Open Access

Is BDNF sufficient for information transfer between microglia and dorsal horn neurons during the onset of central sensitization?

  • James E Biggs1,
  • Van B Lu2,
  • Martin J Stebbing3,
  • Sridhar Balasubramanyan4 and
  • Peter A Smith5Email author
Molecular Pain20106:44

https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-6-44

Received: 30 March 2010

Accepted: 23 July 2010

Published: 23 July 2010

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury activates spinal microglia. This leads to enduring changes in the properties of dorsal horn neurons that initiate central sensitization and the onset of neuropathic pain. Although a variety of neuropeptides, cytokines, chemokines and neurotransmitters have been implicated at various points in this process, it is possible that much of the information transfer between activated microglia and neurons, at least in this context, may be explicable in terms of the actions of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Microglial-derived BDNF mediates central sensitization in lamina I by attenuating inhibitory synaptic transmission. This involves an alteration in the chloride equilibrium potential as a result of down regulation of the potassium-chloride exporter, KCC2. In lamina II, BDNF duplicates many aspects of the effects of chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve on excitatory transmission. It mediates an increase in synaptic drive to putative excitatory neurons whilst reducing that to inhibitory neurons. CCI produces a specific pattern of changes in excitatory synaptic transmission to tonic, delay, phasic, transient and irregular neurons. A very similar 'injury footprint' is seen following long-term exposure to BDNF. This review presents new information on the action of BDNF and CCI on lamina II neurons, including the similarity of their actions on the kinetics and distributions of subpopulations of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC). These findings raise the possibility that BDNF functions as a final common path for a convergence of perturbations that culminate in the generation of neuropathic pain.

In experimental animals, peripheral nerve damage, such as that generated by chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve, induces pain-related behaviours that are accepted as a model for human neuropathic pain [1, 2]. Seven or more days of CCI promotes release of cytokines, chemokines and neurotrophins at the site of nerve injury. These interact with first order primary afferent neurons to produce an enduring increase in their excitability [311]. The central terminals of these damaged afferents exhibit spontaneous activity and release additional cytokines, chemokines, neuropeptides, as well as ATP and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [1223] into the dorsal horn. These exert long term effects on dorsal horn excitability[14, 24, 25] and/or alter the state of activation of spinal microglial cells. Microglia stimulated in this way release of a further set of mediators, again including (BDNF) [13, 14, 17, 18, 2430], that promote a slowly developing increase in excitability of second order sensory neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Figure 1). This 'central sensitization' which develops progressively during CCI, [16, 3134] is responsible for the allodynia, hyperalgesia and causalgia that characterize human neuropathic pain [35]. Whereas microglial activation triggers pain onset, enduring activation of astrocytes is thought to be responsible for the maintenance of central sensitization [16, 17, 3640]. Changes in thalamic and cortical physiology [35, 41], long-term sensitization of peripheral nociceptors [16, 35, 42, 43] and changes in descending inhibition from the rostral ventromedial medulla and periaqueductal grey [16, 35, 42, 4447] and are also involved. Although neuropathic pain can result from a variety of insults to peripheral nerves, including diabetic, postherpetic and HIV-AIDs related neuropathies [48, 49], axotomy [3, 4, 50], nerve crush [51] or compression injury [52], the appearance of ectopic action potentials and spontaneous activity in primary afferent fibres seems to be the initial trigger that initiates central sensitization in many, if not all, types of peripherally generated neuropathic pain [35].
Figure 1

Scheme to show interactions between primary afferents, dorsal horn neurons microglia and astroctyes in the context of chronic pain. Literature citations supporting the illustrated interactions include; IL-1β, MCP-1/CCL-2 and TNF-α in acute and chronic excitation of primary afferents [39]; MCP-1/CCL-2, ATP, BDNF and fractalkine in microglial activation [13, 18, 59, 60, 64, 65]; autocrine actions of TNF-α in microglia [120]; IL-1β release from microglia [55, 57] and its actions on neurons [30, 98]; BDNF release from microglia and its actions on neurons [14, 21, 24, 25, 61]; role of MCP-1/CCL-2 in astrocyte-neuron interactions [38], actions of TNF-α on astrocytes and neurons [30, 58]. To the best of our knowledge actions of IL-1b on astrocytes in spinal cord has not been demonstated but there is evidence for this interaction in other neuronal systems [97, 121].

Despite the documented importance of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) [8, 29, 30, 5358], MCP-1/CCL-2 [7, 18, 38], ATP [13, 59], BDNF [14, 21, 24, 25, 6062] and fractalkine [6365] in central sensitization, findings to be reviewed below point to the possibility that BDNF is alone capable of bringing about one critical step; the interaction between activated microglia and neurons. It may therefore serve as a final common path for a convergence of perturbations that culminate in the generation of neuropathic pain [16, 35] (Figure 1).

A role for BDNF in CCI-induced increase in dorsal horn excitability

BDNF is increased in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and spinal cord following crush or section of peripheral nerves [6672]. It is released within the spinal cord following afferent fibre stimulation [23]. This release is Ca2+ dependent and is favoured by high frequency burst activity [23, 73]. Several lines of evidence are consistent with the central role for BDNF in the initiation of central sensitization [21, 70, 71, 74, 75]. For example, acutely applied BDNF sensitizes lamina II neurons to nociceptive input [76]. It also increases substance P release [77], enhances spinal responses to NMDA [78] and increases the frequency of miniature EPSCs (mEPSC) [79]. Intrathecal injection of BDNF produces hyperalgesia in normal mice whereas injection of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides directed against either BDNF or trkB, prevents inflammation-induced hyperalgesia [80]. Similarly, thermal hyperalgesia and allodynia produced by peripheral nerve ligation are attenuated in BDNF (+/-) heterozygous knock-out mice. They are also reduced following intrathecal injection of TrkB/Fc; a chimeric binding protein which sequesters BDNF [71].

The observations that 1) peripheral nerve injury attenuates GABAergic primary afferent depolarization [81], 2) that both CCI and BDNF reduce the amplitude of spontaneous and/or evoked IPSC's in dorsal horn neurons [14, 33] and 3) that pharmacological blockade of the actions of inhibitory neurotransmitters promote allodynia [8284] strongly implicate impediment of inhibitory neurotransmission in the development of central sensitization [16, 81, 84, 85]. Mechanistically, this is thought to involve alterations in GABA release [33] as well as down regulation of the chloride transporter KCC2 in lamina 1 neurons by microglial-derived BDNF [14, 86]. The resultant perturbation of the chloride gradient leads to attenuation of the inhibitory actions of GABA/glycine. In some neurons, the chloride gradient may actually reverse so that inhibition is converted to excitation [87]. Disinhibition also permits access of sensory information from low threshold Aβ fibres to pain projection neurons in lamina I [8890]. This "opening of polysynaptic excitatory synaptic pathways" provides a physiological basis for the development of allodynia [16].

Although it has been reported that viral vector-driven expression of BDNF and grafting BDNF-expressing cells into the spinal cord reduces signs of pain associated with CCI [91, 92] this may reflect analgesic actions within the midbrain [9395]. Observations from our laboratory are consistent with a pro-nociceptive effect of BDNF, at least at the level of the spinal cord [24, 25]. These and other observations raise the possibility that BDNF is alone capable of conveying many aspects of the communication between activated microglia and neurons during the onset of central sensitization. This appears to occur despite the presence and potential participation of mediators such as IL-1β [5, 20, 30, 54, 9698], TNF-α [58, 99], fractalkine [37, 63, 64, 100, 101], chemotaxic cytokine ligand 2 also known as monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (CCL-2/MCP-1) [7, 18, 100, 101]. These may exert their actions at other points in the central sensitization process (Figure 1) or perhaps function in a parallel fashion to BDNF in microglial - neuron interactions.

BDNF immunoreactivity starts to increase 3 days after the initiation of peripheral nerve injury and its levels remain elevated for several weeks thereafter [66]. We therefore applied BDNF to spinal neurons for 5-6 days to test whether it produces a global increase in spinal cord excitability in a similar fashion to CCI [35]. This involved the use of an organotypic culture of rat spinal cord [102, 103] that allowed us to expose mature neurons to BDNF for prolonged periods [24, 25]. Effects on excitability were monitored by confocal Ca2+ imaging using Fluo 4-AM. This was done in two ways, we either challenged neurons with high concentrations of extracellular K+ (Figure 2A and 2B) or stimulated the dorsal root entry zone (50 Hz; 5 s; 100 μS pulse width) and observed the resultant elevation in intracellular Ca2+. Responses were collected from neurons (regions of interest) in control cultures or in cultures exposed to BDNF for 5-6 d. Ca2+ responses were evoked by nerve stimulation once every 5 min and although there was variability in the amplitude of the responses, those evoked by the 5th and 6th stimulus (S5 and S6) were quite consistent (Figure 2C). Figure 2D compares sample S5 and S6 responses from control neurons with those from neurons cultured with 50 or 200 ng/ml BDNF for 6 days. Those evoked in the presence of the higher concentration of BDNF are clearly larger. The summary of responses of larger populations of neurons illustrated in Figure 2E shows that 200 ng/ml BDNF, but not 50 ng/ml, significantly increased the Ca2+ responses (Figure 2E).
Figure 2

Effect of electrical stimulation and 35 mM K + on intracellular Ca 2+ signals in substantia gelatinosa neurons. A. Confocal image of fluo-4 filled neurons in substantia gelatinosa region of organotypic culture B. Second image of the same field as A after challenging with 35 mM K+. Note increased fluorescence intensity indicative of increases in intracellular Ca2+. C. Responses to a series of 5 sec 50 Hz stimuli (100 μS pulse width) to the dorsal root entry zone (S1 - S8) delivered at 5 minute intervals. Staggered traces show responses from two different neurons. Note despite the variability, responses S5 and S6 displayed fairly consistent amplitudes. These two responses were used for further comparisons. D. Typical S5 and S6 responses sampled from three typical neurons in control slices and in slices treated with 50 or 200 ng/ml BDNF. E. Summary of data from 32 neurons in control slices, 41 neurons from slices treated with 50 ng/ml BDNF and 22 neurons form slices treated with 200 ng/ml BDNF. Note enhanced responses in 200 ng/ml BDNF, * = P < 0.05 relative to appropriate control (One-way Anova with Tukey Kramer multiple comparisons test). Modified from reference [103]

Using ELISA, we found that the ambient level of BDNF in control cultures was 26.2 ± 8.7 ng/ml (n = 3) [103]. Because this was not significantly changed after 6 d exposure of cultures to 50 ng/ml BDNF, where the measured BDNF concentration was 43.7 ± 7.3 ng/ml (n = 3; P = 0.056), this may explain the lack of effect of medium containing 50 ng/ml BDNF in Figure 2E. By contrast, the measured BDNF concentration was significantly increased to 92.4 ± 13.0 ng/ml (n = 3, P < 0.002) after 6 d exposure of cultures to medium containing 200 ng/ml BDNF. As mentioned, this concentration of BDNF promoted a significant increase in excitability was observed (Figure 2E). Metabolism, binding or breakdown of some of the exogenous BDNF by the cultures may explain the lack of correspondence between the applied and measured concentrations.

To test whether CCI would be expected to increase excitability in the cultures, we took advantage of the known role of microglia in central sensitization [1220, 104]. We found that the excitability of cultures was increased when they were exposed to medium conditioned by exposure to lipopolysaccharide activated microglia (activated microglia conditioned medium aMCM [105]). This increase in excitability could be prevented by sequestering BDNF with the binding protein TrkBd5 [25, 106]. This implicates BDNF in the increased excitability produced by aMCM and supports its role as a mediator of pain centralization.

In another series of experiments, we noted that excitability of the cultures could also be increased by 6-8 d exposure to 100 pM interleukin 1β (IL-1β) [98]. Despite this, we do not believe that this cytokine plays a major role in the microglia - neuron interactions that lead to central sensitization. This is because the actions of CCI and BDNF display remarkable similarity at the cellular level [24, 25] whereas the cellular actions of IL-1β are quite different from those seen with CCI [98] (see below).

BDNF and increased excitability of superficial laminae

We have found that CCI produces a specific set of changes in excitatory synaptic transmission in lamina II. Neurons in this region can be classified according to five electrophysiological phenotypes according to their firing pattern in response to depolarizing current. These are defined as tonic, delay, irregular, phasic and transient firing neurons (Figure 3A-E) [24, 102, 107, 108]. Although CCI has minimal effects on the intrinsic membrane properties of these five neuron types, it produces a discrete pattern of changes in excitatory transmission across the whole population; the amplitude and frequency of both miniature and spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (mESPC and sEPSC) are increased in most neuron types but are reduced in tonic firing neurons (Figure 3F). This pattern of changes may be referred to as an 'injury footprint' [107].
Figure 3

Neuron types and injury footprints produced by CCI and BDNF. A-E Firing patterns of tonic, delay, irregular, phasic and transient neurons in response to depolarizing current commands. F. Injury footprint produced by CCI. Neuron types are listed across the top of the scheme and four indices of excitatory synaptic transmission are listed to the left. Neuron specific parameters increased (↑; such as sEPSC amplitude in delay neurons) are coded green. Neuron specific parameters decreased (↓; such as sEPSC amplitude in tonic neurons) are coded red. Data from [107]. nd = not determined. G. Injury footprint produced by BDNF. Neuron types are listed across the top of the scheme and four indices of excitatory synaptic transmission are listed to the left. Neuron specific parameters increased (↑; such as sEPSC amplitude in delay neurons) are coded green. Neuron specific parameters decreased (↓; such as sEPSC amplitude in tonic neurons) are coded red. Data from [24]. H. Overlay of the injury footprints from F and G, similarities between the actions of CCI and BDNF treatment show up as clear green or red squares. Yellow squares illustrate the few parameters which appear to be altered in a different way by BDNF compared to CCI. 2 out 20 (10%) of squares are yellow. I. Injury footprint produced by IL-1β. Neuron types are listed across the top of the scheme and indices of excitatory synaptic transmission SEPSC amplitude and frequency are listed to the left. Neuron specific parameters increased (↑) are coded green. Neuron specific parameters decreased (↓) are coded red. J. Overlay of IL-1β injury footprint from I with sEPSC amplitude and frequency data from A. Yellow squares illustrate the parameters which appear to be altered in a different way by IL-1β compared to CCI. 5 out of 10 (50%) of squares are yellow. This analysis indicates that the consequences of CCI are mimicked more accurately by BDNF than by IL-1β.

Figure 4

Analysis of the effects of BDNF on mEPSCs of tonic neurons (in vitro). A. Superimposed recordings of 3 min of mEPSC activity in a control tonic neuron, average of events presented as superimposed white trace. B. Similar superimposed recordings from a tonic neuron in a BDNF-treated culture. C. Averaged events from the neurons illustrated in A and B. D. Averaged events normalized to control size. Note marked increased rate of decay of current. E. Distribution histogram (1 pA bins) for amplitudes of 1100 mEPSCs from control tonic neurons. Fit of the data to three Gaussian distributions represented by black lines. F. Similar histogram and fit to three Gaussian functions for 877 mEPSCs from BDNF-treated neurons: Insets in E and F. Graphs to show effect of number of Gaussian fits (peaks) on the value of χ2 divided by the number of degrees of freedom. G: Superimposition of the three Gaussian peaks obtained in E with those obtained in F. Modified from reference [24] and reproduced with permission of the Physiological Society.

The observation that BDNF produces a similar 'injury footprint' to CCI (Figure 3F-H) [24, 25] raised the possibility that it is alone capable of communication between microglia and neurons in the context of central sensitization. As with CCI, excitatory synaptic drive to delay, irregular, phasic and transient neuron types is increased by BDNF whereas that to tonic neurons is decreased [24, 25]. Since many tonic neurons are inhibitory [109, 110] and delay neurons are probably never inhibitory [111], we suggested that both BDNF and CCI increase excitatory synaptic drive to excitatory neurons whilst reducing that to inhibitory neurons [24, 107].

This similarity was also seen when we used more exacting criteria to identify putative inhibitory cells using both morphological and electrophysiological criteria. Thus both CCI and BDNF reduced excitatory synaptic drive to putative inhibitory tonic islet central neurones (TIC neurons) [25] and increased it to putative excitatory delay radial neurons (DR neurons) [25]. We also identified GABAeric neurons as those which expressed glutamic acid decaboxylase-like immunoreactivity. BDNF also reduced excitatory synaptic drive to these neurons [25].

Although IL-1β increased overall dorsal horn excitability, its effect on tonic and delay neurons differed from that of BDNF and CCI. Thus while IL-1β increased the amplitude of sEPSC's in delay neurons, sEPSC frequency was unaffected and neither the amplitude nor the frequency of sEPSC's were affected in tonic neurons [98]. These observations argue against IL-1β as a major messenger for transfer information between microglia and spinal neurons. It may however be involved in signalling between damaged peripheral tissue and primary afferents [5, 6, 9, 112]

Further parallels between the actions of BDNF and CCI on tonic neurons

Besides reducing mEPSC and sEPSC amplitude and frequency (Figure 3G), BDNF reduced the time constant for mEPSC decay(τ) in tonic neurons in organotypic culture by 35% [24]. Superimposed events from a typical control tonic neuron and from another neuron from a BDNF-treated culture are shown in Figures 4A and 4B. The white traces show superimposed average data from the two neurons and these are compared in Figure 4C. The scaled averages presented in Figure 4D emphasize the increased rate of mEPSC decay in 'tonic' neurons from BDNF-treated cultures.
Figure 5

Analysis of the effects of CCI on mEPSCs of tonic neurons ( ex vivo ). A. Average mEPSC's in tonic neurons modelled from amplitude and τ values published in [107]. Dark line = average of 325 mEPSC from sham operated animals, red line = average of 175 mEPSC from animals subject to CCI. B. Data from A normalized and replotted. C. Distribution histogram (1 pA bins) for amplitudes of 325 mEPSCs from tonic neurons in sham operated animals. Fit of the data to two Gaussian distributions represented by black lines. D. Similar histogram and fit to two Gaussian functions for 175 mEPSCs in tonic neurons from animals subject to CCI: Insets in C and D. Graphs to show effect of number of Gaussian fits (peaks) on the value of χ2 divided by the number of degrees of freedom. Note that no improvement of fit is seen when a third Gaussian is introduced. E: Superimposition of the two Gaussian peaks obtained in C with those obtained in D.

As well as reducing the amplitude and frequency of mEPSC's and sEPSC's (Figure 3G), CCI produced a 35% reduction in τ in ex vivo tonic neurons (see Table 1). Interestingly, this was numerically the same reduction as was seen with BDNF treatment. For sham operated tonic neurons, τ = 7.3 ± 0.3 ms (n = 598) and this was reduced to 4.94 ± 0.62 ms (n = 236) for mEPSCs recorded from animals subject to CCI (t-test, P < 0.0001). These numbers as well as the mean mEPSC amplitudes (data from Balasubramanyan et al [107]) were used to model the average events depicted in Figures 5A and 5B; (see Lu et al [24] for methods).
Table 1

Comparison of the effects of CCI and BDNF on the characteristics of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC) in tonic and delay neurons.

  

CCI

BDNF

  

ex vivo experiments

Organotypic culture experiments

Tonic

τ (mEPSC decay)

↓ 35%

↓ 35%

  

Peak 1

Peak 2

Peak 1

Peak 2

Peak 3

(sham or control)

mEPSC peak amplitudes

15

10.8

12

19.7

35.7

(CCI or BDNF)

mEPSC peak amplitudes

11.6

8.7

7.3

11

19.4

 

Change in mEPSC peak ampltudes

↓23%

↓19%

↓39%

↓44%

↓46%

 

Change in overall mEPSC amplitude

↓23%

↓18%

  

CCI

BDNF

Delay

τ (mEPSC decay)

Unchanged

↑38%

  

Peak 1

Peak 2

Peak 1

Peak 2

Peak 3

(sham or control)

mEPSC peak amplitudes

8.5

14.7

9.3

12.7

19

(CCI or BDNF)

mEPSC peak amplitudes

7.6

10.1

8.1

12.5

20.5

 

Change in mEPSC peak ampltudes

↓11%

↓31%

↓13%

↓1.5%

↑8%

 

Change in overall mEPSC amplitude

↑12% Due to appearance of small group of high amplitude responses (Figure 7)

↑10% Due to appearance of small group of high amplitude responses (Figure 6)

Figure 6

Analysis of the effects of BDNF on mEPSCs of delay neurons ( in vitro ). A. Superimposed recordings of 3 min of mEPSC activity in a control delay neuron; average of events presented as superimposed white trace. B. Similar superimposed recordings from a delay neuron in a BDNF-treated culture. C. Averaged events from the neurons illustrated in A and B. D. Averaged events normalized to control size. Note no change in the rate of decay of current. E. Distribution histogram (1 pA bins) for amplitudes of 1074 mEPSCs from control delay neurons. Fit of the data to three Gaussian distributions represented by black lines. F. Similar histogram and fit to three Gaussian functions for 1554 mEPSCs from BDNF treated neurons; arrow points out small number of very large events that appear in BDNF. Insets in E and F, graphs to show effect of number of Gaussian fits (peaks) on the value of χ 2 divided by the number of degrees of freedom. G. Superimposition of the three Gaussian peaks obtained in E with those obtained in F. Inset, comparison of area under curves for the three peaks. H. Data for control and BDNF mEPSCs > 30 pA replotted and compared on the same axes. I. Comparison of number of mEPSC events in control and BDNF treated larger than 30 pA. Modified from reference [24] and used with permission of the Physiological Society.

Three populations of mEPSC amplitudes were identified in control tonic neurons in organotypic slices by fitting Guassian curves to binned histogram data. These appeared at 12.1 ± 0.3, 19.7 ± 2.2 and 35.7 ± 7.4 pA (Figure 4E). By contrast those in BDNF-treated neurons (Figure 4F) had smaller amplitudes with peaks at at 7.3 ± 0.2 and 10.9 ± 1.2 and 19.4 ± 2.4 pA. The insets to Figures 4E and 4F show that fitting with 3 peaks produced the optimal reduction in χ2 (see figure legends for methods). Figure 4G shows superimposed plots of the three Gaussian distributions of mEPSC amplitude from control and BDNF tonic neurons for comparison.

Similar effects were seen in mEPSC population amplitudes in tonic neurons (ex vivo) after CCI. Only two populations of mEPSC amplitudes of 15.3 ± 1.3 and 10.8 ± 0.2 pA were seen in tonic neurons from sham operated animals (Figure 5C). Two populations of mEPSC amplitude were also seen in neurons from CCI animals (Figure 5D) but these had smaller peak amplitudes at 11.6 ± 0.1 and 8.7 ± 0.03 pA. The insets to Figures 5C and 5D show that fitting with 2 peaks produced the optimal reduction in χ2 (see Figure legend) with little further reduction in χ2 when a third peak was fitted. Figure 5E shows a superimposition of the Gaussian distributions of mEPSC amplitude from sham and CCI tonic cells for comparison.

Thus for tonic neurons, the effects of CCI and BDNF on both mEPSC time constant of decay (τ) and on the amplitude of subpopulations of mEPSC's are very similar. This similarity is illustrated further in Table 1.

Further parallels between the actions of BDNF and CCI on delay neurons

Unlike its action on tonic neurons, BDNF did not change the overall τ for recovery of mEPSC in delay neurons in organotypic culture (control τ = 10.7 ± 0.6 ms, n = 766; BDNF τ = 9.5 ± 0.8 ms, n = 1177; t-test, P > 0.2). Superimposed individual events from a typical control and a typical BDNF-treated delay neuron are shown in Figures 6A and 6B. Figure 6C shows average data from these cells superimposed. Scaled averages are presented in Figure 6D.
Figure 7

Analysis of the effects of CCI on mEPSCs of delay neurons ( ex vivo ). A. Average mEPSC's in delay neurons modelled from amplitude and τ values published in [107]. Dark line = average of 731 mEPSC from sham operated animals, red line = average of 748 mEPSC from animals subject to CCI. B. Data from A normalized and replotted. C. Distribution histogram (1 pA bins) for amplitudes of 731 mEPSCs from delay neurons in sham operated animals. Fit of the data to two Gaussian distributions represented by black lines. D. Similar histogram and fit to two Gaussian functions for 748 mEPSCs in tonic neurons from animals subject to CCI: Insets in C and D. Graphs to show effect of number of Gaussian fits (peaks) on the value of χ2 divided by the number of degrees of freedom. Note that no improvement of fit is seen when a third Gaussian is introduced. E. Superimposition of the two Gaussian peaks obtained in C with those obtained in D. Inset, comparison of area under curves for the two peaks. F. Data for sham and CCI groups' mEPSCs > 25 pA replotted and compared on the same axes. G. Comparison of number of mEPSC events in sham and CCI delay cells larger than 25 pA.

By contrast, CCI increased τ for mEPSC's in ex vivo delay cells. This increased from 5.0 ± 0.1 ms (n = 624) for events from delay neurons in sham animals to 6.9 ± 0.22 ms for events in animals subject to CCI (n = 1066, P < 0.0001). These numbers as well as the mean mEPSC amplitudes (data from Balasubramanyan et al [107]) were used to model the averaged responses depicted in Figures 7A and 7B; (see Lu et al [24] for methods).

Three populations of mEPSC amplitude were identified in control delay neurons in organotypic culture by fitting Gaussian curves to binned histogram data. These appeared at 9.3 ± 1.5, 12.7 ± 9.0 and 19.0 ± 12.3 pA in control neurons (Figure 6E) and at very similar amplitudes (8.1 ± 0.2, 12.5 ± 1.38 and 20.5 ± 4.3 pA) in BDNF-treated delay neurons (Figure 6F). Insets to Figures 6E and 6F show optimized χ2 values for using 3 peaks to fit the data. Figure 6G is a superimposition of the distributions for comparison between control and BDNF-treated neurons. Since BDNF increases overall mEPSC amplitude in delay neurons (Figure 3G), we tested whether changes in the number of events contributing to each of the three distributions could explain this increase. This was done by measuring the area under the Gaussian curves in Figure 6G and expressing the results as percentage of the total area (Figure 6G inset). Surprisingly, similar proportions of the total events made up each of the three peaks under control and BDNF-treated conditions. However, further inspection of the histogram data obtained from BDNF-treated cells revealed a new population of very large events (indicated by arrow in Figure 6F). Whereas only 30 events in the control data had amplitudes >30 pA, 106 events in data from BDNF-treated delay neurons fell into this category. The appearance of this new population of large events is emphasized by the presentation of data for mEPSCs >30 pA in Figures 6H and 6I. Although few events appear in this group, those that do, have large amplitudes. Thus, the emergence of a new group of large mEPSC amplitude events in BDNF may have a noticeable effect on overall mEPSC amplitude.

Only two populations of mEPSC amplitude were seen ex vivo in delay neurons from sham operated animals. Peaks appeared at 12.7 ± 0.2 and 15.1 ± 0.1 pA in sham delay cells (Figure 7C) and at (7.6 ± 0.1 and 10.1 ± 0.3 pA) in CCI delay cells (Figure 7D). Insets to Figures 7C and 7D show optimized χ2 values for using 2 peaks to fit the data. Figure 7E is a superimposition of the distributions for comparison between neurons from sham operated animals and those subject to CCI. Whilst the decrease in amplitude of the smaller population is highly significant (P < 0.0001), that of the larger population is not (P > 0.25). Nevertheless, these data appear to contradict the finding that CCI increases overall mEPSC amplitude in delay neurons (Figure 3F). There are at least two explanations for this discrepancy; first, when we examined the number of events contributing to each of the two peaks (Figure 7E inset) we found that the majority of events in control neurons fell under the smaller peak, whereas after CCI more events contributed to the larger peak. Also, when we examined very large events we found that a small population of very large events appeared in delay neurons from the CCI animals (Figure 7F and 7G). Appearance of this new population of large events is reminiscent of the effect of BDNF on mEPSC's of delay neurons (Figure 6H and 6I). Figure 7G shows that whilst only 18 mEPSC's in neurons from sham operated animals exceeded 25pA, 33 events exceeded this amplitude in neurons from animals subject to CCI.

Table 1 also compares the effects of BDNF and CCI on delay neurons. Although there is some similarity in the consequences of the two manipulations, this is not as obvious as that seen with tonic neurons.

Conclusions

Many of the findings discussed above are consistent with the possibility that BDNF is alone capable for the transfer of information between activated microglia and neurons during the process of central sensitization. The results supporting this argument are:-
  1. 1.

    In terms of excitatory synaptic transmission, both BDNF and CCI promote a similar 'injury footprint' when the properties of five different neuronal phenotypes are considered (Figure 3) and neither manipulation appears to affect intrinsic neuronal properties such as excitability, input resistance or rheobase [24, 107]. Because this injury footprint is not reproduced by IL-1β [98], this argues against its involvement in the final step of transfer of information between microglia to neurons.

     
  2. 2.

    Detailed analysis of the action of BDNF and CCI on excitatory synaptic transmission to tonic neurons reveals that the two manipulations produce close to identical changes on the kinetics and amplitudes of mEPSC's (Figure 4 and 5, Table 1).

     
  3. 3.

    A similar analysis of actions on delay neurons show that the actions of CCI and BDNF on mEPSC properties are similar, although not identical (Figure 6 and 7, Table 1).

     
  4. 4.

    Numerous lines of evidence from Yves De Koninck's laboratory in Quebec and Mike Salter's group in Toronto implicate microglial-derived BDNF in attenuation of Cl- mediated, GABA/glycine inhibition in the dorsal horn [14, 86].

     
  5. 5.

    BDNF and medium from activated microglia both promote an overall increase in dorsal horn excitability (Figure 2) and the effect of the latter is attenuated when BDNF is sequestered using TrkBd5 [25].

     

If BDNF is sufficient for transferring information between activated microglia and neurons, one has to speculate that other mediators such as IL-1β [20, 29, 54, 113, 114], TNF-α[30, 96, 115], fractalkine [64, 65], MCP-1/CCL-2 [18, 100, 101] and interferon γ [116118] exert their actions at other points in the cascade of events that initiates central sensitization (Figure 1). The observation that blockade of the action of TNFα with the fusion protein blocker, etanercept, attenuates spinal cord injury induced pain [119], suggest that it may act in series rather than in parallel with BDNF. It may, for example, act in an autocrine fashion to enhance microglial activation [120]. Although our data appear to argue against a role for IL-1β in the microglial-neuron interaction (Figure 3), it is clear that the actions of other mediators need to be studied more carefully. Future experiments will therefore involve an examination of the possible role of TNF-α and interferon-γ in microglia-neuron interactions. Do they mimic the CCI-induced injury footprint in the same way as BDNF? If this is the case, it would still be appropriate to state that BDNF is sufficient to transfer of information between microglia and neurons, but other substances are equally capable of effecting this interaction (i.e. BDNF is 'sufficient' but not 'necessary'). It is also possible that the small discrepancies between the action of BDNF and CCI on excitatory synaptic transmission in delay neurons (Table 1), may reflect actions of mediators other than BDNF. Another issue for future consideration is that the severity, duration and nature of neuronal injury may differentially affect spinal cytokine profile [105]. If this is the case, different mediators may be involved at different points in the sensitization 'cascade' such that some similarity and redundancy of actions of such mediators might be expected.

Lastly, it should be remembered that microglial activation and BDNF release in dorsal horn following injury is transient [6672], whereas the maintenance of chronic neuropathic pain appears to involve alterations in astrocyte functions [16, 17, 3640]. It would therefore be useful to know whether BDNF is involved in astrocytes activation. This interesting possibility remains to be investigated.

List of Abbreviations

BDNF: 

Brain derived neurotrophic factor

CCI: 

Chronic constriction injury (of sciatic nerve)

CCL-2/MCP-1: 

Chemotaxic cytokine ligand 2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1)

DRG: 

Dorsal root ganglion

IL-1β: 

Interleukin 1β

mEPSC: 

Miniature (TTX resistant) excitatory postsynaptic current

RD neuro: 

Radial delay neurons

sEPSC: 

Spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic current

TIC neurons: 

Tonic islet-central neurons

TNF-α: 

Tumour necrosis factor-α

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Aaron Lai for carrying out ELISA measurements of BDNF concentrations in organotypic cultures and JihuanYin for art work in Figure 1. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; Funding reference # 81089). VBL received studentship awards from CIHR and from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta
(2)
Laboratory of MolecularPhysiology, NIH/NIAAA
(3)
School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University
(4)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta
(5)
Department of Pharmacology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta

References

  1. Kim KJ, Yoon YW, Chung JM: Comparison of three rodent models of neropahic pain. Exp Brain Res 1997, 113: 200–206. 10.1007/BF02450318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mosconi T, Kruger L: Fixed-diameter polyethylene cuffs applied to the rat sciatic nerve induce a painful neuropathy: ultrastructural morphometric analysis of axonal alterations. Pain 1996, 64: 37–57. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00077-1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdulla FA, Smith PA: Axotomy and Autotomy-Induced Changes in the Excitability of Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. J Neurophysiol 2001, 85: 630–643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wall PD, Devor M: Sensory afferent impulses result from dorsal root ganglia as well as from the periphery in normal and nerve-injured rats. Pain 1983, 17: 321–339. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90164-1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Binshtok AM, Wang H, Zimmermann K, Amaya F, Vardeh D, Shi L, et al.: Nociceptors Are Interleukin-1{beta} Sensors. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28: 14062–14073. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-08.2008PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Stemkowski PL, Smith PA: Increases in sensory neuron excitability after interleukin 1-beta is driven by H-Current and calcium currents but not sodium currents. 3rd CAN-ACN meeting Vancouver 2009.Google Scholar
  7. White FA, Jung H, Miller RJ: Chemokines and the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain. PNAS 2007, 104: 20151–20158. 10.1073/pnas.0709250104PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Woolf CJ, Allchorne A, Safieh-Garabedian B, Poole S: Cytokines, nerve growth factor and inflammatory hyperalgesia: the contribution of tumour necrosis factor alpha. Br J Pharmacol 1997, 121: 417–424. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701148PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shamash S, Reichert F, Rotshenker S: The cytokine network of Wallerian degeneration: tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1alpha, and interleukin-1beta. J Neurosci 2002, 22: 3052–3060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ozaktay AC, Cavanaugh JM, Asik I, DeLeo JA, Weinstein JN: Dorsal root sensitivity to interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor in rats. Eur Spine J 2002, 11: 467–475. 10.1007/s00586-002-0430-xPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kajander JC, Bennett GJ: Onset of a painful peripheral neuropathy in rat: a partial and differential deafferentation and spontaneous discharge in A and A primary afferent neurons. J Neurophysiol 1992, 68: 734–744.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Echeverry S, Shi XQ, Zhang J: Characterization of cell proliferation in rat spinal cord following peripheral nerve injury and the relationship with neuropathic pain. Pain 2007,135(1–2):37–47. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsuda M, Shigemoto-Mogami Y, Koizumi S, Mizokoshi A, Kohsaka S, Salter MW, et al.: P2X4 receptors induced in spinal microglia gate tactile allodynia after nerve injury. Nature 2003, 424: 778–783. 10.1038/nature01786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coull JA, Beggs S, Boudreau D, Boivin D, Tsuda M, Inoue K, et al.: BDNF from microglia causes the shift in neuronal anion gradient underlying neuropathic pain. Nature 2005, 438: 1017–1021. 10.1038/nature04223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xie W, Strong JA, Zhang JM: Early blockade of injured primary sensory afferents reduces glial cell activation in two rat neuropathic pain models. Neuroscience 2009, 160: 847–857. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.016PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sandkuhler J: Models and mechanisms of hyperalgesia and allodynia. Physiol Rev 2009, 89: 707–758. 10.1152/physrev.00025.2008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Scholz J, Woolf CJ: The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10: 1361–1368. 10.1038/nn1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang J, de Koninck Y: Spatial and temporal relationship between monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression and spinal glial activation following peripheral nerve injury. J Neurochem 2006, 97: 772–783. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03746.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. DeLeo JA, Sorkin LS, Watkins LR: Immune and glial regulation of pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Watkins LR, Maier SF: Beyond Neurons: Evidence That Immune and Glial Cells Contribute to Pathological Pain States. Physiol Rev 2002, 82: 981–1011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Merighi A, Salio C, Ghirri A, Lossi L, Ferrini F, Betelli C, et al.: BDNF as a pain modulator. Prog Neurobiol 2008, 85: 297–317. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.04.004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Salio C, Averill S, Priestley JV, Merighi A: Costorage of BDNF and neuropeptides within individual dense-core vesicles in central and peripheral neurons. Dev Neurobiol 2007, 67: 326–338. 10.1002/dneu.20358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lever IJ, Bradbury EJ, Cunningham JR, Adelson DW, Jones MG, McMahon SB, et al.: Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Is Released in the Dorsal Horn by Distinctive Patterns of Afferent Fiber Stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21: 4469–4477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu VB, Ballanyi K, Colmers WF, Smith PA: Neuron type-specific effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rat superficial dorsal horn and their relevance to 'central sensitization'. J Physiol 2007, 584: 543–563. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141267PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu VB, Biggs JE, Stebbing MJ, Balasubramanyan S, Todd KG, Lai AY, et al.: BDNF Drives the Changes in Excitatory Synaptic Transmission in the Rat Superficial Dorsal Horn that Follow Sciatic Nerve Injury. J Physiol (Lond) 2009, 587: 1013–1032. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.166306Google Scholar
  26. Ulmann L, Hatcher JP, Hughes JP, Chaumont S, Green PJ, Conquet F, et al.: Up-regulation of P2X4 receptors in spinal microglia after peripheral nerve injury mediates BDNF release and neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 2008, 28: 11263–11268. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2308-08.2008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Trang T, Beggs S, Wan X, Salter MW: P2X4-Receptor-Mediated Synthesis and Release of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Microglia Is Dependent on Calcium and p38-Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29: 3518–3528. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5714-08.2009PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dougherty KD, Dreyfus CF, Black IB: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia/macrophages after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis 2000, 7: 574–585. 10.1006/nbdi.2000.0318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawasaki Y, Xu ZZ, Wang X, Park JY, Zhuang ZY, Tan PH, et al.: Distinct roles of matrix metalloproteases in the early- and late-phase development of neuropathic pain. Nat Med 2008, 14: 331–336. 10.1038/nm1723PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kawasaki Y, Zhang L, Cheng JK, Ji RR: Cytokine mechanisms of central sensitization: distinct and overlapping role of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in regulating synaptic and neuronal activity in the superficial spinal cord. J Neurosci 2008, 28: 5189–5194. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3338-07.2008PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Woolf CJ: Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983, 306: 686–688. 10.1038/306686a0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Woolf CJ, Mannion RJ: Neuropathic pain: aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management. Lancet 1999, 353: 1959–1964. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01307-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore KA, Kohno T, Karchewski LA, Scholz J, Baba H, Woolf CJ: Partial peripheral nerve injury promotes a selective loss of GABAergic inhibition in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord. J Neurosci 2002, 22: 6724–6731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dalal A, Tata M, Allègre G, Gekiere F, Bons N, Albe-Fessard D: Spontaneous activity of rat dorsal horn cells in spinal segments of sciatic projection following transection of sciatic nerve or of corresponding dorsal roots. Neuroscience 1999, 94: 217–228. 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00328-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ: Central Sensitization: A Generator of Pain Hypersensitivity by Central Neural Plasticity. The Journal of Pain 2009, 10: 895–926. 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marchand F, Perretti M, McMahon SB: Role of the immune system in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6: 521–532. 10.1038/nrn1700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun S, Cao H, Han M, Li TT, Pan HL, Zhao ZQ, et al.: New evidence for the involvement of spinal fractalkine receptor in pain facilitation and spinal glial activation in rat model of monoarthritis. Pain 2007, 129: 64–75. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.035PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gao YJ, Zhang L, Samad OA, Suter MR, Yasuhiko K, Xu ZZ, et al.: JNK-Induced MCP-1 Production in Spinal Cord Astrocytes Contributes to Central Sensitization and Neuropathic Pain. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29: 4096–4108. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3623-08.2009PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhuang ZY, Gerner P, Woolf CJ, Ji RR: ERK is sequentially activated in neurons, microglia, and astrocytes by spinal nerve ligation and contributes to mechanical allodynia in this neuropathic pain model. Pain 2005, 114: 149–159. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Raghavendra V, Tanga F, DeLeo JA: Inhibition of microglial activation attenuates the development but not existing hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003, 306: 624–630. 10.1124/jpet.103.052407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhuo M: Cortical excitation and chronic pain. Trends Neurosci 2008, 31: 199–207. 10.1016/j.tins.2008.01.003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Millan MJ: The Induction of Pain: An Integrative review. Prog Neurobiol 1999, 57: 1–164. 10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00048-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Carlton SM, Du J, Tan HY, Nesic O, Hargett GL, Bopp AC, et al.: Peripheral and central sensitization in remote spinal cord regions contribute to central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. Pain 2009, 147: 265–276. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.09.030PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Carlson JD, Maire JJ, Martenson ME, Heinricher MM: Sensitization of pain-modulating neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci 2007, 27: 13222–13231. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3715-07.2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vera-Portocarrero LP, Zhang ET, Ossipov MH, Xie JY, King T, Lai J, et al.: Descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla maintains nerve injury-induced central sensitization. Neuroscience 2006, 140: 1311–1320. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Pogatzki EM, Urban MO, Brennan TJ, Gebhart GF: Role of the rostral medial medulla in the development of primary and secondary hyperalgesia after incision in the rat. Anesthesiology 2002, 96: 1153–1160. 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ossipov MH, Lai J, Malan TP Jr, Porreca F: Spinal and supraspinal mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000, 909: 12–24. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06673.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jagodic MM, Pathirathna S, Nelson MT, Mancuso S, Joksovic PM, Rosenberg ER, et al.: Cell-Specific Alterations of T-Type Calcium Current in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Enhance Excitability of Sensory Neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27: 3305–3316. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4866-06.2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallace VC, Blackbeard J, Pheby T, Segerdahl AR, Davies M, Hasnie F, et al.: Pharmacological, behavioural and mechanistic analysis of HIV-1 gp120 induced painful neuropathy. Pain 2007, 133: 47–63. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.02.015PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang JM, Donnelly DF, Song XJ, LaMotte RH: Axotomy increases the excitability of dorsal root ganglion cells with unmyelinated axons. J Neurophysiol 1997, 78: 2790–2794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Petersen M, Zhang J, Zhang JM, LaMotte RH: Abnormal spontaneous activity and responses to norepinephrine in dissociated dorsal root ganglion cells after chronic nerve constriction. Pain 1996, 67: 391–397. 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03146-6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ma C, LaMotte RH: Multiple Sites for Generation of Ectopic Spontaneous Activity in Neurons of the Chronically Compressed Dorsal Root Ganglion. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27: 14059–14068. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3699-07.2007PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Samad TA, Wang H, Broom DC, Woolf CJ: Central neuroimmune interactions after peripheral inflammation: interleukin-1b potentiates synaptic transmission in the spinal cord. In 2004 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience; 2004. Program No. 511.7Google Scholar
  54. Honore P, Wade CL, Zhong C, Harris RR, Wu C, Ghayur T, et al.: Interleukin-1alphabeta gene-deficient mice show reduced nociceptive sensitivity in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain but not post-operative pain. Behav Brain Res 2006, 167: 355–364. 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.09.024PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Clark AK, D'Aquisto F, Gentry C, Marchand F, McMahon SB, Malcangio M: Rapid co-release of interleukin 1beta and caspase 1 in spinal cord inflammation. J Neurochem 2006, 99: 868–880. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04126.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. White G, Lovinger DM, Weight FF: Transient low-threshold Ca 2+ current triggers burst firing through an afterdepolarizing potential in an adult mammalian neuron. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86: 6802–6806. 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6802PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Milligan ED, Twining C, Chacur M, Biedenkapp J, O'Connor K, Poole S, et al.: Spinal Glia and Proinflammatory Cytokines Mediate Mirror-Image Neuropathic Pain in Rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23: 1026–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Ohtori S, Takahashi K, Moriya H, Myers RR: TNF-alpha and TNF-alpha receptor type 1 upregulation in glia and neurons after peripheral nerve injury: studies in murine DRG and spinal cord. Spine 2004, 29: 1082–1088. 10.1097/00007632-200405150-00006PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsuda M, Inoue K, Salter MW: Neuropathic pain and spinal microglia: a big problem from molecules in 'small' glia. Trends Neurosci 2005, 28: 101–107. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.12.002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Buldyrev I, Tanner NM, Hsieh Hy, Dodd EG, Nguyen LT, Balkowiec A: Calcitonin gene-related peptide enhances release of native brain-derived neurotrophic factor from trigeminal ganglion neurons. J Neurochem 2006, 99: 1338–1350. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04161.xPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Bardoni R, Ghirri A, Salio C, Prandini M, Merighi A: BDNF-mediated modulation of GABA and glycine release in dorsal horn lamina II from postnatal rats. Dev Neurobiol 2007, 67: 960–975. 10.1002/dneu.20401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith PA, Biggs JE, Lu VB, Balasubramanyan S, Stebbing MJ, Todd KG, et al.: BDNF Programs the Central Sensitization that Underlies Neuropathic Pain. Soc Neurosci Abs 2008. Abs.# 569.5Google Scholar
  63. Milligan ED, Zapata V, Chacur M, Schoeniger D, Biedenkapp J, O'connor KA, et al.: Evidence that exogenous and endogenous fractalkine can induce spinal nociceptive facilitation in rats. Eur J Neurosci 2004, 20: 2294–2302. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03709.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Milligan E, Zapata V, Schoeniger D, Chacur M, Green P, Poole S, et al.: An initial investigation of spinal mechanisms underlying pain enhancement induced by fractalkine, a neuronally released chemokine. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22: 2775–2782. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04470.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Verge GM, Milligan ED, Maier SF, Watkins LR, Naeve GS, Foster AC: Fractalkine (CX3CL1) and fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) distribution in spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia under basal and neuropathic pain conditions. Eur J Neurosci 2004, 20: 1150–1160. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03593.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Cho HJ, Kim JK, Park HC, Kim JK, Kim DS, Ha SO, et al.: Changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor immunoreactivity in rat dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord, and gracile nuclei following cut or crush injuries. Exp Neurol 1998, 154: 224–230. 10.1006/exnr.1998.6936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Michael GJ, Averill S, Shortland PJ, Yan Q, Priestley JV: Axotomy results in major changes in BDNF expression by dorsal root ganglion cells: BDNF expression in large trkB and trkC cells, in pericellular baskets, and in projections to deep dorsal horn and dorsal column nuclei. Eur J Neurosci 1999, 11: 3539–3551. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00767.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ha SO, Kim JK, Hong HS, Kim DS, Cho HJ: Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rat dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord and gracile nuclei in experimental models of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2001, 107: 301–309. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00353-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Fukuoka T, Kondo E, Dai Y, Hashimoto N, Noguchi K: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor increases in the uninjured dorsal root ganglion neurons in selective spinal nerve ligation model. J Neurosci 2001, 21: 4891–4900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Miletic G, Miletic V: Increases in the concentration of brain derived neurotrophic factor in the lumbar spinal dorsal horn are associated with pain behavior following chronic constriction injury in rats. Neurosci Lett 2002, 319: 137–140. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02576-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Yajima Y, Narita M, Usui A, Kaneko C, Miyatake M, Narita M, et al.: Direct evidence for the involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the development of a neuropathic pain-like state in mice. J Neurochem 2005, 93: 584–594. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03045.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Walker SM, Mitchell VA, White DM, Rush RA, Duggan AW: Release of immunoreactive brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the spinal cord of the rat following sciatic nerve transection. Brain Res 2001, 899: 240–247. 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02259-4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Balkowiec A, Katz DM: Activity-dependent release of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor from primary sensory neurons detected by ELISA in situ. J Neurosci 2000, 20: 7417–7423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Yajima Y, Narita M, Narita M, Matsumoto N, Suzuki T: Involvement of a spinal brain-derived neurotrophic factor/full-length TrkB pathway in the development of nerve injury-induced thermal hyperalgesia in mice. Brain Res 2002, 958: 338–346. 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03666-1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Bardoni R, Merighi A: BDNF and TrkB Mediated Mechanisms in the Spinal Cord. In Synaptic Plasticity in Pain. Volume 3. Edited by: Malcangio M. Springer Science& Business Media; 2009:89–108. full_textGoogle Scholar
  76. Garraway SM, Petruska JC, Mendell LM: BDNF sensitizes the response of lamina II neurons to high threshold primary afferent inputs. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 18: 2467–2476. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02982.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Meyer-Tuve A, Malcangio M, Ebersberger A, Mazario J, Schaible HG: Effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on the release of substance P from rat spinal cord. Neuroreport 2001, 12: 21–24. 10.1097/00001756-200101220-00012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kerr BJ, Bradbury EJ, Bennett DL, Trivedi PM, Dassan P, French J, et al.: Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Modulates Nociceptive Sensory Inputs and NMDA-Evoked Responses in the Rat Spinal Cord. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19: 5138–5148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Merighi A, Bardoni R, Salio C, Lossi L, Ferrini F, Prandini M, et al.: Presynaptic functional trkB receptors mediate the release of excitatory neurotransmitters from primary afferent terminals in lamina II (substantia gelatinosa) of postnatal rat spinal cord. Dev Neurobiol 2008, 68: 457–475. 10.1002/dneu.20605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Groth R, Aanonsen L: Spinal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) produces hyperalgesia in normal mice while antisense directed against either BDNF or trkB, prevent inflammation-induced hyperalgesia. Pain 2002, 100: 171–181. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00264-6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Laird JMA, Bennett GJ: Dorsal root potentials and afferent input to the spinal cord in rats with an experimental peripheral neuropathy. Brain Res 1992, 584: 181–190. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90893-EPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Sherman SE, Loomis CW: Morphine insensitive allodynia is produced by intrathecal strychnine in the lightly anesthetized rat. Pain 1994, 56: 17–29. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90146-5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Loomis CW, Khandwala H, Osmond G, Heffean MP: Coadministration of intrathecal strychnine and bicuculline effects synergistic allodynia in the rat: an isobolographic analysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001, 296: 756–761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yaksh TL: Behavioral and autonomic correlates of the tactile evoked allodynia produced by spinal glycine inhibition: effects of modulatory receptor systems and excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 1989, 37: 111–123. 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90160-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Laird JM, Bennett GJ: An electrophysiological study of dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord of rats with an experimental peripheral neuropathy. J Neurophysiol 1993, 69: 2072–2085.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Coull JA, Boudreau D, Bachand K, Prescott SA, Nault F, Sik A, et al.: Trans-synaptic shift in anion gradient in spinal lamina I neurons as a mechanism of neuropathic pain. Nature 2003, 424: 938–942. 10.1038/nature01868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Prescott SA, Sejnowski TJ, de Koninck Y: Reduction of anion reversal potential subverts the inhibitory control of firing rate in spinal lamina I neurons: towards a biophysical basis for neuropathic pain. Mol Pain 2006, 2: 32. 10.1186/1744-8069-2-32PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Torsney C, MacDermott AB: Disinhibition Opens the Gate to Pathological Pain Signaling in Superficial Neurokinin 1 Receptor-Expressing Neurons in Rat Spinal Cord. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26: 1833–1843. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4584-05.2006PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Baba H, Ji RR, Kohno T, Moore KA, Ataka T, Wakai A, et al.: Removal of GABAergic inhibition facilitates polysynaptic A fiber-mediated excitatory transmission to the superficial spinal dorsal horn. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003, 24: 818–830. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00236-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Schoffnegger D, Ruscheweyh R, Sandkuhler J: Spread of excitation across modality borders in spinal dorsal horn of neuropathic rats. Pain 2008, 135: 300–310. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Eaton MJ, Blits B, Ruitenberg MJ, Verhaagen J, Oudega M: Amelioration of chronic neuropathic pain after partial nerve injury by adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated over-expression of BDNF in the rat spinal cord. Gene Ther 2002, 9: 1387–1395. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Cejas PJ, Martinez M, Karmally S, McKillop M, McKillop J, Plunkett JA, et al.: Lumbar transplant of neurons genetically modified to secrete brain-derived neurotrophic factor attenuates allodynia and hyperalgesia after sciatic nerve constriction. Pain 2000, 86: 195–210. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00245-1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Frank L, Wiegand SJ, Siuciak JA, Lindsay RM, Rudge JS: Effects of BDNF infusion on the regulation of TrkB protein and message in adult rat brain. Exp Neurol 1997, 145: 62–70. 10.1006/exnr.1997.6440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Siuciak JA, Altar CA, Wiegand SJ, Lindsay RM: Antinociceptive effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3. Brain Res 1994, 633: 326–330. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91556-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Siuciak JA, Wong V, Pearsall D, Wiegand SJ, Lindsay RM: BDNF produces analgesia in the formalin test and modifies neuropeptide levels in rat brain and spinal cord areas associated with nociception. Eur J Neurosci 1995, 7: 663–670. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00670.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. DeLeo JA, Colburn RW, Rickman AJ: Cytokine and growth factor immunohistochemical spinal profiles in two animal models of mononeuropathy. Brain Res 1997, 759: 50–57. 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00209-6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Rothwell N: Interleukin-1 and neuronal injury: mechanisms, modification, and therapeutic potential. Brain Behav Immun 2003, 17: 152–157. 10.1016/S0889-1591(02)00098-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Gustafson-Vickers SL, Lu VB, Lai AY, Todd KG, Ballanyi K, Smith PA: Long-term actions of interleukin-1beta on delay and tonic firing neurons in rat superficial dorsal horn and their relevance to central sensitization. Mol Pain 2008, 4: 63. 10.1186/1744-8069-4-63PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Cuellar JM, Montesano PX, Carstens E: Role of TNF-alpha in sensitization of nociceptive dorsal horn neurons induced by application of nucleus pulposus to L5 dorsal root ganglion in rats. Pain 2004, 110: 578–587. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.029PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang J, Shi XQ, Echeverry S, Mogil JS, De KY, Rivest S: Expression of CCR2 in both resident and bone marrow-derived microglia plays a critical role in neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 2007, 27: 12396–12406. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3016-07.2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Abbadie C, Bhangoo S, de Koninck Y, Malcangio M, Melik-Parsadaniantz S, White FA: Chemokines and pain mechanisms. Brain Res Rev 2009, 60: 125–134. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.002PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Lu VB, Moran TD, Balasubramanyan S, Alier KA, Dryden WF, Colmers WF, et al.: Substantia Gelatinosa Neurons in Defined-Medium Organotypic Slice Culture are Similar to Those in Acute Slices from Young Adult Rats. Pain 2006, 121: 261–275. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.009PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Biggs JE, Lu VB, Kim H, Lai A, Todd KG, Ballanyi K, et al.: Defined medium organotypic cultures of spinal cord put 'pain in a dish'. In Isolated Brain Circuits. Edited by: Ballanyi K. New York: Humana Press, Springer; 2010:in press.Google Scholar
  104. Clark AK, Gentry C, Bradbury EJ, McMahon SB, Malcangio M: Role of spinal microglia in rat models of peripheral nerve injury and inflammation. Eur J Pain 2006,11(2):223–30. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Lai AY, Todd KG: Differential regulation of trophic and proinflammatory microglial effectors is dependent on severity of neuronal injury. Glia 2008, 56: 259–270. 10.1002/glia.20610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Banfield MJ, Naylor RL, Robertson AG, Allen SJ, Dawbarn D, Brady RL: Specificity in Trk receptor:neurotrophin interactions: the crystal structure of TrkB-d5 in complex with neurotrophin-4/5. Structure 2001, 9: 1191–1199. 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00681-5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Balasubramanyan S, Stemkowski PL, Stebbing MJ, Smith PA: Sciatic Chronic Constriction Injury Produces Cell-type Specific Changes in the Electrophysiological Properties of Rat Substantia Gelatinosa Neurons. J Neurophysiol 2006, 96: 579–590. 10.1152/jn.00087.2006PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Chen Y, Balasubramanyan S, Lai AY, Todd KG, Smith PA: Effects of Sciatic Nerve Axotomy on Excitatory Synaptic Transmission in Rat Substantia Gelatinosa. J Neurophysiol 2009, 102: 3203–3215. 10.1152/jn.00296.2009PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Labrakakis C, Lorenzo LE, Bories C, Ribeiro-da-Silva A, De Koninck Y: Inhibitory coupling between inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Molecular Pain 2009, 5: 24. 10.1186/1744-8069-5-24PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Lu Y, Perl ER: A specific inhibitory pathway between substantia gelatinosa neurons receiving direct C-fiber input. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 8752–8758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Heinke B, Ruscheweyh R, Forsthuber L, Wunderbaldinger G, Sandkuhler J: Physiological, neurochemical and morphological properties of a subgroup of GABAergic spinal lamina II neurones identified by expression of green fluorescent protein in mice. J Physiol 2004, 560: 249–266. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.070540PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Fukuoka H, Kawatani M, Hisamitsu T, Takeshige C: Cutaneous hyperalgesia induced by peripheral injection of interleukin-1 beta in the rat. Brain Res 1994, 657: 133–140. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90960-1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Sommer C, Petrausch S, Lindenlaub T, Toyka KV: Neutralizing antibodies to interleukin 1-receptor reduce pain associated behavior in mice with experimental neuropathy. Neurosci Lett 1999, 270: 25–28. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00450-4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Zelenka M, Schafers M, Sommer C: Intraneural injection of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha into rat sciatic nerve at physiological doses induces signs of neuropathic pain. Pain 2005, 116: 257–263. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.04.018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Marchand F, Tsantoulas C, Singh D, Grist J, Clark AK, Bradbury EJ, et al.: Effects of Etanercept and Minocycline in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Eur J Pain 2009, 13: 673–681. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.08.001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Vikman KS, Siddall PJ, Duggan AW: Increased responsiveness of rat dorsal horn neurons in vivo following prolonged intrathecal exposure to interferon-[gamma]. Neuroscience 2005, 135: 969–977. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Vikman KS, Hill RH, Backstrom E, Robertson B, Kristensson K: Interferon-gamma induces characteristics of central sensitization in spinal dorsal horn neurons in vitro. Pain 2003, 106: 241–251. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00262-8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Robertson B, Xu XJ, Hao JX, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Mhlanga J, Grant G, et al.: Interferon-gamma receptors in nociceptive pathways: role in neuropathic pain-related behaviour. Neuroreport 1997, 8: 1311–1316. 10.1097/00001756-199703240-00050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Marchand F, Tsantoulas C, Singh D, Grist J, Clark AK, Bradbury EJ, et al.: Effects of Etanercept and Minocycline in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Eur J Pain 2009, 13: 673–681. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.08.001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Kuno R, Wang J, Kawanokuchi J, Takeuchi H, Mizuno T, Suzumura A: Autocrine activation of microglia by tumor necrosis factor-[alpha]. Journal of Neuroimmunology 2005, 162: 89–96. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.01.015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Srinivasan D, Yen JH, Joseph DJ, Friedman W: Cell Type-Specific Interleukin-1{beta} Signaling in the CNS. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24: 6482–6488. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5712-03.2004PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Biggs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.