synaptic long-term potentiation in pain pathways in the rat spinal cord in vivo . Anesth Analg 2007, 104: 106–111. 10.1213/01.ane.0000250368.27822.31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Michael GJ, Averill S, Nitkunan A, Rattray M, Bennett DL, Yan Q, Priestley JV: Nerve growth factor treatment increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor selectively in TrkA-expressing dorsal root ganglion cells and in their central terminations within the spinal cord. J Neurosci 1997, 17: 8476–8490.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Lever IJ, Bradbury EJ, Cunningham JR, Adelson DW, Jones MG, McMahon SB, Marvizon JC, Malcangio M: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is released in the dorsal horn by distinctive patterns of afferent fiber stimulation. J Neurosci 2001, 21: 4469–4477.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Salio C, Lossi L, Ferrini F, Merighi A: Ultrastructural evidence for a pre- and postsynaptic localization of full-length trkB receptors in substantia gelatinosa (lamina II) of rat and mouse spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22: 1951–1966. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04392.x

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Dalva MB, Takasu MA, Lin MZ, Shamah SM, Hu L, Gale NW, Greenberg ME: EphB receptors interact with NMDA receptors and regulate excitatory synapse formation. Cell 2000, 103: 945–956. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00197-5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Kayser MS, Nolt MJ, Dalva MB: EphB receptors couple dendritic filopodia motility to synapse formation. Neuron 2008, 59: 56–69. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Kullander K, Klein R: Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3: 475–486. 10.1038/nrm856

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Calò L, Cinque C, Patane M, Schillaci D, Battaglia G, Melchiorri D, Nicoletti F, Bruno V: Interaction between ephrins/Eph receptors and excitatory amino acid receptors: possible relevance in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and in the pathophysiology of neuronal degeneration. J Neurochem 2006, 98: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Battaglia AA, Sehayek K, Grist J, McMahon SB, Gavazzi I: EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligands regulate spinal sensory connectivity and modulate pain processing. Nat Neurosci 2003, 6: 339–340. 10.1038/nn1034

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Liu WT, Han Y, Li HC, Adams B, Zheng JH, Wu YP, Henkemeyer M, Song XJ: An in vivo mouse model of long-term potentiation at synapses between primary afferent C-fibers and spinal dorsal horn neurons: essential role of EphB1 receptor. Mol Pain 2009, 5: 29. 10.1186/1744-8069-5-29

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Song XJ, Zheng JH, Cao JL, Liu WT, Song XS, Huang ZJ: EphrinB-EphB receptor signaling contributes to neuropathic pain by regulating neural excitability and spinal synaptic plasticity in rats. Pain 2008, 139: 168–180. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.019

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Takasu MA, Dalva MB, Zigmond RE, Greenberg ME: Modulation of NMDA receptor-dependent calcium influx and gene expression through EphB receptors. Science 2002, 295: 491–495. 10.1126/science.1065983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Slack S, Battaglia A, Cibert-Goton V, Gavazzi I: EphrinB2 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of NR2B via Src-family kinases during inflammatory hyperalgesia. Neuroscience 2008, 156: 175–183. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Ikeda H, Kusudo K, Murase K: Nitric oxide-dependent long-term potentiation revealed by real-time imaging of nitric oxide production and neuronal excitation in the dorsal horn of rat spinal cord slices. Eur J Neurosci 2006, 23: 1939–1943. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04713.x

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Ruscheweyh R, Goralczyk A, Wunderbaldinger G, Schober A, Sandkühler J: Possible sources and sites of action of the nitric oxide involved in synaptic plasticity at spinal lamina I projection neurons. Neuroscience 2006, 141: 977–988. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.04.010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Lynch MA: Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiol Rev 2004, 84: 87–136. 10.1152/physrev.00014.2003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Cheng LZ, Lu N, Zhang YQ, Zhao ZQ: Ryanodine receptors contribute to the induction of nociceptive input-evoked long-term potentiation in the rat spinal cord slice. Mol Pain 2010, 6: 1. 10.1186/1744-8069-6-1

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Ji RR, Gereau RW, Malcangio M, Strichartz GR: MAP kinase and pain. Brain Res Rev 2009, 60: 135–148. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.011

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Xin WJ, Gong QJ, Xu JT, Yang HW, Zang Y, Zhang T, Li YY, Liu XG: Role of phosphorylation of ERK in induction and maintenance of LTP of the C-fiber evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn. J Neurosci Res 2006, 84: 934–943. 10.1002/jnr.21013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Liu YL, Zhou LJ, Hu NW, Xu JT, Wu CY, Zhang T, Li YY, Liu XG: Tumor necrosis factor-α induces long-term potentiation of C-fiber evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn in rats with nerve injury: the role of NF-κB, JNK and p38 MAPK. Neuropharmacology 2007, 52: 708–715. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.09.011

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Milligan ED, Watkins LR: Pathological and protective roles of glia in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009, 10: 23–36. 10.1038/nrn2533

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Zhong Y, Zhou LJ, Ren WJ, Xin WJ, Li YY, Zhang T, Liu XG: The direction of synaptic plasticity mediated by C-fibers in spinal dorsal horn is decided by Src-family kinases in microglia: The role of tumor necrosis factor-α. Brain Behav Immun 2010, 24: 874–80. 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.01.007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Ma J-Y, Zhao Z-Q: The involvement of glia in long-term plasticity in the spinal dorsal horn of the rat. Neuroreport 2002, 13: 1781–1784. 10.1097/00001756-200210070-00017

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Bardoni R, Goldstein PA, Lee CJ, Gu JG, MacDermott AB: ATP P2X receptors mediate fast synaptic transmission in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1997, 17: 5297–5304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Jo YH, Schlichter R: Synaptic corelease of ATP and GABA in cultured spinal neurons. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2: 241–245. 10.1038/6344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Hamilton N, Vayro S, Wigley R, Butt AM: Axons and astrocytes release ATP and glutamate to evoke calcium signals in NG2-glia. Glia 2010, 58: 66–79. 10.1002/glia.20902

    Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Clark AK, D'Aquisto F, Gentry C, Marchand F, McMahon SB, Malcangio M: Rapid co-release of interleukin 1β and caspase 1 in spinal cord inflammation. J Neurochem 2006, 99: 868–880. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04126.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Tsuda M, Inoue K, Salter MW: Neuropathic pain and spinal microglia: a big problem from molecules in "small" glia. Trends Neurosci 2005, 28: 101–107. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.12.002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    McMahon SB, Cafferty WB, Marchand F: Immune and glial cell factors as pain mediators and modulators. Exp Neurol 2005, 192: 444–462. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Abbadie C, Bhangoo S, De Koninck Y, Malcangio M, Melik-Parsadaniantz S, White FA: Chemokines and pain mechanisms. Brain Res Rev 2009, 60: 125–134. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Gong Q-J, Li Y-Y, Xin W-J, Zang Y, Ren W-J, Wei XH, Li Y-Y, Zhang T, Liu X-G: ATP induces long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked field potentials in spinal dorsal horn: The roles of P2X 4 receptors and p38 MAPK in microglia. Glia 2009, 57: 583–591. 10.1002/glia.20786

    Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Ikeda H, Tsuda M, Inoue K, Murase K: Long-term potentiation of neuronal excitation by neuron-glia interactions in the rat spinal dorsal horn. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 25: 1297–1306. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05386.x

    Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Katsura H, Obata K, Mizushima T, Sakurai J, Kobayashi K, Yamanaka H, Dai Y, Fukuoka T, Sakagami M, Noguchi K: Activation of Src-family kinases in spinal microglia contributes to mechanical hypersensitivity after nerve injury. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 8680–8690. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1771-06.2006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Araque A, Parpura V, Sanzgiri RP, Haydon PG: Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner. Trends Neurosci 1999, 22: 208–215. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01349-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Robinson MB: The family of sodium-dependent glutamate transporters: a focus on the GLT-1/EAAT2 subtype. Neurochem Int 1998, 33: 479–491. 10.1016/S0197-0186(98)00055-2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Rothstein JD, Martin L, Levey AI, Dykes-Hoberg M, Jin L, Wu D, Nash N, Kuncl RW: Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. Neuron 1994, 13: 713–725. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90038-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Wang ZY, Zhang YQ, Zhao ZQ: Inhibition of tetanically sciatic stimulation-induced LTP of spinal neurons and Fos expression by disrupting glutamate transporter GLT-1. Neuropharmacology 2006, 51: 764–772. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.05.024

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Katagiri H, Tanaka K, Manabe T: Requirement of appropriate glutamate concentrations in the synaptic cleft for hippocampal LTP induction. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 14: 547–553. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01664.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Wu H, Zhou Y, Xiong ZQ: Transducer of regulated CREB and late phase long-term synaptic potentiation. FEBS J 2007, 274: 3218–3223. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05891.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Lee HK, Takamiya K, Han JS, Man H, Kim CH, Rumbaugh G, Yu S, Ding L, He C, Petralia RS, et al.: Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit is required for synaptic plasticity and retention of spatial memory. Cell 2003, 112: 631–643. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00122-3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Boehm J, Kang MG, Johnson RC, Esteban J, Huganir RL, Malinow R: Synaptic incorporation of AMPA receptors during LTP is controlled by a PKC phosphorylation site on GluR1. Neuron 2006, 51: 213–225. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Hu NW, Zhang HM, Hu XD, Li MT, Zhang T, Zhou LJ, Liu XG: Protein synthesis inhibition blocks the late-phase LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. J Neurophysiol 2003, 89: 2354–2359. 10.1152/jn.01027.2002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Benrath J, Brechtel C, Stark J, Sandkühler J: Low dose of S(+)-ketamine prevents long-term potentiation in pain pathways under strong opioid analgesia in the rat spinal cord in vivo . Br J Anaesth 2005, 95: 518–523. 10.1093/bja/aei215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Hayashida K, DeGoes S, Curry R, Eisenach JC: Gabapentin activates spinal noradrenergic activity in rats and humans and reduces hypersensitivity after surgery. Anesthesiology 2007, 106: 557–562. 10.1097/00000542-200703000-00021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Millan MJ: Descending control of pain. Prog Neurobiol 2002, 66: 355–474. 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00009-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Afrah AW, Fiska A, Gjerstad J, Gustafsson H, Tjolsen A, Olgart L, Stiller CO, Hole K, Brodin E: Spinal substance P release in vivo during the induction of long-term potentiation in dorsal horn neurons. Pain 2002, 96: 49–55. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00414-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Takemori AE, Portoghese PS: Evidence for the interaction of morphine with κ and δ opioid receptors to induce analgesia in β-funaltrexamine-treated mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987, 243: 91–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Bramham CR, Messaoudi E: BDNF function in adult synaptic plasticity: the synaptic consolidation hypothesis. Prog Neurobiol 2005, 76: 99–125. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.06.003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Zhou L-J, Zhong Y, Ren W-J, Li Y-Y, Zhang T, Liu X-G: BDNF induces late-phase LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. Exp Neurol 2008, 212: 507–514. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.034

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    D'Amours D, Desnoyers S, D'Silva I, Poirier GG: Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions. Biochem J 1999,342(Pt 2):249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Gong QJ, Li YY, Xin WJ, Wei XH, Cui Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Liu CC, Li YY, Liu XG: Differential effects of adenosine A1 receptor on pain-related behavior in normal and nerve-injured rats. Brain Res 2010, 1361: 23–30. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.034

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Yang H-W, Hu X-D, Zhang H-M, Xin W-J, Li M-T, Zhang T, Zhou L-J, Liu X-G: Roles of CaMKII, PKA and PKC in the induction and maintenance of LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. J Neurophysiol 2004, 91: 1122–1133. 10.1152/jn.00735.2003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Zhang HM, Qi YJ, Xiang XY, Zhang T, Liu XG: Time-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission produced by long-term potentiation of C-fiber evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. Neurosci Lett 2001, 315: 81–84. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02343-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Torebjörk HE, Lundberg LE, LaMotte RH: Central changes in processing of mechanoreceptive input in capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans. J Physiol 1992, 448: 765–780.

    Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Treede RD, Meyer RA, Raja SN, Campbell JN: Peripheral and central mechanisms of cutaneous hyperalgesia. Prog Neurobiol 1992, 38: 397–421. 10.1016/0301-0082(92)90027-C

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Vaneker M, Wilder-Smith OH, Schrombges P, Man-Hermsen I, Oerlemans HM: Patients initially diagnosed as 'warm' or 'cold' CRPS 1 show differences in central sensory processing some eight years after diagnosis: a quantitative sensory testing study. Pain 2005, 115: 204–211. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.02.031

    Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Buscher HC, Wilder-Smith OH, van Goor H: Chronic pancreatitis patients show hyperalgesia of central origin: a pilot study. Eur J Pain 2006, 10: 363–370. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.006

    Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Diatchenko L, Nackley AG, Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Maixner W: Idiopathic pain disorders--pathways of vulnerability. Pain 2006, 123: 226–230. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.015

    Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    O'Neill S, Manniche C, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L: Generalized deep-tissue hyperalgesia in patients with chronic low-back pain. Eur J Pain 2007, 11: 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Ziegler EA, Magerl W, Meyer RA, Treede RD: Secondary hyperalgesia to punctate mechanical stimuli. Central sensitization to A-fibre nociceptor input. Brain 1999, 122: 2245–2257. 10.1093/brain/122.12.2245

    Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Seal RP, Wang X, Guan Y, Raja SN, Woodbury CJ, Basbaum AI, Edwards RH: Injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity requires C-low threshold mechanoreceptors. Nature 2009, 462: 651–655. 10.1038/nature08505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Magerl W, Fuchs PN, Meyer RA, Treede RD: Roles of capsaicin-insensitive nociceptors in cutaneous pain and secondary hyperalgesia. Brain 2001, 124: 1754–1764. 10.1093/brain/124.9.1754

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Baron R, Saguer M: Mechanical allodynia in postherpetic neuralgia: evidence for central mechanisms depending on nociceptive C-fiber degeneration. Neurology 1995, 45: S63-S65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Baron R, Maier C: Painful neuropathy: C-nociceptor activity may not be necessary to maintain central mechanisms accounting for dynamic mechanical allodynia. Clin J Pain 1995, 11: 63–69. 10.1097/00002508-199503000-00007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Engert F, Bonhoeffer T: Synapse specificity of long-term potentiation breaks down at short distances. Nature 1997, 388: 279–284. 10.1038/41815

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Scanziani M, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA: Role of intercellular interactions in heterosynaptic long-term depression. Nature 1996, 380: 446–450. 10.1038/380446a0

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Schuman EM, Madison DV: Locally distributed synaptic potentiation in the hippocampus. Science 1994, 263: 532–536. 10.1126/science.8290963

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Nakatsuka T, Gu JG: ATP P2X receptor-mediated enhancement of glutamate release and evoked EPSCs in dorsal horn neurons of the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 2001, 21: 6522–6531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    De Kock M, Lavand'homme P, Waterloos H: 'Balanced analgesia' in the perioperative period: is there a place for ketamine? Pain 2001, 92: 373–380. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00278-0

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Lavand'homme P, De Kock M, Waterloos H: Intraoperative epidural analgesia combined with ketamine provides effective preventive analgesia in patients undergoing major digestive surgery. Anesthesiology 2005, 103: 813–820.

    Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Wilder-Smith OH, Arendt-Nielsen L: Postoperative hyperalgesia: its clinical importance and relevance. Anesthesiology 2006, 104: 601–607. 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00028

    Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Wilder-Smith OH, Schreyer T, Scheffer GJ, Arendt-Nielsen L: Patients with chronic pain after abdominal surgery show less preoperative endogenous pain inhibition and more postoperative hyperalgesia: a pilot study. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2010, 24: 119–128. 10.3109/15360281003706069

    Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Wieseler-Frank J, Maier SF, Watkins LR: Glial activation and pathological pain. Neurochem Int 2004, 45: 389–395. 10.1016/j.neuint.2003.09.009

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Watkins LR, Maier SF: Immune regulation of central nervous system functions: from sickness responses to pathological pain. J Intern Med 2005, 257: 139–155. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01443.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Zeilhofer HU, Zeilhofer UB: Spinal dis-inhibition in inflammatory pain. Neurosci Lett 2008, 437: 170–174. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.056

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ: Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain 2009, 10: 895–926. 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012

    Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    LaMotte RH, Shain CN, Simone DA, Tsai EF: Neurogenic hyperalgesia: psychophysical studies of underlying mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 1991, 66: 190–211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Wilder-Smith OH, Tassonyi E, Crul BJ, Arendt-Nielsen L: Quantitative sensory testing and human surgery: effects of analgesic management on postoperative neuroplasticity. Anesthesiology 2003, 98: 1214–1222. 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Arendt-Nielsen L, Yarnitsky D: Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. J Pain 2009, 10: 556–572. 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.02.002

    Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Randic M, Jiang MC, Cerne R: Long-term potentiation and long-term depression of primary afferent neurotransmission in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1993, 13: 5228–5241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Hansen N, Klein T, Magerl W, Treede RD: Psychophysical evidence for long-term potentiation of C-fiber and Aδ-fiber pathways in humans by analysis of pain descriptors. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97: 2559–2563. 10.1152/jn.01125.2006

    Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Lang S, Klein T, Magerl W, Treede RD: Modality-specific sensory changes in humans after the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in cutaneous nociceptive pathways. Pain 2007, 128: 254–263. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.026

    Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Klein T, Stahn S, Magerl W, Treede RD: The role of heterosynaptic facilitation in long-term potentiation (LTP) of human pain sensation. Pain 2008, 139: 507–519. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.06.001

    Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    van den Broeke EN, van Rijn CM, Biurrun Manresa JA, Andersen OK, Arendt-Nielsen L, Wilder-Smith OH: Neurophysiological Correlates of Nociceptive Heterosynaptic Long-Term Potentiation in Humans. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103: 2107–13. 10.1152/jn.00979.2009

    Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Koppert W, Dern SK, Sittl R, Albrecht S, Schuttler J, Schmelz M: A new model of electrically evoked pain and hyperalgesia in human skin: the effects of intravenous alfentanil, S(+)-ketamine, and lidocaine. Anesthesiology 2001, 95: 395–402. 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00022

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Schmelz M, Schmid R, Handwerker HO, Torebjork HE: Encoding of burning pain from capsaicin-treated human skin in two categories of unmyelinated nerve fibres. Brain 2000, 123: 560–571. 10.1093/brain/123.3.560

    Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Kawamata M, Watanabe H, Nishikawa K, Takahashi T, Kozuka Y, Kawamata T, Omote K, Namiki A: Different mechanisms of development and maintenance of experimental incision-induced hyperalgesia in human skin. Anesthesiology 2002, 97: 550–559. 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Modir JG, Wallace MS: Human experimental pain models 1: the ultraviolet light UV-B pain model. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 617: 159–164. full_text

    Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Modir JG, Wallace MS: Human experimental pain models 3: heat/capsaicin sensitization and intradermal capsaicin models. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 617: 169–174. full_text

    Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Laulin JP, Larcher A, Celerier E, Le Moal M, Simonnet G: Long-lasting increased pain sensitivity in rat following exposure to heroin for the first time. Eur J Neurosci 1998, 10: 782–785. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00083.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Laulin JP, Celerier E, Larcher A, Le Moal M, Simonnet G: Opiate tolerance to daily heroin administration: an apparent phenomenon associated with enhanced pain sensitivity. Neuroscience 1999, 89: 631–636. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00652-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Celerier E, Rivat C, Jun Y, Laulin JP, Larcher A, Reynier P, Simonnet G: Long-lasting hyperalgesia induced by fentanyl in rats: preventive effect of ketamine. Anesthesiology 2000, 92: 465–472. 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Celerier E, Laulin JP, Corcuff JB, Le Moal M, Simonnet G: Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced by repeated heroin administration: a sensitization process. J Neurosci 2001, 21: 4074–4080.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Rivat C, Laulin JP, Corcuff JB, Celerier E, Pain L, Simonnet G: Fentanyl enhancement of carrageenan-induced long-lasting hyperalgesia in rats: prevention by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine. Anesthesiology 2002, 96: 381–391. 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Simonnet G, Rivat C: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: abnormal or normal pain? Neuroreport 2003, 14: 1–7. 10.1097/00001756-200301200-00001

    Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Compton P, Athanasos P, Elashoff D: Withdrawal hyperalgesia after acute opioid physical dependence in nonaddicted humans: a preliminary study. J Pain 2003, 4: 511–519. 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.08.003

    Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Angst MS, Koppert W, Pahl I, Clark DJ, Schmelz M: Short-term infusion of the μ-opioid agonist remifentanil in humans causes hyperalgesia during withdrawal. Pain 2003, 106: 49–57. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00276-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Koppert W, Sittl R, Scheuber K, Alsheimer M, Schmelz M, Schuttler J: Differential modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia and postinfusion hyperalgesia by S-ketamine and clonidine in humans. Anesthesiology 2003, 99: 152–159. 10.1097/00000542-200307000-00025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Hood DD, Curry R, Eisenach JC: Intravenous remifentanil produces withdrawal hyperalgesia in volunteers with capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. Anesth Analg 2003, 97: 810–815. 10.1213/01.ANE.0000078811.80093.88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Stubhaug A, Breivik H, Eide PK, Kreunen M, Foss A: Mapping of punctuate hyperalgesia around a surgical incision demonstrates that ketamine is a powerful suppressor of central sensitization to pain following surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997, 41: 1124–1132. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04854.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    De Kock M, Lavand'homme P, Waterloos H: The short-lasting analgesia and long-term antihyperalgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Anesth Analg 2005, 101: 566–72. table 10.1213/01.ANE.0000157121.71808.04

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Wilder-Smith OH, Tassonyi E, Senly C, Otten P, Arendt-Nielsen L: Surgical pain is followed not only by spinal sensitization but also by supraspinal antinociception. Br J Anaesth 1996, 76: 816–821.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Moiniche S, Dahl JB, Erichsen CJ, Jensen LM, Kehlet H: Time course of subjective pain ratings, and wound and leg tenderness after hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997, 41: 785–789. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04784.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Wilder-Smith OH, Tassonyi E, Arendt-Nielsen L: Preoperative back pain is associated with diverse manifestations of central neuroplasticity. Pain 2002, 97: 189–194. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00430-4

    Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Lautenbacher S, Rollman GB, McCain GA: Multi-method assessment of experimental and clinical pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Pain 1994, 59: 45–53. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90046-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P: Increased pressure pain sensibility in fibromyalgia patients is located deep to the skin but not restricted to muscle tissue. Pain 1995, 63: 335–339. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00061-5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Lautenbacher S, Rollman GB: Possible deficiencies of pain modulation in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain 1997, 13: 189–196. 10.1097/00002508-199709000-00003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Arendt-Nielsen L, Chen AC: Lasers and other thermal stimulators for activation of skin nociceptors in humans. Neurophysiol Clin 2003, 33: 259–268. 10.1016/j.neucli.2003.10.005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Leffler AS, Kosek E, Lerndal T, Nordmark B, Hansson P: Somatosensory perception and function of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Pain 2002, 6: 161–176. 10.1053/eujp.2001.0313

    Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Kosek E, Ordeberg G: Lack of pressure pain modulation by heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation in patients with painful osteoarthritis before, but not following, surgical pain relief. Pain 2000, 88: 69–78. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00310-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Nijs J, Van Houdenhove B: From acute musculoskeletal pain to chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia: application of pain neurophysiology in manual therapy practice. Man Ther 2009, 14: 3–12. 10.1016/j.math.2008.03.001

    Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Rossel P, Pedersen P, Niddam D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Chen AC, Drewes AM: Cerebral response to electric stimulation of the colon and abdominal skin in healthy subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol 2001, 36: 1259–1266. 10.1080/003655201317097092

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Verne GN, Price DD: Irritable bowel syndrome as a common precipitant of central sensitization. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2002, 4: 322–328. 10.1007/s11926-002-0041-x

    Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Mayer EA, Berman S, Chang L, Naliboff BD: Sex-based differences in gastrointestinal pain. Eur J Pain 2004, 8: 451–463. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.01.006

    Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Dimcevski G, Sami SA, Funch-Jensen P, Le Pera D, Valeriani M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Drewes AM: Pain in chronic pancreatitis: the role of reorganization in the central nervous system. Gastroenterology 2007, 132: 1546–1556. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.037

    Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Dimcevski G, Staahl C, Andersen SD, Thorsgaard N, Funch-Jensen P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Drewes AM: Assessment of experimental pain from skin, muscle, and esophagus in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2007, 35: 22–29. 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31805c1762

    Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Giamberardino MA, Affaitati G, Lerza R, Lapenna D, Costantini R, Vecchiet L: Relationship between pain symptoms and referred sensory and trophic changes in patients with gallbladder pathology. Pain 2005, 114: 239–249. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.024

    Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    de Tommaso M, Sardaro M, Vecchio E, Serpino C, Stasi M, Ranieri M: Central sensitisation phenomena in primary headaches: overview of a preventive therapeutic approach. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2008, 7: 524–535. 10.2174/187152708787122932

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Freynhagen R, Baron R, Tolle T, Stemmler E, Gockel U, Stevens M, Maier C: Screening of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic back pain associated with nerve root compression: a prospective observational pilot study (MIPORT). Curr Med Res Opin 2006, 22: 529–537. 10.1185/030079906X89874

    Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Jensen TS, Baron R: Translation of symptoms and signs into mechanisms in neuropathic pain. Pain 2003, 102: 1–8. 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00006-x

    Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Joly V, Richebe P, Guignard B, Fletcher D, Maurette P, Sessler DI, Chauvin M: Remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia and its prevention with small-dose ketamine. Anesthesiology 2005, 103: 147–155. 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00022

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    Compton P, Charuvastra VC, Kintaudi K, Ling W: Pain responses in methadone-maintained opioid abusers. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000, 20: 237–245. 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00191-3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    Chu LF, Clark DJ, Angst MS: Opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients after one month of oral morphine therapy: a preliminary prospective study. J Pain 2006, 7: 43–48. 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.08.001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    Ram KC, Eisenberg E, Haddad M, Pud D: Oral opioid use alters DNIC but not cold pain perception in patients with chronic pain - new perspective of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain 2008, 139: 431–438. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.05.015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    Vera-Portocarrero LP, Zhang ET, King T, Ossipov MH, Vanderah TW, Lai J, Porreca F: Spinal NK-1 receptor expressing neurons mediate opioid-induced hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance via activation of descending pathways. Pain 2007, 129: 35–45. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.033

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Xie JY, Herman DS, Stiller CO, Gardell LR, Ossipov MH, Lai J, Porreca F, Vanderah TW: Cholecystokinin in the rostral ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance. J Neurosci 2005, 25: 409–416. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4054-04.2005

    Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Wallace MS, Ridgeway B, Leung A, Schulteis G, Yaksh TL: Concentration-effect relationships for intravenous alfentanil and ketamine infusions in human volunteers: effects on acute thresholds and capsaicin-evoked hyperpathia. J Clin Pharmacol 2002, 42: 70–80. 10.1177/0091270002042001008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Eisenach JC, Hood DD, Curry R, Tong C: Alfentanil, but not amitriptyline, reduces pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia from intradermal injection of capsaicin in humans. Anesthesiology 1997, 86: 1279–1287. 10.1097/00000542-199706000-00008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Wang H, Bolognese J, Calder N, Baxendale J, Kehler A, Cummings C, Connell J, Herman G: Effect of morphine and pregabalin compared with diphenhydramine hydrochloride and placebo on hyperalgesia and allodynia induced by intradermal capsaicin in healthy male subjects. J Pain 2008, 9: 1088–1095. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Frymoyer AR, Rowbotham MC, Petersen KL: Placebo-controlled comparison of a morphine/dextromethorphan combination with morphine on experimental pain and hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers. J Pain 2007, 8: 19–25. 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.05.010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    Petersen KL, Jones B, Segredo V, Dahl JB, Rowbotham MC: Effect of remifentanil on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat--capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2001, 94: 15–20. 10.1097/00000542-200101000-00008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Petersen KL, Maloney A, Hoke F, Dahl JB, Rowbotham MC: A randomized study of the effect of oral lamotrigine and hydromorphone on pain and hyperalgesia following heat/capsaicin sensitization. J Pain 2003, 4: 400–406. 10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00718-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Warncke T, Stubhaug A, Jørum E: Preinjury treatment with morphine or ketamine inhibits the development of experimentally induced secondary hyperalgesia in man. Pain 2000, 86: 293–303. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00260-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Wallace MS, Quessy S, Schulteis G: Lack of effect of two oral sodium channel antagonists, lamotrigine and 4030W92, on intradermal capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004, 78: 349–355. 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.04.007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Wallace MS, Barger D, Schulteis G: The effect of chronic oral desipramine on capsaicin-induced allodynia and hyperalgesia: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Anesth Analg 2002, 95: 973–8. table 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00034

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    Chizh BA, Gohring M, Troster A, Quartey GK, Schmelz M, Koppert W: Effects of oral pregabalin and aprepitant on pain and central sensitization in the electrical hyperalgesia model in human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2007, 98: 246–254. 10.1093/bja/ael344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    Segerdahl M: Multiple dose gabapentin attenuates cutaneous pain and central sensitisation but not muscle pain in healthy volunteers. Pain 2006, 125: 158–164. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Gottrup H, Juhl G, Kristensen AD, Lai R, Chizh BA, Brown J, Bach FW, Jensen TS: Chronic oral gabapentin reduces elements of central sensitization in human experimental hyperalgesia. Anesthesiology 2004, 101: 1400–1408. 10.1097/00000542-200412000-00021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Wallace MS, Schulteis G: Effect of chronic oral gabapentin on capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Clin J Pain 2008, 24: 544–549. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181673b93

    Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    Tröster A, Sittl R, Singler B, Schmelz M, Schuttler J, Koppert W: Modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia and postinfusion hyperalgesia by parecoxib in humans. Anesthesiology 2006, 105: 1016–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Singler B, Troster A, Manering N, Schuttler J, Koppert W: Modulation of remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia by propofol. Anesth Analg 2007, 104: 1397–403. table 10.1213/01.ane.0000261305.22324.f3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Richmond CE, Bromley LM, Woolf CJ: Preoperative morphine pre-empts postoperative pain. Lancet 1993, 342: 73–75. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91284-S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Annetta MG, Iemma D, Garisto C, Tafani C, Proietti R: Ketamine: new indications for an old drug. Curr Drug Targets 2005, 6: 789–794. 10.2174/138945005774574533

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    Bell RF, Dahl JB, Moore RA, Kalso E: Peri-operative ketamine for acute post-operative pain: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review (Cochrane review). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005, 49: 1405–1428. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00814.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Elia N, Tramer MR: Ketamine and postoperative pain--a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain 2005, 113: 61–70. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.036

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Himmelseher S, Durieux ME: Ketamine for perioperative pain management. Anesthesiology 2005, 102: 211–220. 10.1097/00000542-200501000-00030

    Google Scholar 

  238. 238.

    Bell RF, Dahl JB, Moore RA, Kalso E: Perioperative ketamine for acute postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, CD004603.

    Google Scholar 

  239. 239.

    Visser E, Schug SA: The role of ketamine in pain management. Biomed Pharmacother 2006, 60: 341–348. 10.1016/j.biopha.2006.06.021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  240. 240.

    Ilkjaer S, Bach LF, Nielsen PA, Wernberg M, Dahl JB: Effect of preoperative oral dextromethorphan on immediate and late postoperative pain and hyperalgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. Pain 2000, 86: 19–24. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00305-X

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  241. 241.

    Ho KY, Gan TJ, Habib AS: Gabapentin and postoperative pain--a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain 2006, 126: 91–101. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.018

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  242. 242.

    Hurley RW, Cohen SP, Williams KA, Rowlingson AJ, Wu CL: The analgesic effects of perioperative gabapentin on postoperative pain: a meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006, 31: 237–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Peng PW, Wijeysundera DN, Li CC: Use of gabapentin for perioperative pain control -- a meta-analysis. Pain Res Manag 2007, 12: 85–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  244. 244.

    Tiippana EM, Hamunen K, Kontinen VK, Kalso E: Do surgical patients benefit from perioperative gabapentin/pregabalin? A systematic review of efficacy and safety. Anesth Analg 2007, 104: 1545–56. 10.1213/01.ane.0000261517.27532.80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  245. 245.

    Dauri M, Faria S, Gatti A, Celidonio L, Carpenedo R, Sabato AF: Gabapentin and pregabalin for the acute post-operative pain management. A systematic-narrative review of the recent clinical evidences. Curr Drug Targets 2009, 10: 716–733. 10.2174/138945009788982513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Lenz H, Raeder J, Hoymork SC: Administration of fentanyl before remifentanil-based anaesthesia has no influence on post-operative pain or analgesic consumption. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008, 52: 149–154. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01471.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  247. 247.

    McDonnell C, Zaarour C, Hull R, Thalayasingam P, Pehora C, Ahier J, Crawford MW: Pre-treatment with morphine does not prevent the development of remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia. Can J Anaesth 2008, 55: 813–818. 10.1007/BF03034052

    Google Scholar 

  248. 248.

    Hansen EG, Duedahl TH, Romsing J, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB: Intra-operative remifentanil might influence pain levels in the immediate post-operative period after major abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005, 49: 1464–1470.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  249. 249.

    Xuerong Y, Yuguang H, Xia J, Hailan W: Ketamine and lornoxicam for preventing a fentanyl-induced increase in postoperative morphine requirement. Anesth Analg 2008, 107: 2032–2037. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181888061

    Google Scholar 

  250. 250.

    Park KM, Max MB, Robinovitz E, Gracely RH, Bennett GJ: Effects of intravenous ketamine, alfentanil, or placebo on pain, pinprick hyperalgesia, and allodynia produced by intradermal capsaicin in human subjects. Pain 1995, 63: 163–172. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00029-R

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  251. 251.

    Sethna NF, Liu M, Gracely R, Bennett GJ, Max MB: Analgesic and cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine-alfentanil combinations versus either drug alone after intradermal capsaicin in normal subjects. Anesth Analg 1998, 86: 1250–1256. 10.1097/00000539-199806000-00022

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  252. 252.

    Wallace MS, Braun J, Schulteis G: Postdelivery of alfentanil and ketamine has no effect on intradermal capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia. Clin J Pain 2002, 18: 373–379. 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00005

    Google Scholar 

  253. 253.

    Schulte H, Sollevi A, Segerdahl M: The synergistic effect of combined treatment with systemic ketamine and morphine on experimentally induced windup-like pain in humans. Anesth Analg 2004, 98: 1574–80. table 10.1213/01.ANE.0000113237.89875.5D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  254. 254.

    Koppert W, Ihmsen H, Korber N, Wehrfritz A, Sittl R, Schmelz M, Schuttler J: Different profiles of buprenorphine-induced analgesia and antihyperalgesia in a human pain model. Pain 2005, 118: 15–22. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  255. 255.

    Ilkjaer S, Petersen KL, Brennum J, Wernberg M, Dahl JB: Effect of systemic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (ketamine) on primary and secondary hyperalgesia in humans. Br J Anaesth 1996, 76: 829–834.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  256. 256.

    Gottrup H, Hansen PO, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS: Differential effects of systemically administered ketamine and lidocaine on dynamic and static hyperalgesia induced by intradermal capsaicin in humans. Br J Anaesth 2000, 84: 155–162.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  257. 257.

    Ilkjaer S, Dirks J, Brennum J, Wernberg M, Dahl JB: Effect of systemic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (dextromethorphan) on primary and secondary hyperalgesia in humans. Br J Anaesth 1997, 79: 600–605.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  258. 258.

    Dirks J, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Dahl JB: Gabapentin suppresses cutaneous hyperalgesia following heat-capsaicin sensitization. Anesthesiology 2002, 97: 102–107. 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  259. 259.

    Koppert W, Wehrfritz A, Korber N, Sittl R, Albrecht S, Schuttler J, Schmelz M: The cyclooxygenase isozyme inhibitors parecoxib and paracetamol reduce central hyperalgesia in humans. Pain 2004, 108: 148–153. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.017

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  260. 260.

    Petersen KL, Brennum J, Dahl JB: Experimental evaluation of the analgesic effect of ibuprofen on primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Pain 1997, 70: 167–174. 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03316-7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  261. 261.

    Chizh BA, Dusch M, Puthawala M, Schmelz M, Cookson LM, Martina R, Brown J, Koppert W: The effect of intravenous infusion of adenosine on electrically evoked hyperalgesia in a healthy volunteer model of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 2004, 99: 816–22. table 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132995.35119.99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  262. 262.

    Bandschapp O, Filitz J, Ihmsen H, Berset A, Urwyler A, Koppert W, Ruppen W: Analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of propofol in a human pain model. Anesthesiology 2010, 113: 421–428. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e33ac8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  263. 263.

    Leung A, Wallace MS, Ridgeway B, Yaksh T: Concentration-effect relationship of intravenous alfentanil and ketamine on peripheral neurosensory thresholds, allodynia and hyperalgesia of neuropathic pain. Pain 2001, 91: 177–187. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00433-4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  264. 264.

    Jørum E, Warncke T, Stubhaug A: Cold allodynia and hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain: the effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine-- a double-blind, cross-over comparison with alfentanil and placebo. Pain 2003, 101: 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  265. 265.

    Gottrup H, Bach FW, Juhl G, Jensen TS: Differential effect of ketamine and lidocaine on spontaneous and mechanical evoked pain in patients with nerve injury pain. Anesthesiology 2006, 104: 527–536. 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  266. 266.

    Felsby S, Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS: NMDA receptor blockade in chronic neuropathic pain: a comparison of ketamine and magnesium chloride. Pain 1996, 64: 283–291. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00113-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  267. 267.

    Yucel A, Ozyalcin S, Koknel TG, Kiziltan E, Yucel B, Andersen OK, Arendt-Nielsen L, Disci R: The effect of venlafaxine on ongoing and experimentally induced pain in neuropathic pain patients: a double blind, placebo controlled study. Eur J Pain 2005, 9: 407–416. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.09.009

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  268. 268.

    Liu X-G, Sandkühler J: Long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked potentials in the rat spinal dorsal horn is prevented by spinal N -methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor blockage. Neurosci Lett 1995, 191: 43–46. 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11553-0

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  269. 269.

    Lee KY, Chung K, Chung JM: Involvement of reactive oxygen species in long-term potentiation in the spinal cord dorsal horn. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103: 382–391. 10.1152/jn.90906.2008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  270. 270.

    Ma JY, Zhao ZQ: The effects of Zn2+ on long-term potentiation of C fiber-evoked potentials in the rat spinal dorsal horn. Brain Res Bull 2001, 56: 575–579. 10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00728-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  271. 271.

    Wei F, Vadakkan KI, Toyoda H, Wu LJ, Zhao MG, Xu H, Shum FW, Jia YH, Zhuo M: Calcium calmodulin-stimulated adenylyl cyclases contribute to activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in spinal dorsal horn neurons in adult rats and mice. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 851–861. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3292-05.2006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  272. 272.

    Liu XG, Sandkühler J: Activation of spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate or neurokinin receptors induces long-term potentiation of spinal C-fibre-evoked potentials. Neuroscience 1998, 86: 1209–1216. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00107-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  273. 273.

    Mao J, Price DD, Hayes RL, Lu J, Mayer DJ: Differential roles of NMDA and non- NMDA receptor activation in induction and maintenance of thermal hyperalgesia in rats with painful peripheral mononeuropathy. Brain Res 1992, 598: 271–278. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90193-D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  274. 274.

    Haugan F, Rygh LJ, Tjølsen A: Ketamine blocks enhancement of spinal long-term potentiation in chronic opioid treated rats. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008, 52: 681–687. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01637.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  275. 275.

    Chaplan SR, Malmberg AB, Yaksh TL: Efficacy of spinal NMDA receptor antagonism in formalin hyperalgesia and nerve injury evoked allodynia in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997, 280: 829–838.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  276. 276.

    Qu X-X, Cai J, Li M-J, Chi Y-N, Liao F-F, Liu F-Y, Wan Y, Han J-S, Xing G-G: Role of the spinal cord NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in the development of neuropathic pain. Exp Neurol 2009, 215: 298–307. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.10.018

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  277. 277.

    Pedersen LM, Gjerstad J: Spinal cord long-term potentiation is attenuated by the NMDA-2B receptor antagonist Ro 25–6981. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2008, 192: 421–427. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01756.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  278. 278.

    Guo W, Wei F, Zou S, Robbins MT, Sugiyo S, Ikeda T, Tu J-C, Worley PF, Dubner R, Ren K: Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor NMDA receptor coupling and signaling cascade mediate spinal dorsal horn NMDA receptor 2B tyrosine phosphorylation associated with inflammatory hyperalgesia. J Neurosci 2004, 24: 9161–9173. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3422-04.2004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  279. 279.

    Dogrul A, Ossipov MH, Lai J, Malan TP Jr, Porreca F: Peripheral and spinal antihyperalgesic activity of SIB-1757, a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGLUR 5 ) antagonist, in experimental neuropathic pain in rats. Neurosci Lett 2000, 292: 115–118. 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01458-0

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  280. 280.

    Fisher K, Fundytus ME, Cahill CM, Coderre TJ: Intrathecal administration of the mGluR compound, (S)-4CPG, attenuates hyperalgesia and allodynia associated with sciatic nerve constriction injury in rats. Pain 1998, 77: 59–66. 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00082-7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  281. 281.

    Lee SE, Kim JH: Involvement of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in development and maintenance of neuropathic pain from spinal nerve injury model of rat. Neurosci Res 2007, 58: 245–249. 10.1016/j.neures.2007.03.004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  282. 282.

    Abram SE, Yaksh TL: Morphine, but not inhalation anesthesia, blocks post-injury facilitation. The role of preemptive suppression of afferent transmission. Anesthesiology 1993, 78: 713–721. 10.1097/00000542-199304000-00015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  283. 283.

    Eisenach JC, Hood DD, Curry R: Intrathecal, but not intravenous, clonidine reduces experimental thermal or capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia in normal volunteers. Anesth Analg 1998, 87: 591–596. 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00018

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  284. 284.

    Yajima Y, Narita M, Usui A, Kaneko C, Miyatake M, Narita M, Yamaguchi T, Tamaki H, Wachi H, Seyama Y, et al.: Direct evidence for the involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the development of a neuropathic pain-like state in mice. J Neurochem 2005, 93: 584–594. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03045.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  285. 285.

    Kobayashi H, Kitamura T, Sekiguchi M, Homma MK, Kabuyama Y, Konno S, Kikuchi S, Homma Y: Involvement of EphB1 receptor/EphrinB2 ligand in neuropathic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32: 1592–1598.

    Google Scholar 

  286. 286.

    Ruan JP, Zhang HX, Lu XF, Liu YP, Cao JL: EphrinBs/EphBs signaling is involved in modulation of spinal nociceptive processing through a mitogen-activated protein kinases-dependent mechanism. Anesthesiology 2010, 112: 1234–1249. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d3e0df

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  287. 287.

    Meller ST, Cummings CP, Traub RJ, Gebhart GF: The role of nitric oxide in the development and maintenance of the hyperalgesia produced by intraplantar injection of carrageenan in the rat. Neuroscience 1994, 60: 367–374. 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90250-X

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  288. 288.

    Lui PW, Lee CH: Preemptive effects of intrathecal cyclooxygenase inhibitor or nitric oxide synthase inhibitor on thermal hypersensitivity following peripheral nerve injury. Life Sci 2004, 75: 2527–2538. 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.04.033

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  289. 289.

    Meller ST, Dykstra C, Gebhart GF: Acute thermal hyperalgesia in the rat is produced by activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and protein kinase C and production of nitric oxide. Neuroscience 1996, 71: 327–335. 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00442-4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  290. 290.

    Dai Y, Wang H, Ogawa A, Yamanaka H, Obata K, Tokunaga A, Noguchi K: Ca2+ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in the spinal cord contributes to neuropathic pain in a rat model of mononeuropathy. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 21: 2467–2474. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04091.x

    Google Scholar 

  291. 291.

    Sun RQ, Tu YJ, Lawand NB, Yan JY, Lin Q, Willis WD: Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor activation produces PKA- and PKC-dependent mechanical hyperalgesia and central sensitization. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92: 2859–2866. 10.1152/jn.00339.2004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  292. 292.

    Li KC, Chen J: Differential roles of spinal protein kinases C and a in development of primary heat and mechanical hypersensitivity induced by subcutaneous bee venom chemical injury in the rat. Neurosignals 2003, 12: 292–301. 10.1159/000075311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  293. 293.

    Coderre TJ: Contribution of protein kinase C to central sensitization and persistent pain following tissue injury. Neurosci Lett 1992, 140: 181–184. 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90097-Q

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  294. 294.

    Sammons MJ, Raval P, Davey PT, Rogers D, Parsons AA, Bingham S: Carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia in the mouse: role of nerve growth factor and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Brain Res 2000, 876: 48–54. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02596-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  295. 295.

    Zhuang ZY, Wen YR, Zhang DR, Borsello T, Bonny C, Strichartz GR, Decosterd I, Ji RR: A peptide c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor blocks mechanical allodynia after spinal nerve ligation: respective roles of JNK activation in primary sensory neurons and spinal astrocytes for neuropathic pain development and maintenance. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 3551–3560. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5290-05.2006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  296. 296.

    Xu JT, Xin WJ, Wei XH, Wu CY, Ge YX, Liu YL, Zang Y, Zhang T, Li YY, Liu XG: p38 activation in uninjured primary afferent neurons and in spinal microglia contributes to the development of neuropathic pain induced by selective motor fiber injury. Exp Neurol 2007, 204: 355–365. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.11.016

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  297. 297.

    Milligan ED, Twining C, Chacur M, Biedenkapp J, O'Connor K, Poole S, Tracey K, Martin D, Maier SF, Watkins LR: Spinal glia and proinflammatory cytokines mediate mirror-image neuropathic pain in rats. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 1026–1040.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  298. 298.

    Watkins LR, Martin D, Ulrich P, Tracey KJ, Maier SF: Evidence for the involvement of spinal cord glia in subcutaneous formalin induced hyperalgesia in the rat. Pain 1997, 71: 225–235. 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03369-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  299. 299.

    Mika J, Osikowicz M, Makuch W, Przewlocka B: Minocycline and pentoxifylline attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia and potentiate the effects of morphine in rat and mouse models of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 2007, 560: 142–149. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.01.013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  300. 300.

    Niederberger E, Schmidtko A, Rothstein JD, Geisslinger G, Tegeder I: Modulation of spinal nociceptive processing through the glutamate transporter GLT-1. Neuroscience 2003, 116: 81–87. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00547-X

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  301. 301.

    Watkins LR, Goehler LE, Relton J, Brewer MT, Maier SF: Mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) hyperalgesia. Brain Res 1995, 692: 244–250. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00715-3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  302. 302.

    Sweitzer S, Martin D, DeLeo JA: Intrathecal interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in combination with soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor exhibits an anti-allodynic action in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2001, 103: 529–539. 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00574-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  303. 303.

    Sommer C, Schmidt C, George A: Hyperalgesia in experimental neuropathy is dependent on the TNF receptor 1. Exp Neurol 1998, 151: 138–142. 10.1006/exnr.1998.6797

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  304. 304.

    Milligan E, Zapata V, Schoeniger D, Chacur M, Green P, Poole S, Martin D, Maier SF, Watkins LR: An initial investigation of spinal mechanisms underlying pain enhancement induced by fractalkine, a neuronally released chemokine. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22: 2775–2782. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04470.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) to JS and by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 30570599) to XGL.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Sandkühler.

Additional information

Competing interests

RR, RD, XGL and JS declare that they have no competing interests. OWS declares that he receives research support (independent research grant) from Pfizer, the maker of pregabalin and gabapentin and gives paid lectures for Eurocept, distributor of S-ketamine.

Authors' contributions

RR and JS conceived the review. RR wrote the general parts of the basic science sections and made the figures. RR, RD and XGL wrote the specific parts of the basic science sections. RR, OWS and JS wrote the section translational aspects and the conclusions. OWS wrote the sections on human models. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ruth Ruscheweyh, Oliver Wilder-Smith contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruscheweyh, R., Wilder-Smith, O., Drdla, R. et al. Long-term potentiation in spinal nociceptive pathways as a novel target for pain therapy. Mol Pain 7, 20 (2011).

Download citation


  • NMDA Receptor
  • Opioid Withdrawal
  • Conditioning Stimulation
  • Superficial Dorsal Horn
  • Secondary Hyperalgesia