Open Access

p38 MAPK mediates glial P2X7R-neuronal P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression in dorsal root ganglion neurons

Molecular Pain201511:68

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12990-015-0073-7

Received: 12 October 2015

Accepted: 27 October 2015

Published: 5 November 2015

Abstract

Background

We have previously shown that endogenously active purinergic P2X7 receptors (P2X7Rs) in satellite glial cells of dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) stimulate ATP release. The ATP activates P2Y1Rs located in the enwrapped neuronal somata, resulting in down-regulation of P2X3Rs. This P2X7R-P2Y1-P2X3R inhibitory control significantly reduces P2X3R-mediated nociceptive responses. The underlying mechanism by which the activation of P2Y1Rs inhibits the expression of P2X3Rs remains unexplored.

Results

Examining the effect of the activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase on the expression of P2X3Rs in DRGs, we found that the p38 activator, anisomycin (Anis), reduced the expression of P2X3Rs. Blocking the activity of SGCs by the glial Krebs cycle inhibitor, fluorocitrate, did not change the effect of Anis. These results suggest that neuronal p38 plays a major role in the inhibition of P2X3R expression. Western blotting analyses showed that inhibiting P2Y1Rs by MRS2179 (MRS) or blocking P2X7Rs by either oxATP or A740003 reduced pp38 and increased P2X3R expression in DRGs. These results are further supported by the immunohistochemical study showing that P2X7R and P2Y1R antagonists reduce the percentage of pp38-positive neurons. These observations suggest that activation of P2X7Rs and P2Y1Rs promotes p38 activity to exert inhibitory control on P2X3R expression. Since activation of p38 by Anis in the presence of either A740003 or MRS could overcome the block of P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control, p38 in DRG neurons is downstream of P2Y1Rs. In addition, inhibition of p38 by SB202190 was found to prevent the P2X7R and P2Y1R block of P2X3R expression and increase P2X3R-mediated nociceptive flinch behaviors.

Conclusions

p38 in DRG neurons downstream of P2Y1R is necessary and sufficient for the P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression.

Keywords

Dorsal root ganglion P2X3 P2X7 P2Y1 p38 Pain Purinergic Satellite glial cell

Background

DRG neurons are primary sensory neurons which convey somatic and visceral sensory information, including pain sensation, from peripheral tissues to the spinal cord. The cell bodies (somata) of DRG neurons are tightly packed in the ganglion [1]. The unique morphological features of DRG neurons are that the somata of DRG neurons lack dendrites and do not form synaptic connections with each other [2]. Instead, each soma is tightly wrapped by a layer of SGCs. The soma-SGC unit is enclosed by a connective tissue sheath to form a structural unit [1, 3]. This structural arrangement between neuronal soma and SGCs suggests that soma-SGC-soma communication is essential for determining the somatic activity of DRG neurons.

The robust release of ATP from the somata of DRG neurons [4] and the abundant expression of purinergic receptors in neurons and SGC cells in DRGs and trigeminal ganglia suggest that purinergic signaling is a major means used by neuronal somata and SGCs in sensory ganglia to communicate with each other [512]. Among the seven ionotropic purginergic P2XR subtypes (P2X1-P2X7R), P2X3R is the most abundantly expressed subtype in DRG neurons and plays a key role in the transmission of nociceptive information [10, 1317]. In contrast, P2X7R is the most abundantly expressed P2XR subtype in SGCs of DRGs [4, 1820]. Activation of P2X7Rs has been implicated in apoptosis, maturation and release of cytokines, regulation of receptor trafficking and production and maintenance of pain in the brain and spinal cord [2124]. We and others have shown that the P2X7R expression is not detectable in neurons and P2X3Rs are not found in SGCs of DRGs [4, 1820]. This exclusive expression of P2X3R in neurons and P2X7R in SGCs facilitates our determination of the interaction between glial P2X7Rs and neural P2X3Rs. We showed previously that P2X7Rs in SGCs are endogenously active and mediate a significant portion of the basal ATP release in the DRG [10, 20]. The released ATP activates the metabotropic P2Y1Rs in the somata of DRG neurons and reduces the expression of P2X3Rs. This P2X7R-P2Y1R-P2X3R control exists in both adult and immature rats [20, 25]. The mechanism by which the activation of P2Y1Rs leads to the reduction of P2X3R expression has yet to be elucidated.

p38, together with ERK and JNK, is a major member of MAPKs [26]. In response to signals or stress, p38 MAPK, a serine-threonine kinase, is phosphorylated and activated to regulate cytosolic and nuclear targets [27, 28]. Inflammation and nerve injury were found to upregulate phosphorylated p38 (pp38) in both neuronal somata and SGCs of primary sensory ganglia [29] and in spinal microglia [28, 30, 31]. Activation of purinergic receptors, P2X4Rs [32], P2X7Rs [33] and P2Y12 [34] in microglia of the spinal cord and P2Y1R in DRG neurons and peripheral terminals [35] have been shown to upregulate pp38, which led to thermal or mechanical hypersensitivity. Here we show that in contrast to the pain-producing effects of p38, activation of neuronal p38 also plays a critical role in P2Y1R-mediated inhibitory control of P2X3R expression in DRG neurons.

Results

Activation of p38 reduces the expression of P2X3Rs in DRG neurons

We showed, in a previous study, that P2X3R expression in DRG neurons is regulated by P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control [20]. To determine if p38 is involved in the P2X7R-P2Y1R-P2X3R pathway, we examined the effect of p38 activation on P2X3R expression. DRGs were acutely removed from rats and incubated with the p38 activator, anisomycin (Anis) (10 nM), for 1 h. The expression of P2X3Rs in DRGs, examined with Western analyses, was significantly reduced (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

Activation of neuronal p38 reduces the expression of P2X3R. a Pre-treatment of DRGs with Anis (10 nM, 1 h) significantly reduced the P2X3R expression in DRGs [Anis/Con, 0.72 ± 0.04, n(Con) = 5, n(Anis) = 8]. Treating DRGs with both FC (100 µM) and Anis did not alter the inhibitory action of Anis on P2X3R expression [(Anis + FC)/Con = 0.74 ± 0.07 (mean ± SEM), n(Con) = 5, n(Anis + FC) = 6]. b Pre-treatment of DRGs with Anis (10 nM, 1 h) did not alter the P2X7R expression [Anis/Con, 1.15 ± 0.05, n(Con) = 4, n(Anis) = 3)]. c Treating DRGs with the JNK inhibitor, SP600125 (SP) (2 µM) did not change the P2X3R expression [SP/Con = 0.93 ± 0.13 n(Con) = 4, n(SP) = 3]. *P < 0.05 compared with Con; NS not significant, P > 0.05

Since p38 is expressed in both neurons and SGCs in DRGs [29], it is of interest to determine if neuronal- and/or glial p38 participate in the regulation of P2X3Rs. The effect of Anis on P2X3R expression in the presence of the glia Krebs cycle inhibitor, fluorocitrate (FC), which disrupts the function of SGCs was studied. We found that Anis reduced P2X3R expression to a similar extent with and without FC (Fig. 1a). This observation suggests that the activation of “neuronal” p38 is sufficient to inhibit P2X3R expression.

Anis is known to also inhibit protein synthesis [36]. To eliminate this possibility, we examined the effect of Anis on the expression of another puringeric receptor, i.e., the P2X7R. In contrast to P2X3Rs, Anis had no effect on the expression of P2X7Rs (Fig. 1b). Thus, Anis, at 10 nM (=0.265 ng/ml), does not affect the protein synthesis of purinergic receptors. In addition, Anis can also activate JNKs to affect cell activity [37]. To determine if Anis block of P2X3R expression can be attributable to JNKs activation, the effects of Anis on P2X3R expression with and without pretreatment with the JNKs inhibitor, SP600125 (2 µM), were compared. SP600125 had no effect on P2X3R expression (Fig. 1c). These results strongly suggest that Anis reduces P2X3R expression through its activation of p38.

To further confirm that Anis treatment indeed activates pp38 in DRGs, we examined the pp38 expression using Western blotting analyses. Anis increased pp38 expression in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 2a). We then used immunohistochemical (IHC) experiments to determine the distribution of pp38 in DRG neurons. pp38 was found in ~20 % of DRG neurons in control rats (Fig. 2b). After Anis (10 nM) treatment, a majority of neurons (~74 %) expressed pp38.
Fig. 2

Activation of pp38 by Anis in DRGs. a Pre-treatment of DRGs with Anis increased the expression of pp38 in a dose-dependent manner [Anis (10 nM)/Con, 1.64 ± 0.13, n = 4; Anis (100 nM)/Con, 3.06 ± 0.20, n = 4). b Intrathecal application of Anis (10 nM) significantly increased the percentage of pp38 positive neurons in DRGs. Con, Anis: labeled DRG cells with the pp38 antibody in control and Anis treated DRG slices. Percentages of pp38 positive neurons were 20.4 ± 3.1 % (Control) and 74.0 ± 11.4 % (Anis). c Double labeled DRG neurons with pp38 and P2X3R antibodies. About 20 % P2X3R positive cells expressed pp38. Arrows cells labeled with both P2X3R and pp38. Calibration bar 50 µm, *P < 0.05 compared with Con

Colocalization of pp38 and P2X3Rs in DRG neurons was also determined. We labeled neurons with both pp38 and P2X3R antibodies and found that ~20 % P2X3R positive neurons expressed pp38; ~33 % of pp38-containing cells were P2X3R-positive (Fig. 2c).

p38 is involved in the P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3Rs

In our previous studies, we showed that endogenously activated P2X7Rs in SGCs evoke ATP release from satellite cells to activate P2Y1Rs in neurons and P2X7R-P2Y1R exerts inhibitory control of P2X3R expression in DRGs [20]. To determine the role of p38 in the P2X7R → P2Y1R → P2X3R pathway, the pp38 expression was determined in the presence of the P2X7R antagonist, oxATP, or the P2Y1R antagonist, MRS2179 (MRS). Both oxATP and MRS inhibited the level of pp38 (Fig. 3a), suggesting that p38 activity is regulated by P2X7Rs and P2Y1Rs. In another set of experiments, we used a specific P2X7R antagonist A740003 to inhibit P2X7R and found that pp38 expression was similarly inhibited (Fig. 3b), thus confirming that P2X7R promotes the expression of pp38. We then used the P2Y1 agonist, 2mesADP [38], to further examine the participation of P2Y1Rs in the control of p38 expression. 2mesADP was found to increase the expression pp38 (Fig. 3c, left). Because 2mesADP is known to activate P2Y1, P2Y12 and P2Y13 receptors [39], we determined if the observed action of 2mesADP is mediated by P2Y1Rs. When DRGs were treated with both 2mesADP and the P2Y1R antagonist MRS, 2mesADP no longer altered pp38 expression (Fig. 3c). Thus, the observed 2mesADP effect on pp38 is mediated by P2Y1Rs. These experiments confirmed the involvement of P2X7 and P2Y1R in promoting p38 activity in DRGs.
Fig. 3

P2X7R and P2Y1R regulate pp38 expression. a Inhibition of P2X7R or P2Y1R activity reduces pp38 expression. Treating DRGs with the P2X7R antagonist, oxATP (100 µM), or with the P2Y1R antagonist, MRS2179 (60 µM) for 3 h greatly diminished the expression of pp38 (oxATP/Con, 0.16 ± 0.10; MRS/Con, 0.39 ± 0.10, n = 3, *P < 0.05). b Incubation of DRGs with the specific P2X7R antagonist A740003 (A74) also decreased the pp38 expression [(A740003/Con, 0.42 ± 0.08, n (Con) = 9, n(740003) = 7, *P < 0.05]. c (Left) Treating DRGs with the P2YR agonist, 2mesADP (100 µM), increased the pp38 expression (2mesADP/Con = 1.53 ± 0.11,*P < 0.05). (right) Incubation of the P2Y1R antagonist, MRS, with 2mesADP blocked the enhancing effect of 2mesADP on pp38 expression (Con/2mesADP + MRS, 1.05 ± 0.08, n = 3, NS, P > 0.05)

In addition, IHC analyses were used to determine the effect of P2X7R antagonist, A74003 or the effect of the P2Y1R antagonist, MRS, on the percentage of pp38-positive cells expressed in DRG neurons. Both antagonists significantly decreased the number of pp38 positive neurons (Fig. 4), further confirming the involvement of the P2X7R and P2Y1R in promoting the p38 activity in DRG neurons.
Fig. 4

IHC evidence of the involvement of P2X7R and P2Y1R in the regulation of pp38 expression. Intrathecal applications of the P2X7R antagonist, A740003 (A74) (250 nM) or the P2Y1R antagonist MRS (60 µM) at 10 µl, twice a day for 3 days, significantly inhibited the percentage of pp38 positive neurons in DRGs (Control: 20.40 ± 3.10 %, A740003: 8.00 ± 3.33 % and MRS: 1.93 ± 1.93 %) calibration bar: 50 µm, n = 3, *P < 0.05 compared with control

p38 is downstream of P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control

We then determined if p38 can control the P2X3R expression in the absence of P2X7R or P2Y1R activation. Blocking P2X7R activation by the P2X7R antagonist, A740003 was found to enhance P2X3R expression in DRGs. Studying the effect of the p38 activator, Anis, in the presence of A740003, we found that Anis could overcome A740003-induced enhancement of P2X3R expression (Fig. 5, left). Similarly, using the P2Y1R antagonist, MRS, to block P2Y1R activation, P2X3R expression was also increased (Fig. 5, right). Again, Anis blocked the MRS-induced increase in the expression of P2X3R. These observations suggest that p38 is located downstream of the P2X7R-P2Y1R pathway to control the P2X3R expression in DRG neurons.
Fig. 5

p38 is downstream of P2X7R-P2Y1R control of P2X3R expression. a Blocking P2X7R activation with the P2X7R antagonist, A740003 (A74) (250 nM), caused an increase in the P2X3R expression in DRGs [A74/Con, 2.17 ± 0.13, n(Con) = 14, n (A74) = 9]. Activating p38 with Anis (10 nM) overrode the enhancing effect of A74 on P2X3R expression [(Anis + A74)/Con = 0.98 ± 0.11, n(Con) = 14, n (Anis + A74003) = 9]. b Blocking P2Y1R activation with MRS increased P2X3R expression [MRS/Con, 2.17 ± 0.19, n(Con) = 14, n(MRS) = 9]. In the presence of Anis, MRS no longer augmented the P2X3R expression [(Anis + MRS)/Con = 0.93 ± 0.14, n(Con) = 14, n(Anis + MRS) = 8]. NS: P > 0.05; *P < 0.05 compared with [A74 (−) + Anis (−)] (a) or with [MRS (−) + Anis (−)] (b); #P < 0.05 compared with [A74 (+) + Anis (+)] (a) or with [MRS (+) + Anis (+)] (b)

Activation of p38 in neurons is necessary for P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression

We next examined if P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3Rs can exist in the absence of p38. Freshly removed DRGs were incubated with the p38 inhibitor, SB, for 3 h and P2X3R expression was then probed. We found that SB enhanced the expression of P2X3Rs (Fig. 6a). In addition, treating DRGs with SB significantly increased the number of P2X3R positive neurons in DRG neurons (Fig. 6b). These results suggest that without p38 activation, P2X7-P2Y1 could not exert its inhibitory control on the P2X3R expression.
Fig. 6

Activation of p38 in neurons is necessary for the P2X7R-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression. a p38 activation is required for P2X7-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3Rs. P2X3R expression was enhanced when p38 activity was inhibited by SB (100 µM, 3 h) (SB/Con, 1.60 ± 0.14, n(Con) = 8, n(SB) = 7, *P < 0.05) b Intrathecal application of SB (100 µM) increased the  % of P2X3R positive neurons (Control: 39.5 ± 0.8 %, SB: 52.8 ± 4.3 %. n = 3) *P < 0.05, bar = 50 µm. c In SB treated rats, α,β-meATP induces exaggerated flinch behavioral responses in the absence of activation of p38 (n = 4) (ANOVA, *P < 0.05)

The functional consequence of p38 activation in the P2X7R-P2X3R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression was also determined. Following the synthesis of P2X3Rs in the somata of DRGs, the receptors are transported to peripheral and central nerve terminals for pain signaling. An intradermal hindpaw injection of the P2XR agonist, αβ-meATP, elicited the rat to lift its injected paw repetitively (flinching) (Fig. 6c). This nocifensive behavior is a result of the activation of P2X3Rs [17, 20, 40]. Intrathecal injections of the p38 inhibitor, SB, induced exaggerated nociceptive flinching responses (Fig. 6c). Thus, the inhibition of p38 eliminates P2X7-P2Y1 inhibitory control significantly and increases the P2X3R-mediated nociceptive responses at the DRG level. Both the Western and behavioral analyses suggest that activation of p38 is necessary for the inhibitory control of P2X3Rs expression through the P2X7R-P2Y1R pathway. From these observations, we conclude that an activation of P2X7R-P2Y1R would lead to the activation of p38 and down-regulation of P2X3Rs, resulting in less P2X3Rs transported to the central and peripheral nerve terminals (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

A schematic shows the involvement of p38 in P2X7R-P2Y1R-P2X3R inhibitory control. Activation of P2X7R-P2Y1R leads to the activation of p38 in DRG neurons. p38 down-regulates P2X3Rs and results in reduction of nociception

Discussion

Our studies show that activation of p38 in DRG neurons plays a critical role in the P2X7-P2Y1 inhibitory control of P2X3R expression in neurons (Figs. 1, 3). Since the disruption of SGC functions by the glia Krebs cycle inhibitor, FC, does not affect the inhibitory action of p38 on P2X3R expression (Fig. 1a), the observation suggests that the p38 in SGCs is not involved in the P2X7-P2Y1 control and the activation of neuronal p38 is sufficient to control the P2X3R expression in DRG neurons.

The p38 activator, Anis, is known to be a protein synthesis inhibitor [36]. It has been shown that Anis, at the dose (10 nM) used in our study, rarely affects the incorporation of [3H]lysine into protein in DRGs [36]. This together with our finding that Anis inhibits the P2X3R but not P2X7R expression (Fig. 1b) strongly supports our assertion that the Anis effect on P2X3R expression is through its activation of p38 activity, rather than an effect on protein synthesis. Pretreatment the JNK inhibitor, SP600125, did not alter the Anis effect on P2X3R confirming that JNKs are not involved in the action of Anis on P2X3R expression (Fig. 1c).

Since p38 activation can overcome the blocking action of P2X7Rs or P2Y1Rs on P2X3R expression (Fig. 5), this places p38 downstream of the P2X7-P2Y1 pathway (Fig. 7). In the presence of the p38 blocker, SB, P2X7R-P2Y1R can no longer exert an inhibitory control of P2X3R expression (Fig. 6), leading to the conclusion that p38 activation is necessary for the P2X7-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression to take place. Activation of p38 would result in a reduction in P2X3R expression in neuronal somata and thus less P2X3Rs transported to the central and peripheral nerve terminals (Fig. 7). This would reduce pain perception in the periphery or synaptic transmission in the spinal cord.

Under control conditions, pp38 was found in ~20 % of P2X3R-positive DRG neurons (Fig. 2) and P2X3R was present in ~40 % of the neurons (Fig. 6). Thus, it appears that only ~8 % of all DRG neurons or ~8/40 = ~20 % of P2X3R-containing neurons express pp38 and exert P2X7-P2Y1R inhibitory control of P2X3R expression. This is unlikely to be accurate because pp38 was found to be endogenously active under control conditions (Fig. 6b). As a result of pp38 inhibition of P2X3R expression in those cells, the number of pp38 and P2X3R double-labeled cells would be underestimated. Treatment of DRG with the p38 inhibitor, SB, resulted in a ~13 % increase in P2X3R neurons expressing p38 (Fig. 6b), suggesting that ~(8 + 13) = ~21 % of total neurons or ~21/(40 + 13) = ~40 % of P2X3R-containing neurons may express both P2X3R and pp38. This rough estimate illustrates the likelihood that a substantial percentage of P2X3R-containing cells exert pp38-dependent P2X7-P2Y1 inhibitory control of the P2X3R expression.

We observed an increase in P2X3R expression in complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA)-treated inflamed rats, even though the P2X7R expression is upregulated [15, 20]. Others showed that p38 is activated in DRG neurons after inflammation [41]. Thus, the enhancements in endogenous P2X7Rs and p38 are insufficient to block all of the increase in P2X3R expression induced by CFA. Additional activation of P2X7R was found to be required to block the CFA-induced P2X3R upregulation [10, 20].

In the periphery, injury-induced p38 activation mostly occurs in neurons [35, 42, 43]. Following tissue or nerve injury, mast cells, macrophages, neutrophils, keratinocytes and Schwann cells are recruited and/or activated at injured sites [4446]. Inflammatory mediators, e.g., TNFα, nerve growth factor (NGF) and ATP are upregulated and released from those non-neuronal cells. They act directly on their receptors at sensory neurons, nerve fibers and their terminals [4750] or indirectly through the release of prostanoids, e.g. PGE2 [51]. Initiation of mechanical allodynia induced by spinal nerve ligation has been attributed to TNFα-induced transient increase in pp38 in DRG neurons [42]. Exogenously-applied TNFα was found to activate p38 in cultured DRG neurons and increase TTX-resistant Na+ channel activity [43]. NGF was shown to activate p38 to potentiate TRPV1 responses after inflammation [41]. It has been shown that activation of P2Y1R in DRGs induces thermal sensitization or hyperalgesia [35, 52]. Kwon et al. [35] further found that activation of P2Y1Rs in peripheral nerve terminals by ATP released from damaged tissues after carrageenan-induced inflammation enhances pp38 expression in DRG neurons and results in TRPV1 upregulation.

There are fewer examples that p38-mediated changes in receptor or channel activity result in the reduction of hyperalgesia or chronic pain. Bhattacharjee’s group found that activation of p38 increased the activities of Na+ activated K+ channels thus reducing the activity of DRG neurons [53]. In our study, we showed that the activation of P2Y1Rs in neurons, induced by ATP released from activated P2X7R in SGCs, increases neuronal pp38 production (Fig. 3). Instead of causing an increase in the activity in DRG somata, this results in down-regulation of P2X3R expression and thus a reduction of nociceptor activity (Figs. 6, 7) [20].

Major differences exist between our results and those of Kwon et al. [35]. In addition to the opposite consequence between the excitatory P2Y1 → pp38 → TRPV1 cascade and inhibitory P2Y1 → pp38 → P2X3 cascade, the characteristics of the two responses are different. In the P2Y1 → pp38 → TRPV1 cascade, application of a P2Y1 agonist is required to stimulate the expression of TRPV1. Thermal hyperalgesia, but not mechanical allodynia, is affected by a P2Y1 antagonist [35]. In our previous study, applications of a P2Y1 agonist can alter mechanical allodynia induced by CFA (Figure S6 in [20]). It is of interest to determine the downstream events controlled by pp38 activation to produce pain-causing upregulation of TRPV1 versus analgesic down-regulation of P2X3Rs.

Since p38 activation was found mostly to enhance hyperalgesia, many proposed to use p38 inhibitors to treat chronic pain conditions [54]. There are at least two possible drawbacks to such an approach. One is that p38 is involved in many cell functions in addition to the induction of chronic pain [46, 54, 55]. Blocking p38 may also disrupt some essential cell functions and produce unexpected side effects. The second drawback is that such an approach not only blocks the pain-inducing effects, but also inhibits pain-reducing actions of p38 as we observed here. As we have shown before [4, 10, 20], P2X7R activation produces both excitatory and inhibitory action on P2X3R responses in DRGs, thus providing complex and interesting modulations of P2X3R activity. A better strategy is to aim at downstream targets of p38 which link directly to the production of specific chronic pain conditions.

Methods

Animals

Male Sprague–Dawley rats (250–350 g) were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or with halothane (3 % for induction and 2 % for maintenance). L4 and L5 DRGs were used for experiments. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Texas Medical Branch and were in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).

Western blots

L4 and L5 DRGs were removed from normal rats and recovered in an oxygenated external solution (in mM) (130 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 KH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, and 10 HEPES, pH7.4, osmolarity, 295–300 mosM) at room temperature for 30 min. DRGs were then treated with various drugs dissolved in the same solution for 1–3 h. DRGs were lysed in RIPA buffer (Thermal Scientific) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). For pp38 experiments, phosphatase Inhibitor III (Sigma) and phosphatase Inhibitor II (Sigma) were added into the RIPA buffer [56]. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. Equal volumes of total protein sample from each group determined by BCA (Pierce) were loaded onto a SDS-PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane, incubated with a blocking buffer (1× TBS with 5 % w/v fat free dry milk) for 2 h, and then with rabbit anti-P2X3R (1:1000; Alomone) for 2 h at room temperature, or with mouse anti-pp38(1:1000; Cell Signaling) for 24 h at 4 °C. The PVDF membrane was then washed 5 times with TBST (1× TBS and 0.1 % Tween 20), incubated with Clean-Blot IP Detection Reagent (HRP) (1:1000; Thermo Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature and washed 5 times with TBST. For pp38 experiments, we used anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000, Chemicon). The immunoreactive proteins were detected by an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences) and visualized by exposing the PVDF membrane onto an X-ray film. Loading controls were determined by re-probing the membrane with mouse anti-Actin (1:30,000, Chemicon) for 2 h or with rabbit anti-p38 (1:200; Santa Cruz) overnight at 4 °C for the pp38 experiment. After washing, the membrane was incubated with Blotting Grade Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L)-HRP Conjugate (1:15,000; Bio-Rad) for 1 h or with anti-rabbit peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000; Santa Cruz) for 1 h at room temperature. The intensity of protein bands was determined using the ImageJ software.

Immunohistochemical procedure

To study the effect of a drug on the distribution of pp38 and/or P2X3Rs in DRG neurons, 10 µl of the drug at a proper concentration was applied intrathecally twice a day for 3 days. Rats were then deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital (80 mg/kg, i.p.) and transcardially perfused with normal saline (~50 ml) followed by a fixative (4 % paraformaldehyde plus 0.2 % picric acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, ~300 ml). L4 and L5 DRGs were then removed, put in a 30 % sucrose solution and stored at 4 °C overnight. Tissue was then embedded in OCT compound with liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C. Transverse sections of DRGs (10 µm thick) were cut on a cryostat and thaw-mounted onto glass slides. After drying, tissue sections were washed with PBS three times and incubated in PBS containing 10 % normal goat serum and 0.3 % Triton-100 for 1 h to block non-specific binding. The sections were then incubated with primary guinea pig anti-P2X3 receptor polyclonal antibody (Millipore, 1:5000) for 48 h or rabbit anti-pp38 monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling, 1:500) for 36 h. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with secondary Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgG (Invitrogen, 1:200) or secondary Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, 1:200) for 1 h. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 1 % normal goat serum and 0.3 % Triton-100. To double stain the tissue with P2X3R and pp38, sections were stained first with P2X3 receptor antibody and stained subsequently with pp38 antibody using the procedures described before. All staining procedures were conducted at room temperature.

Drug application

To block the activity of P2X7Rs, either the P2X7R antagonist oxATP (100 µM, Sigma) [57] or a highly selective P2X7R antagonist A740003 (250 nM, Sigma) was used. At 250 nM, A740003 inhibits >90 % of P2X7 receptor-mediated Ca2+ influx [58]. To activate P2Y1Rs, the agonist 2mesADP (100 µM, Sigma) was used. At 100 µM, 2mesADP was found to excite P2Y1 receptors in inhibitory neurons in the hippocampal slice [38]. To inhibit P2Y1R activity, the potent selective P2Y1R antagonist, MRS (60 µM, Tocris) was incubated with DRGs. In neocortical subventricular zone slices, MRS, at 50 µM, effectively blocks P2Y1R-mediated Ca2+ responses in intermediate neuronal progenitors [59]. To study the role of p38 in P2Y1R–P2X3R control, either the p38 inhibitor, SB (100 µM, Tocris) or the p38 activator, Anis (10 nM, Sigma) was used [60, 61]. The function of SGCs was disrupted by incubating DRGs in the glia Krebs cycle inhibitor, FC, (100 µM, Sigma) [62]. Unless stated otherwise, the incubation time for chemicals was 1 h.

Behavioral experiments

All behavioral studies were performed under blind conditions. To inhibit the activity of p38, SB (100 µM, 10 µl) was applied intrathecally twice a day for 3 days. The behavioral experiment was started on the 4th day. Flinching of the rat left hindpaw in response to an intradermal paw injection of the P2X receptor agonist, α,β-meATP (50 nmole in 50 µl), was used to assess nociception elicited by activation of P2X3Rs [17, 63]. The nocifensive behavior was analyzed according to a previously described method [17, 40]. In response to α,β-meATP injection, rats not only lifted the injected paw more frequently, but also kept the paw in the air for a longer period. We therefore used paw withdrawal (PW) duration, i.e., the accumulative duration that the hindpaw was lifted in the air in a 1 min time bin, to assess flinching behaviors. Since PW duration depends on both paw lift frequency and duration, it gives a more accurate measure of nociception than flinching frequency, i.e., the number of paw lifts per min—a parameter commonly used to assess flinching behaviors.

Data analyses

Data were expressed as mean ± SE. When the significance of changes between two groups was assessed, Student’s t test was used for data that were normally distributed. The Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test was used when the normality test failed. When means from more than two groups were compared, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Holm-Sidak post hoc test was used with normally distributed data sets. Kruskal–Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks followed by Dunn’s Method was used when data were not normally distributed. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YC designed the study, performed experiments, analyzed data and prepared the manuscript. GL designed and performed immunohistochemical and behavioral experiments and analyzed data. LMH designed the study, analyzed data and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by Grants from National Institutes of Health (NS030045 and DE017813).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch

References

  1. Hanani M. Satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia: from form to function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;48:457–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pannese E. The satellite cells of the sensory ganglia. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 1981;65:1–111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pannese E, Ledda M, Cherkas PS, Huang TY, Hanani M. Satellite cell reactions to axon injury of sensory ganglion neurons: increase in number of gap junctions and formation of bridges connecting previously separate perineuronal sheaths. Anat Embryol. 2003;206:337–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang X, Chen Y, Wang C, Huang LY. Neuronal somatic ATP release triggers neuron-satellite glial cell communication in dorsal root ganglia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9864–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakatsuka T, Gu JG. P2X purinoceptors and sensory transmission. Pflugers Arch. 2006;452:598–607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Villa G, Fumagalli M, Verderio C, Abbracchio MP, Ceruti S. Expression and contribution of satellite glial cells purinoceptors to pain transmission in sensory ganglia: an update. Neuron Glia Biol. 2010;6:31–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnstock G, Krugel U, Abbracchio MP, Illes P. Purinergic signalling: from normal behaviour to pathological brain function. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;95:229–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanani M. Intercellular communication in sensory ganglia by purinergic receptors and gap junctions: implications for chronic pain. Brain Res. 2012;1487:183–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Franke H, Verkhratsky A, Burnstock G, Illes P. Pathophysiology of astroglial purinergic signalling. Purinergic Signalling. 2012;8:629–57.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang LY, Gu Y, Chen Y. Communication between neuronal somata and satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia. Glia. 2013;61:1571–81.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabbretti E. ATP P2X3 receptors and neuronal sensitization. Frontiers Cell Neurosci. 2013;7:236.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Magni G, Ceruti S. The purinergic system and glial cells: emerging costars in nociception. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:495789.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen CC, Akopian AN, Sivilotti L, Colquhoun D, Burnstock G, Wood JN. A P2X purinoceptor expressed by a subset of sensory neurons. Nature. 1995;377:428–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn PM, Zhong Y, Burnstock G. P2X receptors in peripheral neurons. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;65:107–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xu GY, Huang LY. Peripheral inflammation sensitizes P2X receptor-mediated responses in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22:93–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. North RA. P2X3 receptors and peripheral pain mechanisms. J Physiol. 2004;554:301–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen Y, Li GW, Wang C, Gu Y, Huang LY. Mechanisms underlying enhanced P2X receptor-mediated responses in the neuropathic pain state. Pain. 2005;119:38–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang XF, Han P, Faltynek CR, Jarvis MF, Shieh CC. Functional expression of P2X7 receptors in non-neuronal cells of rat dorsal root ganglia. Brain Res. 2005;1052:63–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kobayashi K, Fukuoka T, Yamanaka H, Dai Y, Obata K, Tokunaga A, Noguchi K. Differential expression patterns of mRNAs for P2X receptor subunits in neurochemically characterized dorsal root ganglion neurons in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2005;481:377–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen Y, Zhang X, Wang C, Li G, Gu Y, Huang LY. Activation of P2X7 receptors in glial satellite cells reduces pain through downregulation of P2X3 receptors in nociceptive neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:16773–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Colomar A, Marty V, Medina C, Combe C, Parnet P, Amedee T. Maturation and release of interleukin-1beta by lipopolysaccharide-primed mouse Schwann cells require the stimulation of P2X7 receptors. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:30732–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chessell IP, Hatcher JP, Bountra C, Michel AD, Hughes JP, Green P, Egerton J, Murfin M, Richardson J, Peck WL, Grahames CB, Casula MA, Yiangou Y, Birch R, Anand P, Buell GN. Disruption of the P2X7 purinoceptor gene abolishes chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Pain. 2005;114:386–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McGaraughty S, Chu KL, Namovic MT, Donnelly-Roberts DL, Harris RR, Zhang XF, Shieh CC, Wismer CT, Zhu CZ, Gauvin DM, Fabiyi AC, Honore P, Gregg RJ, Kort ME, Nelson DW, Carroll WA, Marsh K, Faltynek CR, Jarvis MF. P2X7-related modulation of pathological nociception in rats. Neuroscience. 2007;146:1817–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ando RD, Mehesz B, Gyires K, Illes P, Sperlagh B. A comparative analysis of the activity of ligands acting at P2X and P2Y receptor subtypes in models of neuropathic, acute and inflammatory pain. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159:1106–17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen Y, Li G, Huang LY. P2X7 receptors in satellite glial cells mediate high functional expression of P2X3 receptors in immature dorsal root ganglion neurons. Mol Pain. 2012;8:9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cargnello M, Roux PP. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 2011;75:50–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark AR, Dean JL, Saklatvala J. Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression by mitogen-activated protein kinase p38. FEBS Lett. 2003;546:37–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ji RR, Gereau RWt, Malcangio M, Strichartz GR. MAP kinase and pain. Brain Res Rev. 2009;60:135–48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jin SX, Zhuang ZY, Woolf CJ, Ji RR. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is activated after a spinal nerve ligation in spinal cord microglia and dorsal root ganglion neurons and contributes to the generation of neuropathic pain. J Neurosci. 2003;23:4017–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsuda M, Mizokoshi A, Shigemoto-Mogami Y, Koizumi S, Inoue K. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in spinal hyperactive microglia contributes to pain hypersensitivity following peripheral nerve injury. Glia. 2004;45:89–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Svensson CI, Marsala M, Westerlund A, Calcutt NA, Campana WM, Freshwater JD, Catalano R, Feng Y, Protter AA, Scott B, Yaksh TL. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in spinal microglia is a critical link in inflammation-induced spinal pain processing. J Neurochem. 2003;86:1534–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Trang T, Beggs S, Wan X, Salter MW. P2X4-receptor-mediated synthesis and release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in microglia is dependent on calcium and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:3518–28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chu YX, Zhang Y, Zhang YQ, Zhao ZQ. Involvement of microglial P2X7 receptors and downstream signaling pathways in long-term potentiation of spinal nociceptive responses. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:1176–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kobayashi K, Yamanaka H, Fukuoka T, Dai Y, Obata K, Noguchi K. P2Y12 receptor upregulation in activated microglia is a gateway of p38 signaling and neuropathic pain. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2892–902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kwon SG, Roh DH, Yoon SY, Moon JY, Choi SR, Choi HS, Kang SY, Han HJ, Beitz AJ, Lee JH. Blockade of peripheral P2Y1 receptors prevents the induction of thermal hyperalgesia via modulation of TRPV1 expression in carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain rats: involvement of p38 MAPK phosphorylation in DRGs. Neuropharmacology. 2014;79:368–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Winter E, Keen P. Effects of synthesis inhibition and nervous activity on concentrations of neuronal substance P. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archiv Pharmacol. 1983;323:173–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Sherrin T, Blank T, Hippel C, Rayner M, Davis RJ, Todorovic C. Hippocampal c-Jun-N-terminal kinases serve as negative regulators of associative learning. J Neurosci. 2010;30:13348–61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kawamura M, Gachet C, Inoue K, Kato F. Direct excitation of inhibitory interneurons by extracellular ATP mediated by P2Y1 receptors in the hippocampal slice. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10835–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. von Kugelgen I. Pharmacological profiles of cloned mammalian P2Y-receptor subtypes. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;110:415–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang C, Gu Y, Li GW, Huang LY. A critical role of the cAMP sensor Epac in switching protein kinase signalling in prostaglandin E2-induced potentiation of P2X3 receptor currents in inflamed rats. J Physiol. 2007;584:191–203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ji RR, Samad TA, Jin SX, Schmoll R, Woolf CJ. p38 MAPK activation by NGF in primary sensory neurons after inflammation increases TRPV1 levels and maintains heat hyperalgesia. Neuron. 2002;36:57–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schafers M, Lee DH, Brors D, Yaksh TL, Sorkin LS. Increased sensitivity of injured and adjacent uninjured rat primary sensory neurons to exogenous tumor necrosis factor-alpha after spinal nerve ligation. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3028–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jin X, Gereau RWt. Acute p38-mediated modulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in mouse sensory neurons by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Neurosci. 2006;26:246–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kondo S, Kooshesh F, Sauder DN. Penetration of keratinocyte-derived cytokines into basement membrane. J Cell Physiol. 1997;171:190–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Marchand F, Perretti M, McMahon SB. Role of the immune system in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:521–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Leung L, Cahill CM. TNF-alpha and neuropathic pain–a review. J Neuroinflam. 2010;7:27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Sorkin LS, Xiao WH, Wagner R, Myers RR. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha induces ectopic activity in nociceptive primary afferent fibres. Neuroscience. 1997;81:255–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu B, Li H, Brull SJ, Zhang JM. Increased sensitivity of sensory neurons to tumor necrosis factor alpha in rats with chronic compression of the lumbar ganglia. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:1393–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hucho T, Levine JD. Signaling pathways in sensitization: toward a nociceptor cell biology. Neuron. 2007;55:365–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hu P, Bembrick AL, Keay KA, McLachlan EM. Immune cell involvement in dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord after chronic constriction or transection of the rat sciatic nerve. Brain Behav Immun. 2007;21:599–616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fehrenbacher JC, Nicol GD, Vasko MR. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1beta stimulate the expression of cyclooxygenase II but do not alter prostaglandin E2 receptor mRNA levels in cultured dorsal root ganglia cells. Pain. 2005;113:113–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jankowski MP, Rau KK, Soneji DJ, Ekmann KM, Anderson CE, Molliver DC, Koerber HR. Purinergic receptor P2Y1 regulates polymodal C-fiber thermal thresholds and sensory neuron phenotypic switching during peripheral inflammation. Pain. 2012;153:410–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fleites J. Modulation of sodium activated potassium channels (KNa) by p38 map kinase. MS Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo 2013.Google Scholar
  54. Anand P, Shenoy R, Palmer JE, Baines AJ, Lai RY, Robertson J, Bird N, Ostenfeld T, Chizh BA. Clinical trial of the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor dilmapimod in neuropathic pain following nerve injury. Eur J Pain. 2011;15:1040–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zarubin T, Han J. Activation and signaling of the p38 MAP kinase pathway. Cell Res. 2005;15:11–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Boyle DL, Jones TL, Hammaker D, Svensson CI, Rosengren S, Albani S, Sorkin L, Firestein GS. Regulation of peripheral inflammation by spinal p38 MAP kinase in rats. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e338.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Deuchars SA, Atkinson L, Brooke RE, Musa H, Milligan CJ, Batten TF, Buckley NJ, Parson SH, Deuchars J. Neuronal P2X7 receptors are targeted to presynaptic terminals in the central and peripheral nervous systems. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7143–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Donnelly-Roberts DL, Namovic MT, Han P, Jarvis MF. Mammalian P2X7 receptor pharmacology: comparison of recombinant mouse, rat and human P2X7 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:1203–14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu X, Hashimoto-Torii K, Torii M, Haydar TF, Rakic P. The role of ATP signaling in the migration of intermediate neuronal progenitors to the neocortical subventricular zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11802–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang R, Sun L, Hayashi Y, Liu X, Koyama S, Wu Z, Nakanishi H. Acute p38-mediated inhibition of NMDA-induced outward currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons by interleukin-1beta. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;38:68–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Agca C, Gubler A, Traber G, Beck C, Imsand C, Ail D, Caprara C, Grimm C. p38 MAPK signaling acts upstream of LIF-dependent neuroprotection during photoreceptor degeneration. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e785.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Christian CA, Huguenard JR. Astrocytes potentiate GABAergic transmission in the thalamic reticular nucleus via endozepine signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:20278–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hamilton SG, Wade A, McMahon SB. The effects of inflammation and inflammatory mediators on nociceptive behaviour induced by ATP analogues in the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;126:326–32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al. 2015

Advertisement